|
mellorbo
|
 |
August 17, 2014, 02:43:06 PM |
|
apart from NODE being a stripped down clone of NXT and originally called NXTL you mean?
Everyone knows they just recoded NXT in another language, yawn.
how do you know that? are you just speculating? they have not released any code that i am aware of so it can be new code or a copy of nxt. neither are a bad thing for node, nxt is a good platform but its mainly the services and uses which give a coin value. correct me if im wrong tho |
|
|
|
|
|
HunterMinerCrafter
|
|
August 17, 2014, 03:13:39 PM |
|
how do you know that? are you just speculating? they have not released any code that i am aware of so it can be new code or a copy of nxt. neither are a bad thing for node, nxt is a good platform but its mainly the services and uses which give a coin value. correct me if im wrong tho
The first version of the wallet shipped with "packed" but non-obfuscated code for the backend. I linked to the original code earlier in the thread, but here is the link again for reference: http://pastebin.com/a7JzU7kvThe new version was obfuscated using jscrambler, so it seems they spent additional time, effort, and $35 to $95 this week to try to better hide their source. To what end, I'm not sure. I didn't try much to reconstruct the obfuscated source. Given that we have the first version and there were likely not heavy code changes in-between it should still be relatively easy to get the version 2 source, but I probably will not bother. |
|
|
|
|
|
Simakki
|
|
August 17, 2014, 03:32:03 PM |
|
how do you know that? are you just speculating? they have not released any code that i am aware of so it can be new code or a copy of nxt. neither are a bad thing for node, nxt is a good platform but its mainly the services and uses which give a coin value. correct me if im wrong tho
The first version of the wallet shipped with "packed" but non-obfuscated code for the backend. I linked to the original code earlier in the thread, but here is the link again for reference: http://pastebin.com/a7JzU7kvThe new version was obfuscated using jscrambler, so it seems they spent additional time, effort, and $35 to $95 this week to try to better hide their source. To what end, I'm not sure. I didn't try much to reconstruct the obfuscated source. Given that we have the first version and there were likely not heavy code changes in-between it should still be relatively easy to get the version 2 source, but I probably will not bother. Was the code atleast decent or were there any suspicious parts ? I still do not know how to feel about this project. There are something odd in the PR, distribution and development. Do not see What's was the whole point launching NODE before working client, exchanges etc. Basically we have monetary system built up but no ways to use it. |
|
|
|
|
SillkRoad
|
|
August 17, 2014, 04:18:27 PM |
|
how do you know that? are you just speculating? they have not released any code that i am aware of so it can be new code or a copy of nxt. neither are a bad thing for node, nxt is a good platform but its mainly the services and uses which give a coin value. correct me if im wrong tho
The first version of the wallet shipped with "packed" but non-obfuscated code for the backend. I linked to the original code earlier in the thread, but here is the link again for reference: http://pastebin.com/a7JzU7kvThe new version was obfuscated using jscrambler, so it seems they spent additional time, effort, and $35 to $95 this week to try to better hide their source. To what end, I'm not sure. I didn't try much to reconstruct the obfuscated source. Given that we have the first version and there were likely not heavy code changes in-between it should still be relatively easy to get the version 2 source, but I probably will not bother. Was the code atleast decent or were there any suspicious parts ? I still do not know how to feel about this project. There are something odd in the PR, distribution and development. Do not see What's was the whole point launching NODE before working client, exchanges etc. Basically we have monetary system built up but no ways to use it. for security purposes, the source code will be published after beta testing |
|
|
|
|
|
mellorbo
|
|
August 17, 2014, 04:32:46 PM |
|
how do you know that? are you just speculating? they have not released any code that i am aware of so it can be new code or a copy of nxt. neither are a bad thing for node, nxt is a good platform but its mainly the services and uses which give a coin value. correct me if im wrong tho
The first version of the wallet shipped with "packed" but non-obfuscated code for the backend. I linked to the original code earlier in the thread, but here is the link again for reference: http://pastebin.com/a7JzU7kvThe new version was obfuscated using jscrambler, so it seems they spent additional time, effort, and $35 to $95 this week to try to better hide their source. To what end, I'm not sure. I didn't try much to reconstruct the obfuscated source. Given that we have the first version and there were likely not heavy code changes in-between it should still be relatively easy to get the version 2 source, but I probably will not bother. Was the code atleast decent or were there any suspicious parts ? I still do not know how to feel about this project. There are something odd in the PR, distribution and development. Do not see What's was the whole point launching NODE before working client, exchanges etc. Basically we have monetary system built up but no ways to use it. for security purposes, the source code will be published after beta testing so is that way of saying currently its insecure? because it sounds like it i agree with simakki all this should have been done way before launch not after or at least have a half decent working wallet. |
|
|
|
|
|
SillkRoad
|
|
August 17, 2014, 04:39:10 PM
Last edit: August 17, 2014, 04:59:26 PM by SillkRoad |
|
so is that way of saying currently its insecure? because it sounds like it
i agree with simakki all this should have been done way before launch not after or at least have a half decent working wallet.
Blockchain already formed, the only thing that we set up and test the network and data synchronization. We have already done today new changes in the code On the following days there is a new client update. You should understand that before the final version of the client will be new updates it will not affect Your accounts and coins I am referring to the safety of our project Have you seen something to NXT or other project once fully open code from the very beginning |
|
|
|
|
|
mellorbo
|
|
August 17, 2014, 04:58:29 PM |
|
so is that way of saying currently its insecure? because it sounds like it
i agree with simakki all this should have been done way before launch not after or at least have a half decent working wallet.
Blockchain already formed, the only thing that we set up and test the network and data synchronization. We have already done today new changes in the code On the following days there is a new client update I am referring to the safety of our project Have you seen something to NXT or other project once fully open code from the very beginning if its just the security of the project you was meaning thats fine, its understandable. at least for me it sounded like u was meaning security in the wallet. i must ask tho why has the client not been built up to at least a stable beta before the coins were distributed? a great proportion of other coins have released a functional client before they distributed the coins or at least a secure web client but we diddnt even get that. what was the reasoning behind choosing http over https to distribute NODE as imo it was a security risk to do so. |
|
|
|
|
|
SillkRoad
|
|
August 17, 2014, 05:11:54 PM |
|
if its just the security of the project you was meaning thats fine, its understandable.
at least for me it sounded like u was meaning security in the wallet.
i must ask tho why has the client not been built up to at least a stable beta before the coins were distributed? a great proportion of other coins have released a functional client before they distributed the coins or at least a secure web client but we diddnt even get that. what was the reasoning behind choosing http over https to distribute NODE as imo it was a security risk to do so.
Our beta test, everything was fine and the network worked After the release of the client we are faced with the problems of synchronization, we now debug and test with you I ask the community to be patient until we release the final customer |
|
|
|
|
|
tencentcoin
|
|
August 17, 2014, 05:52:05 PM |
|
would this coin become the exocoin v2?
only test test test and test ?
beta1 beta 1.02 and so on?
i wish we will get the final version soon , best wish to this coin
|
|
|
|
ifightformerkel
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 17, 2014, 07:48:58 PM |
|
i wish it too, is there a schedule when this coin will be 100% working?
So we can contact a exchange.
|
|
|
|
|
CoinHolder
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
August 17, 2014, 08:04:16 PM |
|
would this coin become the exocoin v2?
only test test test and test ?
beta1 beta 1.02 and so on?
i wish we will get the final version soon , best wish to this coin
Better to test it, than launch like Syscoin.  |
|
|
|
|
|
koop4u (OP)
|
|
August 17, 2014, 09:21:08 PM |
|
so is that way of saying currently its insecure? because it sounds like it
i agree with simakki all this should have been done way before launch not after or at least have a half decent working wallet.
Blockchain already formed, the only thing that we set up and test the network and data synchronization. We have already done today new changes in the code On the following days there is a new client update I am referring to the safety of our project Have you seen something to NXT or other project once fully open code from the very beginning if its just the security of the project you was meaning thats fine, its understandable. at least for me it sounded like u was meaning security in the wallet. i must ask tho why has the client not been built up to at least a stable beta before the coins were distributed? a great proportion of other coins have released a functional client before they distributed the coins or at least a secure web client but we diddnt even get that. what was the reasoning behind choosing http over https to distribute NODE as imo it was a security risk to do so. The security of the project! It is cool that people are trying to verify the code from the beginning, and we are looking forward to that, cause thanks to their help we might find goals to work on! But messing with the code in a vicious way, might harm! And also we are innovating, and pioneering with node.js! Which means that nobody did something that our team does, and this creates opportunities for plagiate (which is inevitable cause this is an open source project). And we would rather postpone it after the source release! After all our team deserves the credit, even if it will be taken away later. The client should had been released at the same time as the distribution ended, but we had a small miscommunication, and the release was delayed! And the http it is temporary, as we were just about to release the client. I think it will be added in the near future. |
|
|
|
|
mellorbo
|
|
August 17, 2014, 10:30:40 PM |
|
so is that way of saying currently its insecure? because it sounds like it
i agree with simakki all this should have been done way before launch not after or at least have a half decent working wallet.
Blockchain already formed, the only thing that we set up and test the network and data synchronization. We have already done today new changes in the code On the following days there is a new client update I am referring to the safety of our project Have you seen something to NXT or other project once fully open code from the very beginning if its just the security of the project you was meaning thats fine, its understandable. at least for me it sounded like u was meaning security in the wallet. i must ask tho why has the client not been built up to at least a stable beta before the coins were distributed? a great proportion of other coins have released a functional client before they distributed the coins or at least a secure web client but we diddnt even get that. what was the reasoning behind choosing http over https to distribute NODE as imo it was a security risk to do so. The security of the project! It is cool that people are trying to verify the code from the beginning, and we are looking forward to that, cause thanks to their help we might find goals to work on! But messing with the code in a vicious way, might harm! And also we are innovating, and pioneering with node.js! Which means that nobody did something that our team does, and this creates opportunities for plagiate (which is inevitable cause this is an open source project). And we would rather postpone it after the source release! After all our team deserves the credit, even if it will be taken away later. The client should had been released at the same time as the distribution ended, but we had a small miscommunication, and the release was delayed! And the http it is temporary, as we were just about to release the client. I think it will be added in the near future. thankyou for the update koop4u its greatly appreciated. i look forward to future development  |
|
|
|
|
cryptnutter
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
August 17, 2014, 11:00:54 PM |
|
Glad I got in on this one! Node.js is very popular with developers so I can see Node getting some good word of mouth advertising in dev circles.
|
|
|
|
Fernandez
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 18, 2014, 12:09:24 AM |
|
I was one of the first users who had signed up for this many months back. SInce then there has been some revisions, and the latest was I signed up again after receiving a PM from Grumand. How do I go about claiming my stake?
|
|
|
|
|
baby222
|
|
August 18, 2014, 12:22:42 AM |
|
I was one of the first users who had signed up for this many months back. SInce then there has been some revisions, and the latest was I signed up again after receiving a PM from Grumand. How do I go about claiming my stake?
maybe you can only get 20000coins now , because you late , see the memberlist there are about 200+later members |
|
|
|
|
Fernandez
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 18, 2014, 12:28:35 AM |
|
I was one of the first users who had signed up for this many months back. SInce then there has been some revisions, and the latest was I signed up again after receiving a PM from Grumand. How do I go about claiming my stake?
maybe you can only get 20000coins now , because you late , see the memberlist there are about 200+later members By the side of my name its written as 598894. Does this mean I get the full amount? What do I need to do now? This has been very confusing. |
|
|
|
|
LemonAndFries
|
|
August 18, 2014, 02:05:20 AM |
|
I was one of the first users who had signed up for this many months back. SInce then there has been some revisions, and the latest was I signed up again after receiving a PM from Grumand. How do I go about claiming my stake?
maybe you can only get 20000coins now , because you late , see the memberlist there are about 200+later members By the side of my name its written as 598894. Does this mean I get the full amount? What do I need to do now? This has been very confusing. log into your account from the client |
|
|
|
|
|
Warfare2020
|
|
August 18, 2014, 02:31:50 AM |
|
hope node will get better and better,strong community and good team!
|
|
|
|
|
koop4u (OP)
|
|
August 18, 2014, 05:56:50 AM |
|
I was one of the first users who had signed up for this many months back. SInce then there has been some revisions, and the latest was I signed up again after receiving a PM from Grumand. How do I go about claiming my stake?
The coins were distributed! You just have to log in to your node account! If you have any questions, let me know! |
|
|
|
|
