mellorbo
|
|
August 17, 2014, 12:08:48 PM |
|
agreed bter is just as good as dead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
Viper1
|
|
August 17, 2014, 12:18:56 PM |
|
agreed bter is just as good as dead. I'm curious. Poloniex was hacked in March. Why aren't they dead and why are people still using them? Mintpal was hacked as well wasn't it? So out of the remaining exchanges that NODE could get on, maybe Cryptsy or Bittrex (shit coin and pump and dump haven) could be used as most others seem to have no serious volume or simply wouldn't take a new coin.
|
BTC: 1F8yJqgjeFyX1SX6KJmqYtHiHXJA89ENNT LTC: LYAEPQeDDM7Y4jbUH2AwhBmkzThAGecNBV DOGE: DSUsCCdt98PcNgUkFHLDFdQXmPrQBEqXu9
|
|
|
shaman2000
|
|
August 17, 2014, 12:20:16 PM |
|
Hi there! Where I can download wallet?
|
|
|
|
mellorbo
|
|
August 17, 2014, 12:26:46 PM |
|
agreed bter is just as good as dead. I'm curious. Poloniex was hacked in March. Why aren't they dead and why are people still using them? Mintpal was hacked as well wasn't it? So out of the remaining exchanges that NODE could get on, maybe Cryptsy or Bittrex (shit coin and pump and dump haven) could be used as most others seem to have no serious volume or simply wouldn't take a new coin. IMO the amount that was stolen (approx $1.7million) from bter is too much to recover from. poloniex diddnt have anywhere near that amount to pay back so it was "easy" to return the funds. bter is going to have to pull some tricks out of the hat to fix this mess in the light of what has happened it just shows that there is an even greater need for a decentralized exchange
|
|
|
|
helloge
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1057
Merit: 1000
The Experience Layer of the Decentralized Internet
|
|
August 17, 2014, 12:29:03 PM |
|
agreed bter is just as good as dead. I'm curious. Poloniex was hacked in March. Why aren't they dead and why are people still using them? Mintpal was hacked as well wasn't it? So out of the remaining exchanges that NODE could get on, maybe Cryptsy or Bittrex (shit coin and pump and dump haven) could be used as most others seem to have no serious volume or simply wouldn't take a new coin. IMO, the best trade way now is in the btt forum via escrow.
|
|
|
|
zhinkk
|
|
August 17, 2014, 12:36:07 PM |
|
Could someone tell me about the algorithm "curve25519". I tried googling it but can't really find anything related to bitcoin/node. Like is it similar to scrypt?
|
|
|
|
patmast3r
|
|
August 17, 2014, 12:40:07 PM |
|
Could someone tell me about the algorithm "curve25519". I tried googling it but can't really find anything related to bitcoin/node. Like is it similar to scrypt?
Afaik curve25519 is what's used for keys (as in your priv- and pub-key). Scrypt is used for PoW which is something completely different.
|
|
|
|
TwinWinNerD
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1001
CEO Bitpanda.com
|
|
August 17, 2014, 12:42:07 PM |
|
Any updates? I want to trade NODE...
|
|
|
|
oldisoft
|
|
August 17, 2014, 12:45:18 PM |
|
Dgex was hacked as well and now is working, I think that Bter will work as well!
By the way- Bter has already returned 46 000 000 NXT back from hacker for 320 btc.
It seems that BTER will recover quickly!
|
|
|
|
cryptoknightt
|
|
August 17, 2014, 12:47:09 PM |
|
agreed bter is just as good as dead. I'm curious. Poloniex was hacked in March. Why aren't they dead and why are people still using them? Mintpal was hacked as well wasn't it? So out of the remaining exchanges that NODE could get on, maybe Cryptsy or Bittrex (shit coin and pump and dump haven) could be used as most others seem to have no serious volume or simply wouldn't take a new coin. IMO, the best trade way now is in the btt forum via escrow. The forum BUY / SELL Threadhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=727745.0Another Updatehttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740147.400Looks like the thief returned most of what he stole for 440 BTC which is a VERY good deal for Bter. They got out rather cheap. Looks like Bter will take a hit because people are aware of their lack of security and recklessness, but it looks like they will survive
|
|
|
|
oldisoft
|
|
August 17, 2014, 12:51:43 PM |
|
agreed bter is just as good as dead. I'm curious. Poloniex was hacked in March. Why aren't they dead and why are people still using them? Mintpal was hacked as well wasn't it? So out of the remaining exchanges that NODE could get on, maybe Cryptsy or Bittrex (shit coin and pump and dump haven) could be used as most others seem to have no serious volume or simply wouldn't take a new coin. nxt multigateway is the most sensible way forward in such a situation. taken from nem thread.. its the smartest and cheapest way forward.. (no trading fees bar transaction fees) the sooner NEM can be untied to NXT, the better..
what is happening with NXT right now is another good lesson to learn from.. well first of all the lesson is don't get hacked if you're an exchange and secondly, don't perform a rollback or hardfork for an exchange. it would just blemish the reputation of your coin, ala the great Vericoin bailout of '14.
This wasn't a fault of the coin though. It was the exchange. This is why it's important nem gets on a number of equally popular exchanges on release. One exchange monopolizing the volumes can go belly up if they make even a simple mistake. it is possible to set up and run our own multigateway for nxt WE so that people can trade with out worry of a central point of failure. All we need is for nem to support multisig and some to set up the servers then just 3 highly trusted people from nem to host the servers. I think after recent events it would be a very good idea to give people this option straight of the bat. Do you not have to worry about those servers getting hacked then though and someone siphoning off trades midstream? (disclaimer - I know noting) 3 people will be in control of a server each.. as long as you trust that the 3 members will not collude to steal the funds with in the servers then your coins are safe.. as far as i know, all three servers would need to be hacked simultaneously in order for someone to steal the coins.. its not entirely decentralized, but it is magnitudes safer than traditional exchanges... preferably you get people with a vested interest in the said currency/platform to be in control of the servers. for example in nxt, its going to be james, the owner of nxthaus (new nxt exchange in the making) and cant remember who else.. the reason these were chosen as the right people is because they all have a huge vested interested in not stealing the coins.. james has coded the damn thing and has a reputation to protect and is also heavily invested in nxt and multigateway assets and therefore has to protect the interests of the buyers of MGW asset. the owner of nxthaus would never mess with servers as he has a vested interest in being seen as trustworthy, cos if hes not, no one will use his new exchange. the same applies for the other guy ie. high vested interest or is very trustworthy already. you only have to trust that 2 of the 3 wont collude.. one malicious server maintainer cannot steal the funds alone.. he may be able to fek up multigateway so it stops working but funds cannot be stolen or accounts miscalculated. so even if one entity isnt trust worthy your coins are still safe.. if centralised exchanges used multigateway for their back end stuff, the odds of these hacks stealing millions would not be a concern any longer.. This is not so good idea, let's stop trading one coin through the another one coin NODE haven't any relation with nxtjust stop promotion nxt in every big coin thread, ok ? As well, I don't think that it is very good idea to trade NEM and of course NODE in nxt AE, cause it hurts NEM(and other coins) when nxt like ussualy has problem- OK?
|
|
|
|
mellorbo
|
|
August 17, 2014, 01:05:46 PM |
|
agreed ^^ i think node team will have something sorted in the near future
|
|
|
|
oldisoft
|
|
August 17, 2014, 01:08:32 PM |
|
Dear Kodtycoon, I just think that every Big coin deserve OWN path without any relation to another coin. with own mistake and so on! Or may be you think that NEM after distribution(I hope) in September will use again something from nxt? come on...
|
|
|
|
Deviant1
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
August 17, 2014, 01:10:35 PM |
|
NODE is off to a great start on its own, no need to mix NXT or NEM into the equation
|
|
|
|
HunterMinerCrafter
|
|
August 17, 2014, 01:13:06 PM |
|
Could someone tell me about the algorithm "curve25519". I tried googling it but can't really find anything related to bitcoin/node. Like is it similar to scrypt?
Afaik curve25519 is what's used for keys (as in your priv- and pub-key). Scrypt is used for PoW which is something completely different. Here is the complete contents of the "node-curve25519" module from the first version of the wallet: var crypto = require("crypto");
exports.sha256 = function(message) { var shasum = crypto.createHash('sha256'); shasum.update(message); return shasum.digest(); };
In the second version that module is not present but since they further obfuscated, and apparently aren't releasing source after all, we can't easily tell what they replaced it with.
|
|
|
|
Viper1
|
|
August 17, 2014, 01:36:16 PM |
|
IMO the amount that was stolen (approx $1.7million) from bter is too much to recover from. poloniex diddnt have anywhere near that amount to pay back so it was "easy" to return the funds. bter is going to have to pull some tricks out of the hat to fix this mess
in the light of what has happened it just shows that there is an even greater need for a decentralized exchange The hacker returned 42M of it now so it's not as much for them to recover from. Haven't looked at NXT, but I played around with the CounterParty exchange and frankly I don't see it going anywhere. To slow. Fees too much and of course there's not enough people using it. I was so frustrated I moved stuff out of it to a regular exchange and had my trade done in minutes. But I guess we'll see what happens.
|
BTC: 1F8yJqgjeFyX1SX6KJmqYtHiHXJA89ENNT LTC: LYAEPQeDDM7Y4jbUH2AwhBmkzThAGecNBV DOGE: DSUsCCdt98PcNgUkFHLDFdQXmPrQBEqXu9
|
|
|
mellorbo
|
|
August 17, 2014, 01:43:18 PM |
|
IMO the amount that was stolen (approx $1.7million) from bter is too much to recover from. poloniex diddnt have anywhere near that amount to pay back so it was "easy" to return the funds. bter is going to have to pull some tricks out of the hat to fix this mess
in the light of what has happened it just shows that there is an even greater need for a decentralized exchange The hacker returned 42M of it now so it's not as much for them to recover from. Haven't looked at NXT, but I played around with the CounterParty exchange and frankly I don't see it going anywhere. To slow. Fees too much and of course there's not enough people using it. I was so frustrated I moved stuff out of it to a regular exchange and had my trade done in minutes. But I guess we'll see what happens. yea i literally just read that, thats good news at least for bter and the people who lost their coins but i bet its still put a huge dent into there reputation
|
|
|
|
Coinr88
|
|
August 17, 2014, 02:01:44 PM |
|
agreed bter is just as good as dead. I'm curious. Poloniex was hacked in March. Why aren't they dead and why are people still using them? Mintpal was hacked as well wasn't it? So out of the remaining exchanges that NODE could get on, maybe Cryptsy or Bittrex (shit coin and pump and dump haven) could be used as most others seem to have no serious volume or simply wouldn't take a new coin. nxt multigateway is the most sensible way forward in such a situation. taken from nem thread.. its the smartest and cheapest way forward.. (no trading fees bar transaction fees) the sooner NEM can be untied to NXT, the better..
what is happening with NXT right now is another good lesson to learn from.. well first of all the lesson is don't get hacked if you're an exchange and secondly, don't perform a rollback or hardfork for an exchange. it would just blemish the reputation of your coin, ala the great Vericoin bailout of '14.
This wasn't a fault of the coin though. It was the exchange. This is why it's important nem gets on a number of equally popular exchanges on release. One exchange monopolizing the volumes can go belly up if they make even a simple mistake. it is possible to set up and run our own multigateway for nxt WE so that people can trade with out worry of a central point of failure. All we need is for nem to support multisig and some to set up the servers then just 3 highly trusted people from nem to host the servers. I think after recent events it would be a very good idea to give people this option straight of the bat. Do you not have to worry about those servers getting hacked then though and someone siphoning off trades midstream? (disclaimer - I know noting) 3 people will be in control of a server each.. as long as you trust that the 3 members will not collude to steal the funds with in the servers then your coins are safe.. as far as i know, all three servers would need to be hacked simultaneously in order for someone to steal the coins.. its not entirely decentralized, but it is magnitudes safer than traditional exchanges... preferably you get people with a vested interest in the said currency/platform to be in control of the servers. for example in nxt, its going to be james, the owner of nxthaus (new nxt exchange in the making) and cant remember who else.. the reason these were chosen as the right people is because they all have a huge vested interested in not stealing the coins.. james has coded the damn thing and has a reputation to protect and is also heavily invested in nxt and multigateway assets and therefore has to protect the interests of the buyers of MGW asset. the owner of nxthaus would never mess with servers as he has a vested interest in being seen as trustworthy, cos if hes not, no one will use his new exchange. the same applies for the other guy ie. high vested interest or is very trustworthy already. you only have to trust that 2 of the 3 wont collude.. one malicious server maintainer cannot steal the funds alone.. he may be able to fek up multigateway so it stops working but funds cannot be stolen or accounts miscalculated. so even if one entity isnt trust worthy your coins are still safe.. if centralised exchanges used multigateway for their back end stuff, the odds of these hacks stealing millions would not be a concern any longer.. This is not so good idea, let's stop trading one coin through the another one coin NODE haven't any relation with nxtjust stop promotion nxt in every big coin thread, ok ? As well, I don't think that it is very good idea to trade NEM and of course NODE in nxt AE, cause it hurts NEM(and other coins) when nxt like ussualy has problem- OK? Developers of any new coin should think of ways how to prevent such scenarios in the future. That's not just nxt promotion. We should consider every alternative to centralized exchanges.
|
|
|
|
zachamo
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 346
Merit: 251
There can be only one!
|
|
August 17, 2014, 02:30:21 PM |
|
Question: can the current client forge? I'm guessing not, as the pace of blocks is painfully slow. Yes the client does take a long time to load, especially initially, but even the NXT client can take forever to load up blocks / update the db (mine took hours last night), so I think folks are somewhat accustomed to it. Pretty good for a beta.. It would be nice if there was a built-in blockchain explorer (i.e. see transactions & balances of accounts) - at very least I should be able to clearly see my own history. Again, pretty solid for a beta. It's purdy too
|
4000 chars available and all I got was this stupid tagline.
|
|
|
rabbiter
|
|
August 17, 2014, 02:37:11 PM |
|
agreed bter is just as good as dead. I'm curious. Poloniex was hacked in March. Why aren't they dead and why are people still using them? Mintpal was hacked as well wasn't it? So out of the remaining exchanges that NODE could get on, maybe Cryptsy or Bittrex (shit coin and pump and dump haven) could be used as most others seem to have no serious volume or simply wouldn't take a new coin. nxt multigateway is the most sensible way forward in such a situation. taken from nem thread.. its the smartest and cheapest way forward.. (no trading fees bar transaction fees) the sooner NEM can be untied to NXT, the better..
what is happening with NXT right now is another good lesson to learn from.. well first of all the lesson is don't get hacked if you're an exchange and secondly, don't perform a rollback or hardfork for an exchange. it would just blemish the reputation of your coin, ala the great Vericoin bailout of '14.
This wasn't a fault of the coin though. It was the exchange. This is why it's important nem gets on a number of equally popular exchanges on release. One exchange monopolizing the volumes can go belly up if they make even a simple mistake. it is possible to set up and run our own multigateway for nxt WE so that people can trade with out worry of a central point of failure. All we need is for nem to support multisig and some to set up the servers then just 3 highly trusted people from nem to host the servers. I think after recent events it would be a very good idea to give people this option straight of the bat. Do you not have to worry about those servers getting hacked then though and someone siphoning off trades midstream? (disclaimer - I know noting) 3 people will be in control of a server each.. as long as you trust that the 3 members will not collude to steal the funds with in the servers then your coins are safe.. as far as i know, all three servers would need to be hacked simultaneously in order for someone to steal the coins.. its not entirely decentralized, but it is magnitudes safer than traditional exchanges... preferably you get people with a vested interest in the said currency/platform to be in control of the servers. for example in nxt, its going to be james, the owner of nxthaus (new nxt exchange in the making) and cant remember who else.. the reason these were chosen as the right people is because they all have a huge vested interested in not stealing the coins.. james has coded the damn thing and has a reputation to protect and is also heavily invested in nxt and multigateway assets and therefore has to protect the interests of the buyers of MGW asset. the owner of nxthaus would never mess with servers as he has a vested interest in being seen as trustworthy, cos if hes not, no one will use his new exchange. the same applies for the other guy ie. high vested interest or is very trustworthy already. you only have to trust that 2 of the 3 wont collude.. one malicious server maintainer cannot steal the funds alone.. he may be able to fek up multigateway so it stops working but funds cannot be stolen or accounts miscalculated. so even if one entity isnt trust worthy your coins are still safe.. if centralised exchanges used multigateway for their back end stuff, the odds of these hacks stealing millions would not be a concern any longer.. This is not so good idea, let's stop trading one coin through the another one coin NODE haven't any relation with nxtjust stop promotion nxt in every big coin thread, ok ? As well, I don't think that it is very good idea to trade NEM and of course NODE in nxt AE, cause it hurts NEM(and other coins) when nxt like ussualy has problem- OK? apart from NODE being a stripped down clone of NXT and originally called NXTL you mean? Everyone knows they just recoded NXT in another language, yawn.
|
|
|
|
|