Closed Thread

[Vega]

I have to agree with everyone, this second auction is very bad form. You should just increase the stakes.
This is not your first bad public relation blunder nor the second or third.
You seriously need to learn to stick with your original plan, even if it's not the most beneficial for you at the moment. In the long run it will be better for everyone.

I also hope someone from the community will pick up marketing and PR job for the coin after launch, because you really suck at this. No shame in it, there are very few people who can create a great coin, and very few who can successfully promote one. Those who are really good at both are almost nonexistent. So if you just great at coding, everything will be alright. Just find someone who is good at communicating.

[Simakki]

This is gettin out of hand! Auction after auction to just gather more btc to the devs ?

You had allready change the rules before, so maybe it is a time to listen the voice of the community and rather just  share the coins with current stakeholders !

[BLACKCOIN883]

really unprofessional behavior in here, seems like moneygrab after moneygrab from this team, trying to stretch out this whole ipo way too long.
I read the distribution list was going to be finalized and investors had the time to send their account info till the 27th, one of the first posts after this date is this team trying to sell more stakes from empty spots on the list..

thats not how this is supposed to work...look at everyone's reaction, this stuff just makes everyone all feel like you guys are stringing everyone along for months..its almost shameful how you're trying to squeeze more btc out of it..

[dadingsda]

Too much greed will kill the whole project    Hope you don´t do that!

[LemonAndFries]

here's an idea, use additional stakes for bounties and such. everyone is happy if you do this

[BLACKCOIN883]

dont they already have btc from ipo?

[dzarmush]

dont they already have btc from ipo?

1. From ipo
2. From Auction 1.1
3. From Auction 1.2, coz they sold much more stakes then announced
4. From selling 21 more stakes, I don't know where those came from

Although I have no problems with Auction 2.0, if people are willing to pay then why not.

But I don't see any reason to put puppets' stakes on NXT AE. It just doesn't make any sense at all. People saw NEM stakes and they want NODE stakes, but the situation it totally different.

[Touque]

I am worried about this project. Are you guys still working on the software? Do you have a alpha version yet?

Someone here reminded me of the storagecoin guy. He talked and sounded like Storagecoin guy. I have a very bad feeling now.

[JakeThePanda]

Here's an idea.  It's already becoming a fiasco.  Just let the member list stand.  If someone got away with a sock puppet than so be it. It's not worth ruining the reputation of the project over it.

[hypersire]

Here's an idea.  It's already becoming a fiasco.  Just let the member list stand.  If someone got away with a sock puppet than so be it. It's not worth ruining the reputation of the project over it.

I have to agree. If a legitimate user gets mistaken for being a sock puppet and then has their stake stripped from them (a stake which they paid for) only to have it then put on auction, well that could cause a lot more harm than the sock puppet would have in the first place!

[s11made]

Please don't make it look like you are desperate and need every single BTC you can get. (Even if it is the case!) Make the coin a success and it's a win win situation for everyone.
If you do a good job, you will have much more than you can get by selling a few more stacks.

[gentlemand]

Please don't make it look like you are desperate and need every single BTC you can get. (Even if it is the case!) Make the coin a success and it's a win win situation for everyone.
If you do a good job, you will have much more than you can get by selling a few more stacks.

Indeed.

It's not been the smoothest of rides so far. Every time the goalposts are moved you're eroding the trust and credibility of the project. That affects its future prospects badly.

[mellorbo]

i must agree with the above comments. this seems to be becoming a super long and extravagant IPO with the auctions e.t.c

it seems to me that the community are not happy with your latest decisions.

imho you should listen to US "the community" as without US "the community" you have no following for your coin therefore no votes for exchanges, no one to spread the word, no one to trade the coin. and it will be dumped all the way down to 0.00000001 like so many other failed coins. DON'T LET THIS HAPPEN HERE.

if you want this coin to succeed you NEED us happy.
So its in your interest to keep the community happy as things can turn sour for a coin very quickly and bad P.R can destroy your reputation in a day.

Just something for you to think about

[regtable69]

from what i think i saw in the list 1 /2 accounts as sockpuppets mashed into a block of 11 sold for 0.3btc to one person? or was that the pupeteer?? if not then someones just got 11x more than ipo inverters late on at a better price! which they will dump im sure and leave other ipo buyers struggling to return on investment atleast. i was going to hold on o my stake for a while but i see a sharp drop i am joining in]#

[Istanbul34]

Dev team.

I advice you listen to your community. Because they are your strength sso don't lose them.

[643399]

Dev team.

I advice you listen to your community. Because they are your strength sso don't lose them.

:)Agree with you
Hope that the development team to listen to good advice, destroy is very easy

[ownerbest]

Sent some test coins to several random accounts

[SillkRoad]

I do not understand what the dispute
1) We are looking suckputest all together. You are helping us.
2) We distribute coins (July 15)
3) Launch

All found suckputest community will block, after the launch we will decide with the community that we will do

a) Bounty
b) AE
and other variants

I think we should use suckputest for the benefit of the project

[dzarmush]

I do not understand what the dispute
1) We are looking suckputest all together. You are helping us.
2) We distribute coins (July 15)
3) Launch

All found suckputest community will block, after the launch we will decide with the community that we will do

Easy.

1. You or koop4u post a decision based on only god knows what.
2. People start criticizing it.
3. You keep silent.
4. People start freaking out.
5. Finally one of you post corrected decision.

It happens all the time.

[SillkRoad]

I do not understand what the dispute
1) We are looking suckputest all together. You are helping us.
2) We distribute coins (July 15)
3) Launch

All found suckputest community will block, after the launch we will decide with the community that we will do

Easy.

1. You or koop4u post a decision based on only god knows what.
2. People start criticizing it.
3. You keep silent.
4. People start freaking out.
5. Finally one of you post corrected decision.

It happens all the time.

Here offer different ideas, AE, distribution.
The decision was not any. Someone wants to AE. Someone wants to distribution, someone wants more

We listen to every opinion and discuss, someone does not like the idea and talk in a negative way