Bitcoin Forum
November 07, 2024, 07:52:03 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 [166] 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Slimcoin : Proof of Burn NEW BLOCK GEN, Mineable by low power computer!  (Read 284948 times)
slimcoin (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
July 10, 2014, 04:45:09 PM
 #3301

I pushed a new non-mandatory update that includes the signrawtransaction and sendrawtransaction rpc commands.

-Much Donate
BTC-1D5pnma7E1CP6cquHujycVy79EyXJ3eY
TheRealSteve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500

FUN > ROI


View Profile
July 10, 2014, 05:45:08 PM
 #3302

Slimcoin now has a blockchain explorer at http://www.blockexperts.com/slm!
Very nice!  Glad they got it up and running after the changes Smiley

BTMan
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100

BTMan


View Profile
July 10, 2014, 05:50:11 PM
 #3303

VERY GOOD FOR UPDATE THE TOPIC.

ANN Monitor System http://ann.ymq123.com  (chrome Or IE7-IE9)
Donation BTC: 1F4zvgxAqpbCktYp8oKeupjY2oL3JWVFa3      QQ Group: 229207518
ANN监控系统创世帖 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=657764.0
ustcstone
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 10, 2014, 05:56:49 PM
 #3304

the difficulty has been this high before due to PoS blocks. but the network hash rate of 9mh seems to be a all-time high.

My coins are in my wallet since 1 week and 4 days ago... and still no stake... how to fix this?


me too!is this a bug?
rfcdejong
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 10, 2014, 08:00:20 PM
 #3305

Slimcoin now has a blockchain explorer at http://www.blockexperts.com/slm!

great Wink

but it's doesn't allow address searching yet.. and missing a richlist for some people Wink

and is buggy with PoB amount, says 7.74 on a PoB block which must be a PoW block

http://www.blockexperts.com/slm/height/35610
slimcoin (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
July 10, 2014, 08:15:58 PM
 #3306

That block is listed as PoW?

-Much Donate
BTC-1D5pnma7E1CP6cquHujycVy79EyXJ3eY
TheRealSteve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500

FUN > ROI


View Profile
July 10, 2014, 08:22:26 PM
 #3307

appears to be listed as PoB on the main page (the list of blocks) - probably just a glitch Smiley
( still needs fixing, of course )

slimcoin (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
July 10, 2014, 08:35:50 PM
 #3308

Could I have more feedback regarding having a switch to enable/disable PoS minting on the client. See my long post 1 page back for details.

-Much Donate
BTC-1D5pnma7E1CP6cquHujycVy79EyXJ3eY
rfcdejong
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 10, 2014, 08:36:22 PM
 #3309

There should be at least two people working on a block explorer, the dev and a third party who only accidentally landed here; but the latter reported an issue that needs to be addressed first.  In due time Smiley

I just started a test to see if i will be able to fill a  database with block information.
That database can be indexed and i will be able to create a simple frontend to start with.

I'm not sure if i continue with it, as i do too many things currently.
The RPC is really slow, so filling the database takes time..


To quote myself (and leaving that big picture out)...

i know why it was slow.. i was having all JSON set to log into the console window, lol Wink

Now it parse ~20 blocks per second into the database, while mining slimcoin...
rfcdejong
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 10, 2014, 08:37:46 PM
 #3310

Could I have more feedback regarding having a switch to enable/disable PoS minting on the client. See my long post 1 page back for details.

Better would be a button on the client instead of a startup parameter, but i don't have issues with PoS because i burn all.. don't ask me Wink
glop
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 10, 2014, 08:40:40 PM
 #3311

Could I have more feedback regarding having a switch to enable/disable PoS minting on the client. See my long post 1 page back for details.

Better would be a button on the client instead of a startup parameter, but i don't have issues with PoS because i burn all.. don't ask me Wink

 Same for me...
primer-
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
July 10, 2014, 08:47:02 PM
 #3312

Block propagation issue has not been completely fixed. I am running 10 qt clients in total and at least 20 times a day i need to restart one because they stop syncing.

If i leave them long enough (20 min - 1hour) they sync by themselves.
rfcdejong
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 10, 2014, 09:00:40 PM
 #3313

i found something strange with old blocks, it's not the explorer, it is the blockchain which has wrong timestamp on block 11807, which is a proof-of-burn block... it's 5 minutes in the past?

http://www.blockexperts.com/slm/height/11806    June 11, 2014, 02:04:08
http://www.blockexperts.com/slm/height/11807    June 11, 2014, 01:59:36
http://www.blockexperts.com/slm/height/11808    June 11, 2014, 02:06:03

same with

http://www.blockexperts.com/slm/height/13934    June 13, 2014, 08:23:39
http://www.blockexperts.com/slm/height/13935    June 13, 2014, 08:18:58
http://www.blockexperts.com/slm/height/13936    June 13, 2014, 08:24:21


those PoB Blocks are in the past... might be correct, but it looks odd  (or might be because the blocks are old)
glop
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 10, 2014, 09:55:12 PM
 #3314

Could I have more feedback regarding having a switch to enable/disable PoS minting on the client. See my long post 1 page back for details.

Better would be a button on the client instead of a startup parameter, but i don't have issues with PoS because i burn all.. don't ask me Wink

 Same for me...

    Should have button in addition, not instead because when you run wallet headless it could be difficult in this case to deactivate POS...
theprofileth
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 239
Merit: 100

Socialist Cryptocurrency Devote


View Profile
July 11, 2014, 12:22:17 AM
 #3315

I think someone needs to get some new windows binaries up given that the stake reward has changed and the PoB targetting has changed so allowing clients that are not up to date just screw people over who dont have the proper tools to compile.
slimcoin (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
July 11, 2014, 03:37:33 AM
 #3316

They have not changed yet, I still have not pushed the updates.

-Much Donate
BTC-1D5pnma7E1CP6cquHujycVy79EyXJ3eY
jadefalke
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1014


View Profile
July 11, 2014, 06:14:36 AM
 #3317

i think a POS on/off would be nice, but would it not be easier to just set the Reserve to 5000 to avoid the Client staking?
If you want to stake you can lower the Reserve manualy.
yang5034
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 173
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 11, 2014, 07:08:01 AM
 #3318

They have not changed yet, I still have not pushed the updates.
thank you for your hard work.
a123
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 11, 2014, 08:05:10 AM
 #3319

Block propagation issue has not been completely fixed. I am running 10 qt clients in total and at least 20 times a day i need to restart one because they stop syncing.

If i leave them long enough (20 min - 1hour) they sync by themselves.

I might be noticing the same issue. I'm running a custom front-end that interfaces 2 daemons on separate machines at highest priority, over 2 different ISPs through 2 different continents (Asia and US, via SOCKS proxy) and feeds the miners the highest block count work, and the front-end regularly reports de-synchronisations (> 1 block difference) that resolves only after many blocks.

In spite of this, I still occasionally get consecutive chunks of orphan chains, that seem somewhat dependant on network load (I.e. I don't see any orphans when network hash is ~ 3 mhps, but now I'm seeing like 20% orphan rate, and they come in chunks: i.e. t+0 accepted, t+1306 orphan, t+1418 orphan, t+1530 accepted, where t is about 3 hours before this post) so I assume even these two daemons don't seem to be working well.

However, the mining pools don't seem to be orphaning as much, so it might just be an localised latency issue for me, so I'll be grateful for any advice.
rfcdejong
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 11, 2014, 01:29:44 PM
 #3320

They have not changed yet, I still have not pushed the updates.

Somehow my client isn't finding any PoB anymore past 30 hours, maybe there is something changed?
I normally find between 3 and 6 PoB every 24 hours.

2200 SLIM burned..


SetBestChain: new best=00000001540ac72c5c32  height=36278  trust=15616798614  moneysupply=376804.070875 nEffectiveBurnCoins=166191.691281
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
SlimCoinAfterBurner():
   Smallest Hash is 00000017e6fe0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001
   by tx 358e280c7076522ee09a2aa26644bccd0e84173460bd80050fd58f5a1bb0ffee
   with Block height 33666, transaction depth 1, vout depth 0
   PoB Tartget is 000000014acb0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
   nBurnBits=1d014acb, nEffectiveBurnCoins=166191691281 (formatted 166191.691281)
Pages: « 1 ... 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 [166] 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!