bitbd83
Full Member
 Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Crypto Enthusiast, BD
|
 |
June 16, 2014, 04:44:59 PM |
|
We need more feedbacks from the anon testnet wallet, you should be enjoying anonymous sends only few crypto has this function in reality.
Nodes TX fee 1% is may be huge. I like test-net anon wallet. Use it. Need more marketing through social media. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
supercointeam (OP)
|
|
June 16, 2014, 04:56:00 PM |
|
We need more feedbacks from the anon testnet wallet, you should be enjoying anonymous sends only few crypto has this function in reality.
Nodes TX fee 1% is may be huge. I like test-net anon wallet. Use it. Need more marketing through social media. Thanks for the feedback. Currently, external bitcoin mixer services usually actually asks same or more fees and we will become reasonable on this. We will think about this. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitcoinwonders010
|
|
June 16, 2014, 05:19:37 PM |
|
dev coin logo revised   Let me know what you think |
|
|
|
|
|
timerland
|
|
June 16, 2014, 05:21:28 PM |
|
wat eva people can read for themselves
i;ve wasted enough time already
have fun
gtfo noob. Dev what is status with busoni I have not got any answer from him, still. Although Busoni issued an apology ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.msg7319548#msg7319548), it is not enough. They need to give a conclusion of their investigation: is Supercoin good or bad, do they find any issues, if at all? If no issues or no major issues, and since Supercoin was the first in voting list, they should add it to Poloniex, this is the only way they can clear all their mistakes. Their debacle caused many investors to lose money, we demand an explanation from them on the conclusion of their investigation of supercoin! But now I don't see any conclusions, and they have kept the title of that thread ("Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin" https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.0), in a very misleading way. This title is translated to "We have rejected a bad coin", but what is bad? They did not or can not say anything (because Supercoin is a great coin!).Before this is done, I can't see Busoni's apology is sincere at all. We demand Poloniex give a clear explanation on it! |
|
|
|
bitbd83
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Crypto Enthusiast, BD
|
|
June 16, 2014, 05:22:50 PM |
|
Now this is perfect 100% I vote it +1 |
|
|
|
|
strasboug
|
|
June 16, 2014, 05:23:54 PM |
|
wat eva people can read for themselves
i;ve wasted enough time already
have fun
gtfo noob. Dev what is status with busoni I have not got any answer from him, still. Although Busoni issued an apology ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.msg7319548#msg7319548), it is not enough. They need to give a conclusion of their investigation: is Supercoin good or bad, do they find any issues, if at all? If no issues or no major issues, and since Supercoin was the first in voting list, they should add it to Poloniex, this is the only way they can clear all their mistakes. Their debacle caused many investors to lose money, we demand an explanation from them on the conclusion of their investigation of supercoin! But now I don't see any conclusions, and they have kept the title of that thread ("Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin" https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.0), in a very misleading way. This title is translated to "We have rejected a bad coin", but what is bad? They did not or can not say anything (because Supercoin is a great coin!).Before this is done, I can't see Busoni's apology is sincere at all. We demand Poloniex give a clear explanation on it!+1. Yes absolutely! |
|
|
|
|
|
originalchilli
|
|
June 16, 2014, 05:25:39 PM |
|
dev coin logo revised Let me know what you think very nice! |
FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER - @originalchilli
|
|
|
|
bitcoinwonders010
|
|
June 16, 2014, 05:30:08 PM |
|
dev coin logo revised Let me know what you think very nice! with stars or without stars. |
|
|
|
|
|
bitcoinwonders010
|
|
June 16, 2014, 05:31:51 PM |
|
crypt coin has a market cap of $950k, which has no anon function workin. super coin market cap $150k, lol. we have a working anon wallet. first floor is at 20k sats when we hit mintpal 50ksats plus
|
|
|
|
|
|
supercointeam (OP)
|
|
June 16, 2014, 05:39:41 PM |
|
dev coin logo revised Let me know what you think Thanks now it's really SUPER :-) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitcoinwonders010
|
|
June 16, 2014, 05:41:07 PM |
|
dev coin logo revised Let me know what you think Thanks now it's really SUPER :-) which one with or without stars |
|
|
|
|
|
supercointeam (OP)
|
|
June 16, 2014, 05:47:13 PM |
|
dev coin logo revised Let me know what you think Thanks now it's really SUPER :-) which one with or without stars I hesitate, i personally liked starred one but i know people may like simpler one, without stars. Stars remind some good positive energy for me. |
|
|
|
|
|
bitcoinwonders010
|
|
June 16, 2014, 05:48:12 PM |
|
dev coin logo revised Let me know what you think Thanks now it's really SUPER :-) which one with or without stars I hesitate, i personally liked starred one but i know people may like simpler one, without stars. Stars remind some good positive energy for me. we'l let community vote |
|
|
|
|
|
bitcoinwonders010
|
|
June 16, 2014, 05:48:38 PM |
|
dev coin logo revised Let me know what you think Thanks now it's really SUPER :-) which one with or without stars I hesitate, i personally liked starred one but i know people may like simpler one, without stars. Stars remind some good positive energy for me. any update on busoni he seems to be online |
|
|
|
|
|
bitcoinwonders010
|
|
June 16, 2014, 05:50:13 PM |
|
dev coin logo revised Let me know what you think Thanks now it's really SUPER :-) which one with or without stars I hesitate, i personally liked starred one but i know people may like simpler one, without stars. Stars remind some good positive energy for me. any update on busoni he seems to be online im feeling all good again, don't care what busoni says this a good coin after looking at crypt coin rising. i just want him to clear things up. if he doesn't add us cool if he does cool. |
|
|
|
|
|
supercointeam (OP)
|
|
June 16, 2014, 05:52:25 PM |
|
You know as soon as i have some answers from busoni, i'll get back with this to the community. I am aware most of you stressed with this official giga fud. But both parties (dev team vs. poloniex) is positive, at least communicating for some time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
some138
|
|
June 16, 2014, 06:07:51 PM |
|
wat eva people can read for themselves
i;ve wasted enough time already
have fun
gtfo noob. Dev what is status with busoni I have not got any answer from him, still. Although Busoni issued an apology ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.msg7319548#msg7319548), it is not enough. They need to give a conclusion of their investigation: is Supercoin good or bad, do they find any issues, if at all? If no issues or no major issues, and since Supercoin was the first in voting list, they should add it to Poloniex, this is the only way they can clear all their mistakes. Their debacle caused many investors to lose money, we demand an explanation from them on the conclusion of their investigation of supercoin! But now I don't see any conclusions, and they have kept the title of that thread ("Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin" https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.0), in a very misleading way. This title is translated to "We have rejected a bad coin", but what is bad? They did not or can not say anything (because Supercoin is a great coin!).Before this is done, I can't see Busoni's apology is sincere at all. We demand Poloniex give a clear explanation on it!+1. Yes absolutely! makes a lot sense to me. Waiting for busoni to explain, clarify and correct... |
|
|
|
provenceday
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 16, 2014, 06:09:18 PM |
|
wat eva people can read for themselves
i;ve wasted enough time already
have fun
gtfo noob. Dev what is status with busoni I have not got any answer from him, still. Although Busoni issued an apology ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.msg7319548#msg7319548), it is not enough. They need to give a conclusion of their investigation: is Supercoin good or bad, do they find any issues, if at all? If no issues or no major issues, and since Supercoin was the first in voting list, they should add it to Poloniex, this is the only way they can clear all their mistakes. Their debacle caused many investors to lose money, we demand an explanation from them on the conclusion of their investigation of supercoin! But now I don't see any conclusions, and they have kept the title of that thread ("Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin" https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.0), in a very misleading way. This title is translated to "We have rejected a bad coin", but what is bad? They did not or can not say anything (because Supercoin is a great coin!).Before this is done, I can't see Busoni's apology is sincere at all. We demand Poloniex give a clear explanation on it!+1 i agree with this. |
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
