🎰 SolCasinos.io 🏆 Find The BEST CRYPTO CASINOS 🎁 Best Casino Bonuses ✨

[JoyceBTC]

A friend believes that having a first-hand experience is always better than praising the service to appear better to others. It can be misleading if it turns out that the service is not to be trusted at all. If a person hasn't personally used a casino, he shouldn't leave a review. People should first make use of the casino before giving praise the casino does not deserve.

I agree with your sentiment here bro, you must first have an experience in making use of the casino before writing a review about them, because if you give a review with other people's opinions, that's completely forgery that can misled people that hasn't made use of it before.

I think the issue is that reviews are now bought. Back in the day, reviews were honest, not paid for but the case is different now. Pay people, and they start writing gibberish pleasing in the eyes of a casino. They genuinely have no clue how the casino operates.

If this is actually true, then it's really bad because I know that casino and most platforms hire people to register an account on their platform, make use of it, and give an honest review of their site, but if it gets to a level where the platform will be telling them what to say, like praising them or saying nice things about them that is not actually true, that's really bad, because that can mislead so many people that are too lazy to do their own research them. So it's very important that we do our own proper research first before proceeding on these casinos.

There is actually no way casinos will hire people to make use of their casinos and give reviews that will not be in their favour, that is the power of money.
It a different scenario if you are registering on your own, then give a review and when the company itself is paying you to do it. That’s why it is always said not to rely on review and rating of a casino on their site, make your research from other sources.

[Wakate]

I agree with your sentiment here bro, you must first have an experience in making use of the casino before writing a review about them, because if you give a review with other people's opinions, that's completely forgery that can misled people that hasn't made use of it before.

I think a lot of people still do it, they based their trust on others rather than on their own experience which is wrong because you don't know if those good reviews about the casino were genuinely written because of their service or people were paid to give those positive feedbacks on thier page. So inorder for people not be mislead,they shouldn't trust all the reviews about a casino rather they should register and try the casino and see for themselves whether those reviews are truly honest. We should always drop a honest feedback about a casino so that others who are just coming in can have an insights of what that casino truly looks like on the inside.

Crypto casino reviews can either be done by players or the platform that were employed or single handedly decided to review the casino why basing the review in their own person perception or opinions. Anyone can give review about a casino and most times these people may decided to talk about their personal experience in an honest manner without adding lies or something that is untrue.

[khaled0111]

There is actually no way casinos will hire people to make use of their casinos and give reviews that will not be in their favour, that is the power of money.

That’s not always true. Take the review campaigns hosted on this forum where casinos and other services pay forum members to test their services and share their reviews. If you go through some of those campaign threads and read the reviews, you will see that many of them focus on the negative points and the features that need to be added or improved more than just praising the service.

But I have to agree with you that on most other platforms, paid reviews are just shilling and that’s why where you get the reviews from and who wrote them make a huge difference.

[Hazink]

That’s not always true. Take the review campaigns hosted on this forum where casinos and other services pay forum members to test their services and share their reviews. If you go through some of those campaign threads and read the reviews, you will see that many of them focus on the negative points and the features that need to be added or improved more than just praising the service.

That's the difference and Joyce might not have been aware of the forum review campaigns and how it's being done, where the manager pays members not to praise the casino but to try the casino and give their honest review, not like some shillings jobs and review platform where the casino will have to review what their paid reviewer are doing what ever don't pass review don't get published here even when members are not paid they still test to verify what was said by others if the casino is actually same way it's being praised to be.

[Gentle_Soul]

A friend believes that having a first-hand experience is always better than praising the service to appear better to others. It can be misleading if it turns out that the service is not to be trusted at all. If a person hasn't personally used a casino, he shouldn't leave a review. People should first make use of the casino before giving praise the casino does not deserve.

I agree with your sentiment here bro, you must first have an experience in making use of the casino before writing a review about them, because if you give a review with other people's opinions, that's completely forgery that can misled people that hasn't made use of it before.

I think the issue is that reviews are now bought. Back in the day, reviews were honest, not paid for but the case is different now. Pay people, and they start writing gibberish pleasing in the eyes of a casino. They genuinely have no clue how the casino operates.

If this is actually true, then it's really bad because I know that casino and most platforms hire people to register an account on their platform, make use of it, and give an honest review of their site, but if it gets to a level where the platform will be telling them what to say, like praising them or saying nice things about them that is not actually true, that's really bad, because that can mislead so many people that are too lazy to do their own research them. So it's very important that we do our own proper research first before proceeding on these casinos.

There is actually no way casinos will hire people to make use of their casinos and give reviews that will not be in their favour, that is the power of money.
It a different scenario if you are registering on your own, then give a review and when the company itself is paying you to do it. That’s why it is always said not to rely on review and rating of a casino on their site, make your research from other sources.

Yeah that's absolutely true if a casino is paying you to make a review of there casino then you will have play review by there rules because I do not think that a casino will pay you for a review and allow you to write what you feel even if it is good or bad about the casino, they will want to pattern the way you should write for you so that it will be in the favour of the casino at the end of the day. Paid casino reviews are not supposed to be regarded as the actual review of the casino but the question is how do you know which is a sponsored casino review and which is a genuine casino review because it can be misleading at the end of the day.

[adultcrypto]

Yeah that's absolutely true if a casino is paying you to make a review of there casino then you will have play review by there rules because I do not think that a casino will pay you for a review and allow you to write what you feel even if it is good or bad about the casino, they will want to pattern the way you should write for you so that it will be in the favour of the casino at the end of the day. Paid casino reviews are not supposed to be regarded as the actual review of the casino but the question is how do you know which is a sponsored casino review and which is a genuine casino review because it can be misleading at the end of the day.

Please this not always true because some platform care more about their integrity than the money they are paid to review the casino. They understand the consequence of writing positive and nice things about a scam site so despite the money, they will try to remain as neutral as possible because that is how they will be taken seriously. A review site that is only interested in the money and not on delivering objective review will become a laughing stock that will never be taken seriously.

[Johnlomape]

There is actually no way casinos will hire people to make use of their casinos and give reviews that will not be in their favour, that is the power of money.

That’s not always true. Take the review campaigns hosted on this forum where casinos and other services pay forum members to test their services and share their reviews. If you go through some of those campaign threads and read the reviews, you will see that many of them focus on the negative points and the features that need to be added or improved more than just praising the service.

But I have to agree with you that on most other platforms, paid reviews are just shilling and that’s why where you get the reviews from and who wrote them make a huge difference.

It is only a casino that lack trust that will be looking for players that will use their platform and give them good review omitting the criticisms players supposed to write about especially the part of the casino that need improvement.
There have been so many reviews with little penny as compensation for players that are interested in writing reviews on this forum. The  casinos that are open to criticisms about their games and features and the aspect that needs improvements will often be seen as reputable casino. Good casinos that are genuine will always be ready to accept opinions from random players that are ready to share their experience about what they like and dislike.

[Bushdark]

I agree with your sentiment here bro, you must first have an experience in making use of the casino before writing a review about them, because if you give a review with other people's opinions, that's completely forgery that can misled people that hasn't made use of it before.

I think a lot of people still do it, they based their trust on others rather than on their own experience which is wrong because you don't know if those good reviews about the casino were genuinely written because of their service or people were paid to give those positive feedbacks on thier page. So inorder for people not be mislead,they shouldn't trust all the reviews about a casino rather they should register and try the casino and see for themselves whether those reviews are truly honest. We should always drop a honest feedback about a casino so that others who are just coming in can have an insights of what that casino truly looks like on the inside.

There are platforms I will never take their review seriously because I know know that there is possibility of the platform manipulating the genuine reviews from real players to the favour of the casino in particular. The only review I will frown at about a casino is when it's coming from the same platform being the one that structured and wrote the review for visitors to read and access at their own risk.

If users are given the opportunity to test and share their experience about a casino, it will be seen as bad ethics when the same platform is writing the reviews on their own culture to present to the public. There could be manipulatiom in such a review.

[khaled0111]

That's the difference and Joyce might not have been aware of the forum review campaigns and how it's being done, where the manager pays members not to praise the casino but to try the casino and give their honest review,

Seriously! I just hope this is nothing more than a mere misunderstanding. Do you really believe that Joyce is not aware of the review campaigns being held on this forum? I can’t really remember, but I believe Joyce has even organized some of these campaigns  
And just to add to what you said, many members participate in review campaigns and post positive feedback just because they believe this is the only way they will get paid (or get a chane to be accepted in a signature campaign). Those members are to be added to your ignore list.