Answer the question above with a question.

[hamster78]

lol nice thread but some questions seems useless

Why didn't you answer with a question?

indeed when all you need to do is add one word... isnt ?

why would you add only one word?

Isn't that how computer types write a one-word sentence -- namely, they start with an empty sentence and then add n words to it, where n =1?

cryptodouble.com will double your coins in just 100 hours! 200+ different types of cryptocurrency are available! welcome!

[1714138935]

1714138935

[(oYo)]

lol nice thread but some questions seems useless

Why didn't you answer with a question?

indeed when all you need to do is add one word... isnt ?

why would you add only one word?

Isn't that how computer types write a one-word sentence -- namely, they start with an empty sentence and then add n words to it, where n =1?

cryptodouble.com will double your coins in just 100 hours! 200+ different types of cryptocurrency are available! welcome!

Why do you think it's ok to spam?

[sickhouse]

lol nice thread but some questions seems useless

Why didn't you answer with a question?

indeed when all you need to do is add one word... isnt ?

why would you add only one word?

Isn't that how computer types write a one-word sentence -- namely, they start with an empty sentence and then add n words to it, where n =1?

cryptodouble.com will double your coins in just 100 hours! 200+ different types of cryptocurrency are available! welcome!

Why do you think it's ok to spam?

Why do you think it's ok to objectify the beatiful creature that women are?

[(oYo)]

lol nice thread but some questions seems useless

Why didn't you answer with a question?

indeed when all you need to do is add one word... isnt ?

why would you add only one word?

Isn't that how computer types write a one-word sentence -- namely, they start with an empty sentence and then add n words to it, where n =1?

cryptodouble.com will double your coins in just 100 hours! 200+ different types of cryptocurrency are available! welcome!

Why do you think it's ok to spam?

Why do you think it's ok to objectify the beatiful creature that women are?

Looking at women's magazines (as an example) wouldn't you agree they objectify themselves?

[Gleb Gamow]

See what I mean?

Just answer the ques.
By whom?

have you figured out the you cant use periods yet?

    I can half Understand but i haven't broken any rule  

Have you?

Will you? Proceed.. :v

Have you noticed that every sentence everyone else has said ends in a question mark?

Its because they don't wanna get out of the game, its the rules.. Do u probably know the rules that from which u r being constantly questioning me..since my first post  :3

Why you didn't answer previous question with question?

Bubbsandbubbs3 effect :p :v

Do you want to repeat that?

Nopes?

Question of Order, Your Honor: is it supposed to be "any question above", or "the question immediately above"?

Order of Silence please, Yes. Now, the above is a Rhetorical question combined with an answearable question from within. Any further question? On next meeting of the court.

Objection, Your Honor: are we supposed to continue playing soccer if one of the players keeps hitting the ball with a baseball bat?

If the one is accused so he maybe brought on to the court for the Jury to decide.
And i sincerely hope so, that m not the *She* in the chicken conversation above? otherwise strict interrogation will be carried out respectively. Court day closes.

Since you bypassed my question, I now get to "I object!" by posing the same question: Did you not see the two poor quacks also taken for the ride of their lives?

That was an urgent appeal made which was ought to be answered immediately.
 May i not take any strict action against you for blaming the judge?
And do you not see so many poor chickens along with the two quacks? And may that wasn't to be brought to me?

So, this is where the questions were forked on this thread?

[Bubbsandbubbs3]

See what I mean?

Just answer the ques.
By whom?

have you figured out the you cant use periods yet?

    I can half Understand but i haven't broken any rule  

Have you?

Will you? Proceed.. :v

Have you noticed that every sentence everyone else has said ends in a question mark?

Its because they don't wanna get out of the game, its the rules.. Do u probably know the rules that from which u r being constantly questioning me..since my first post  :3

Why you didn't answer previous question with question?

Bubbsandbubbs3 effect :p :v

Do you want to repeat that?

Nopes?

Question of Order, Your Honor: is it supposed to be "any question above", or "the question immediately above"?

Order of Silence please, Yes. Now, the above is a Rhetorical question combined with an answearable question from within. Any further question? On next meeting of the court.

Objection, Your Honor: are we supposed to continue playing soccer if one of the players keeps hitting the ball with a baseball bat?

If the one is accused so he maybe brought on to the court for the Jury to decide.
And i sincerely hope so, that m not the *She* in the chicken conversation above? otherwise strict interrogation will be carried out respectively. Court day closes.

Since you bypassed my question, I now get to "I object!" by posing the same question: Did you not see the two poor quacks also taken for the ride of their lives?

That was an urgent appeal made which was ought to be answered immediately.
 May i not take any strict action against you for blaming the judge?
And do you not see so many poor chickens along with the two quacks? And may that wasn't to be brought to me?

So, this is where the questions were forked on this thread?

shouldn't we go with this fork, since it's more interesting?

[picolo]

shouldn't we go with this fork, since it's more interesting?

Let's get rid of all the quotes, shall we?

[Gleb Gamow]

shouldn't we go with this fork, since it's more interesting?

Let's get rid of all the quotes, shall we?

Only if, "Are you going to tell me why my former quark pic won't load?"

[mm5aes]

shouldn't we go with this fork, since it's more interesting?

Let's get rid of all the quotes, shall we?

Only if, "Are you going to tell me why my former quark pic won't load?"

This thread has taken a paltry direction has it not?

[galdur]

shouldn't we go with this fork, since it's more interesting?

Let's get rid of all the quotes, shall we?

Only if, "Are you going to tell me why my former quark pic won't load?"

This thread has taken a paltry direction has it not?

Do we need a more blue-sky approach to knowledge-based logistical consulting ?

[teodor87]

shouldn't we go with this fork, since it's more interesting?

Let's get rid of all the quotes, shall we?

Only if, "Are you going to tell me why my former quark pic won't load?"

This thread has taken a paltry direction has it not?

Do we need a more blue-sky approach to knowledge-based logistical consulting ?

Do we need more "Do-we-need"s?

[blablaace]

shouldn't we go with this fork, since it's more interesting?

Let's get rid of all the quotes, shall we?

Only if, "Are you going to tell me why my former quark pic won't load?"

This thread has taken a paltry direction has it not?

Do we need a more blue-sky approach to knowledge-based logistical consulting ?

Do we need more "Do-we-need"s?

Why wouldn't we need it?

[Bubbsandbubbs3]

Why wouldn't we need it?

Why would we?

[mm5aes]

Why wouldn't we need it?

Why would we?

How else are we going to get the bread to rise?

[JorgeStolfi]

Why wouldn't we need it?

Why would we?

How else are we going to get the bread to rise?

Will you guys be annoyed if I bring back that chickens and quacks picture, for no particular reason?

[aacoins]

Why wouldn't we need it?

Why would we?

How else are we going to get the bread to rise?

Will you guys be annoyed if I bring back that chickens and quacks picture, for no particular reason?

Would you believe that I wouldn't?

[Gleb Gamow]

Why wouldn't we need it?

Why would we?

How else are we going to get the bread to rise?

Will you guys be annoyed if I bring back that chickens and quacks picture, for no particular reason?

Would you believe that I wouldn't?

Would you believe that the anagram for I Wouldn't is Wold Unit, wold being an Old English term for a forest or an area of woodland on high ground, of which its tree are of wood, in turn (which rhymes with term and tern, the latter a bird that doesn't nests in trees), rhymes with would?

[Bubbsandbubbs3]

Why wouldn't we need it?

Why would we?

How else are we going to get the bread to rise?

Will you guys be annoyed if I bring back that chickens and quacks picture, for no particular reason?

Would you believe that I wouldn't?

Would you believe that the anagram for I Wouldn't is Wold Unit, wold being an Old English term for a forest or an area of woodland on high ground, of which its tree are of wood, in turn (which rhymes with term and tern, the latter a bird that doesn't nests in trees), rhymes with would?

Is there a way to get rid of this image?

[Gleb Gamow]

Why wouldn't we need it?

Why would we?

How else are we going to get the bread to rise?

Will you guys be annoyed if I bring back that chickens and quacks picture, for no particular reason?

Would you believe that I wouldn't?

Would you believe that the anagram for I Wouldn't is Wold Unit, wold being an Old English term for a forest or an area of woodland on high ground, of which its tree are of wood, in turn (which rhymes with term and tern, the latter a bird that doesn't nests in trees), rhymes with would?

Is there a way to get rid of this image?

What if we made it smaller and moved it around, would that work for you?

[aacoins]

Why would you believe that satoshi would approve of that?