|
darlidada
|
 |
January 15, 2015, 04:35:08 PM |
|
dead coin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed
timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It
takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but
hard to stifle." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Este Nuno
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1000
amarha
|
|
January 15, 2015, 06:12:15 PM |
|
dead coin
Only if you consider Bitcoin and all alts dead as well I'd say. |
|
|
|
|
|
sorryforthat
|
|
January 15, 2015, 09:24:45 PM |
|
dead coin
Only if you consider Bitcoin and all alts dead as well I'd say. I dont understand your correlation. I suppose one would assume that the lack of dev involvement would make a coin a dead coin. I dont mean a dev that works, but one that posts often and continues to bring updates to this thread. We dont really have much chatter going on in this room about the future of the coin. No updates on payment gateways. XDN and XMR have online wallets and boolberry, which was at one point the first to bring alot to the table has fallen short as of late. Its movement in the crypto world has mostly come to a stop. XDN is working on POW and I know zoid is too, but not for boolberry which is troubling. I am a holder and will continue to be, but I am afraid that without something new, even something trivial, people will consider this coin somewhat dead. |
|
|
|
|
maxcan
Member
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 100
|
|
January 15, 2015, 11:07:08 PM |
|
I am a holder and will continue to be, but I am afraid that without something new, even something trivial, people will consider this coin somewhat dead.
2014 had a lot of crazy stuff going on in the altcoin scene. new coins touting a small thing that set them apart from their competitors (or, in most cases, promised to but never delivered) brought huge boom and bust cycles as people gained and lost interest within the span of a week or two. can you name more than a handful that have any dev involvement or hope of relevance now? supernet is coming soon and BBR is an important part of it. we don't need to rely on new bells and whistles to have value; the anonymity is solid and gives it a reason to be used. zoidberg says he's got some plans to improve it in the future, but it works well as it is now. adding a bunch of pointless features and trying to make it a 'theme park' cryptonote only complicates things and, really, only benefits holders who want to sell. i agree i'd like some word from zoidberg on what he's up to as far as supernet integration or anything of the sort, but it doesn't matter much to me since things look fine already. i look forward to the coming months.  |
|
|
|
|
S3MKi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1016
|
|
January 19, 2015, 08:58:21 PM |
|
dead coin
think same.devs made greate profit and now it is dead coin. |
|
|
|
|
Djinou94
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 20, 2015, 12:52:42 AM |
|
Where is the new wallet? The dev said before new year Maybe he wanted to say chinese new year?  |
|
|
|
|
jwinterm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1103
|
|
January 20, 2015, 12:57:08 AM |
|
Someone spamming the blockchain for the last day or so with tons of small transactions (usually 30-50 in a block), all of them with mixin 6. For example: http://chainradar.com/bbr/block/176315Anyone have any idea what this is about? Someone testing something out? Someone just being a dick? |
|
|
|
|
scruffy scruffington
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
January 20, 2015, 05:22:29 AM |
|
Where is the new wallet? The dev said before new year Maybe he wanted to say chinese new year? We are testing it.) It will be ready soon. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lordoftherigs
|
|
January 21, 2015, 02:58:04 PM |
|
Would be nice to hear something from james or dev...
|
|
|
|
|
pt7
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
January 21, 2015, 04:17:45 PM |
|
Would be nice to hear something from james or dev...
James is occupied with the coding of SuperNet and can be found in the Slack http://104.236.15.119:8086/logs/api/index |
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3738
Merit: 1709
|
|
January 24, 2015, 06:41:52 AM |
|
I think this coin is FORKED.
I sent a few payments and they are stuck on UNCONFIRMED for the last few hours.
SOmething is wrong with the block chain
|
|
|
|
pt7
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
January 24, 2015, 08:30:23 AM |
|
I think this coin is FORKED.
I sent a few payments and they are stuck on UNCONFIRMED for the last few hours.
SOmething is wrong with the block chain
Appears to be working ok here. Just sent from one wallet to another a small payment that cleared. Also payments from pool are being received ok. |
|
|
|
|
scruffy scruffington
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
January 24, 2015, 10:22:28 AM |
|
I think this coin is FORKED.
I sent a few payments and they are stuck on UNCONFIRMED for the last few hours.
SOmething is wrong with the block chain
Hi Can you give some details about this transactions? Have you checked it with blockexplorer ( https://minergate.com/blockchain/bbr/blocks) ? |
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3738
Merit: 1709
|
|
January 24, 2015, 11:46:27 AM |
|
Transaction id: acb05fb0f2f216b44c5f0cf30e9dd8b4892f7354ecec2c73ca42bfa1f2c697c8
size: 3367 bytes
fee: 0.001000000000
unlock_time: 0
split transfers:
Payment id: 2d573f7cf6f8950351149e27d9c3674d3fdc19e33a126dfebf88626be6f9a3cc
AND
Transaction id: 669576156684191bd2e2da278a5e982c7a740876a3cc77c576856211d8d71dbc
size: 3803 bytes
fee: 0.001000000000
unlock_time: 0
split transfers:
Payment id: 2d573f7cf6f8950351149e27d9c3674d3fdc19e33a126dfebf88626be6f9a3cc
BOTH SHOW UP UNCONFIRMED FOR THE LAST FEW HOURS!
|
|
|
|
Djinou94
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 24, 2015, 01:24:43 PM |
|
Where is the new wallet? The dev said before new year Maybe he wanted to say chinese new year? We are testing it.) It will be ready soon. Alleluia |
|
|
|
|
scruffy scruffington
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
January 24, 2015, 01:38:19 PM |
|
Transaction id: acb05fb0f2f216b44c5f0cf30e9dd8b4892f7354ecec2c73ca42bfa1f2c697c8
AND
Transaction id: 669576156684191bd2e2da278a5e982c7a740876a3cc77c576856211d8d71dbc
It seams this transactions were not really send. Can you rebuild your wallet data file as it is described here - http://boolberry.com/howto.html#rebuild_wallet_datafile ? Be carefull with key file or you can lose your bbrs. |
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3738
Merit: 1709
|
|
January 24, 2015, 01:54:38 PM |
|
Transaction id: acb05fb0f2f216b44c5f0cf30e9dd8b4892f7354ecec2c73ca42bfa1f2c697c8
AND
Transaction id: 669576156684191bd2e2da278a5e982c7a740876a3cc77c576856211d8d71dbc
It seams this transactions were not really send. Can you rebuild your wallet data file as it is described here - http://boolberry.com/howto.html#rebuild_wallet_datafile ? Be carefull with key file or you can lose your bbrs. Ok I will try that and hope that it works. THANKS! |
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3738
Merit: 1709
|
|
January 25, 2015, 12:09:38 AM |
|
I tried rebuilding the wallet but now it says transaction failed by daemon.
I can send 1 or 2 coins but not the entire wallet.
|
|
|
|
|
crypto_zoidberg (OP)
|
|
January 25, 2015, 02:01:41 AM |
|
I tried rebuilding the wallet but now it says transaction failed by daemon.
I can send 1 or 2 coins but not the entire wallet.
Where this coins came from ? Is it mining ? Or does this wallet from pool ? Sometimes pool's wallets have a lot of many inputs, a dust, wich is hard to spend. |
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3738
Merit: 1709
|
|
January 25, 2015, 02:23:20 AM |
|
I tried rebuilding the wallet but now it says transaction failed by daemon.
I can send 1 or 2 coins but not the entire wallet.
Where this coins came from ? Is it mining ? Or does this wallet from pool ? Sometimes pool's wallets have a lot of many inputs, a dust, wich is hard to spend. I mine directly to my computer wallet and then after a few days I send the coins to my exchange wallet (which is where it failed) |
|
|
|
|
