fluffypony
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1060
GetMonero.org / MyMonero.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 16, 2016, 11:19:54 PM |
|
No it is not going to go in before the next fork. It would need a fork to support the new signature method.
Just to reiterate - the idea is to code-freeze 7 months before the hard fork. This time we didn't code freeze as timeously as we would have liked, but even if you grabbed the code from like October you'd still be fine till after the March fork. Even the malicious fork from Friday wouldn't have affected you, as long as you gave it a few days for the fork to resolve.
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 16, 2016, 11:25:00 PM |
|
No it is not going to go in before the next fork. It would need a fork to support the new signature method.
Just to reiterate - the idea is to code-freeze 7 months before the hard fork. This time we didn't code freeze as timeously as we would have liked, but even if you grabbed the code from like October you'd still be fine till after the March fork. Even the malicious fork from Friday wouldn't have affected you, as long as you gave it a few days for the fork to resolve. More like a few hours even due to the hard work of the real developers. I was helping by drinking whiskey.
|
|
|
|
|
Wheatclove
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 17, 2016, 03:18:10 AM |
|
same sort of fork happened to shadowcash when they implemented adam back's ring signature improvements. interesting.
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 17, 2016, 03:22:20 AM Last edit: January 17, 2016, 03:35:04 AM by smooth |
|
same sort of fork happened to shadowcash when they implemented adam back's ring signature improvements. interesting.
It is a clear risk any time you have different implementations on the network, as during an upgrade process. If the same implementation forked against itself (also possible, but not what happened with Monero) that is different sort of bug. I don't know which happened in SDC.
|
|
|
|
aiwe
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1101
karbo.io
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 17, 2016, 10:48:06 AM |
|
New updates to the open source XMR miner, reaching over 800H/s on 290X in some configs; they can be found at my github; I'll probably be making Windows binaries shortly Great news! I am looking forward for windows binaries to try.
|
████▄▄████████████▄▄████ ██▄██████████████████▄██ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ██▀██████████████████▀██ ████▀▀████████████▀▀████ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ |
|
|
|
GingerAle
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 17, 2016, 01:51:50 PM |
|
Great news! People that mine on AMD, can we see some screenshots and let us know about stability etc. It'd be great to put together a how-to for the total noobs. Now that we're at claymore equivalence (I think), this should probably be the one people end up using...
|
|
|
|
nioc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 17, 2016, 02:09:30 PM |
|
Great news! People that mine on AMD, can we see some screenshots and let us know about stability etc. It'd be great to put together a how-to for the total noobs. Now that we're at claymore equivalence (I think), this should probably be the one people end up using... @GingerAle, Thanks for the direction and motivation you provide. Time to update your "<<<DLOAD WIN64 0.9 RELEASE!!>>" link in your signature ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
muchoman
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 17, 2016, 02:32:31 PM |
|
Claymore still has upper hand.
270x wolf-xmr-miner-0.3b 360H/s claymore 420H/s
|
|
|
|
muchoman
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 17, 2016, 03:44:09 PM |
|
Claymore still has upper hand.
270x wolf-xmr-miner-0.3b 360H/s claymore 420H/s
Keep in mind clocks in my config file ARE NOT SET - you need to use an external application. Same with powertune and fanspeeds. Additionally - driver version, rawintensity, and worksize? catalyst 15.7.1 clocks 1105/1475 rawintensity 672 worksize 12
|
|
|
|
Coinonomous
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 17, 2016, 04:01:18 PM |
|
hi i'm new to this. How do I get the xmr.conf file to work with 2 cards? I can only get it to run with one for some reason no matter how i try and add another GPU id "1"? thanks! edit - is this even the right thread? ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
,╓p@@███████@╗╖,
,p████████████████████N,
d█████████████████████████b
d██████████████████████████████æ
,████²█████████████████████████████,
,█████ ╙████████████████████╨ █████y
██████ `████████████████` ██████
║██████ Ñ███████████` ███████
███████ ╩██████Ñ ███████
███████ ▐▄ ²██╩ a▌ ███████
╢██████ ▐▓█▄ ▄█▓▌ ███████
██████ ▐▓▓▓▓▌, ▄█▓▓▓▌ ██████─
▐▓▓▓▓▓▓█,,▄▓▓▓▓▓▓▌
▐▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓─
²▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓╩
▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀
²▀▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀▀`
²²²
|
|
|
muchoman
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 17, 2016, 04:23:53 PM |
|
Claymore still has upper hand.
270x wolf-xmr-miner-0.3b 360H/s claymore 420H/s
Keep in mind clocks in my config file ARE NOT SET - you need to use an external application. Same with powertune and fanspeeds. Additionally - driver version, rawintensity, and worksize? catalyst 15.7.1 clocks 1105/1475 rawintensity 672 worksize 12 Yeah, worksize is usually best a power of two, or at LEAST a multiple of 8. Try 768 rI and 8 ws. Anything over 672 gives me error. Error -61 when calling clCreateBuffer to create hash scratchpads buffer
|
|
|
|
aiwe
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1101
karbo.io
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 17, 2016, 04:35:55 PM |
|
I am getting around 750H/s with defaults not changed in xmr.conf "rawintensity": 1336, "worksize": 16 etc. R9 290x Windows 10, driver AMD-Catalyst-15.7.1-Win10-64bit. Card is also on its default settings GPU Clock 1030 MHz Mem Clock 1250MHz. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F1kzvU44.jpg&t=665&c=0nHOCmRarxEp9g) This miner gives me 2 degrees lower temperature than Claymore's miner. Claymore's miner in comparison shows varied speed on its default settings from 720H/s to 780H/s. Ah, and now with Wolf's miner driver not crashes when closing miner window ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
████▄▄████████████▄▄████ ██▄██████████████████▄██ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ██▀██████████████████▀██ ████▀▀████████████▀▀████ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ |
|
|
|
aiwe
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1101
karbo.io
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 17, 2016, 04:48:19 PM |
|
Drop worksize to 8 - should help just a little bit!
In the meawhile I looked at your config and did it. Now with worksise 8 I am getting ~ 770H/s [18:46:19] Share accepted: 7/7 (100.00%) [18:46:19] Total Hashrate: 772.70H/s
|
████▄▄████████████▄▄████ ██▄██████████████████▄██ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ████████████████████████ ██▀██████████████████▀██ ████▀▀████████████▀▀████ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ | | | | Ҝ Ҝ Ҝ |
|
|
|
Afros
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 17, 2016, 06:32:45 PM |
|
Hello guys, i've set up a full node and everything seems to work fine (90+ connections) except one strange message : WARNING: no two valid MoneroPulse DNS checkpoint records were received
Ubuntu 14.04 x64 Any ideas?
|
|
|
|
nioc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 17, 2016, 06:38:06 PM |
|
Hello guys, i've set up a full node and everything seems to work fine (90+ connections) except one strange message : WARNING: no two valid MoneroPulse DNS checkpoint records were received
Ubuntu 14.04 x64 Any ideas? Are you running 0.9.1? I got the same warning when I updated from 0.9 to 0.9.1 and basically was told to ignore it as it would right itself which it did. If you want details somebody will probably oblige.
|
|
|
|
Afros
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 17, 2016, 06:47:10 PM |
|
Yes,i'm running 0.9.1 so i guess i'll wait a few days and see how it goes. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
pippo
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 17, 2016, 07:55:13 PM |
|
What is the next big thing for Monero that could push Monero to place 5 on cmc?
- Database (imminent)
- GUI (soon™)
- More people looking for privacy and anonymity in their transactions
- Services and Merchants accepting XMR
- Emission that decreases each and every block
All of these things are coming from a growing community. after 11 months, were is the gui wallet?
|
QORA|NEW CODE|QZypEij9Y3p7xw7bWmmc3d9HRpSZFbBcrC
|
|
|
pönde
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 17, 2016, 08:30:51 PM |
|
Why it is not possible to withdraw xmr from bittrex.com? XMR can be exchanged to BTC and BTC can be withdrawn but XMR can not be directly withdrawn. Why?
Sorry if this is not right thread for this question.
|
|
|
|
|