|
ircactus
|
 |
June 20, 2014, 05:40:18 PM
Last edit: June 20, 2014, 05:50:27 PM by ircactus |
|
I dropped all three types of miners within the last hour and am still having issues staying connected.. Scrypt, SHA and X11..
Although it seems X11 has now stabilized...
Edit1: Scrypt is back to speed now as well. Waiting on SHA to stabilize.
Edit2: Boom goes the Dynamite.. All down again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally
controlled
networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem
to be holding their own." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JHammer
Member
 Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
June 20, 2014, 05:51:49 PM |
|
I dropped all three types of miners within the last hour and am still having issues staying connected.. Scrypt, SHA and X11..
Although it seems X11 has now stabilized...
Edit1: Scrypt is back to speed now as well. Waiting on SHA to stabilize.
Edit2: Boom goes the Dynamite.. All down again.
What the hell.. |
|
|
|
|
|
ircactus
|
|
June 20, 2014, 05:54:07 PM
Last edit: June 20, 2014, 06:09:53 PM by ircactus |
|
Somethings causing the stratums to go nite nite. you can see it in the available network hash rate as well..
Edit: And we're back again.
|
|
|
|
|
djbert
Member
Offline
Activity: 462
Merit: 10
|
|
June 21, 2014, 02:47:06 AM |
|
We only implied stricter rules regarding rejected shares (too many rejects will ultimately ban you), because we were victim of DDOS with rejected shares. Just make sure your miner isn't sending too many rejected shares (in bulk) and everything will be fine.
well i guess that is my problem now....i was using stratum proxy before with no problems, then that DDos happened, and now i am screwed...i dont think i had a high rate rejects using it, actually am pretty sure of it, since stratum proxy is know to have good acceptance rates...however, it will not connect now, since i am guessing the stratum version you guys used has been changed or something, and my proxy is not compatible now...i found i could get the bfgminer proxy working, but that is known to have a high reject rate, which equals BAN now on nicehash. this sucks, i love the ease of use with nicehash, but now i need to find a new place to put my hash too...  only if the stratum proxy could be updated to work with these newer pools.... |
|
|
|
|
djbert
Member
Offline
Activity: 462
Merit: 10
|
|
June 21, 2014, 02:51:38 AM |
|
Hi, I have a ton of problems with this setup: 5 Gridseed Blades (approx 28Mh/s) on 1 RapsPi using Minera. Sometimes i succeed to connect to Nicehash as primary pool, but i get banned soon. It usually happens the same on all RaspPies.  After that i can't reconnect to Nicehash's stratum for a long time. I'm getting this in log: [2014-06-20 15:41:22.8214] Checking main pool: stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:3333
[2014-06-20 15:41:22.8823] stratum_recv_line failed
I tried different diff settings (default,1024,2048,4096,8192.) Now it's Vardiff anyway, so i don't know what else to do. Other miners work ok. Have some GPU rigs on NH x11 using same IP - no problems. Other miners (A2mini) on other IP working fine. Plz help i think we have the same problem...see the post above your original post that is from nicehash. my issue is that i am using bfgminer as a getwork to stratum proxy and i am having too high of a reject rate because of it. i was using stratum proxy before with zero issues and with a very low reject rate, and now it doesnt work anymore with nicehash. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DarKSm0ke
|
|
June 21, 2014, 10:10:03 AM |
|
I am also experimenting a lot of issue on scrypt mining with the new stratum security.
I have an ASIC on GAW Miners and i put the correct diff for the hashing power. But after 1-2 hours of mining i get disconnected and unable to reconnect.
I don't understand why i got banned from the server because there is hardly no rejected shares...
|
|
|
|
|
djbert
Member
Offline
Activity: 462
Merit: 10
|
|
June 21, 2014, 12:46:51 PM |
|
thank you for the suggestion and i am going to try it now. if it works for me, i will definitely post the results here! |
|
|
|
|
durdur23
Member
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
|
|
June 21, 2014, 01:51:57 PM |
|
I saw some automated order that turns on/off to manipulate the price.
Is that NiceHash itself? or some major Hash Supplier?
|
|
|
|
|
|
nicehashdev
|
|
June 21, 2014, 02:17:25 PM |
|
We did some further improvements. Let us know if you still have issues for getting banned. I saw some automated order that turns on/off to manipulate the price.
Is that NiceHash itself? or some major Hash Supplier?
No, we don't have our own orders placed. |
|
|
|
|
JHammer
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
June 21, 2014, 02:24:15 PM |
|
I have tried pointing my GAW hosted miners here several times over the last 5 weeks.. Back 5 weeks ago it use to work perfect... But then about 4 weeks ago until now each time I try it starts off good and then in a few hours I start having issues.. Hash Rate dropping for no reason, Fail over to backup pool for reason I cant see. And I dont think I ever get paid what the Stats claim it is paying the last 4 weeks I have tried here.. 5 Weeks ago it was spot on what it way paying me and it matched the 24 Hr Avg Payout stat
I want to like and use Nicehash but I cant..
|
|
|
|
|
|
ircactus
|
|
June 21, 2014, 03:28:58 PM |
|
Still having disconnects on sha and hash rate seems to vary way too much lately... ie +/- 200GH. Pulling sha till things stabilize. I love the service but need the stability. I keep watching and testing and shall return when stability does.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DarkAGeS
|
|
June 21, 2014, 04:26:47 PM |
|
admins,
do you understand that you have obsolete factors for x11 and x13?
OK - they are right for sgminer 5 multialgo miner, cause it doesn't work with new bin-files from 14.6 driver.
But x11mod lasybear miner works perfectly and we have about f=6 for x11 and f=4.7 for x13
we really need sgminer 5 multialgo miner working with new bin-files and then you should change default factors
|
|
|
|
|
sprof
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
June 21, 2014, 06:07:36 PM |
|
I am also getting disconnects  |
|
|
|
|
|
nicehashdev
|
|
June 21, 2014, 06:25:29 PM |
|
You will be getting disconnects as long as you use mining software that does not support extranonce subscriptions. If you use any special ASIC, make sure to put some pressure on hardware providers to implement extranonce subscription: https://www.nicehash.com/software/#devs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nicehashdev
|
|
June 21, 2014, 06:50:56 PM |
|
The first link you posted - no.
As for sgminer v5, you should check the thread about it.
|
|
|
|
|
sprof
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
June 21, 2014, 07:07:47 PM |
|
You will be getting disconnects as long as you use mining software that does not support extranonce subscriptions. If you use any special ASIC, make sure to put some pressure on hardware providers to implement extranonce subscription: https://www.nicehash.com/software/#devsI am using cgminer on the A2 innosilicon terminator scrypt and haven't had problems on any other pools |
|
|
|
|
|
bittcoinn
|
|
June 21, 2014, 07:09:21 PM |
|
You will be getting disconnects as long as you use mining software that does not support extranonce subscriptions. If you use any special ASIC, make sure to put some pressure on hardware providers to implement extranonce subscription: https://www.nicehash.com/software/#devstesting on nicehash : cgminer-zeusminer 3.1.1 and it works. should look any further for other soft or cgminer-zeusminer would work on nicehash? |
|
|
|
|
|
nicehashdev
|
|
June 21, 2014, 07:34:30 PM |
|
It will, but not as efficiently as our suggested software. You will get lower performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
