Bitcoin Forum
November 03, 2024, 11:42:07 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 [351] 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 ... 2126 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency  (Read 4670876 times)
onemorebtc
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 20, 2014, 04:22:00 PM
 #7001

Some say XMR will rise when XMR/BTC market will open on Mintpal. What's the reasoning behind this (except from larger exposure) ... are there precedents ?

I'm under the impression last couple of days and certainly last couple of hours, XMR is being pumped on Polo in anticipation of the Mintpal notation and XMR will be dumped on Mintpal.

What's your opinion ?

i've been relative new to alt-currencies but i recognized very fast how crappy polo is (eg you have to talk to support every third withdraw)

so polo wont ever get more than 0.25btc from me at a time.

i hope that mintpal works better (it certainly looks like). i dont know if there are more than me who thinks that way and i'd like to see some precedents too

transfer 3 onemorebtc.k1024.de 1
454420031
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 20, 2014, 04:27:04 PM
 #7002

For help, my 26 XMR into the poloniex did not receive, for several days, how to do?
Ed4252
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 204
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 20, 2014, 04:27:50 PM
 #7003

Some say XMR will rise when XMR/BTC market will open on Mintpal. What's the reasoning behind this (except from larger exposure) ... are there precedents ?
I'm under the impression last couple of days and certainly last couple of hours, XMR is being pumped on Polo in anticipation of the Mintpal notation and XMR will be dumped on Mintpal.
What's your opinion ?

Short term variations doesn't matter.

People will regret not having XMR in few months.


Monero doesn't have the community size to have potential imo.

It's just not growing compared to the other coins.
xa4
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 71
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 20, 2014, 04:29:49 PM
 #7004

Some say XMR will rise when XMR/BTC market will open on Mintpal. What's the reasoning behind this (except from larger exposure) ... are there precedents ?

I'm under the impression last couple of days and certainly last couple of hours, XMR is being pumped on Polo in anticipation of the Mintpal notation and XMR will be dumped on Mintpal.

What's your opinion ?

i've been relative new to alt-currencies but i recognized very fast how crappy polo is (eg you have to talk to support every third withdraw)

so polo wont ever get more than 0.25btc from me at a time.

i hope that mintpal works better (it certainly looks like). i dont know if there are more than me who thinks that way and i'd like to see some precedents too

No problems with polo for me so far. 5 deposits and 3 withdrawals without any problem.... I guess I'm lucky ?
onemorebtc
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 20, 2014, 04:31:54 PM
 #7005

Some say XMR will rise when XMR/BTC market will open on Mintpal. What's the reasoning behind this (except from larger exposure) ... are there precedents ?

I'm under the impression last couple of days and certainly last couple of hours, XMR is being pumped on Polo in anticipation of the Mintpal notation and XMR will be dumped on Mintpal.

What's your opinion ?

i've been relative new to alt-currencies but i recognized very fast how crappy polo is (eg you have to talk to support every third withdraw)

so polo wont ever get more than 0.25btc from me at a time.

i hope that mintpal works better (it certainly looks like). i dont know if there are more than me who thinks that way and i'd like to see some precedents too

edit: their support is nice and fast though Wink
No problems with polo for me so far. 5 deposits and 3 withdrawals without any problem.... I guess I'm lucky ?

dont know... it wasnt even big amounts... always around 5-30mro. about 7 seven withdraws and 3 support tickets...

transfer 3 onemorebtc.k1024.de 1
sk00t3r
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 192
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 20, 2014, 04:33:27 PM
 #7006

Some say XMR will rise when XMR/BTC market will open on Mintpal. What's the reasoning behind this (except from larger exposure) ... are there precedents ?

I'm under the impression last couple of days and certainly last couple of hours, XMR is being pumped on Polo in anticipation of the Mintpal notation and XMR will be dumped on Mintpal.

What's your opinion ?

i've been relative new to alt-currencies but i recognized very fast how crappy polo is (eg you have to talk to support every third withdraw)

so polo wont ever get more than 0.25btc from me at a time.

i hope that mintpal works better (it certainly looks like). i dont know if there are more than me who thinks that way and i'd like to see some precedents too

No problems with polo for me so far. 5 deposits and 3 withdrawals without any problem.... I guess I'm lucky ?

I have moved over 150 XMR to and from Poloniex over many multiple transfers/withdrawals. Not one issue. I guess count me lucky as well.
454420031
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 20, 2014, 04:36:51 PM
 #7007

Or whether XMR can repair the wallet,Let me know. Let me have a try
fluffypony
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1060


GetMonero.org / MyMonero.com


View Profile WWW
June 20, 2014, 04:39:48 PM
 #7008

Hi guys, I wish to know if the limits of CoinJoin described in the following article apply also to Monero?
http://www.coindesk.com/blockchains-sharedcoin-users-can-identified-says-security-expert/

Not at all, it's a completely different approach. Mixing services (any altcoin that uses the word "nodes" in the description of their anonymity) and CoinJoin all suffer from the fatal flaws described in that article.

fluffypony
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1060


GetMonero.org / MyMonero.com


View Profile WWW
June 20, 2014, 04:40:11 PM
 #7009

Monero blockchain grew to 1 Gb in one month and it's a pain to sync, and only a few people use it now, imagine what would happen when/if it gets more popular. Do you think that Monero alone won't fly due to syncing and storing issues if everyone uses the same cryptonote currency?

In my opinion, a few cryptonote currencies will become popular and interexchangeable, since the code is shared, and users would need to download only one of the blockchains. The userbase and transactions are thus split into a few smaller blockchains instead of one huge and everyone chooses their favorite flavor, like linux OSes, with every flavor taking 20-30% of total marketcap of cryptonote currencies.

It's just a pain to wait for it to be fully synced if you only open it once every few days and have to wait 20-30 mins before you can use it. For now it's just pumping at exchanges as many people don't even bother with withdrawing, especially since there is no GUI and they are only speculators. What do you think of this?

I was thinking of this as well. What if a multibit version of the monero qt wallet was made? Where only the important parts of the blockchain are stored, so much less space is needed for the monero multibit/lightweight wallet.

Is a thin client even possible with cryptonote currencies? Let the devs answer this.

Not an SPV client in the Bitcoin sense, but there is an idea we're playing with that will allow for very light clients. Practically speaking, though, it's quite a ways away. The general route to that is going to be QoS to fix bandwidth issues -> embedded database to fix RAM usage -> fat GUI client -> thin GUI client

fluffypony
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1060


GetMonero.org / MyMonero.com


View Profile WWW
June 20, 2014, 04:41:00 PM
 #7010

Some say XMR will rise when XMR/BTC market will open on Mintpal. What's the reasoning behind this (except from larger exposure) ... are there precedents ?
I'm under the impression last couple of days and certainly last couple of hours, XMR is being pumped on Polo in anticipation of the Mintpal notation and XMR will be dumped on Mintpal.
What's your opinion ?

Short term variations doesn't matter.

People will regret not having XMR in few months.


Monero doesn't have the community size to have potential imo.

It's just not growing compared to the other coins.

That's the way we'd prefer it at this stage. It's not ready for massive growth, not until we have all the tooling in place.

strangewildthing
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
June 20, 2014, 04:58:32 PM
Last edit: June 20, 2014, 05:18:53 PM by strangewildthing
 #7011


Thanks for waiting and reporting! All payouts have been made out successfully Smiley

On the side note, the Extermehash XMR pool has been updated to newer hardware and tweaked with better code. We're getting blocks very consistently and with lots of luck. Feel free to drop by #extremehash on Freenode and hang out, my IRC nick is wildstrangething.

Support decentralization, pop by the Extremehash pool!

www.extremehash.com
deadmanwalking
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 20, 2014, 05:20:42 PM
 #7012

I'm an expert by no means whatsoever. That said, here's my 2 cents on Monero and why it will succeed: It isn't an altcoin! Monero and other cryptonote currencies are not bitcoin forks, they are a completely new, untraceable currency. That's it! Truly an alternative to bitcoin, not just a fork of bitcoin. Even a dummy( me ) can understand the potential.

\
tacotime
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005



View Profile
June 20, 2014, 05:31:47 PM
 #7013

Its friday and i have really better things todo than addressing your constant hate without a reason.

First of all, it was a hotfix and its was coordinated with pools and exchanges, there is absolutely no problem users just need to update their wallets... Polo and Bittrex both work pretty close with us and we coordinate everything with them.
There was nothing uncoordinated i have even discussed the fix with zoidberg and he sees no problem either. There was a compatibility window and still is - there are pools who mine the low fee transactions.

About the hashrate and your botnet paranoia - the hashincrease simply matches the price increase on exchanges, theres no vodoo or black magic - and whats the difference to BCN, they use the same Proof of work...
Then your other concern that the miner was crippled is just a joke because we were the ones who fixed it, you better ask bcn why they did make the pow so slow without a reason.
The dev progress speaks to itself, you just have to check our githubs (all monero people):

https://github.com/mikezackles/bitmonero/commits/daemonize
https://github.com/Neozaru/bitmonero/commits/master
https://github.com/wolf9466/bitmonero/commits/master
https://github.com/wolf9466/cpuminer-multi/commits/master
https://github.com/fluffypony/bitmonero/commits/master
https://github.com/tewinget/bitmonero/commits/master
https://github.com/zone117x/node-cryptonote-pool/commits/master
https://github.com/NoodleDoodleNoodleDoodleNoodleDoodleNoo/bitmonero/commits/master

This is an open source project with a great community and not a one man show, you should realize that.

There was a critical bug which allowed the blockchain to be replaced due to an error in their checkpoint system we found here: https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/commit/5ceffa8c8abb96bb8314939bf75c9b935ea7b5bc
and fixed here: https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/commit/e7171250739790a5e5040264c4c1356ddeeea241

This bug allowed it to replace the whole blockchain on CN coins, because it made it possible to fabricate a blockchain with a bigger cummulative difficulty due to non-checking of the block before the checkpointing. Just for your info.

Ultimately we should all work together but with the hatred from certain people here i doubt that will happen....

I have some comments on this.

There has never been a hardfork of Monero. We're still operating on the same blockchain that TFT started back in the day. The original Bitmonero software can still sorta connect to and sync to the network, although it will get stuck at certain times because the software originally evaluated block rewards incorrectly and couldn't handle tx_extra. So, unlike other blockchains like DOGE or DRK, we've had zero hardforks up to now (just softforks).

There are cases where the ByteCoin devs merged things in without review (seemingly), for instance a number of TFT's fixes. It's obvious that whoever owns the amjuarez ByteCoin repo trusts whatever TFT devs, which is unfortunate as he introduced a very severe mining bug into ByteCoin (which Monero fixed a while ago).

The bug othe speaks of was first bypassed here:
https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/commit/5ceffa8c8abb96bb8314939bf75c9b935ea7b5bc

I caught it originally when I added checkpoints to the code and noticed that the blocks before checkpoints weren't having their PoWs checked, This was very dangerous, because it allowed you to upload random blocks to anyone syncing the client that corrupted the block database. So, I disabled checkpoints and then fixed it properly.

https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/commit/3a3a8176782a4fa75b0607fba0393c9d4a1746be (blockchain_storage.cpp)
and checkpointing flagging was turned on here:
https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/commit/e7171250739790a5e5040264c4c1356ddeeea241

BoolBerry has 100% the same code, so either they fixed it the same way independently or they used our fix. In either case, it was a very severe bug.

Code:
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns
Mumbles
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 20, 2014, 05:54:51 PM
 #7014

Botnets shouldn't matter at all to a coin. They are just the same as "real" miners dumping coins. As long as there are reasons for the user base to grow and use the coin, then it doesn't matter the source of the mining at all. Unless you are a miner trying to compete with bots for short term profit of course.



CPU mined coins are subject to botnets by definition. However, this is not what you want for the coin you're mining or investing in. Large botnet share means that the majority of the coins is obtained by the scammers and is likely to be dumped. This can't be good for the long term development because the coins are spread not among the devs or users, but are obtained by botnet holders.

How much is the case for Monero? I really believe that not all of the spikes are due to botnets, but at least some of them could be.
eizh
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 20, 2014, 05:57:43 PM
 #7015

Monero blockchain grew to 1 Gb in one month and it's a pain to sync, and only a few people use it now, imagine what would happen when/if it gets more popular. Do you think that Monero alone won't fly due to syncing and storing issues if everyone uses the same cryptonote currency?

Much of that is actually due to dust in the blockchain. It has nothing to do with CryptoNote v. Bitcoin, and it's being fixed.
AceCobra1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 20, 2014, 06:14:49 PM
 #7016

Botnets shouldn't matter at all to a coin. They are just the same as "real" miners dumping coins. As long as there are reasons for the user base to grow and use the coin, then it doesn't matter the source of the mining at all. Unless you are a miner trying to compete with bots for short term profit of course.



CPU mined coins are subject to botnets by definition. However, this is not what you want for the coin you're mining or investing in. Large botnet share means that the majority of the coins is obtained by the scammers and is likely to be dumped. This can't be good for the long term development because the coins are spread not among the devs or users, but are obtained by botnet holders.

How much is the case for Monero? I really believe that not all of the spikes are due to botnets, but at least some of them could be.

Are botnets just those trading robots ?
1qaz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 666
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 20, 2014, 06:16:16 PM
 #7017


Thanks for waiting and reporting! All payouts have been made out successfully Smiley

On the side note, the Extermehash XMR pool has been updated to newer hardware and tweaked with better code. We're getting blocks very consistently and with lots of luck. Feel free to drop by #extremehash on Freenode and hang out, my IRC nick is wildstrangething.

Support decentralization, pop by the Extremehash pool!

www.extremehash.com

thx to you , for good support
darlidada
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 723
Merit: 503


View Profile
June 20, 2014, 06:16:18 PM
 #7018



What else but Monero could be such a trouble to implement ? Tongue
darlidada
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 723
Merit: 503


View Profile
June 20, 2014, 06:20:10 PM
 #7019

Good news keep coming:

jwinterm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3136
Merit: 1116



View Profile
June 20, 2014, 06:30:56 PM
 #7020

Botnets shouldn't matter at all to a coin. They are just the same as "real" miners dumping coins. As long as there are reasons for the user base to grow and use the coin, then it doesn't matter the source of the mining at all. Unless you are a miner trying to compete with bots for short term profit of course.



CPU mined coins are subject to botnets by definition. However, this is not what you want for the coin you're mining or investing in. Large botnet share means that the majority of the coins is obtained by the scammers and is likely to be dumped. This can't be good for the long term development because the coins are spread not among the devs or users, but are obtained by botnet holders.

How much is the case for Monero? I really believe that not all of the spikes are due to botnets, but at least some of them could be.

Are botnets just those trading robots ?

botnets are groups of infected computers that can be remotely controlled, but this point is largely moot since gpu mining exists and will likely be refined/optimized in the near future.
Pages: « 1 ... 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 [351] 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 ... 2126 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!