🔸 SageSwap.io - Fast Crypto Swap 🔸 Escrow $2000 🔸 NO KYC/AML!

[SFR10]

However, it is the users who have to check the amount if they want to make a claim on escrow.

This is true in most situations, but it's worth noting that SageSwap has users from other forums/platforms who don't know the formula for calculating the exact remaining funds in escrow ^{[I wouldn't mind doing it for them (especially if it gets reflected onto the opening posts as well)]}.
^{- This might only be useful for those who transact smaller amounts (based on SageSwap's latest post, I believe there are still a lot of them who fall into this category).}

[cLoazyL]

That's a lot of completed transactions. I guess it's no surprise that people who are looking for instant swap and no KYC platform would pick the no AML swap mode. Getting used by some projects are great too.

As an average number of transactions, 21,000 transactions is not a large number, and it represents ~ 3,500 transactions per month. However, compared to a trading volume of $100 million, the average value of each transaction is about $5,000, which is not a small amount. Therefore, assume that a whale used their service in the past months.

The average transaction amount is significantly inflated due to large individual transactions in AML mode, which could reach as high as $250,000 per transaction

I'm curious to know what the largest single transaction was can you tell us?

[UmerIdrees]

That's a lot of completed transactions. I guess it's no surprise that people who are looking for instant swap and no KYC platform would pick the no AML swap mode. Getting used by some projects are great too.

As an average number of transactions, 21,000 transactions is not a large number, and it represents ~ 3,500 transactions per month. However, compared to a trading volume of $100 million, the average value of each transaction is about $5,000, which is not a small amount. Therefore, assume that a whale used their service in the past months.

The average transaction amount is significantly inflated due to large individual transactions in AML mode, which could reach as high as $250,000 per transaction

I'm curious to know what the largest single transaction was can you tell us?

Even if they tell you their largest single transaction, what does it prove? A bad service may have a very large single transaction, and a good service may not have that many big single transactions. Hence, it doesn't show anything.

As far as SageSwap.io is concerned, they have proved their existence and gained enough trust that you can swap your coins through them without getting into more technical details and records.  

[SamReomo]

As far as SageSwap.io is concerned, they have proved their existence and gained enough trust that you can swap your coins through them without getting into more technical details and records.  

I agree with you, I've used their service myself and I never faced any issue. I believe when a platform is generating profits then its owners and founders always try their best to remain genuine to their users. SageSwap has proved multiple times that they're going to remain in the market for long term and that's why they always deliver the best services possible.

[cLoazyL]

That's a lot of completed transactions. I guess it's no surprise that people who are looking for instant swap and no KYC platform would pick the no AML swap mode. Getting used by some projects are great too.

As an average number of transactions, 21,000 transactions is not a large number, and it represents ~ 3,500 transactions per month. However, compared to a trading volume of $100 million, the average value of each transaction is about $5,000, which is not a small amount. Therefore, assume that a whale used their service in the past months.

The average transaction amount is significantly inflated due to large individual transactions in AML mode, which could reach as high as $250,000 per transaction

I'm curious to know what the largest single transaction was can you tell us?

Even if they tell you their largest single transaction, what does it prove? A bad service may have a very large single transaction, and a good service may not have that many big single transactions. Hence, it doesn't show anything.

As far as SageSwap.io is concerned, they have proved their existence and gained enough trust that you can swap your coins through them without getting into more technical details and records.  

I've never said sageswap is not reputable, I'm just curious

[hugeblack]

Despite the claim of processing millions of dollars, stopping the signature campaign at this time sends a negative signal. What are the reasons that prompted you to do this if the service achieved successes by advertising here? 

[SageSwap]

Despite the claim of processing millions of dollars, stopping the signature campaign at this time sends a negative signal. What are the reasons that prompted you to do this if the service achieved successes by advertising here?  

The budget allocated for the campaign at the beginning of the year has been exhausted, for now, we are postponing the campaign’s extension, though we may resume it in the future.

Is it a bad sign that the campaign has been running for five months and the budget has already been spent?

[icopress]

Despite the claim of processing millions of dollars, stopping the signature campaign at this time sends a negative signal. What are the reasons that prompted you to do this if the service achieved successes by advertising here?  

Pausing a sig campaign isn't a negative sign. I'd call it resource optimization. For example, if you look at Whale, you'll see that their signature campaign was paused, but the workflow structure that was set up over the past six months remains intact and is still operational. Incidentally, both Whale and Sportsbet's campaigns were paused on the same day, with the only difference being that Sportsbet's activity dropped by 80%, while Whale's activity only slightly.

At this stage, I think the same concept will be maintained with SageSwap.