Closed Thread

[Istanbul34]

l8orre,

We had the idea to take patronage on the "NODE" thread on nxtforum, but unfortunately there are too many restrictions - I can't even to attach pics
(UPD: Looks like I was finally granted the right to insert pictures   )
Nevertheless, we are ready to answer any questions at the thread when it occur  

Actually I think that any information platform is good, including nstforum, reddit, own forum or big media.
But honestly serious marketing at present stage only will prevent a development, we are not yet ready for the spotlight.
What sense to inflate another little empty public bubble if we want to make a global system of cooperation which will change the nature of financial interaction

You just have to make a few posts.

This is just a precaution to block spammers.

[1714169225]

1714169225

[TonyVice54]

Bter is not safe really need another exchange

why not safe for bter?
which one you suggest?

I haven't had a problem with bter

[BlackMarket]

when marketing and OP will update ?
koop said will update at 1 or 2 month ago, but still not update until now

[bitdraw]

Bter is not safe really need another exchange

why not safe for bter?
which one you suggest?

I haven't had a problem with bter

im using bter for over a year now and never had any problems.

[helloge]

Bter is not safe really need another exchange

why not safe for bter?
which one you suggest?

Good choice of bittrex.

bittrex and bter are both OK, imo.

[rlh]

Yes, well, i have had negative experiences and they've been hacked.  Any time there is a major hack, that's a BIG issue for everyone, even if it hasn't effected your personal wallet.

Also, as it has been said, there is a 1% withdrawal fee.  I understand that they need to take a percent for fees on the block chain.  I'm OK with that (even though that could be avoidable with the proper business model) but 1% is quite a deterant.  Regardless, you should never have saily withdrawal limits.  This may not seem like an issue for the small time traders, but for many of us, we'd rather not take 5+ days to move our money.  They either have the money, or don't.  Let it be accessible.

Also, don't think this is about security.  In my strong opinion, if you want to protect yourself, and your users, just setup a system to monitor withdrawals.  If an account behaves a certain way, flag it for manual withdrawal verification.  If you monitor for suspicious behavior, you don't have to lock in funds but can place the withdrawals on hold until the usecase can be validated as legit.

[TheRealSilk]

@update
We have fixed the bug, but the update will be released next week
Due to the fact that most of us are leaving today for houses in the new year's eve
we will not be able to test and monitor clients these days, if we release a new client that bter should be updated and we need to debug it work because old clients will not work.

[3x2]

@update
We have fixed the bug, but the update will be released next week
Due to the fact that most of us are leaving today for houses in the new year's eve
we will not be able to test and monitor clients these days, if we release a new client that bter should be updated and we need to debug it work because old clients will not work.

No Problem, Happy New Year 

[TheRealSilk]

@update
We have fixed the bug, but the update will be released next week
Due to the fact that most of us are leaving today for houses in the new year's eve
we will not be able to test and monitor clients these days, if we release a new client that bter should be updated and we need to debug it work because old clients will not work.

No Problem, Happy New Year 

Thank you !!! 
You and the entire community a happy new year

[helloge]

@update
We have fixed the bug, but the update will be released next week
Due to the fact that most of us are leaving today for houses in the new year's eve
we will not be able to test and monitor clients these days, if we release a new client that bter should be updated and we need to debug it work because old clients will not work.

no worry , take it easy,
happy new year.

[kevinkk525]

Yes, well, i have had negative experiences and they've been hacked.  Any time there is a major hack, that's a BIG issue for everyone, even if it hasn't effected your personal wallet.

Also, as it has been said, there is a 1% withdrawal fee.  I understand that they need to take a percent for fees on the block chain.  I'm OK with that (even though that could be avoidable with the proper business model) but 1% is quite a deterant.  Regardless, you should never have saily withdrawal limits.  This may not seem like an issue for the small time traders, but for many of us, we'd rather not take 5+ days to move our money.  They either have the money, or don't.  Let it be accessible.

Also, don't think this is about security.  In my strong opinion, if you want to protect yourself, and your users, just setup a system to monitor withdrawals.  If an account behaves a certain way, flag it for manual withdrawal verification.  If you monitor for suspicious behavior, you don't have to lock in funds but can place the withdrawals on hold until the usecase can be validated as legit.

Personally I always calculate with the possibility of an exchange being hacked and my coins being stolen. No big exchange is safe from hackers. We should all know that by now and calculate with that possibility.
What really would be great is an exchange that has no central wallets that can be hacked. Some kind of exchange on the basis of a coin technic. A decentralized system with a blockchain (or tradechain) where a trade is only executed after enough clients confirmed it. I know that is not really possible as still only one client has to do the transaction in the Node or Bitcoin Blockchain and this client is then a weak point in the system. But maybe that could work although every user would have to have its wallets (Node, BTC, ...) open so that the exchange client can execute a trade.. hmm..
sorry I thought too much while i was writing

[rlh]

Research cross-chain atomic transactions.  It's tech that is being developed but you might be pleasantly surprised.

[kevinkk525]

Research cross-chain atomic transactions.  It's tech that is being developed but you might be pleasantly surprised.

Thanks a lot!
Quite interesting. Will change the landscape of cryptocurrency when this is implemented in the networks.

[Hueristic]

Bter is not safe really need another exchange

why not safe for bter?
which one you suggest?

I haven't had a problem with bter

So says the 2 post newb.

[GreenDude]

Bter is not safe really need another exchange

why not safe for bter?
which one you suggest?

I haven't had a problem with bter

So says the 2 post newb.

I've been long time around crypto world before doing my first post on btt.There are lots of people who just like to read and gather info without being noticed or posting around.

[LemonAndFries]

NODE 120,000 Giveaway Update:

2,000 NODE were sent out today to those who wanted to participate.

500 extra NODE went to a participant who added their own style of signature to footer.

115,500 - 2,500 = 113,000 NODE left to giveaway!

[Hueristic]

Bter is not safe really need another exchange

why not safe for bter?
which one you suggest?

I haven't had a problem with bter

So says the 2 post newb.

I've been long time around crypto world before doing my first post on btt.There are lots of people who just like to read and gather info without being noticed or posting around.

If he wasn't a noob he wouldn't have said that.

[coinzcoinzcoinz]

Was going to buy a large amount of Node due to low prices, then I came to this thread to check out the buzz first and I notice title:

"[AИN] NODE - 2nd Gen. CryptoCurrency build from SCRATCH on NODE.JS - NEW CODE!"

I aborted investment as "build" should be "built". I cannot stand amateurs who cannot get the details right. It seems nitpicky, but it is a very bad sign for a big investor. If the thread title is not perfect, then what does that say about the code?

Hopefully this feedback will help you in some kind of way. Good luck with your project.

[Hueristic]

Was going to buy a large amount of Node due to low prices, then I came to this thread to check out the buzz first and I notice title:

"[AИN] NODE - 2nd Gen. CryptoCurrency build from SCRATCH on NODE.JS - NEW CODE!"

I aborted investment as "build" should be "built". I cannot stand amateurs who cannot get the details right. It seems nitpicky, but it is a very bad sign for a big investor. If the thread title is not perfect, then what does that say about the code?

Hopefully this feedback will help you in some kind of way. Good luck with your project.

It says the coders are Chinese and don't waste the effort on translations that they should. But they are very competent programmers.

[LemonAndFries]

Was going to buy a large amount of Node due to low prices, then I came to this thread to check out the buzz first and I notice title:

"[AИN] NODE - 2nd Gen. CryptoCurrency build from SCRATCH on NODE.JS - NEW CODE!"

I aborted investment as "build" should be "built". I cannot stand amateurs who cannot get the details right. It seems nitpicky, but it is a very bad sign for a big investor. If the thread title is not perfect, then what does that say about the code?

Hopefully this feedback will help you in some kind of way. Good luck with your project.

lol, seriously?

Have you not noticed that the crypto coin projects are being developed by people from all over the world?  For a lot of them, english is not their first language.

edit: actually the post seems like a weak attempt at fud