[ANN] CommunityCoin (COMM) | Pure PoS | Original COMM MultiPools Coming Soon

[schnötzel]

how do you know that those belongs to the dev? there were many cheaters in the first round, it's very likely that someone holds many millions and it is not even the dev...

I also don't hope so.     Think about it: how can these cheaters succeed in both the first AND second rounds?  The dev is a fool? Be played twice?

For fun, just show you two more "stakeholders" whose names are both in the 1st round list and 2nd round list:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=140122
jlong187  
Name:    jlong187
Posts:    78
Activity:    78
Position:    Member
Date Registered:    July 24, 2013, 04:46:40 PM
Last Active:    February 06, 2014, 01:08:17 AM

------------------------------------------------
asicuser  
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=149684
Name:    asicuser
Posts:    28
Activity:    28
Position:    Newbie
Date Registered:    September 10, 2013, 04:14:15 PM
Last Active:    February 03, 2014, 08:56:54 PM


Funny enough? Emm?

the thing is that we don't really know, those two gusy can be legit or cheaters, no real proof

if there isn't real proof the claim is without any meaning

But why they were in 2nd round? I do what i can for this coin since weeks. And i´m not in 2nd round. That makes me angry...2nd round distribution was a joke ;(
 

[pabloangello]

how do you know that those belongs to the dev? there were many cheaters in the first round, it's very likely that someone holds many millions and it is not even the dev...

I also don't hope so.     Think about it: how can these cheaters succeed in both the first AND second rounds?  The dev is a fool? Be played twice?

For fun, just show you two more "stakeholders" whose names are both in the 1st round list and 2nd round list:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=140122
jlong187  
Name:    jlong187
Posts:    78
Activity:    78
Position:    Member
Date Registered:    July 24, 2013, 04:46:40 PM
Last Active:    February 06, 2014, 01:08:17 AM

------------------------------------------------
asicuser  
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=149684
Name:    asicuser
Posts:    28
Activity:    28
Position:    Newbie
Date Registered:    September 10, 2013, 04:14:15 PM
Last Active:    February 03, 2014, 08:56:54 PM


Funny enough? Emm?

Since you have (apparently) the time, can you check for their posts on the other forums (those where they gives their COM address and see how much they get)

How have you found these guys? They have no posts in CommunityCoin thread.

[brightlight]

the thing is that we don't really know, those two gusy can be legit or cheaters, no real proof

if there isn't real proof the claim is without any meaning

What kind of "real proof" do you want?  And  where are the left 80mil coins which were for the reconsideration distribution?

I also don't expect that's all true. I hope what I found are all misunderstandings.  

So we need the explanations from the dev or Majormax. Do you agree?

At this point I agree, but Majormax can't give explanations as he is only communicator. He gives as any fresh news, anyway.

Btw, miramare, don't expect any answers from community, therefore there is no reason post the same content ten and more times.

If you have so much time for FUD, please go through the 1st and 2nd round list and make spreadsheet, including post count, last active, etc columns.

And, yes, I received too ITC stake. But it doesn't give me me rights to start FUD COMM thread. Actually I am a little bit in suspicion, that COMM and ITC dev is same person.

[miramare]

how do you know that those belongs to the dev? there were many cheaters in the first round, it's very likely that someone holds many millions and it is not even the dev...

I also don't hope so.     Think about it: how can these cheaters succeed in both the first AND second rounds?  The dev is a fool? Be played twice?

For fun, just show you two more "stakeholders" whose names are both in the 1st round list and 2nd round list:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=140122
jlong187  
Name:    jlong187
Posts:    78
Activity:    78
Position:    Member
Date Registered:    July 24, 2013, 04:46:40 PM
Last Active:    February 06, 2014, 01:08:17 AM

------------------------------------------------
asicuser  
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=149684
Name:    asicuser
Posts:    28
Activity:    28
Position:    Newbie
Date Registered:    September 10, 2013, 04:14:15 PM
Last Active:    February 03, 2014, 08:56:54 PM


Funny enough? Emm?

Since you have (apparently) the time, can you check for their posts on the other forums (those where they gives their COM address and see how much they get)

How have you found these guys? They have no posts in CommunityCoin thread.

http://ecoiner.org/communitycoin/2nd-round-raw-list-1684/

find them by yourself.

[sammy007]

How can u guys are so childish? There is no coins always pumping. It's normal that the price will go up and down.
And, why ITC comes to this thread? What's wrong with ITC? I don't think there are conflict between COMM and ITC.

Actually ITC is even more unfair, I don't have an active facebook account by choice

You can apply using twitter account.

[pabloangello]

how do you know that those belongs to the dev? there were many cheaters in the first round, it's very likely that someone holds many millions and it is not even the dev...

I also don't hope so.     Think about it: how can these cheaters succeed in both the first AND second rounds?  The dev is a fool? Be played twice?

For fun, just show you two more "stakeholders" whose names are both in the 1st round list and 2nd round list:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=140122
jlong187  
Name:    jlong187
Posts:    78
Activity:    78
Position:    Member
Date Registered:    July 24, 2013, 04:46:40 PM
Last Active:    February 06, 2014, 01:08:17 AM

------------------------------------------------
asicuser  
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=149684
Name:    asicuser
Posts:    28
Activity:    28
Position:    Newbie
Date Registered:    September 10, 2013, 04:14:15 PM
Last Active:    February 03, 2014, 08:56:54 PM


Funny enough? Emm?

Since you have (apparently) the time, can you check for their posts on the other forums (those where they gives their COM address and see how much they get)

How have you found these guys? They have no posts in CommunityCoin thread.

http://ecoiner.org/communitycoin/2nd-round-raw-list-1684/

find them by yourself.

Not everyone from these list have got any COMMs!! This is list about nicks that were under consideration.

[vivithemage]

the thing is that we don't really know, those two gusy can be legit or cheaters, no real proof

if there isn't real proof the claim is without any meaning

What kind of "real proof" do you want?  And  where are the left 80mil coins which were for the reconsideration distribution?

I also don't expect that's all true. I hope what I found are all misunderstandings.  

So we need the explanations from the dev or Majormax. Do you agree?

At this point I agree, but Majormax can't give explanations as he is only communicator. He gives as any fresh news, anyway.

Btw, miramare, don't expect any answers from community, therefore there is no reason post the same content ten and more times.

You have to face the truth.
You can find the dev's old post,and you will find that many of the posts have been modified by himself.
He is really a asshole at all,he deleted all of the word about last distribution 80 million round.

[miramare]

the thing is that we don't really know, those two gusy can be legit or cheaters, no real proof

if there isn't real proof the claim is without any meaning

What kind of "real proof" do you want?  And  where are the left 80mil coins which were for the reconsideration distribution?

I also don't expect that's all true. I hope what I found are all misunderstandings.  

So we need the explanations from the dev or Majormax. Do you agree?

At this point I agree, but Majormax can't give explanations as he is only communicator. He gives as any fresh news, anyway.

Btw, miramare, don't expect any answers from community, therefore there is no reason post the same content ten and more times.

You know, the dev is here.  Looking at his status, you may find he is online or at least online within hour.
He don't give any response, even a short word. Why?
Is it difficult to say a word?
I just show community what I found till now. And I want the RESPONSE of the dev.
I think the community is a whole and can realise what is going on.
We need speak our voice to the dev and let him know and give us feedback.

[djm34]

how do you know that those belongs to the dev? there were many cheaters in the first round, it's very likely that someone holds many millions and it is not even the dev...

I also don't hope so.     Think about it: how can these cheaters succeed in both the first AND second rounds?  The dev is a fool? Be played twice?

For fun, just show you two more "stakeholders" whose names are both in the 1st round list and 2nd round list:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=140122
jlong187  
Name:    jlong187
Posts:    78
Activity:    78
Position:    Member
Date Registered:    July 24, 2013, 04:46:40 PM
Last Active:    February 06, 2014, 01:08:17 AM

------------------------------------------------
asicuser  
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=149684
Name:    asicuser
Posts:    28
Activity:    28
Position:    Newbie
Date Registered:    September 10, 2013, 04:14:15 PM
Last Active:    February 03, 2014, 08:56:54 PM


Funny enough? Emm?

Since you have (apparently) the time, can you check for their posts on the other forums (those where they gives their COM address and see how much they get)

How have you found these guys? They have no posts in CommunityCoin thread.

http://ecoiner.org/communitycoin/2nd-round-raw-list-1684/

find them by yourself.

and their COMM address (will be easier to verify) ?, you are the one bringing that, do the job entirely

actually it is the list of people "considered" for the second round not those who get into the second round

[testadimerlo]

Let's focus in our projects guys, hold your coins leaving the price grows up and being responsible for the investors. Perfection doesn't exist, we have to do just the best
One flower for the trolls

[brightlight]

the thing is that we don't really know, those two gusy can be legit or cheaters, no real proof

if there isn't real proof the claim is without any meaning

What kind of "real proof" do you want?  And  where are the left 80mil coins which were for the reconsideration distribution?

I also don't expect that's all true. I hope what I found are all misunderstandings.  

So we need the explanations from the dev or Majormax. Do you agree?

At this point I agree, but Majormax can't give explanations as he is only communicator. He gives as any fresh news, anyway.

Btw, miramare, don't expect any answers from community, therefore there is no reason post the same content ten and more times.

You know, the dev is here.  Looking at his status, you may find he is online or at least online within hour.
He don't give any response, even a short word. Why?
Is it difficult to say a word?
I just show community what I found till now. And I want the RESPONSE of the dev.
I think the community is a whole and can realise what is going on.
We need speak our voice to the dev and let him know and give us feedback.

Enough said, big head! If dev is just lurking/hiding, he will to this again and again. There are many tries to get some feedback without success. So, don't attack this thread with invaluable posts.

[samysamy1]

STOP

Problem:
The dev can't use the form anymore, because as soon as he puts on a button he receives loads of junk applications.

Solution:
Only the best COMM supporters/leaders will qualify and they will receive stake as quickly as possible. The rest will be held for bounties.

What you have to do:
If you think you qualify just pm me and explain what you did for COMM and why you deverse a stake (with proof to links in this thread or outside this thread.)
If I see that you are quallified I will recommend you to the dev, but do not expect any response from me about your particular situation as I'm not the one who takes the final decision.

Edit: Also tell me if you have received stake before or not and send me your Comm address to check out your coins.

Everyone happy ?

[vivithemage]

Let's focus in our projects guys, hold your coins leaving the price grows up and being responsible for the investors. Perfection doesn't exist, we have to do just the best
One flower for the trolls

You can't get the point.
Look at here!

http://ecoiner.org/communitycoin/2nd-round-cleared-list-2192/

It is 278 ppl on the list for second round
The dev said that it is 470 ppl on the first round.

278+470+missing196=944

Where, people ask, has the money gone?

[miramare]

and their COMM address (will be easier to verify) ?, you are the one bringing that, do the job entirely

actually it is the list of people "considered" for the second round not those who get into the second round

Take  asicuser as an example
His wallet:
https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/9028-communitycoin-comm-information/?p=77488
http://www.coinexplorers.com/address/CVS49JSMpMiJDEGvYh9A1k4N34pY8h6ZKQ

one of the TXID of including this address:
http://www.coinexplorers.com/block/8a0c58f50eb3e7678259f45c2ddf76b7a5880c0977718a54b358a5b2a1876a18

You can find that some coins (125509.221231COMMS) from this address have been sent to the wallet:
CMYjkyHMPMaAUY2mCgDnaV4XvkrQdpxZAY
this wallet received 65150901 COMMS.

Who can own this kind of wallet? You know that.

Funny enough?

[vivithemage]

STOP

Problem:
The dev can't use the form anymore, because as soon as he puts on a button he receives loads of junk applications.

Solution:
Only the best COMM supporters/leaders will qualify and they will receive stake as quickly as possible. The rest will be held for bounties.

What you have to do:
If you think you qualify just pm me and explain what you did for COMM and why you deverse a stake (with proof to links in this thread or outside this thread.)
If I see that you are quallified I will recommend you to the dev, but do not expect any response from me about your particular situation as I'm not the one who takes the final decision.

Everyone happy ?

Get the fuck off!
Any rookie programmers know you are bull shit!

[samysamy1]

Please don't send me messages with I did this or that and expect me to search for proof. You have to provide proof yourself if you're serious about receiving final stake otherwise I will ignore your message.

[K128kevin]

Let's focus in our projects guys, hold your coins leaving the price grows up and being responsible for the investors. Perfection doesn't exist, we have to do just the best
One flower for the trolls

You can't get the point.
Look at here!

http://ecoiner.org/communitycoin/2nd-round-cleared-list-2192/

It is 278 ppl on the list for second round
The dev said that it is 470 ppl on the first round.

278+470+missing196=944

Where, people ask, has the money gone?

communitycoin,samysamy1,Majormax

Can your guys answer this direct question?

[miramare]

and their COMM address (will be easier to verify) ?, you are the one bringing that, do the job entirely

actually it is the list of people "considered" for the second round not those who get into the second round

Take  asicuser as an example
His wallet:
https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/9028-communitycoin-comm-information/?p=77488
http://www.coinexplorers.com/address/CVS49JSMpMiJDEGvYh9A1k4N34pY8h6ZKQ

one of the TXID of including this address:
http://www.coinexplorers.com/block/8a0c58f50eb3e7678259f45c2ddf76b7a5880c0977718a54b358a5b2a1876a18

You can find that some coins (125509.221231COMMS) from this address have been sent to the wallet:
CMYjkyHMPMaAUY2mCgDnaV4XvkrQdpxZAY
this wallet received 65150901 COMMS.

Who can own this kind of wallet? You know that.

Conclusion: asicuser is one of fake accounts of the dev.   

Funny enough?

can anyone explain this for me?

[djm34]

and their COMM address (will be easier to verify) ?, you are the one bringing that, do the job entirely

actually it is the list of people "considered" for the second round not those who get into the second round

Take  asicuser as an example
His wallet:
https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/9028-communitycoin-comm-information/?p=77488
http://www.coinexplorers.com/address/CVS49JSMpMiJDEGvYh9A1k4N34pY8h6ZKQ

one of the TXID of including this address:
http://www.coinexplorers.com/block/8a0c58f50eb3e7678259f45c2ddf76b7a5880c0977718a54b358a5b2a1876a18

You can find that some coins (125509.221231COMMS) from this address have been sent to the wallet:
CMYjkyHMPMaAUY2mCgDnaV4XvkrQdpxZAY
this wallet received 65150901 COMMS.

Who can own this kind of wallet? You know that.

Funny enough?

I don't see anything weird. That's just the way PoS works, just check the date. (check your address you will see the same kind of thing)
This account was given 1M and its balance is now  around 70000. So that guy didn't make it to the second round.
(he didn't even sell his entire stack)

4 first line:
16216bcaaf...   3391   2014-03-28 02:47:33   1000000   1000000   CC   <-- initial deposit
40113ff54f...   6024   2014-03-30 01:33:58   500801.12   1500801.12   CC   the 3 transactions have the exact same date: POS
40113ff54f...   6024   2014-03-30 01:33:58   500801.133972   2001602.253972   CC
40113ff54f...   6024   2014-03-30 01:33:58   (1000000)   1001602.253972   CC  Final amount added after staking/minting: 1602

[samysamy1]

Let's focus in our projects guys, hold your coins leaving the price grows up and being responsible for the investors. Perfection doesn't exist, we have to do just the best
One flower for the trolls

You can't get the point.
Look at here!

http://ecoiner.org/communitycoin/2nd-round-cleared-list-2192/

It is 278 ppl on the list for second round
The dev said that it is 470 ppl on the first round.

278+470+missing196=944

Where, people ask, has the money gone?

communitycoin,samysamy1,Majormax

Can your guys answer this direct question?

Sorry I cannot answer this as the dev did not communicate to me how much coins are left.