[ANN][XC] >> Mandatory Update to new Wallet - The first POS X11 anonymous wallet

[provenceday]

Is anything being done for development so far? webstie, multipool, Im, just going to go and sit on Twitter.

Yes new website is in the works

looking for multipool ==== bounty

dev, he will add XC coin payment.

let's do this!

[blade87]

We need a XC multipool to let miner still can mine XC coin when pow ends!

let's do this guys!

Agreed anyone who has the technical experience to do this please contact me.

http://www.cryptoalts.com/

Ask Blade to add you guys!

I could put up XC mining support pretty quickly. If you guys would be interested, let me know.

[Teka]

We need a XC multipool to let miner still can mine XC coin when pow ends!

let's do this guys!

Agreed anyone who has the technical experience to do this please contact me.

http://www.cryptoalts.com/

Ask Blade to add you guys!

I could put up XC mining support pretty quickly. If you guys would be interested, let me know.

Yeah we would.

[brother3]

I woke up with a smile today lads. Cool stuff on that staking Ill be doing that in the future after im done trading for a few months :p

I set out a bounty for a logo and videos for this coin on other forums that im quite popular. Blackhat, WarriorForum, TheMisc.

Keep up the work and i cannot wait for this price to rise.

That's good... I was actually worried about you yesterday! 

[wartywarlock]

We need a XC multipool to let miner still can mine XC coin when pow ends!

let's do this guys!

Agreed anyone who has the technical experience to do this please contact me.

http://www.cryptoalts.com/

Ask Blade to add you guys!

I could put up XC mining support pretty quickly. If you guys would be interested, let me know.

I for one will jump straight on the first x11 multi available after POW ends. granted I only have ~15mhs but I'll mine away

[provenceday]

We need a XC multipool to let miner still can mine XC coin when pow ends!

let's do this guys!

Agreed anyone who has the technical experience to do this please contact me.

http://www.cryptoalts.com/

Ask Blade to add you guys!

I could put up XC mining support pretty quickly. If you guys would be interested, let me know.

do this. we need this.

[JesstersDead]

Man, take off for a handful of days and this thread has exploded. Had to cut my trip short to get back home and re-target the mining farm due to the adjustment in PoW block height.

DEV, you're killing it man. Just killing it. Very fine job thus far.

@Teka - Awesome choice for a Com Manager imho.

In regards to the name... I personally still see no problem with just XC. A lot of major brands are known by their acronym much more so than their actual name.

Excited to see where this goes. BlockChain 2.0 has a lot of people on the edge of their seats, in and of itself. The xnode implementation just puts XC that much further ahead of the curve in it's design aspects. Even though I am a miner, I am happy with the adjustments. ASIC, FPGA, or otherwise, PoW needed to be handled. Glad to see it was done so in an expedited fashion. Starting to feel like I did when LTC was launched! Only even more excited...

[tbearhere]

 suprnova  thanks for shutting down my rented rigs

Always add workers BEFORE you rent the rigs - otherwise they'll automatically get temporary banned

 damn i added them two days ago and now he cant mine there 5 coins and nothing but bs

I already mailed you that the was problems with the rigs you rented as they connected with no username, you replied with "fu" and "bye" - don't blame me for your rigs, i've tried anything for you to help !

sorry it wasn't your fault suprnova. I apologize. thank you.  

[JesstersDead]

We need a XC multipool to let miner still can mine XC coin when pow ends!

let's do this guys!

Agreed anyone who has the technical experience to do this please contact me.

http://www.cryptoalts.com/

Ask Blade to add you guys!

I could put up XC mining support pretty quickly. If you guys would be interested, let me know.

+1 just about to retarget my farm once PoW closes.

[provenceday]

Biggest chinese Multipool need Bonus

i know a guy who run the biggest chinese Multipool,i am contact with him now,

i am trying to convince him to set a Multipool for XC coin！

how many bonus do we have for a big Multipool?

thanks


here is the two biggest multipool in china which both runned by that guy, you can check this

1 http://x11.ltc1btc.com/  more than 80G X11 hashpow

2 http://www.ltc1btc.com/ more than 25G scrypt hashpow

[Teka]

Man, take off for a handful of days and this thread has exploded. Had to cut my trip short to get back home and re-target the mining farm due to the adjustment in PoW block height.

DEV, you're killing it man. Just killing it. Very fine job thus far.

@Teka - Awesome choice for a Com Manager imho.

In regards to the name... I personally still see no problem with just XC. A lot of major brands are known by their acronym much more so than their actual name.

Excited to see where this goes. BlockChain 2.0 has a lot of people on the edge of their seats, in and of itself. The xnode implementation just puts XC that much further ahead of the curve in it's design aspects. Even though I am a miner, I am happy with the adjustments. ASIC, FPGA, or otherwise, PoW needed to be handled. Glad to see it was done so in an expedited fashion. Starting to feel like I did when LTC was launched! Only even more excited...

Thank You, for sticking with us and the awesome choice award.

[battbot]

Man, take off for a handful of days and this thread has exploded. Had to cut my trip short to get back home and re-target the mining farm due to the adjustment in PoW block height.

DEV, you're killing it man. Just killing it. Very fine job thus far.

@Teka - Awesome choice for a Com Manager imho.

In regards to the name... I personally still see no problem with just XC. A lot of major brands are known by their acronym much more so than their actual name.

Excited to see where this goes. BlockChain 2.0 has a lot of people on the edge of their seats, in and of itself. The xnode implementation just puts XC that much further ahead of the curve in it's design aspects. Even though I am a miner, I am happy with the adjustments. ASIC, FPGA, or otherwise, PoW needed to be handled. Glad to see it was done so in an expedited fashion. Starting to feel like I did when LTC was launched! Only even more excited...

Dev, as many new members are entering the community, I think now would be a good time to state clearly answers to the following questions:

1) How is XC's anonymous transfer superior to DRK's?
2) How are Xnodes superior to DRK's masternodes?
3) How soon can we expect Xnode implementation into the wallets?
4) Can you explain how this will all relate to your "block chain 2.0" project?

Also, I think it would be a good idea to add answers to these questions (but maybe without the DRK comparisons, your call) in the OP so new people don't have to keep filtering through the many pages.  This will help people more readily see why XC is currently the most undervalued, yet attractive altcoin on the market.  Thanks

+1 to all of this.  And I agree -- I think it would be a good idea to organize this information for people to see in the OP.

[provenceday]

Biggest chinese Multipool need Bonus

i know a guy who run the biggest chinese Multipool,i am contact with him now,

i am trying to convince him to set a Multipool for XC coin！

how many bonus do we have for a big Multipool?

thanks


here is the two biggest multipool in china which both runned by that guy, you can check this

1 http://x11.ltc1btc.com/  more than 80G X11 hashpow

2 http://www.ltc1btc.com/ more than 25G scrypt hashpow

？

[fedmahnkassad]

Seams like after missing the DRK train, Bryce also missed the XC train. What a dick:

Bryce Weiner ‏@BryceWeiner 26s

X11Coin premine info removed from ANN thread. Trade wisely.

[bitcad4u]

Man, take off for a handful of days and this thread has exploded. Had to cut my trip short to get back home and re-target the mining farm due to the adjustment in PoW block height.

DEV, you're killing it man. Just killing it. Very fine job thus far.

@Teka - Awesome choice for a Com Manager imho.

In regards to the name... I personally still see no problem with just XC. A lot of major brands are known by their acronym much more so than their actual name.

Excited to see where this goes. BlockChain 2.0 has a lot of people on the edge of their seats, in and of itself. The xnode implementation just puts XC that much further ahead of the curve in it's design aspects. Even though I am a miner, I am happy with the adjustments. ASIC, FPGA, or otherwise, PoW needed to be handled. Glad to see it was done so in an expedited fashion. Starting to feel like I did when LTC was launched! Only even more excited...

Dev, as many new members are entering the community, I think now would be a good time to state clearly answers to the following questions:

1) How is XC's anonymous transfer superior to DRK's?
2) How are Xnodes superior to DRK's masternodes?
3) How soon can we expect Xnode implementation into the wallets?
4) Can you explain how this will all relate to your "block chain 2.0" project?

Also, I think it would be a good idea to add answers to these questions (but maybe without the DRK comparisons, your call) in the OP so new people don't have to keep filtering through the many pages.  This will help people more readily see why XC is currently the most undervalued, yet attractive altcoin on the market.  Thanks

+1 to all of this.  And I agree -- I think it would be a good idea to organize this information for people to see in the OP.

Some words from Dev:

I wanted to provide some more answers about the decentralized anonymous solution and how it will work
100XC to 1000XC's Required (#'s still being vetted)
Any client having the required XC's can enable xnode option (windows, mac & linux wallets)
xnodes will charge a fee which will be deducted from the transaction and kept in the local wallet << incentive based >>
no masternode or supernode required to communicate xnodes to clients
fully decentralized
Hope that answers all the questions, the majority of the code is already in the wallet and I expect a release supporting these features as outlined above to be available for testing in 3 weeks or less

[ottobene]

New wallet (win 7 64bit) works fine, thanks!

[wartywarlock]

While we wait, what program do you think ATC was talking about that still runs? My money is one of the p2p protocols like Kazzaa or emule. I dunno, I just got a feeling. Would love to know!

[flipboxx]

New Wallet for Mac is fine also - but old GUI   No ...I won't complain, glad to have - cosmetics can come later!

[bitcad4u]

Man, take off for a handful of days and this thread has exploded. Had to cut my trip short to get back home and re-target the mining farm due to the adjustment in PoW block height.

DEV, you're killing it man. Just killing it. Very fine job thus far.

@Teka - Awesome choice for a Com Manager imho.

In regards to the name... I personally still see no problem with just XC. A lot of major brands are known by their acronym much more so than their actual name.

Excited to see where this goes. BlockChain 2.0 has a lot of people on the edge of their seats, in and of itself. The xnode implementation just puts XC that much further ahead of the curve in it's design aspects. Even though I am a miner, I am happy with the adjustments. ASIC, FPGA, or otherwise, PoW needed to be handled. Glad to see it was done so in an expedited fashion. Starting to feel like I did when LTC was launched! Only even more excited...

Dev, as many new members are entering the community, I think now would be a good time to state clearly answers to the following questions:

1) How is XC's anonymous transfer superior to DRK's?
2) How are Xnodes superior to DRK's masternodes?
3) How soon can we expect Xnode implementation into the wallets?
4) Can you explain how this will all relate to your "block chain 2.0" project?

Also, I think it would be a good idea to add answers to these questions (but maybe without the DRK comparisons, your call) in the OP so new people don't have to keep filtering through the many pages.  This will help people more readily see why XC is currently the most undervalued, yet attractive altcoin on the market.  Thanks

+1 to all of this.  And I agree -- I think it would be a good idea to organize this information for people to see in the OP.

Some words from Dev:

I wanted to provide some more answers about the decentralized anonymous solution and how it will work
100XC to 1000XC's Required (#'s still being vetted)
Any client having the required XC's can enable xnode option (windows, mac & linux wallets)
xnodes will charge a fee which will be deducted from the transaction and kept in the local wallet << incentive based >>
no masternode or supernode required to communicate xnodes to clients
fully decentralized
Hope that answers all the questions, the majority of the code is already in the wallet and I expect a release supporting these features as outlined above to be available for testing in 3 weeks or less

http://imgur.com/YhU6uNz  <- network flow

[xamido]

Seams like after missing the DRK train, Bryce also missed the XC train. What a dick:

Bryce Weiner ‏@BryceWeiner 26s

X11Coin premine info removed from ANN thread. Trade wisely.

Dev, please put the premine info back to the thread. People will trust this coin more if you put it back.

* bryce is still a douche though.