user2
Member
 Offline
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
|
 |
May 21, 2014, 05:20:47 AM |
|
Went solo a week ago. 37 blocks, 1 orphaned. Number of found blocks per day fluctuates like crazy. Could be 6 blocks, could be 1. You really need to have some faith.
What's your setup? 3 rigs (9x7970 + 6x7950), primecoind on linux server, claymore miner 9.1 solo. |
▒ NOW token ▒ by ChangeNOW ▒ Get the WIN! ▒ ChangeNOW - an instant Non-custodial Exchange Service (( changenow.io )) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even in the event that an attacker gains more than 50% of the network's
computational power, only transactions sent by the attacker could be
reversed or double-spent. The network would not be destroyed.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Claymore
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
May 21, 2014, 07:28:57 AM |
|
2Claymore: is there chance of good speedup of "slow" cards, like 270x-7870 - they show 1/2 of 290x speed at other algo's and less in XPM
270X has 20 computing units, 290X has 44 of them. So 270X is always in 2.2 times slower than 290X. Also 270X has less memory bandwidth and much less speed in double precision calculations. In latest version 270X has about 3.5 CPD, x2.2 = 7.7, 290X has about 8.0 cpd, so the miner shows good results on 270X. |
|
|
|
|
SpeedDemon13 (OP)
|
|
May 21, 2014, 07:37:30 AM |
|
Went solo a week ago. 37 blocks, 1 orphaned. Number of found blocks per day fluctuates like crazy. Could be 6 blocks, could be 1. You really need to have some faith.
What's your setup? 3 rigs (9x7970 + 6x7950), primecoind on linux server, claymore miner 9.1 solo. Cool, still profitable with your setup. I only have 2 cards mining XPM at the moment and with another miner at the moment. |
CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911 |
|
|
Claymore
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
May 22, 2014, 09:40:38 AM |
|
v10.0 is available:
- Improved speed by about 9-10% for all cards. Up to 8.8 CPD on 290X.
I'm working on further improvements, in 1-2 versions the miner will reach 10 CPD.
|
|
|
|
btcfanx
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
May 22, 2014, 12:15:55 PM |
|
I'm working on further improvements, in 1-2 versions the miner will reach 10 CPD.
In your opinion - what is the maximum possible performance for 280x. In other words where is the limit  |
|
|
|
|
user2
Member
Offline
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
|
|
May 22, 2014, 12:45:26 PM |
|
I'm working on further improvements, in 1-2 versions the miner will reach 10 CPD.
In your opinion - what is the maximum possible performance for 280x. In other words where is the limit It's obvious. Sky's the limit. |
▒ NOW token ▒ by ChangeNOW ▒ Get the WIN! ▒ ChangeNOW - an instant Non-custodial Exchange Service (( changenow.io )) |
|
|
btcfanx
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
May 22, 2014, 12:45:54 PM |
|
I don't know how it's possible but my "block yield in coins" decreased by more than 40% in YPool since I changed the version from 9.1 to 10.0.
Does anyone have that problem too?
|
|
|
|
|
Claymore
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
May 22, 2014, 01:54:58 PM |
|
I'm working on further improvements, in 1-2 versions the miner will reach 10 CPD.
In your opinion - what is the maximum possible performance for 280x. In other words where is the limit I don't know where is the limit, but I'm going to find it I don't know how it's possible but my "block yield in coins" decreased by more than 40% in YPool since I changed the version from 9.1 to 10.0.
Does anyone have that problem too?
I tested v10 for two days on a few rigs based on 290X cards, also I checked it on 280X and 270X for a day. So I don't think it is a problem of the miner. |
|
|
|
csa1234
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 286
Merit: 100
O2-Protocol.com Carbon Offset DeFi
|
|
May 22, 2014, 03:11:01 PM |
|
sorry to mess arround, but CureCoin mining is way more profitable than Primecoin mining.
it consumes same power as X11 (cool n quiet fans) and im earning 0.013BTC/day per singler R9 280x
Just look out for Folding@home project, its way more profitable right now
|
O2-Protocol.com
Carbon Offset DeFi
|
|
|
|
old_pioner
|
|
May 22, 2014, 03:33:43 PM |
|
Seems like a spam, u just can give link to the pool.
upd: lol, algo - scrypt!
|
|
|
|
|
|
gilad215
|
|
May 22, 2014, 04:01:07 PM |
|
Seems like a spam, u just can give link to the pool.
upd: lol, algo - scrypt!
Hes a Full member! we must belive him!!! lol |
Neluns ♦ New Generation Financial Ecosystem ♦ Pre-sale on Aug, 1 |
|
|
csa1234
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 286
Merit: 100
O2-Protocol.com Carbon Offset DeFi
|
|
May 22, 2014, 04:48:58 PM |
|
just trying to help, thats all. no SPAM, im trying to help others to look at the best profitable mining, not just to stick with one algo or coin, otherwise it will be centralized...
|
O2-Protocol.com
Carbon Offset DeFi
|
|
|
|
Strannik-74
|
|
May 22, 2014, 06:05:52 PM |
|
sorry to mess arround, but CureCoin mining is way more profitable than Primecoin mining.
it consumes same power as X11 (cool n quiet fans) and im earning 0.013BTC/day per singler R9 280x
Just look out for Folding@home project, its way more profitable right now
280X just about 4,5 CURE/Day * 0,001 BTC = 0.0045 BTC/day per single R9 280x |
|
|
|
|
csa1234
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 286
Merit: 100
O2-Protocol.com Carbon Offset DeFi
|
|
May 22, 2014, 07:26:06 PM |
|
sorry to mess arround, but CureCoin mining is way more profitable than Primecoin mining.
it consumes same power as X11 (cool n quiet fans) and im earning 0.013BTC/day per singler R9 280x
Just look out for Folding@home project, its way more profitable right now
280X just about 4,5 CURE/Day * 0,001 BTC = 0.0045 BTC/day per single R9 280x im earning 8 - 10 CURE/Day per R9 280x = 0.0088 - 0.011 BTC/day |
O2-Protocol.com
Carbon Offset DeFi
|
|
|
Burninj
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 22, 2014, 08:16:57 PM |
|
There's not enough buy volume for cure @ the moment.
Price is barely staying above 0.001 for the moment...
|
|
|
|
|
|
kev7112001
|
|
May 22, 2014, 11:32:42 PM |
|
make up to 6.6cpd on a 12 core mobo with 7970 5.9cpd on a dual
9.1cpd on 290x's
|
MCXNOW MODERATOR
|
|
|
serpiente12
Member
Offline
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
If you dont like something change it
|
|
May 22, 2014, 11:51:59 PM |
|
v10 is out, lets testdrive  |
|
|
|
|
|
bclcjunkie
|
|
May 23, 2014, 12:36:13 AM |
|
how does mining other algo/coin help decentralize? on another note claymore had a good opportunity to do that and has it even now to keep xpm decentralized by focusing on solo mining but chose not to. i guess it's hard to resist when it rains money from continuous stream of 10% income...  just trying to help, thats all. no SPAM, im trying to help others to look at the best profitable mining, not just to stick with one algo or coin, otherwise it will be centralized...
|
|
|
|
|
liifer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
|
|
May 23, 2014, 09:28:38 AM |
|
Some problems with v10. With i5 CPU and 3 280x everything works fine, I get 16 CPD. But with AMD Sempron single core processor and 3 280x very few share only found. It estimates 15 CPD but reality is more like 1.5 with 10.0v. Same rig estimates and averages 14 CPD with 9.1, so I switched back to 9.1v.
|
|
|
|
|
btcfanx
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
May 23, 2014, 09:39:05 AM |
|
Some problems with v10. With i5 CPU and 3 280x everything works fine, I get 16 CPD. But with AMD Sempron single core processor and 3 280x very few share only found. It estimates 15 CPD but reality is more like 1.5 with 10.0v. Same rig estimates and averages 14 CPD with 9.1, so I switched back to 9.1v.
I have exactly the same problem. I switched back to ver. 9.1. |
|
|
|
|
|
