[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[ReRunRod]

Hello.

I was invited to check the implementation of XC compared to FedoraCoin's codebase in order to find possible similarities between them.
First of all, I visited FedoraCoin's repository and checked the specific file mentioned (mixerann.cpp and the header file).
Then, I was invited to Developer's station with a Teamviewer session and saw the code that implements the specific feature.

The code is in no way similar between the two coins.
But, I believe that one must trusts his own eyes (and compiler). Just download the source code from FedoraCoin and create a working wallet that has all the features of XC enabled. That would prove whether the claim is correct or false.

Now, I do not know who claimed that Fedora and XC share the same codebase. If someone claims that some principles are the same, then I'm afraid that someone hasn't heard of Bitcoin and the blockchain concept (or the transaction concept, or the pubkey->wallet address concept, or... the list goes on forever).

IMPORTANT!

RIGHT ON!

Thank you Mindfox

[1714656918]

1714656918

[1714656918]

1714656918

[1714656918]

1714656918

[nzminer]

lol,
this is gold!

Have you seen how heated the DRK thread is getting!!!!??

[milkyway]

can someone summarize for me what are the happenings? I am kind of lost as to what happened? (conflicts,code, price etc)
Thank you

[BEECoinfan]

Hello.

I was invited to check the implementation of XC compared to FedoraCoin's codebase in order to find possible similarities between them.
First of all, I visited FedoraCoin's repository and checked the specific file mentioned (mixerann.cpp and the header file).
Then, I was invited to Developer's station with a Teamviewer session and saw the code that implements the specific feature.

The code is in no way similar between the two coins.
But, I believe that one must trusts his own eyes (and compiler). Just download the source code from FedoraCoin and create a working wallet that has all the features of XC enabled. That would prove whether the claim is correct or false.

Now, I do not know who claimed that Fedora and XC share the same codebase. If someone claims that some principles are the same, then I'm afraid that someone hasn't heard of Bitcoin and the blockchain concept (or the transaction concept, or the pubkey->wallet address concept, or... the list goes on forever).

IMPORTANT!

+1

+1  Thanks for taking the time!

[cryptico]

The DRK fanboys won't be happy soon, I really think DRK is about to come off and XC is about to rise... Could get interesting...

this is the reply to your last message but I dont see it anymore in thread and my previous reply either

"dude cut it out already I have 17000 coins and I was concerned about this review thing and actually still am this is something can change my life compleatly or burn all my savings so Yes I am concerned read my first fuking post in here I arrived just today just for this community and this coin. so please do not offend me anymore "

I would like to know why they were both deleted

I strongly believe in this coin but this is scaring me

Well dumb of you to use your savings, trading anything is like gambling.

Well you r right my crypto savings I should say but I strongly believed in XC

if the Dev will deliver everything this will take not litecoin place but bitcoin itself, I don't see any limit to its growt

[TheGift73]

Hello.

I was invited to check the implementation of XC compared to FedoraCoin's codebase in order to find possible similarities between them.
First of all, I visited FedoraCoin's repository and checked the specific file mentioned (mixerann.cpp and the header file).
Then, I was invited to Developer's station with a Teamviewer session and saw the code that implements the specific feature.

The code is in no way similar between the two coins.
But, I believe that one must trusts his own eyes (and compiler). Just download the source code from FedoraCoin and create a working wallet that has all the features of XC enabled. That would prove whether the claim is correct or false.

Now, I do not know who claimed that Fedora and XC share the same codebase. If someone claims that some principles are the same, then I'm afraid that someone hasn't heard of Bitcoin and the blockchain concept (or the transaction concept, or the pubkey->wallet address concept, or... the list goes on forever).

Thanks for taking the time to take a look at this mindfox. Great to see you helping out another coin again.

[ReRunRod]

can someone summarize for me what are the happenings? I am kind of lost as to what happened? (conflicts,code, price etc)
Thank you

Code.. That is all

No worries.. Everything is getting settled nicely.

Enjoy the coin and have fun!

[badam]

Teka what about quoting these peer reviews in op because with this speed of postings they will be lost in the thread.

[greyskies]

You guys are totally missing the point. I don't care whether the current XC code is original or not. Writing a centralized mixer is so easy that the Fedoracoin guys did it. The point is the difference in difficulty between coding a centralized mixing service and coding a decentralized mixing service is enormous. Being able to do the former is NOT evidence that one can do the latter.

DRK hasn't been able to code that themselves (hint: check the last weeks activity in DRK).

The DRK dev is still trying to determine a solution that doesn't cause forking, security issues and other such matters. And even then it will still not be truly decentralised.

XC also has encrypted transactions. In a way XC is actually SUPERIOR to DRK. The only advantage DRK has right now is the dodgy masternodes that offer more decentralisation... cling onto that whilst you can because by this time next month we'll be past it.

[ReRunRod]

I don't see why we all can't get along like Google and the Cyanogen team.

Let's all be friends and enjoy the time we have!

[PmcUnited]

The DRK fanboys won't be happy soon, I really think DRK is about to come off and XC is about to rise... Could get interesting...

this is the reply to your last message but I dont see it anymore in thread and my previous reply either

"dude cut it out already I have 17000 coins and I was concerned about this review thing and actually still am this is something can change my life compleatly or burn all my savings so Yes I am concerned read my first fuking post in here I arrived just today just for this community and this coin. so please do not offend me anymore "

I would like to know why they were both deleted

I strongly believe in this coin but this is scaring me

Chill out mate got half my savings on this coin too don't worry its a laugh losing money. I sold 5000 dark at 50 cents and forgot to buy them back. Sold 10,000 VTC for like 0.4 had 13 BTC worth or MAZACOIN week or two was worth 0.1 or some shit like that. Was going to sell my XC last night right before dump as my highly correct senses told me to and buy back in morning could have tripled my shit.

Do you see me moaning like a little bitch? Don't invest stupid amounts of money in something that your not certain about and especially not what you can't afford even tho i do it all the time i don't moan.

[jasinlee]

Hello.

I was invited to check the implementation of XC compared to FedoraCoin's codebase in order to find possible similarities between them.
First of all, I visited FedoraCoin's repository and checked the specific file mentioned (mixerann.cpp and the header file).
Then, I was invited to Developer's station with a Teamviewer session and saw the code that implements the specific feature.

The code is in no way similar between the two coins.
But, I believe that one must trusts his own eyes (and compiler). Just download the source code from FedoraCoin and create a working wallet that has all the features of XC enabled. That would prove whether the claim is correct or false.

Now, I do not know who claimed that Fedora and XC share the same codebase. If someone claims that some principles are the same, then I'm afraid that someone hasn't heard of Bitcoin and the blockchain concept (or the transaction concept, or the pubkey->wallet address concept, or... the list goes on forever).

Thanks for posting this update.

[atcsecure]

Updated Windows Wallet



http://xc-official.com/release/xc-release.rar



Github is updated w/ the latest source for this build as well.

Thank you

Keep up the great work chief!

Please download the updated wallet!

[Teka]

Can anyone send me the Peer Review for Darksend? @DarkcoinCrypto #Darkcoin #DRK #XC

https://twitter.com/XCplatform/status/472149892992081921

[nzminer]

You guys are totally missing the point. I don't care whether the current XC code is original or not. Writing a centralized mixer is so easy that the Fedoracoin guys did it. The point is the difference in difficulty between coding a centralized mixing service and coding a decentralized mixing service is enormous. Being able to do the former is NOT evidence that one can do the latter.

DRK hasn't been able to code that themselves (hint: check the last weeks activity in DRK).

The DRK dev is still trying to determine a solution that doesn't cause forking, security issues and other such matters. And even then it will still not be truly decentralised.

XC also has encrypted transactions. In a way XC is actually SUPERIOR to DRK. The only advantage DRK has right now is the dodgy masternodes that offer more decentralisation... cling onto that whilst you can because by this time next month we'll be past it.

LOL, this is so true!

I really wonder if at all the masternode system will ever be free of forking issues, i can see this project stalling for a long time!

[Bl4ckw00d]

Updated Windows Wallet



http://xc-official.com/release/xc-release.rar



Github is updated w/ the latest source for this build as well.

ATC! my nigga!  thanks for the update.  Let's grab the reigns a bit from all the negative nancys and get this bitch back on track.

[mfqrs3]

Hello.

I was invited to check the implementation of XC compared to FedoraCoin's codebase in order to find possible similarities between them.
First of all, I visited FedoraCoin's repository and checked the specific file mentioned (mixerann.cpp and the header file).
Then, I was invited to Developer's station with a Teamviewer session and saw the code that implements the specific feature.

The code is in no way similar between the two coins.
But, I believe that one must trusts his own eyes (and compiler). Just download the source code from FedoraCoin and create a working wallet that has all the features of XC enabled. That would prove whether the claim is correct or false.

Now, I do not know who claimed that Fedora and XC share the same codebase. If someone claims that some principles are the same, then I'm afraid that someone hasn't heard of Bitcoin and the blockchain concept (or the transaction concept, or the pubkey->wallet address concept, or... the list goes on forever).

Thanks for sharing !

[ReRunRod]

Updated Windows Wallet



http://xc-official.com/release/xc-release.rar



Github is updated w/ the latest source for this build as well.

Thank you

Keep up the great work chief!

Please download the updated wallet!

Will do once I get home to my laptop! Much appreciated on what you are doing. Let the haters hate

[Artoodeetoo]

Yep, DRK is a good coin, but I dont think they realise the masternodes could be its biggest weakness not strength.. If the coin gets a very high value a masternode will need to be like fort knox.. One on Amazon has already been hacked... Owner lost 1000 DRK, so its not a laughing matter.

[trader19]

Teka what about quoting these peer reviews in op because with this speed of postings they will be lost in the thread.

yes please