thisisverypointless
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2014, 10:03:43 PM |
|
definitely one of my favourite places to rent hashes, good price and you can set your hashrate limit as to not overhash a coin
|
|
|
|
Vitalogy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 22, 2014, 04:25:40 AM |
|
As a buyer how to prevent my order be banned for difficulty lower than 32 when the pool use vardiff?
The way it currently work, it's like buying a ticket lottery. It depend how fast the pool adjust the difficulty of the worker. Sometime it work, sometime it don't.
|
|
|
|
nicehashdev
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 22, 2014, 11:28:54 AM |
|
PM me your email address you registered with and screenshot of your wallet transaction history.
|
|
|
|
aadje93
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 22, 2014, 12:04:42 PM |
|
I'm also thinking its a little bit weird pool.
I have 2 7950 rigs which both report 14,66m avg since start. and a 780 which is hashing @ 4900
while the pool reports only 26mhash!!. The rigs should be putting out a 28mhash and then 4,5 or so from the 780. 99%+ accepted rates.....
I'm switching to another pool until someone can convice me this is right.
|
|
|
|
kenshirothefist (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 22, 2014, 05:05:35 PM |
|
We have published new sgminer_v5 binaries (linux, windows), build today ... most notable updates: - completely new configuration options with profiles (remember to replace any pool-xxx setting with only xxx), take your time and read thoroughly all the details here: https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer/blob/v5_0/doc/configuration.md- support for 14.6 drivers - new x11 (darkcoin-mod) and x13 (marucoin-mod) kernels (make sure you delete your old .bin files before running new version!) - optimized nist5 (talkcoin-mod) kernel - numerous bugfixes, also related to algorithm switching https://www.nicehash.com/software/#sgminer
|
|
|
|
aznboy84
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 22, 2014, 07:20:30 PM |
|
We have published new sgminer_v5 binaries (linux, windows), build today ... most notable updates: - completely new configuration options with profiles (remember to replace any pool-xxx setting with only xxx), take your time and read thoroughly all the details here: https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer/blob/v5_0/doc/configuration.md- support for 14.6 drivers - new x11 (darkcoin-mod) and x13 (marucoin-mod) kernels (make sure you delete your old .bin files before running new version!) - optimized nist5 (talkcoin-mod) kernel - numerous bugfixes, also related to algorithm switching https://www.nicehash.com/software/#sgminerI could use a small guide if you have it ... downloaded and run sgminer.exe but it just exit immediately without any message
|
|
|
|
Kay0r
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/question.gif) |
June 22, 2014, 10:51:01 PM |
|
Ordered some X11 power, canceled my order due to high price, made another but it doesn't show as active neither in the homepage nor in my orders section. The pool i've pointed the hashpower handled well my previous order, but right now the worker isn't active and 0.08206208 BTC vanished.
Here's a snip of the order table highlighting the vanished order
2014-06-22 21:48:38 Comment: Fee order #24431 -0.00177474 2014-06-22 21:48:36 Comment: Payment order #24431 -0.08206208
Can you please take a look at it?
|
If the above post was helpful, please consider donate BTC to 1F6BBUcpJLbGoXuftGYa9YSZkCCVHYdHAP -gagapool.pw- Multialgo/Multicoin payout. The first of its kind.
|
|
|
nicehashdev
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 22, 2014, 11:43:52 PM |
|
You created scrypt order and it is dead at the moment.
|
|
|
|
Kay0r
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 23, 2014, 12:03:50 AM |
|
You created scrypt order and it is dead at the moment.
Thanks, i was worried 'cause the order showed up later than i supposed
|
If the above post was helpful, please consider donate BTC to 1F6BBUcpJLbGoXuftGYa9YSZkCCVHYdHAP -gagapool.pw- Multialgo/Multicoin payout. The first of its kind.
|
|
|
nwfella
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
Well hello there!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 23, 2014, 01:12:47 AM |
|
Just checking out your web site and decided to create an account. Will try to get a rig pointed here sometime this evening if I can.
|
¯¯̿̿¯̿̿'̿̿̿̿̿̿̿'̿̿'̿̿̿̿̿'̿̿̿)͇̿̿)̿̿̿̿ '̿̿̿̿̿̿\̵͇̿̿\=(•̪̀●́)=o/̵͇̿̿/'̿̿ ̿ ̿̿
Gimme the crypto!!
|
|
|
jstefanop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2151
Merit: 1399
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 23, 2014, 03:21:05 PM |
|
Can you guys add a way to link payment address to our accounts, so we don't have to go in the worker section and scroll down to find our payment address each time!
|
|
|
|
brucen
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 23, 2014, 07:24:48 PM |
|
Can you guys add a way to link payment address to our accounts, so we don't have to go in the worker section and scroll down to find our payment address each time!
No need for NiceHash to do that for you. Just save a bookmark in your browser the next time you are on your payment page. Then you can go directly to the payment page each time without scrolling though the payment list.
|
|
|
|
StuffOfInterest
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 23, 2014, 08:14:39 PM |
|
One feature I'd like to see added is worker identification such as the "address.workerid" format used by some other pools. I have miners running on a couple of machines and it is easier to look at the stats page to make sure everything is running instead of going to look at the other machine.
|
|
|
|
nwfella
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
Well hello there!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 23, 2014, 10:30:41 PM |
|
lol...boy I guess I just picked the wrong time to try out this pool's sha256 situation. Talk about bad timing. I'll give it another go this evening seeing as how it looks like everything is back up!
|
¯¯̿̿¯̿̿'̿̿̿̿̿̿̿'̿̿'̿̿̿̿̿'̿̿̿)͇̿̿)̿̿̿̿ '̿̿̿̿̿̿\̵͇̿̿\=(•̪̀●́)=o/̵͇̿̿/'̿̿ ̿ ̿̿
Gimme the crypto!!
|
|
|
kenshirothefist (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 24, 2014, 06:35:43 AM Last edit: June 24, 2014, 11:41:02 AM by kenshirothefist |
|
Information for buyers: Due to increased transaction dust, produced from mining directly into NiceHash deposit address, we can not allow this anymore. Many small incoming transactions are increasing online wallet load and also increasing outgoing transaction fees. We ask you to mine into your personal wallet and then transfer funds in your NiceHash online deposit address - it will be faster (we only require 2 confirmations) and cheaper at the end of the day. Unfortunately we will have to disable mining directly into NiceHash deposit address at the beginning of the next week. Many online exchanges and similar services have implemented this kind of restrictions in the past. Thanks for understanding and thanks for using NiceHash!
|
|
|
|
StuffOfInterest
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 24, 2014, 10:13:24 AM |
|
Information for buyers: Due to increased transaction dust, produced from mining directly into NiceHash deposit address, we can not allow this anymore. Many small incoming transactions are increasing online wallet load and also increasing outgoing transaction fees. We ask you to mine into your personal wallet and then transfer funds in your NiceHash online deposit address - it will be faster (we only require 2 confirmations) and cheaper in the end of the day. Unfortunately we will have to disable mining directly into NiceHash deposit address at the beginning of the next week. Many online exchanges and similar services have implemented this kind of restrictions in the past. Thanks for understanding and thanks for using NiceHash!
Another feature worth considering, payment threshold. Possibly as another password parameter such as "t=0.02" to transfer when balance reaches 0.02 BTC. If multiple values come in then take the lowest value recorded since the last payment.
|
|
|
|
chococat211
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 24, 2014, 05:01:32 PM |
|
Hi Nicehash dev, is there white list so I can avoid you ban me, I'm using slow internet but my rig so big (~600MB) that give me too many reject (~3% to 7%)
My wallet add is: 17BEAnCpVk88wg8Eszmbw8periW1ZXv9BG (in case u can add me in your white list).
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
PonyBoy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 25, 2014, 07:54:42 PM |
|
Are some people being given priority? I noticed this problem affecting both scrypt and x13, it may affect the other algos as well. Here is the problem. I put up an order for hash power, even tho it is above the lowest priced order that is hashing it never starts, even If I increase the price alot it will never start. I noticed alot of people having the same problem. It appears that some people are getting priority to hash first which is really shitty. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Ftommyslist.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F06%2Fwth-1024x669.png&t=665&c=j7SuJRC8lbfG8Q)
|
|
|
|
nicehashdev
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 25, 2014, 08:45:32 PM |
|
I see nothing wrong. Keep in mind following: - Orders are filled from top to bottom; top orders are filled first. If a lot of new orders appear or a lot of new orders become alive, then the picture you have shown would appear and it takes some time for rigs to get reassigned. We don't reassign rigs constantly, because that would give very bad performance to rig owners; we rather do that in approx. 2 minute intervals (reassigning 100-200 rigs at a time). - Some of our customers use API, custom pools and can therefore manipulate when order is alive (if their pool terminates connection, then order gets dead and is pushed down the list - you get impression as if that order didn't exists). When this order gets alive again, it will be somewhere in the middle of the list and with 0 miners, waiting to get filled with miners. We do permit this kind of behavior because providers are awarded for connections dropped by remote pools.
|
|
|
|
|