apee
|
|
June 09, 2014, 05:07:35 PM Last edit: June 09, 2014, 06:49:20 PM by apee |
|
I paid $1615 for Batch 1 on May 22. I'm assuming the package is on it's way to me, but I have no idea when it will arrive. SF-express tracking just says it's in transit in Los Angeles.
The unit shipped on June 4th.
I would like some form of compensation before Batch 2 starts shipping.
Me too! Wow thats fuken fast! Edit: Never mind, I noticed other people are getting things faster. 1 week and half is a bit too much.
|
|
|
|
davecoin
|
|
June 09, 2014, 06:53:35 PM |
|
The problem isn't even so much the price drop, it's the fact that shipping was guaranteed by May 31st and that clearly didn't happen. Simon / HASHRA; is the shipping date still may 31st? And is that guaranteed?
YEP. As stated on our site if we do not ship out by 31st everyone gets offered a full refund. Simon, please send me an email or pm regarding this issue.
|
|
|
|
jjj0923
|
|
June 09, 2014, 07:25:29 PM |
|
As an early supporter of Hashra - I for one feel us early supporters who paid in full up front to help fund the development of these systems are owed something.
We have been slapped in the face with late delivery and then we come to find out that a mere 7 days from now the same units that we paid a lot of money for are now available for at least 25% less than we paid.
It's a real insult to me and others - I know they have sent me PM's and there are a lot of unhappy people.
Is this what we get for helping Hasra get started?
I was probably the first person to get the unit in the U.S. and I just got it two days ago and wowee - I get a whole 9 day advantage in terms of mining over people who did not have faith in Hashra?
I won't make in 9 days what I could have saved - that's for sure.
In my humble opinion there would be no Hashra miners even available for sale had he not stepped up to the plate and placed our orders
it's insulting to be treated this way.
One very disgruntled customer
Was yours also shipped on the 4th of June? That alone is reason for compensation. Dave - I ordered two and the first was received on June 5 and the second on June 6. My the shipping documents mine were shipped on Sat - May 31st. I am just asking for some 'consideration' in some form for being an original 'investor' in Hashra and making it possible for these machines to even exist.
|
|
|
|
anarchoatheist
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
June 09, 2014, 10:43:15 PM |
|
I just received my "lunar launcher". I hooked it up and it's been running for about 15 min now on clevermining. Miner is only hashing at around 11.40 mhs, 9 hardware errors and around 13% rejects. This is not good.
|
|
|
|
jjj0923
|
|
June 09, 2014, 10:45:57 PM |
|
I just received my "lunar launcher". I hooked it up and it's been running for about 15 min now on clevermining. Miner is only hashing at around 11.40 mhs, 9 hardware errors and around 13% rejects. This is not good.
give it some time - for some reason they're slow to start and often take 15 to 20 minutes to get going. can you check clevermining to see what they're reporting hashing wise?
|
|
|
|
anarchoatheist
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
June 09, 2014, 10:54:03 PM |
|
I just received my "lunar launcher". I hooked it up and it's been running for about 15 min now on clevermining. Miner is only hashing at around 11.40 mhs, 9 hardware errors and around 13% rejects. This is not good.
give it some time - for some reason they're slow to start and often take 15 to 20 minutes to get going. can you check clevermining to see what they're reporting hashing wise? The HASHRA controls crashed and I had to restart my r-pi. Though now it seems to be doing better. 14.34 MHS average. 4 hw errors and 6.19% reject. Oh also on a side note, I can also confirm that the power cable that came with the r-pi didn't work. I had to use a different cable plugger into wall socket. You also had this problem, correct?
|
|
|
|
jjj0923
|
|
June 09, 2014, 11:05:25 PM |
|
I just received my "lunar launcher". I hooked it up and it's been running for about 15 min now on clevermining. Miner is only hashing at around 11.40 mhs, 9 hardware errors and around 13% rejects. This is not good.
give it some time - for some reason they're slow to start and often take 15 to 20 minutes to get going. can you check clevermining to see what they're reporting hashing wise? The HASHRA controls crashed and I had to restart my r-pi. Though now it seems to be doing better. 14.34 MHS average. 4 hw errors and 6.19% reject. Oh also on a side note, I can also confirm that the power cable that came with the r-pi didn't work. I had to use a different cable plugger into wall socket. You also had this problem, correct? yes and so have others - fortunately the Pi used the same power connector as most droid phones which is what I had to use for the 2nd hashra box I got - I also found out the ethernet cables that come with the units are usleless - would not work at all. ps: if you have ssh - ssh to the pi with username/password: pi/controla and then "tail f- /var/log/syslog' if you really want to keep an eye on things. I do
|
|
|
|
anarchoatheist
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
June 09, 2014, 11:21:23 PM |
|
If I purchased another lunar launcher, could I run it off of the same r-pi as the other lunar launcher? Can I run it off of the spare USB port on the pi or do I need powered hub? Will contrala software recognize another launcher?
|
|
|
|
|
davecoin
|
|
June 09, 2014, 11:46:14 PM |
|
Finally got my unit today.
501 watts on an EVGA gold PSU.
It is indeed hashing over 14mh/s, but I can't achieve that poolside.
What diff setting are you guys using?
Will lowering the clock speed reduce HW errors? Mine is about 6% HW errors after a half an hour.
|
|
|
|
iikun
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1062
Merit: 1003
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:40:22 AM |
|
Finally got my unit today.
501 watts on an EVGA gold PSU.
It is indeed hashing over 14mh/s, but I can't achieve that poolside.
What diff setting are you guys using?
Will lowering the clock speed reduce HW errors? Mine is about 6% HW errors after a half an hour.
I get about 2-3% rejects and 8-10%HW errors. Sometimes the rejects will go up to 10% as well but resetting the miner seems to fix it ok. I find the controla reported hash wildly in accurate btw. I've had it reporting 3.5Mhs before for about 5 hours while my pool said it was averaging 13 or so. Has anyone else had trouble with coinotron btw? I can't hash higher than 5Mhs there, wondering if it's to do with the difficulty setting of the shares they allocate etc.
|
|
|
|
armin22
|
|
June 10, 2014, 06:30:17 AM |
|
I guess all these miner are, are just good looking boxes of crap that wasted a lot of peoples money. Shame, saw some potential of a potentially game-changing company and miner. My heart goes out to all the people who bough early and got thrown under the bus.
|
|
|
|
maxzilla
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
June 10, 2014, 07:36:11 AM |
|
Finally got my unit today.
501 watts on an EVGA gold PSU.
It is indeed hashing over 14mh/s, but I can't achieve that poolside.
What diff setting are you guys using?
Will lowering the clock speed reduce HW errors? Mine is about 6% HW errors after a half an hour.
I get about 2-3% rejects and 8-10%HW errors. Sometimes the rejects will go up to 10% as well but resetting the miner seems to fix it ok. I find the controla reported hash wildly in accurate btw. I've had it reporting 3.5Mhs before for about 5 hours while my pool said it was averaging 13 or so. Has anyone else had trouble with coinotron btw? I can't hash higher than 5Mhs there, wondering if it's to do with the difficulty setting of the shares they allocate etc. The HW errors are normal for these chips btw. ASICS are inherently less stable then GPU's when scrypt mining.
|
|
|
|
iikun
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1062
Merit: 1003
|
|
June 10, 2014, 10:16:18 AM |
|
Finally got my unit today.
501 watts on an EVGA gold PSU.
It is indeed hashing over 14mh/s, but I can't achieve that poolside.
What diff setting are you guys using?
Will lowering the clock speed reduce HW errors? Mine is about 6% HW errors after a half an hour.
I get about 2-3% rejects and 8-10%HW errors. Sometimes the rejects will go up to 10% as well but resetting the miner seems to fix it ok. I find the controla reported hash wildly in accurate btw. I've had it reporting 3.5Mhs before for about 5 hours while my pool said it was averaging 13 or so. Has anyone else had trouble with coinotron btw? I can't hash higher than 5Mhs there, wondering if it's to do with the difficulty setting of the shares they allocate etc. The HW errors are normal for these chips btw. ASICS are inherently less stable then GPU's when scrypt mining. Oh ok, wasn't aware of that. My only experience with ASICs was with gridseeds, which had very few HW errors in my case. I'll stop bothering to try and reduce them then.
|
|
|
|
jjj0923
|
|
June 10, 2014, 10:24:21 AM |
|
I guess all these miner are, are just good looking boxes of crap that wasted a lot of peoples money. Shame, saw some potential of a potentially game-changing company and miner. My heart goes out to all the people who bough early and got thrown under the bus.
|
|
|
|
|
geetash
|
|
June 10, 2014, 11:06:53 AM |
|
Finally got my unit today.
501 watts on an EVGA gold PSU.
It is indeed hashing over 14mh/s, but I can't achieve that poolside.
What diff setting are you guys using?
Will lowering the clock speed reduce HW errors? Mine is about 6% HW errors after a half an hour.
dont you think 2 oced gridseed blades will do the same rate with less power and h/w errors for the same price.
|
|
|
|
jjj0923
|
|
June 10, 2014, 11:27:19 AM |
|
Finally got my unit today.
501 watts on an EVGA gold PSU.
It is indeed hashing over 14mh/s, but I can't achieve that poolside.
What diff setting are you guys using?
Will lowering the clock speed reduce HW errors? Mine is about 6% HW errors after a half an hour.
dont you think 2 oced gridseed blades will do the same rate with less power and h/w errors for the same price. hmmm... what do they advertise the OC blades at? good question.. I have five blades running standard speed and they're hashing at 28 mhs - 400 watts... the best price you an find now is on minereu.com you'd have to do the math power consumption wise . my elec is 12.6 per kilowatt hour
|
|
|
|
geetash
|
|
June 10, 2014, 11:48:01 AM |
|
Finally got my unit today.
501 watts on an EVGA gold PSU.
It is indeed hashing over 14mh/s, but I can't achieve that poolside.
What diff setting are you guys using?
Will lowering the clock speed reduce HW errors? Mine is about 6% HW errors after a half an hour.
dont you think 2 oced gridseed blades will do the same rate with less power and h/w errors for the same price. hmmm... what do they advertise the OC blades at? good question.. I have five blades running standard speed and they're hashing at 28 mhs - 400 watts... the best price you an find now is on minereu.com you'd have to do the math power consumption wise . my elec is 12.6 per kilowatt hour its better if we can get unmodded ones and mod it ourselves. it can easily achieve 6.5~MH/s by replacing the 33k resistor with slightly higher one and 7 MHz+ with a higher resistor and proper cooling. power consumption 150W~ at 6.5MHz
|
|
|
|
jjj0923
|
|
June 10, 2014, 01:16:29 PM |
|
Finally got my unit today.
501 watts on an EVGA gold PSU.
It is indeed hashing over 14mh/s, but I can't achieve that poolside.
What diff setting are you guys using?
Will lowering the clock speed reduce HW errors? Mine is about 6% HW errors after a half an hour.
dont you think 2 oced gridseed blades will do the same rate with less power and h/w errors for the same price. hmmm... what do they advertise the OC blades at? good question.. I have five blades running standard speed and they're hashing at 28 mhs - 400 watts... the best price you an find now is on minereu.com you'd have to do the math power consumption wise . my elec is 12.6 per kilowatt hour its better if we can get unmodded ones and mod it ourselves. it can easily achieve 6.5~MH/s by replacing the 33k resistor with slightly higher one and 7 MHz+ with a higher resistor and proper cooling. power consumption 150W~ at 6.5MHz so it's almost doubles power consumption for an 15% increase in hashing speed. think it's worth it?
|
|
|
|
|