[KTK] KryptKoin > [PHR] Phore: check new ANN

[curT]

46   KTK   Krypt Koin  voted  #3643

[Equate]

voted #3647 , THC is our next target and it will be bypassed soon , thanks community for all the support.

[MarryUncle]

voted #3647 , THC is our next target and it will be bypassed soon , thanks community for all the support.

no problem!

[RII-promo]

voted #3647 , THC is our next target and it will be bypassed soon , thanks community for all the support.

no problem!

46   KTK   Krypt Koin   #3680
17 more votes to reach THC

[policymaker]

Just for the record, I want to report that when I am staking for 5-6 instances simultaneously, the wallet tends to spike to 25%, momentarily, of my cpu usage. I dont know if this is normal for every wallet staking, but ive seen it with krypt only for now. The othen bug is that it hangs when syncing

[Equate]

Just for the record, I want to report that when I am staking for 5-6 instances simultaneously, the wallet tends to spike to 25%, momentarily, of my cpu usage. I dont know if this is normal for every wallet staking, but ive seen it with krypt only for now. The othen bug is that it hangs when syncing

Even I have reported earlier about the same issue that wallet hangs while syncing. I don't know if there is any update about this bug from Dev , but I hope he will address it soon.

[uki]

Just for the record, I want to report that when I am staking for 5-6 instances simultaneously, the wallet tends to spike to 25%, momentarily, of my cpu usage. I dont know if this is normal for every wallet staking, but ive seen it with krypt only for now. The othen bug is that it hangs when syncing

Even I have reported earlier about the same issue that wallet hangs while syncing. I don't know if there is any update about this bug from Dev , but I hope he will address it soon.

I observed this for KTK as well.
I have similar issues with Zeitcoin wallet as well that eats a lot of CPU and RAM.

[LordPiccolo]

Just for the record, I want to report that when I am staking for 5-6 instances simultaneously, the wallet tends to spike to 25%, momentarily, of my cpu usage. I dont know if this is normal for every wallet staking, but ive seen it with krypt only for now. The othen bug is that it hangs when syncing

Even I have reported earlier about the same issue that wallet hangs while syncing. I don't know if there is any update about this bug from Dev , but I hope he will address it soon.

I observed this for KTK as well.
I have similar issues with Zeitcoin wallet as well that eats a lot of CPU and RAM.

My wallet froze whilst I was making my donation last night but other than that it's been fine and dandy.

[NoxX]

A while back there was some talk about coin control. Staking leads to smaller and smaller coin "chunks" over time. If you activate coin control in the options of the KTK wallet, you can see those chunks in the "send" tab. If you have a lot of chunks (500-1000+) this can lead to performance decrease.

With coin control, you can select some of the small chunks and send them to yourself, resulting in one big chunk. Note, however, that you have to pay the transaction fee for this, and also the big chunk starts with a coin age of zero. Nevertheless, after some weeks of staking, I would recommend consolidating the tiny chunks into bigger ones.


Also: #3698, bye bye THC  

EDIT: A lot of small chunks also lead to long loading times when sending coins, as hundreds, or even thousands of coin hashes have to be combined into the transaction which takes time (I'm sure some technically minded person can explain that better but the gist should be correct).

[Historical]

Just for the record, I want to report that when I am staking for 5-6 instances simultaneously, the wallet tends to spike to 25%, momentarily, of my cpu usage. I dont know if this is normal for every wallet staking, but ive seen it with krypt only for now. The othen bug is that it hangs when syncing

My wallet eat some little CPU power when staking. But I saw that in all pos coin wallets.

[uki]

A while back there was some talk about coin control. Staking leads to smaller and smaller coin "chunks" over time. If you activate coin control in the options of the KTK wallet, you can see those chunks in the "send" tab. If you have a lot of chunks (500-1000+) this can lead to performance decrease.

With coin control, you can select some of the small chunks and send them to yourself, resulting in one big chunk. Note, however, that you have to pay the transaction fee for this, and also the big chunk starts with a coin age of zero. Nevertheless, after some weeks of staking, I would recommend consolidating the tiny chunks into bigger ones.

I did that recently and the performance of the wallet increased. Also cost of transaction to yourself is relatively low: 0.01KTK/1000Bytes of chunk records (about 6 chunks fit in that).

[amacar]

A while back there was some talk about coin control. Staking leads to smaller and smaller coin "chunks" over time. If you activate coin control in the options of the KTK wallet, you can see those chunks in the "send" tab. If you have a lot of chunks (500-1000+) this can lead to performance decrease.

With coin control, you can select some of the small chunks and send them to yourself, resulting in one big chunk. Note, however, that you have to pay the transaction fee for this, and also the big chunk starts with a coin age of zero. Nevertheless, after some weeks of staking, I would recommend consolidating the tiny chunks into bigger ones.

I did that recently and the performance of the wallet increased. Also cost of transaction to yourself is relatively low: 0.01KTK/1000Bytes of chunk records (about 6 chunks fit in that).

But if I do this, would I be still qualified for remaining KTKs from holding for one month?

[NoxX]

A while back there was some talk about coin control. Staking leads to smaller and smaller coin "chunks" over time. If you activate coin control in the options of the KTK wallet, you can see those chunks in the "send" tab. If you have a lot of chunks (500-1000+) this can lead to performance decrease.

With coin control, you can select some of the small chunks and send them to yourself, resulting in one big chunk. Note, however, that you have to pay the transaction fee for this, and also the big chunk starts with a coin age of zero. Nevertheless, after some weeks of staking, I would recommend consolidating the tiny chunks into bigger ones.

I did that recently and the performance of the wallet increased. Also cost of transaction to yourself is relatively low: 0.01KTK/1000Bytes of chunk records (about 6 chunks fit in that).

But if I do this, would I be still qualified for remaining KTKs from holding for one month?

If you send the KTK to the same address on which you received the stake then yes. And if in doubt, you can always only consolidate 15.000 KTK, as the requirement for the bonus is holding on to half the KTK

[uki]

I did that recently and the performance of the wallet increased. Also cost of transaction to yourself is relatively low: 0.01KTK/1000Bytes of chunk records (about 6 chunks fit in that).

But if I do this, would I be still qualified for remaining KTKs from holding for one month?

It has been discussed earlier in this thread (about 100 pages ago ) that transferring to yourself (the same address) for consolidation purposes doesn't cancel you rights to the bonus payout.

[amacar]

Thank you for both answers, looks like that I missed this information.

[MarryUncle]

3707    exceed ruby

[affection]

#3724

[LionOfNarnia]

#3726

NewYorkCoin only +10

[LordPiccolo]

Today I underestimated the voting power of KTK! I thought maybe 46/47th place would be good but 44th and still ages to go today

You guys are doing a wonderful job, keep it up.

LP

[curT]

44   KTK   Krypt Koin  voted  #3731