|
curT
|
 |
June 18, 2014, 12:33:43 PM |
|
46 KTK Krypt Koin voted #3643
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equate
|
|
June 18, 2014, 12:40:54 PM |
|
voted #3647 , THC is our next target and it will be bypassed soon , thanks community for all the support.
|
|
|
|
|
MarryUncle
Member
 Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
June 18, 2014, 12:55:08 PM |
|
voted #3647 , THC is our next target and it will be bypassed soon , thanks community for all the support.
no problem! |
|
|
|
RII-promo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
June 18, 2014, 01:43:05 PM |
|
voted #3647 , THC is our next target and it will be bypassed soon , thanks community for all the support.
no problem! 46 KTK Krypt Koin #3680 17 more votes to reach THC |
|
|
|
|
policymaker
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
|
June 18, 2014, 01:47:17 PM |
|
Just for the record, I want to report that when I am staking for 5-6 instances simultaneously, the wallet tends to spike to 25%, momentarily, of my cpu usage. I dont know if this is normal for every wallet staking, but ive seen it with krypt only for now. The othen bug is that it hangs when syncing
|
|
|
|
|
Equate
|
|
June 18, 2014, 01:54:41 PM |
|
Just for the record, I want to report that when I am staking for 5-6 instances simultaneously, the wallet tends to spike to 25%, momentarily, of my cpu usage. I dont know if this is normal for every wallet staking, but ive seen it with krypt only for now. The othen bug is that it hangs when syncing
Even I have reported earlier about the same issue that wallet hangs while syncing. I don't know if there is any update about this bug from Dev , but I hope he will address it soon. |
|
|
|
|
uki
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
cryptojunk bag holder
|
|
June 18, 2014, 01:56:29 PM |
|
Just for the record, I want to report that when I am staking for 5-6 instances simultaneously, the wallet tends to spike to 25%, momentarily, of my cpu usage. I dont know if this is normal for every wallet staking, but ive seen it with krypt only for now. The othen bug is that it hangs when syncing
Even I have reported earlier about the same issue that wallet hangs while syncing. I don't know if there is any update about this bug from Dev , but I hope he will address it soon. I observed this for KTK as well. I have similar issues with Zeitcoin wallet as well that eats a lot of CPU and RAM. |
this space is intentionally left blank
|
|
|
|
LordPiccolo
|
|
June 18, 2014, 01:57:46 PM |
|
Just for the record, I want to report that when I am staking for 5-6 instances simultaneously, the wallet tends to spike to 25%, momentarily, of my cpu usage. I dont know if this is normal for every wallet staking, but ive seen it with krypt only for now. The othen bug is that it hangs when syncing
Even I have reported earlier about the same issue that wallet hangs while syncing. I don't know if there is any update about this bug from Dev , but I hope he will address it soon. I observed this for KTK as well. I have similar issues with Zeitcoin wallet as well that eats a lot of CPU and RAM. My wallet froze whilst I was making my donation last night but other than that it's been fine and dandy. |
|
|
|
|
NoxX
|
|
June 18, 2014, 02:08:38 PM |
|
A while back there was some talk about coin control. Staking leads to smaller and smaller coin "chunks" over time. If you activate coin control in the options of the KTK wallet, you can see those chunks in the "send" tab. If you have a lot of chunks (500-1000+) this can lead to performance decrease. With coin control, you can select some of the small chunks and send them to yourself, resulting in one big chunk. Note, however, that you have to pay the transaction fee for this, and also the big chunk starts with a coin age of zero. Nevertheless, after some weeks of staking, I would recommend consolidating the tiny chunks into bigger ones. Also: #3698, bye bye THC  EDIT: A lot of small chunks also lead to long loading times when sending coins, as hundreds, or even thousands of coin hashes have to be combined into the transaction which takes time (I'm sure some technically minded person can explain that better but the gist should be correct). |
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
June 18, 2014, 02:10:09 PM |
|
Just for the record, I want to report that when I am staking for 5-6 instances simultaneously, the wallet tends to spike to 25%, momentarily, of my cpu usage. I dont know if this is normal for every wallet staking, but ive seen it with krypt only for now. The othen bug is that it hangs when syncing
My wallet eat some little CPU power when staking. But I saw that in all pos coin wallets. |
|
|
|
uki
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
cryptojunk bag holder
|
|
June 18, 2014, 02:14:43 PM |
|
A while back there was some talk about coin control. Staking leads to smaller and smaller coin "chunks" over time. If you activate coin control in the options of the KTK wallet, you can see those chunks in the "send" tab. If you have a lot of chunks (500-1000+) this can lead to performance decrease.
With coin control, you can select some of the small chunks and send them to yourself, resulting in one big chunk. Note, however, that you have to pay the transaction fee for this, and also the big chunk starts with a coin age of zero. Nevertheless, after some weeks of staking, I would recommend consolidating the tiny chunks into bigger ones.
I did that recently and the performance of the wallet increased. Also cost of transaction to yourself is relatively low: 0.01KTK/1000Bytes of chunk records (about 6 chunks fit in that). |
this space is intentionally left blank
|
|
|
|
amacar
|
|
June 18, 2014, 02:20:16 PM |
|
A while back there was some talk about coin control. Staking leads to smaller and smaller coin "chunks" over time. If you activate coin control in the options of the KTK wallet, you can see those chunks in the "send" tab. If you have a lot of chunks (500-1000+) this can lead to performance decrease.
With coin control, you can select some of the small chunks and send them to yourself, resulting in one big chunk. Note, however, that you have to pay the transaction fee for this, and also the big chunk starts with a coin age of zero. Nevertheless, after some weeks of staking, I would recommend consolidating the tiny chunks into bigger ones.
I did that recently and the performance of the wallet increased. Also cost of transaction to yourself is relatively low: 0.01KTK/1000Bytes of chunk records (about 6 chunks fit in that). But if I do this, would I be still qualified for remaining KTKs from holding for one month? |
|
|
|
|
|
NoxX
|
|
June 18, 2014, 02:23:39 PM |
|
A while back there was some talk about coin control. Staking leads to smaller and smaller coin "chunks" over time. If you activate coin control in the options of the KTK wallet, you can see those chunks in the "send" tab. If you have a lot of chunks (500-1000+) this can lead to performance decrease.
With coin control, you can select some of the small chunks and send them to yourself, resulting in one big chunk. Note, however, that you have to pay the transaction fee for this, and also the big chunk starts with a coin age of zero. Nevertheless, after some weeks of staking, I would recommend consolidating the tiny chunks into bigger ones.
I did that recently and the performance of the wallet increased. Also cost of transaction to yourself is relatively low: 0.01KTK/1000Bytes of chunk records (about 6 chunks fit in that). But if I do this, would I be still qualified for remaining KTKs from holding for one month? If you send the KTK to the same address on which you received the stake then yes. And if in doubt, you can always only consolidate 15.000 KTK, as the requirement for the bonus is holding on to half the KTK  |
|
|
|
uki
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
cryptojunk bag holder
|
|
June 18, 2014, 02:26:24 PM |
|
I did that recently and the performance of the wallet increased. Also cost of transaction to yourself is relatively low: 0.01KTK/1000Bytes of chunk records (about 6 chunks fit in that).
But if I do this, would I be still qualified for remaining KTKs from holding for one month? It has been discussed earlier in this thread (about 100 pages ago  ) that transferring to yourself (the same address) for consolidation purposes doesn't cancel you rights to the bonus payout. |
this space is intentionally left blank
|
|
|
|
amacar
|
|
June 18, 2014, 02:31:42 PM |
|
Thank you for both answers, looks like that I missed this information.
|
|
|
|
|
MarryUncle
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
June 18, 2014, 02:34:06 PM |
|
3707 exceed ruby
|
|
|
|
affection
Member
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
|
|
June 18, 2014, 03:13:36 PM |
|
#3724
|
|
|
|
|
LionOfNarnia
|
|
June 18, 2014, 03:21:12 PM |
|
#3726 NewYorkCoin only +10 |
"I don't always kill & eat things - but when I do it's because I'm a Lion & they were things" |
|
|
|
LordPiccolo
|
|
June 18, 2014, 03:34:16 PM |
|
Today I underestimated the voting power of KTK! I thought maybe 46/47th place would be good but 44th and still ages to go today
You guys are doing a wonderful job, keep it up.
LP
|
|
|
|
|
curT
|
|
June 18, 2014, 03:34:30 PM |
|
44 KTK Krypt Koin voted #3731
|
|
|
|
|
|
