MrBobC
Member
Offline
Activity: 110
Merit: 10
|
|
July 03, 2014, 01:46:04 PM |
|
First make sure you use same factors for each pool (currently you don't).
My apologies, I have edited the conf from my post to show the correct one. All the connection issues still apply.
|
|
|
|
OptimusPrime7
|
|
July 03, 2014, 02:01:12 PM |
|
Need a way for nicehash to show each rig hashrate, its hard to go through 1 by 1 to find which rig is down.
|
|
|
|
kbiteroner
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
July 03, 2014, 03:03:56 PM |
|
Next order placed and also dead.
SHA256 BtcGuild and Ghash.io dont work.
Which pools are working with nicehash?
|
|
|
|
kbiteroner
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
July 03, 2014, 03:37:12 PM |
|
Now Ghash is working.
|
|
|
|
rahulgarg12342
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
July 03, 2014, 03:42:02 PM |
|
Can someone just explain me when do you get remote pool terminated connection error?
And nicehashdev, could you please add a feature to change pool information when order is live or at least add more money to the remaining BTC?
|
|
|
|
OldCoinMiner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
July 03, 2014, 04:29:26 PM |
|
@ nicehashdev
Hello!
do you don't answer to this question, and I think it is not a stupid question:
the web design of nicehash looks like coinex (the dead altcoin exchange), is there a relation between nicehash and coinex? same sevellopers? same admin?
|
|
|
|
nicehashdev
|
|
July 03, 2014, 04:35:41 PM |
|
Can someone just explain me when do you get remote pool terminated connection error?
And nicehashdev, could you please add a feature to change pool information when order is live or at least add more money to the remaining BTC?
More BTC to current order will be done in future. Is on todo list. @ nicehashdev
Hello!
do you don't answer to this question, and I think it is not a stupid question:
the web design of nicehash looks like coinex (the dead altcoin exchange), is there a relation between nicehash and coinex? same sevellopers? same admin?
No relation. We use bootstrap for web design, many sites use bootstrap.
|
|
|
|
mannyg
|
|
July 03, 2014, 06:53:23 PM |
|
Why does nicehash randomly take a very long time to connect after launching my miner lately? For the last 2-3 days, or since the last major DDoS attack, it sometimes would take 5mins or more before the miner would finally connect and begin hashing. Ive noticed a few other people having the same problem.
|
|
|
|
cryptosminer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
July 03, 2014, 08:06:52 PM |
|
Hi I would like to ask what happend to my payments from today 2014-07-03. My nicehash BTC address (1Go5KGh82qTifhNYtguVsoH3buDegyVTRB) is not listed in any of todays transactions???
thanks
|
|
|
|
Fitness76
|
|
July 04, 2014, 01:04:10 AM Last edit: July 04, 2014, 02:15:23 AM by Fitness76 |
|
Hello, I'm having a problem with my order #30459 it reports as dead. I doubled and tripled checked the info and it is correct and the 2 other rigs I rented from someone else and my own 2 rigs are fine. Any idea why? Oh I have rented and mined at the same site before, just for a different coin, and it worked fine. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance and Have a Good Day. Update: Finally just came online of course after the bid price went up Offline again now saying "Disconnected. Old job." what does that mean? The order is at most a couple hours old.
|
|
|
|
StuffOfInterest
|
|
July 04, 2014, 01:50:36 AM |
|
Just uploaded NiceHash Control version 1.0.3 which includes X15 and Nist5 support. This program is primarily aimed at people using nVIDIA cards for mining as there is no one executable that will do all algorithms. NiceHash Control can launch different miners based on which algo is paying best for your particular configuration.
|
|
|
|
evolvia31
Member
Offline
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
|
|
July 04, 2014, 08:04:47 AM |
|
Hi, Anyone have configuration to R9 280X with X15 algo Actually i have only 1.8Mh/s when i read the average on R9 280X is 2.6MH/s Could you help me
|
|
|
|
deznuts
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
|
|
July 04, 2014, 09:05:48 AM |
|
Can I suggest a change? As of right now payout is set per different algorithm. I think due to so many different algorithms now and with profit switching that payout should be per btc address combining all algorithm earnings together.
|
|
|
|
fillerguy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
July 04, 2014, 09:21:40 AM |
|
Hi, Anyone have configuration to R9 280X with X15 algo Actually i have only 1.8Mh/s when i read the average on R9 280X is 2.6MH/s Could you help me Try the sgminer from this thread, I was able to get mine up to 2.7 : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=669806
|
|
|
|
evolvia31
Member
Offline
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
|
|
July 04, 2014, 10:13:51 AM |
|
i have found my error i used driver 13.12, i just update and now i have 2.7Mh/s
|
|
|
|
StuffOfInterest
|
|
July 04, 2014, 10:44:45 AM |
|
Can I suggest a change? As of right now payout is set per different algorithm. I think due to so many different algorithms now and with profit switching that payout should be per btc address combining all algorithm earnings together.
I believe the dev has said this is in their plans but not easy to implement. Must be due to their current accounting architecture. It is something I'd like to see as well. From my control program screenshot above you can see that I had money sitting on every algo due to testing. Some of that has been there for a few weeks now since it is far below the payout threshold.
|
|
|
|
cryptosminer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
July 04, 2014, 11:21:21 AM |
|
Hi, Anyone have configuration to R9 280X with X15 algo Actually i have only 1.8Mh/s when i read the average on R9 280X is 2.6MH/s Could you help me Hi my settings for 3x Gigabyte R9 280X OC { "name": "x15", "nfactor" : "10", "algorithm" : "bitblock", "intensity": "18", "gpu-engine": "1110" },
"vectors": "1", "worksize": "256", "lookup-gap": "2", "thread-concurrency": "8192", "shaders": "2048", "gpu-memclock": "1500", "gpu-powertune": "-20", "gpu-vddc" : "1.112", ...
but I'm not able to get over 2200 per card
|
|
|
|
evolvia31
Member
Offline
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
|
|
July 04, 2014, 11:47:07 AM |
|
thx to your help If you have driver ati 14.6 beta, you can try this config I have now 2.7Mh/s average with R9 280X MSI Gaming { "name": "x15", "nfactor" : "10", "algorithm" : "bitblock", "intensity" : "19", "worksize" : "64", "gpu-memclock" : "1250", "gpu-engine" : "1100" },
|
|
|
|
uberua
Member
Offline
Activity: 179
Merit: 10
|
|
July 04, 2014, 01:06:57 PM Last edit: July 04, 2014, 02:14:33 PM by uberua |
|
Hi, Anyone have configuration to R9 280X with X15 algo Actually i have only 1.8Mh/s when i read the average on R9 280X is 2.6MH/s Could you help me One of my rigs with 280x has next settings: sgminer.exe --algorithm bitblock -o server -u user -p x --intensity 16 --thread-concurrency 8192 --lookup-gap 2 --worksize 128 -g 2 gives 2,44 Mh for me (no HW).
|
|
|
|
uberua
Member
Offline
Activity: 179
Merit: 10
|
|
July 04, 2014, 02:13:28 PM |
|
I got 2*7870 and 2*7950 rig and the settings are: --intensity 17,17,15,15 -w 128 --thread-concurrency 8192 --vectors 1 --gpu-threads 2 --lookup-gap 2 I got several HW in a hour for each card and doesn't know how to solve it (drivers 14.6 beta and sgminer 5). Does anyone have an answer how to fix it?
|
|
|
|
|