Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 06:02:02 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 [183] 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Slimcoin : Proof of Burn NEW BLOCK GEN, Mineable by low power computer!  (Read 284891 times)
SpeedDemon13
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
August 12, 2014, 07:27:29 PM
 #3641

Block propagation in slimcoin is broken, always was. Even if you all sync up to the same chain (very unlikely as there are over 100 forks), it will fork again.
Bulgarian hardcoded node was keeping things in check, the moment it was shut off slim forked.

You will need to fix the block propagation issue first. Good luck!

Understood, someone should try to pick up the task to repair it.

I checked the nodes posted above:
54.191.247.114 is at 66270
Code:
SetBestChain: new best=60133ce7ffbf9f49b6f6  height=66270  trust=112643180633  moneysupply=624240.386373 nEffectiveBurnCoins=200544.329924

69.172.231.56 stuck at 65494 few hours ago on other fork.
Other nodes are offline.

If you know other forks at similar height and trust value - post their nodes.


Code:
addnode=54.191.247.114
addnode=112.113.96.138:41682
addnode=112.113.96.138:41683
addnode=112.113.96.138:41686

I ended up using these nodes and sync fine, seem like the pools aren't on the same fork.


CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
mbk
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
August 12, 2014, 08:05:06 PM
 #3642

I cannot connect to 112.113.96.138 on any port so I guess you use only 54.191.247.114 node. All 3 pools linked from the start page are offline so let's keep them out of equation.
Block propagation in slimcoin is broken, always was. Even if you all sync up to the same chain (very unlikely as there are over 100 forks), it will fork again.
Bulgarian hardcoded node was keeping things in check, the moment it was shut off slim forked.

You will need to fix the block propagation issue first. Good luck!

Understood, someone should try to pick up the task to repair it.

I checked the nodes posted above:
54.191.247.114 is at 66270
Code:
SetBestChain: new best=60133ce7ffbf9f49b6f6  height=66270  trust=112643180633  moneysupply=624240.386373 nEffectiveBurnCoins=200544.329924

69.172.231.56 stuck at 65494 few hours ago on other fork.
Other nodes are offline.

If you know other forks at similar height and trust value - post their nodes.


Code:
addnode=54.191.247.114
addnode=112.113.96.138:41682
addnode=112.113.96.138:41683
addnode=112.113.96.138:41686

I ended up using these nodes and sync fine, seem like the pools aren't on the same fork.



Boolberry OpenCL solo miner - https://github.com/mbkuperman/boolberry-opencl
Boolberry OpenCL stratum pool miner - https://github.com/mbkuperman/cpuminer-multi-opencl
MBK's Boolberry pool - http://bbr.mbkpool.info
SpeedDemon13
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
August 12, 2014, 09:03:39 PM
 #3643

I cannot connect to 112.113.96.138 on any port so I guess you use only 54.191.247.114 node. All 3 pools linked from the start page are offline so let's keep them out of equation.
Block propagation in slimcoin is broken, always was. Even if you all sync up to the same chain (very unlikely as there are over 100 forks), it will fork again.
Bulgarian hardcoded node was keeping things in check, the moment it was shut off slim forked.

You will need to fix the block propagation issue first. Good luck!

Understood, someone should try to pick up the task to repair it.

I checked the nodes posted above:
54.191.247.114 is at 66270
Code:
SetBestChain: new best=60133ce7ffbf9f49b6f6  height=66270  trust=112643180633  moneysupply=624240.386373 nEffectiveBurnCoins=200544.329924

69.172.231.56 stuck at 65494 few hours ago on other fork.
Other nodes are offline.

If you know other forks at similar height and trust value - post their nodes.


Code:
addnode=54.191.247.114
addnode=112.113.96.138:41682
addnode=112.113.96.138:41683
addnode=112.113.96.138:41686

I ended up using these nodes and sync fine, seem like the pools aren't on the same fork.



So, it's best just to solo mine? From the standalone miner or the one in the wallet?

CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
almightyruler
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1092


View Profile
August 13, 2014, 12:44:39 AM
 #3644

So, it's best just to solo mine? From the standalone miner or the one in the wallet?

Mining is pot luck at the moment. You could solo mine, but there's no guarantee that the chain you're on will necessarily be accepted (by community consensus and/or the dev) as the official one. Your client could even end up starting its own private fork.

I just restarted the client and it's obvious from the small number of peers I've connected to that there are multiple forks (I've had a go at labelling them below)

Code:
2014-08-13 00:31:54 UTC Slimcoin version v0.3.2.0-g154b52a-alpha ()
2014-08-13 00:32:10 UTC version message: version 60003, blocks=66461      ** (1)
2014-08-13 00:32:39 UTC version message: version 60003, blocks=63435      ** (2)
2014-08-13 00:32:45 UTC version message: version 60003, blocks=16014      ** (3)
2014-08-13 00:35:22 UTC version message: version 60003, blocks=66462      ** (1)
2014-08-13 00:35:47 UTC version message: version 60003, blocks=26934      ** (4)
2014-08-13 00:36:44 UTC version message: version 60003, blocks=30183      ** (5)
2014-08-13 00:38:57 UTC version message: version 60003, blocks=66465      ** (1)
2014-08-13 00:39:23 UTC version message: version 60003, blocks=15164      ** (6)
2014-08-13 00:43:52 UTC version message: version 60003, blocks=64907      ** (7)
2014-08-13 00:46:49 UTC version message: version 60003, blocks=26940      ** (4)
primer-
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 13, 2014, 01:04:59 PM
 #3645

Cobra
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 289
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 13, 2014, 06:35:26 PM
Last edit: August 13, 2014, 09:17:27 PM by Cobra
 #3646

Block propagation in slimcoin is broken, always was. Even if you all sync up to the same chain (very unlikely as there are over 100 forks), it will fork again.
Bulgarian hardcoded node was keeping things in check, the moment it was shut off slim forked.

You will need to fix the block propagation issue first. Good luck!

You have been saying this for about 20 pages now, the Dev must have got the message by now. You repeat the same things on every page that it is dead and you are moving on. (after you have made profit by dumping slim) yet you continue to follow the thread and post often....good thing you are sticking around to "look out for people".  While the coin currently has some problems what is to say a dedicated community cannot overcome these obstacles and get it back on track? Some unique features exist here which makes it worth saving.

Edit: If the Dev doesn't show up to address the situation with the forks it very well could be over. I was just saying it is not over yet and options exist. Dev's can always change hands, example would be what happened with Asiacoin a while back. In an over saturated alt coin market some people may rather move on versus save this.  I guess we will see soon.
rfcdejong
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 13, 2014, 08:20:49 PM
 #3647

I think slimcoin went on vacation for a week or maybe two, he doesn't even know about the current forks.

Last Active:   August 08, 2014, 12:38:00 PM


And perhaps his nodes went down as well..
95A31
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 10:59:50 AM
 #3648

I think slimcoin went on vacation for a week or maybe two, he doesn't even know about the current forks.

Last Active:   August 08, 2014, 12:38:00 PM


And perhaps his nodes went down as well..

I think too. I am working on PoB pool and he stop reply to my questions from 8th August. Anyway, the code is almost done, I am looking for testers  Grin
rfcdejong
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 15, 2014, 05:39:31 PM
 #3649

I was on a big fork until my wallet crashed, high nr of blocks, diff reasonable and networkghps reasonable.

"blocks" : 68556,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.03609960,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkghps" : 0.00108424,
"pooledtx" : 1,
"testnet" : false
}
rfcdejong
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 15, 2014, 11:26:07 PM
 #3650

Seems the network is stabilizing itself, i don't have any sync problems anymore

01:24:50
{
"blocks" : 69279,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.04104161,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 3234,
"networkghps" : 0.00169493,
"pooledtx" : 1,
"testnet" : false
}
m5j0r
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 16, 2014, 12:51:22 AM
 #3651

My getmininginfo always gives me this:



Code:
{
"blocks" : 69328,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.04002995,
"errors" : "WARNING: Checkpoint is too old. Wait for block chain to download, or notify developers of the issue.",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkghps" : 0.00138651,
"pooledtx" : 1,
"testnet" : false
}

Is that warning okay?

I run with
Code:
-maxconnections=1 -connect=54.191.247.114

for some odd reason it also says I have 0 connections. I seem to get the latest blocks though....

How should you run this now?
Zels
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 203
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 16, 2014, 06:37:56 AM
 #3652

Why do you keep trying this coin when DEV run away, fork everywhere, wallet bugs, etc  Huh Huh
rfcdejong
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 16, 2014, 09:57:24 AM
 #3653

Why do you keep trying this coin when DEV run away, fork everywhere, wallet bugs, etc  Huh Huh

DEV seems to be on vacation, maybe it's the same DEV as GUE because he also is away since 8-8 ?
And about the fork, it seems it solved itself, my wallets are all on the same block with just the regular .conf, they aren't out of sync anymore.
A fork won't happen that fast if there are more nodes, people just need to keep their wallets open and turn on listen=1 (if they can keep it open 24/7)

Stability comes when the group is larger, there are less wallet bugs since the last version, slimcoin did a good job except he should communicate more and better.



primer-
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 16, 2014, 10:33:05 AM
 #3654

Why do you keep trying this coin when DEV run away, fork everywhere, wallet bugs, etc  Huh Huh

DEV seems to be on vacation, maybe it's the same DEV as GUE because he also is away since 8-8 ?
And about the fork, it seems it solved itself, my wallets are all on the same block with just the regular .conf, they aren't out of sync anymore.
A fork won't happen that fast if there are more nodes, people just need to keep their wallets open and turn on listen=1 (if they can keep it open 24/7)

Stability comes when the group is larger, there are less wallet bugs since the last version, slimcoin did a good job except he should communicate more and better.


Its over you idiot. Go find some other shitcoin to support, this one is dead.
-Greed-
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000


Decentralized Jihad


View Profile
August 16, 2014, 10:48:39 AM
 #3655

Where are you, dev? Sad We need you to get bugs fixed.

Its over you idiot. Go find some other shitcoin to support, this one is dead.
Welcome to my ignore list! Grin (c) smaragda

slimcoin (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
August 16, 2014, 06:47:24 PM
 #3656

The reason for my hiatus was that I was indeed away on vacation. I could not take my computer, and subsequently, could not write from there. I am currently investigating the issue with the fork.

I have not abandoned Slimcoin.

-Much Donate
BTC-1D5pnma7E1CP6cquHujycVy79EyXJ3eY
-Greed-
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000


Decentralized Jihad


View Profile
August 16, 2014, 07:26:42 PM
 #3657

The reason for my hiatus was that I was indeed away on vacation. I could not take my computer, and subsequently, could not write from there. I am currently investigating the issue with the fork.

I have not abandoned Slimcoin.
Good news. Keep working on SLM. Wink

m5j0r
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 16, 2014, 08:03:19 PM
 #3658

I have tried to send 5 SLM to bter to see if I'm on the right fork. Did not arrive even after 24h.
I have burnt about 7000 SLM and dont get anything out of it. I've wasted money.

@dev: Fix this. Fast. Or you'll lose even the last investor.
rfcdejong
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 16, 2014, 08:16:28 PM
 #3659

I'm still perfectly synced, on a good fork
1 wallet was confused a bit for a hour or two, but it's back on track now.

22:15:19
{
"blocks" : 69854,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.03342591,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkghps" : 0.00105561,
"pooledtx" : 1,
"testnet" : false
}
m5j0r
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 16, 2014, 10:32:30 PM
 #3660

Happy that it works for you but I've lost my whole balance. It's ALL GONE.
If the dev comes up with a solution I would try it, but if not I'm gone and spreading the news so other investors don't get fucked in their arse by an incompetent dev.

Lost about 6000 SLM.
Pages: « 1 ... 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 [183] 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!