Drhiggins
|
|
August 07, 2016, 06:34:30 PM |
|
So I saw this today for the first time. The message came from the daemon. Any ideas what it means?
2016-Aug-07 09:03:36.615102 [P2P6]WARNING: no two valid MoneroPulse DNS checkpoi nt records were received
|
Monerohash.com U.S. Mining Pool
|
|
|
|
|
smoothie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
|
|
August 07, 2016, 10:11:28 PM |
|
Even over 5 years later after MTGOX original hack, people still dont understand that holding bitcoin and storing it on a centralized exchange are not the same.
|
███████████████████████████████████████
,╓p@@███████@╗╖, ,p████████████████████N, d█████████████████████████b d██████████████████████████████æ ,████²█████████████████████████████, ,█████ ╙████████████████████╨ █████y ██████ `████████████████` ██████ ║██████ Ñ███████████` ███████ ███████ ╩██████Ñ ███████ ███████ ▐▄ ²██╩ a▌ ███████ ╢██████ ▐▓█▄ ▄█▓▌ ███████ ██████ ▐▓▓▓▓▌, ▄█▓▓▓▌ ██████─ ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓█,,▄▓▓▓▓▓▓▌ ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓─ ²▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓╩ ▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀ ²▀▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀▀` ²²² ███████████████████████████████████████
| . ★☆ WWW.LEALANA.COM My PGP fingerprint is A764D833. History of Monero development Visualization ★☆ . LEALANA BITCOIN GRIM REAPER SILVER COINS. |
|
|
|
mmortal03
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1762
Merit: 1011
|
|
August 08, 2016, 02:52:30 AM |
|
I posted this over in Monero Support, but after further testing, I figure it'd be appropriate to post here.
Was simplewallet --restore-deterministic-wallet, or something related to the following problem, broken in the master as of at least a month ago? I happened to build from the master back on July 10th and I just tried using it to restore a paper wallet, and it detected no inputs or outputs and gave me a balance of zero. I refreshed, but it still showed a zero balance. I did a rescan_bc, and I noticed it scanned absurdly quickly compared to what I'm used to, but still displayed a zero balance. So, I went back to simplewallet from 0.9.4.0, and after letting it scan from scratch, the correct inputs and outputs were detected, and the correct balance was shown.
I've just compiled from the latest master, and the problem persists. The scanning from scratch simply doesn't seem to detect any inputs or outputs, whereas 0.9.4.0 works as expected.
|
|
|
|
antanst
|
|
August 08, 2016, 09:32:16 AM |
|
I posted this over in Monero Support, but after further testing, I figure it'd be appropriate to post here.
Was simplewallet --restore-deterministic-wallet, or something related to the following problem, broken in the master as of at least a month ago? I happened to build from the master back on July 10th and I just tried using it to restore a paper wallet, and it detected no inputs or outputs and gave me a balance of zero. I refreshed, but it still showed a zero balance. I did a rescan_bc, and I noticed it scanned absurdly quickly compared to what I'm used to, but still displayed a zero balance. So, I went back to simplewallet from 0.9.4.0, and after letting it scan from scratch, the correct inputs and outputs were detected, and the correct balance was shown.
I've just compiled from the latest master, and the problem persists. The scanning from scratch simply doesn't seem to detect any inputs or outputs, whereas 0.9.4.0 works as expected.
Are you using the same versions of bitmonerod and simplewallet? There are some incompabitilities between -master versions of simplewallet and bitmonerod v0.9.4, for example.
|
|
|
|
MoneroMooo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1276
Merit: 1001
|
|
August 08, 2016, 10:58:02 AM |
|
Was simplewallet --restore-deterministic-wallet, or something related to the following problem, broken in the master as of at least a month ago? I happened to build from the master back on July 10th and I just tried using it to restore a paper wallet, and it detected no inputs or outputs and gave me a balance of zero. I refreshed, but it still showed a zero balance. I did a rescan_bc, and I noticed it scanned absurdly quickly compared to what I'm used to, but still displayed a zero balance. So, I went back to simplewallet from 0.9.4.0, and after letting it scan from scratch, the correct inputs and outputs were detected, and the correct balance was shown.
I've just compiled from the latest master, and the problem persists. The scanning from scratch simply doesn't seem to detect any inputs or outputs, whereas 0.9.4.0 works as expected.
simplewallet now skips refresh till the block the wallet was created, so there must be a bug that makes it think it doesn't need to refresh those early blocks. File a bug on https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero with the exact command line you use (placeholders are ok for addresses etc) and we'll fix soon.
|
|
|
|
|
TheKoziTwo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1552
Merit: 1047
|
|
August 08, 2016, 11:36:28 AM |
|
I suppose it will be time for a new FFS thread for him soon™. I think we should do it now. Let's fund the completion of RingCT, beta test and release.
|
|
|
|
|
mmortal03
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1762
Merit: 1011
|
|
August 08, 2016, 06:16:23 PM |
|
Are you using the same versions of bitmonerod and simplewallet? There are some incompabitilities between -master versions of simplewallet and bitmonerod v0.9.4, for example.
Yep, I was, but this is still good to know. simplewallet now skips refresh till the block the wallet was created, so there must be a bug that makes it think it doesn't need to refresh those early blocks. File a bug on https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero with the exact command line you use (placeholders are ok for addresses etc) and we'll fix soon. Will do.
|
|
|
|
Bassica
|
|
August 08, 2016, 09:16:21 PM |
|
I suppose it will be time for a new FFS thread for him soon™. I think we should do it now. Let's fund the completion of RingCT, beta test and release. Very happy to make another donation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TechorMarketing
|
|
August 09, 2016, 06:42:18 PM |
|
Share this press release with any media contacts you may have Blockchain, Aug. 9, 2016 /PRNewswire/ Monero joins Bitcoin and Ethereum as the 3rd blockchain based currency or consensus network on Stack Exchange. Stack Exchange is the largest network of websites for software developers and users to find, ask, and answer their technical questions. Stack Overflow alone serves tens of millions professional and novice programmers each month. The entire Stack Exchange Network has expanded to cover 150+ topics including Cryptography, Economics, Open Source and Project Management. Monero is a crypto currency that is not based on the Bitcoin codebase and seeks to be the leader in privacy, security, and scalability. All Monero transactions are cryptographically untraceable and unlinkable, and there is no separate "clear" token. This enables end users to trust Monero as a private store of value and as a medium of exchange that is impervious to blockchain analysis or miner censorship. Developers building privacy-aware or privacy-centric applications will benefit from Monero's private-by-default approach and will appreciate the small and simple metadata storage area (tx_extra) available in every transaction. Additionally, they will benefit from the standard and uncomplicated cryptography based on Daniel J. Bernstein's Curve25519 EC curve as well as EdDSA signatures. Those building pegged off-chain or sidechain systems needn't worry about on-chain limitations, as Monero's dynamic block size algorithm grows and shrinks the block size limit based on the on-chain demand. Peg as much back to the Monero blockchain as you need! Monero Stack Exchange is a community-run question and answer site for developers and users of the secure, private and untraceable cryptocurrency Monero. Experts available to answer questions will include PhD mathematicians from Monero Research Lab and many of the developers who have directly contributed to the Monero source-code repository. Learn more by joining the open beta of Monero Stack Exchange.
|
|
|
|
luigi1111
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1105
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 09, 2016, 11:15:40 PM |
|
Ok thanks. And why isn't this the same issue for other coins ?
I think Polo is just lazy WRT XMR; they don't sweep their wallet's dust and allow large withdrawals, and at the same time use a pretty hefty fee (higher than the average network fee for sure). XMR itself has higher than average fees. This is mostly due to (1). disincentivizing spam/paying for block space, (2). anonymity not being free, and (3). Monero's price in fiat being at the upper end of its recent range. If its price continues higher, fees will be adjusted downward (measured in XMR).
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
August 10, 2016, 12:40:39 AM |
|
Ok thanks. And why isn't this the same issue for other coins ?
I think Polo is just lazy WRT XMR; they don't sweep their wallet's dust and allow large withdrawals, and at the same time use a pretty hefty fee (higher than the average network fee for sure). Sweeping wouldn't reduce the actual costs though. As long as people make many small deposits and Poloniex doesn't impose any kind of fees on the deposit side (which aren't a standard in the industry so might be a tough sell) then those costs are going to be shifted to Poloniex or its trading and withdrawing customers. Guess which one Poloniex chooses? Paying higher than average network fees are another matter though. I have no idea why they do that.
|
|
|
|
birr
|
|
August 10, 2016, 04:15:16 AM |
|
High fee per withdrawal and a withdrawal cap of 1000 xmr really discourages heavy trading. You can't move coins on and off the exchange.
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
August 10, 2016, 04:18:09 AM |
|
High fee and a withdrawal cap of 1000 xmr really discourages heavy trading.
It discourages withdrawals more directly, and encourages keeping balances on the site. That's actually a bit of a red flag. When Cryptsy was hiding its insolvency it introduced higher withdrawal fees.
|
|
|
|
|