knightcoin
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Stand on the shoulders of giants
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 27, 2014, 03:24:44 AM |
|
This doesn't make sense.
There's a Bitmonero, and a Monero both made by different devs?
Can someone please clarify?
Same fork, same dev as the original author. The community changed the name, but the original author didn't close the thread. so I guess the problem is the lib dependence ...
|
|
|
|
xeroc
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 28, 2014, 08:53:44 AM |
|
I was trying to compile it on ubuntu 13.10 but something went wrong ... ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) first I got a problem with libboost-atomic v1.53.0 .. the I got stuck here ... ubuntu@ubuntu:~/bitmonero$ sudo make mkdir -p build/release cd build/release && cmake -D CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release ../.. -- Boost version: 1.53.0 -- Found the following Boost libraries: -- system -- filesystem -- thread -- date_time -- chrono -- regex -- serialization -- atomic -- program_options -- Found Git: /usr/bin/git -- Could NOT find Threads (missing: Threads_FOUND) -- Configuring done -- Generating done -- Build files have been written to: /home/ubuntu/bitmonero/build/release cd build/release && make make[1]: Entering directory `/home/ubuntu/bitmonero/build/release' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/ubuntu/bitmonero/build/release' make[3]: Entering directory `/home/ubuntu/bitmonero/build/release' make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/ubuntu/bitmonero/build/release' make[3]: Entering directory `/home/ubuntu/bitmonero/build/release' fatal: No names found, cannot describe anything. CMake Warning at src/version.cmake:3 (message): Cannot determine current revision. Make sure that you are building either from a Git working tree or from a source archive.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/ubuntu/bitmonero/build/release' [ 0%] Built target version make[3]: Entering directory `/home/ubuntu/bitmonero/build/release' make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/ubuntu/bitmonero/build/release' [ 13%] Built target upnpc-static make[3]: Entering directory `/home/ubuntu/bitmonero/build/release' make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/ubuntu/bitmonero/build/release' [ 16%] Built target common make[3]: Entering directory `/home/ubuntu/bitmonero/build/release' make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/ubuntu/bitmonero/build/release' [ 26%] Built target cryptonote_core make[3]: Entering directory `/home/ubuntu/bitmonero/build/release' make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/ubuntu/bitmonero/build/release' [ 45%] Built target crypto make[3]: Entering directory `/home/ubuntu/bitmonero/build/release' make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/ubuntu/bitmonero/build/release' make[3]: Entering directory `/home/ubuntu/bitmonero/build/release' make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libboost_atomic.so', needed by `src/connectivity_tool'. Stop. make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/ubuntu/bitmonero/build/release' make[2]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/connectivity_tool.dir/all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/ubuntu/bitmonero/build/release' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ubuntu/bitmonero/build/release' make: *** [build-release] Error 2 ubuntu@ubuntu:~/bitmonero$ Are you using 32 bit Ubuntu ? noop .. amd64 Here it helped deleting the build folder and starting all over .. I updated boost and then got exactly this error msg.
|
|
|
|
knightcoin
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Stand on the shoulders of giants
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 28, 2014, 02:42:57 PM |
|
I still have trouble to compile it on Linux ... now it's goes a little further .. but complete frozen the machine, I have to reset it manually on power bottom ... today I will try to install libboost 1.55 instead 1.53 as soon as I get a spare time on my job ...
|
|
|
|
melosine
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 28, 2014, 05:15:56 PM |
|
I tried compiling on Debian, got the libboost error. I can't seem to update to libboost1.55 on testing yet. Don't want to break my system, so I gave up.
|
|
|
|
tacotime
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 28, 2014, 05:17:43 PM |
|
fresh install of 13.10 works fine, i recommend you just shrink your volume a bit and install it alongside your current linux part.
|
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns
|
|
|
stellarman
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 28, 2014, 11:33:33 PM |
|
So, I downloaded and ran the daemon, downloaded the blockchain, figured out the firewall issues, got the daemon to start mining, and actually showed a hash rate. I'm on a 2.8GH AMD Sempron 64-bit Windows 8 machine with 8GB of memory. Decent, but not a super machine. CPU usage is > 95%.
The problem is that the highest hash rate I have seen so far was 0.1 H/sec. Most of the time it is zero.
What's with that??
At this point, I can't justify running the processor at 100% when it is producing no significant hashes.
Anyone have any suggestions?
Rick
|
|
|
|
knightcoin
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Stand on the shoulders of giants
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 28, 2014, 11:45:20 PM |
|
my linux compiling problem - SOLVED ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) ... ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fthumbnails111.imagebam.com%2F32348%2F493696323472964.jpg&t=665&c=17mNcDTmejsdHw)
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 28, 2014, 11:47:34 PM |
|
So, I downloaded and ran the daemon, downloaded the blockchain, figured out the firewall issues, got the daemon to start mining, and actually showed a hash rate. I'm on a 2.8GH AMD Sempron 64-bit Windows 8 machine with 8GB of memory. Decent, but not a super machine. CPU usage is > 95%.
The problem is that the highest hash rate I have seen so far was 0.1 H/sec. Most of the time it is zero.
What's with that??
At this point, I can't justify running the processor at 100% when it is producing no significant hashes.
Anyone have any suggestions?
Rick
Linux or Windows? If Windows, boot to Linux and compile it yourself. The Windows binaries may be poorly optimized for AMD. Also, I'm not really familiar with the Sempron but if it has small cache and slow access to RAM it may never mine this coin very well. The proof of work for this coin is designed to be memory hard. I'd try Linux before giving up though.
|
|
|
|
knightcoin
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Stand on the shoulders of giants
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 29, 2014, 12:45:00 AM |
|
So, I downloaded and ran the daemon, downloaded the blockchain, figured out the firewall issues, got the daemon to start mining, and actually showed a hash rate. I'm on a 2.8GH AMD Sempron 64-bit Windows 8 machine with 8GB of memory. Decent, but not a super machine. CPU usage is > 95%.
The problem is that the highest hash rate I have seen so far was 0.1 H/sec. Most of the time it is zero.
What's with that??
At this point, I can't justify running the processor at 100% when it is producing no significant hashes.
Anyone have any suggestions?
Rick
Linux or Windows? If Windows, boot to Linux and compile it yourself. The Windows binaries may be poorly optimized for AMD. Also, I'm not really familiar with the Sempron but if it has small cache and slow access to RAM it may never mine this coin very well. The proof of work for this coin is designed to be memory hard. I'd try Linux before giving up though. it's awkward ... on the exacly same machine I get 13.9 hashrate on bytecoin daemon ... but monero daemon all I got this below .. any clues ? ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Foi58.tinypic.com%2F4i0qk0.jpg&t=665&c=U9gKTaNcesVV-A)
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 29, 2014, 12:49:30 AM |
|
it's awkward ... on the exacly same machine I get 13.9 hashrate on bytecoin daemon ... but monero daemon all I got this below .. any clues ?
That is odd, the mining code is exactly the same. Have you tried restarting? Deleting and redownloading the block chain (the Monero block chain is pretty small, so this is easy)? Sounds like something is messsed up. When you do print_cn in the daemon do you see active connections? BCN and MRO use different ports to connect, maybe one is being blocked by a firewall. That's the only difference I can think of.
|
|
|
|
knightcoin
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Stand on the shoulders of giants
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 29, 2014, 01:02:12 AM |
|
it's awkward ... on the exacly same machine I get 13.9 hashrate on bytecoin daemon ... but monero daemon all I got this below .. any clues ?
That is odd, the mining code is exactly the same. Have you tried restarting? Deleting and redownloading the block chain (the Monero block chain is pretty small, so this is easy)? Sounds like something is messsed up. When you do print_cn in the daemon do you see active connections? BCN and MRO use different ports to connect, maybe one is being blocked by a firewall. That's the only difference I can think of. now is fine ... thanks ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi58.tinypic.com%2F15hg1uu.png&t=665&c=2aL_DfLLGY7Tdg)
|
|
|
|
mrpopgun
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 29, 2014, 04:44:19 AM |
|
Has anyone benched a Haswell i3 vs a Haswell i7?
|
|
|
|
gaba
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 29, 2014, 11:58:26 AM |
|
21 days behind after 1 hour of synchronization. It's that OK?
|
LWWE6dtTUXuaq36KTCne5XqMQHfhfwpadC
|
|
|
stellarman
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 30, 2014, 02:51:59 AM |
|
What did you do to get it working better?
|
|
|
|
knightcoin
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Stand on the shoulders of giants
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 30, 2014, 07:28:01 AM |
|
now is fine ... thanks ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi58.tinypic.com%2F15hg1uu.png&t=665&c=2aL_DfLLGY7Tdg) What did you do to get it working better? Microsoft Solution, restart, joking but I was about to do that ... then what I actually did was change the process priority before.. just to see what happens... and did works .. lucky me ...
|
|
|
|
knightcoin
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Stand on the shoulders of giants
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 30, 2014, 07:31:57 AM |
|
But I think it's very hard to solo mining rigth now .. I got 2 machines running @ 29 hashrate 24 hours and noting ... not even a single block .. so I going to stop and wait for a pool server ... I'll back to primecoin mining ...
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 30, 2014, 08:06:00 AM |
|
But I think it's very hard to solo mining rigth now .. I got 2 machines running @ 29 hashrate 24 hours and noting ... not even a single block .. so I going to stop and wait for a pool server ... I'll back to primecoin mining ...
Total hash rate is about 10000. With 29 you should get 0.29% of the blocks. There are 1440 blocks per day so you should be getting 4 blocks per day at that rate. You might want to keep going.
|
|
|
|
Patejl
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 30, 2014, 02:02:53 PM |
|
Something is wrong. I can't get into my windows wallet anymore.
Error: refresh error: transaction extra parse error.
|
|
|
|
GreekBitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
getmonero.org
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 30, 2014, 02:32:49 PM |
|
Something is wrong. I can't get into my windows wallet anymore.
Error: refresh error: transaction extra parse error.
I got the same error in Linux a few minutes ago... I have a feeling that this is not good ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
|
dnaleor
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000
Want privacy? Use Monero!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 30, 2014, 02:43:00 PM |
|
What is the issue? I can not connect at the momen (I am on a public network witrh restrictions...)
|
|
|
|
|