[ANN][SUPERCOIN]First P2p Decentralized Trustless Anonymous Wallet Coming Soon

[crypto-dude]

Very important message to make.

You guys know I post a lot of charts around but this time I have something to say. This weekend we have witness several crash on the largest crypto markets: Litecoin, Cloakcoin, Blackcoin, Nxt, etc. A lot of crypto have been lagging since.

I would like to point your attention to the recent price activity in SuperCoin indicating that a new leadership is coming and we might see a lot of money coming into this market really soon.

I have studied a lot of charts and cryptocurrencies this weekend and I have many reasons to believe that we could see a price increase to 6000-7000 satoshis very quickly. The days building up to "SuperSend Trustless" and the Aug. 25th release date could bring much more investors after that sending the price above 15 000 satoshis.

Trade at your own risk, crypto is a very dangerous market but there is some fundamental strengths in Supercoin right now.

Agree, good analysis

Yes with more and more details released for the first ever trustless anonymous system, people will be more confident on the Supercoin. Also the dev team should soon release the short and long term roadmap. The dev team is not doing a pump and dump, they are working on the long term benefits of the coin.

[1714918525]

1714918525

[1714918525]

1714918525

[1714918525]

1714918525

[marseille]

Very important message to make.

You guys know I post a lot of charts around but this time I have something to say. This weekend we have witness several crash on the largest crypto markets: Litecoin, Cloakcoin, Blackcoin, Nxt, etc. A lot of crypto have been lagging since.

I would like to point your attention to the recent price activity in SuperCoin indicating that a new leadership is coming and we might see a lot of money coming into this market really soon.

I have studied a lot of charts and cryptocurrencies this weekend and I have many reasons to believe that we could see a price increase to 6000-7000 satoshis very quickly. The days building up to "SuperSend Trustless" and the Aug. 25th release date could bring much more investors after that sending the price above 15 000 satoshis.

Trade at your own risk, crypto is a very dangerous market but there is some fundamental strengths in Supercoin right now.

Agree, good analysis

Yes with more and more details released for the first ever trustless anonymous system, people will be more confident on the Supercoin. Also the dev team should soon release the short and long term roadmap. The dev team is not doing a pump and dump, they are working on the long term benefits of the coin.

Yes very true, good points

[some138]

I am looking forward to coin's long term roadmap, this will boost people's confidence.

[toaster3]

exciting days ahead of us

[supercointeam]

First p2p decentralized trustless anonymous wallet
This is what we do!

[supercointeam]

@Supercointeam Have you guys started talking about automated payments on Super Multi Pool or you are concentring more on SuperSend Trustless?

Pool manager will keep update system as long as there are miners on the pool, you can expect weekends some updates. Pool is not our dev team project, it's separate.

[supercointeam]

Are you worried about being found out by unwanted parties?
Find out the definition of anonymity with SuperCoin...

lol, this is good point. It is literally 1 min for SUPER vs 1 hr for BTC

this is very true, lol

That's why Supercoin is the solution for many. If you want lighting fast crypto and anonymous.
then answer is Super coin

[RW-Stott]

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but XC already has a p2p decentralized trustless anon wallet released for almost a month now.

Please change thread title.

[brookefinancial]

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but XC already has a p2p decentralized trustless anon wallet released.

Please change thread title.

I don't know much about #XC but Supercoin's approach with multisig transaction is very innovative and never seen before for trustless system.

[brookefinancial]

Very important message to make.

You guys know I post a lot of charts around but this time I have something to say. This weekend we have witness several crash on the largest crypto markets: Litecoin, Cloakcoin, Blackcoin, Nxt, etc. A lot of crypto have been lagging since.

I would like to point your attention to the recent price activity in SuperCoin indicating that a new leadership is coming and we might see a lot of money coming into this market really soon.

I have studied a lot of charts and cryptocurrencies this weekend and I have many reasons to believe that we could see a price increase to 6000-7000 satoshis very quickly. The days building up to "SuperSend Trustless" and the Aug. 25th release date could bring much more investors after that sending the price above 15 000 satoshis.

Trade at your own risk, crypto is a very dangerous market but there is some fundamental strengths in Supercoin right now.

Agree, good analysis

Yes with more and more details released for the first ever trustless anonymous system, people will be more confident on the Supercoin. Also the dev team should soon release the short and long term roadmap. The dev team is not doing a pump and dump, they are working on the long term benefits of the coin.

I really like the buying orders on every exchange, we have seen the price stabilising over 20K satoshi on every exchange...even the Litecoin Market!

[RW-Stott]

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but XC already has a p2p decentralized trustless anon wallet released.

Please change thread title.

I don't know much about #XC but Supercoin's approach with multisig transaction is very innovative and never seen before for trustless system.

XC uses multisig as well... So yes, it has been seen before.

[eltonking3000]

 
https://i.imgur.com/MsXwWNV.jpg?1?9879

[Coinster2014]

Some questions...

1) If you only use 1 mixer and 1 guarantor, what if I have so many nodes that I can send you a modified multisig transactions that actually sends the coin to another address instead?   What's to guarantee that my coins won't get stolen in the process in that scenario?   The sender will lose because 2 of 3 belongs to the bad nodes?

2) If sender is only sending it to the mixer and then to the receiver, I can just analyze within X blocks for the same amount of coins and I will have a pretty high confidence level that the transaction belongs to the sender/receiver, especially if the amount is pretty unique like 312.91871298?

[supercointeam]

http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/first-part-of-supercoins-supersend-trustless-revealed

Up Up Up! SuperCoin The only crypto can FLY!

[brookefinancial]

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but XC already has a p2p decentralized trustless anon wallet released.

Please change thread title.

I don't know much about #XC but Supercoin's approach with multisig transaction is very innovative and never seen before for trustless system.

XC uses multisig as well... So yes, it has been seen before.

I don't know enough about the "tech" behind #XC to start a debate on this matter especially that I'm coming from the world of finance and not much of a geek on crypto. I do understand the whitepaper so far and I have been very impressed by the dev.

There are over 200 crypto with great promising tech but what makes Supercoin attractive right now is the releasing of "SuperSend Trustless" the mix of very fast transaction (2-3 minutes) and the multisig trustless system.

At least this what the market is smelling recently with increase in trading volumes and higher price activity. You can take a look at this graph from the dev:

[supercointeam]

Looks very good, Supercoin is on the right track.

Please start the next multipool payout before the beta test begins.

I'll ask this from pool manager.

[supercointeam]

SUPERCoin technology that no one can REJECT.

[marseille]

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but XC already has a p2p decentralized trustless anon wallet released.

Please change thread title.

I don't know much about #XC but Supercoin's approach with multisig transaction is very innovative and never seen before for trustless system.

XC uses multisig as well... So yes, it has been seen before.

It is a joke, just because they said they used multisig without any details? they use multisig tx in the point to point transfer? excuse me? do you understand how it works?

Any coin can use the name, but without the details, it does not prove anything. Are you going to show me a log that XC actually uses a trustless system?

[Coinster2014]

Some questions...

1) If you only use 1 mixer and 1 guarantor, what if I have so many nodes that I can send you a modified multisig transactions that actually sends the coin to another address instead?   What's to guarantee that my coins won't get stolen in the process in that scenario?   The sender will lose because 2 of 3 belongs to the bad nodes?

2) If sender is only sending it to the mixer and then to the receiver, I can just analyze within X blocks for the same amount of coins and I will have a pretty high confidence level that the transaction belongs to the sender/receiver, especially if the amount is pretty unique like 312.91871298?

I can't help but noticed that you completely ignored my tech questions and just kept on posting useless pics.   I am starting to get really bad vibes about this coin if you can't even answer basic questions about the merit of your anon feature....

[supercoindev]

Some questions...

1) If you only use 1 mixer and 1 guarantor, what if I have so many nodes that I can send you a modified multisig transactions that actually sends the coin to another address instead?   What's to guarantee that my coins won't get stolen in the process in that scenario?   The sender will lose because 2 of 3 belongs to the bad nodes?

2) If sender is only sending it to the mixer and then to the receiver, I can just analyze within X blocks for the same amount of coins and I will have a pretty high confidence level that the transaction belongs to the sender/receiver, especially if the amount is pretty unique like 312.91871298?

I can't help but noticed that you completely ignored my tech questions and just kept on posting useless pics.   I am starting to get really bad vibes about this coin if you can't even answer basic questions about the merit of your anon feature....

Be patient man, you posted questions for a few mins, and you expect dev waiting there watching for questions all the time?

Let me answer your questions here:

1. First of all, another node will have no idea on what is the escrow multisig address. It is not a public address. It is created on the fly with randomly selected public keys from each of the participating nodes. Other nodes will not receive any info on the public keys. The system does broadcast any messages. Messages are point-2-point and not broadcasted.

Second, all communicated private messages are signed with each party's private key, and verified on arriving by the public key of that party. So another node can not forge a message from a participating party, not to say he has no way to get the message and know the id of transactions etc at all. So what you described the scenario is not valid.

2. You can't analysis these for sure. The first step we send as one amount, the amount can easily be splitted into multiple amounts as we did in our phase-1 mixer scenario (amount splitted into random 2-4 parts). Moreover, there are many similar amount sent around. All escrow amounts are similar amounts, all you see is that 3-4 similar amounts sent around and you can't trace them as in/out addresses are not linked at all. It is also easy to split the sending amount (and all fund transfer in the transaction) into "canonical" values (meaning standard like 100, 50, 25, 10, 5, 2, 1 etc). These enhancements are very easy to do.