Splatters
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1000
★YoBit.Net★ 1400+ Coins Exchange
|
 |
June 22, 2014, 07:20:09 PM |
|
we touched 150 twice in the last week, and now we're back to 112k. The hell is going on!?
|
I know why your pray will never be answered!
|
|
|
policymaker
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
|
June 22, 2014, 07:21:56 PM |
|
we touched 150 twice in the last week, and now we're back to 112k. The hell is going on!?
Progress  check last 5 pages |
|
|
|
|
Artoodeetoo
|
|
June 22, 2014, 07:32:08 PM |
|
Hopefully a whale will just say enough of this nonsense now and slap a 200 BTC wall down at 120k
|
DASH #DashDC #DashIntoDigitalCash
|
|
|
Splatters
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1000
★YoBit.Net★ 1400+ Coins Exchange
|
|
June 22, 2014, 07:40:45 PM |
|
we touched 150 twice in the last week, and now we're back to 112k. The hell is going on!?
Progress check last 5 pages I'm gonna check, but are you telling that is it like a good thing, this price that go down? |
I know why your pray will never be answered!
|
|
|
|
Samuray
|
|
June 22, 2014, 07:41:52 PM |
|
XC TEAM AT CONFERENCE!  LOL amazing! Good Job Guys !!! |
|
|
|
policymaker
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
|
June 22, 2014, 07:55:00 PM |
|
we touched 150 twice in the last week, and now we're back to 112k. The hell is going on!?
Progress check last 5 pages I'm gonna check, but are you telling that is it like a good thing, this price that go down? Actually yeah weak hands sell us our coins back. There was some "leaked" info which many holders interpreted as not so good news and thus there was uncertainty. Soon those very holders bought back even more XC though lol. You can check the pages for yourself. ONLY good news today(PLUS PICS), but price went a bit down. In addition, razor was launched in mintpal today so people needed liquidity to invest there as well SO EVERYTHING NORMAL IN XC LAND. |
|
|
|
NewWorldCoiner
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
Saved you from a scam? Send me some BTC!
|
|
June 22, 2014, 07:58:41 PM |
|
So we're merging with CACHE now? And before anyone says otherwise, it is a merger if they have to share the same codebase to implement PoBc, presumably they will share the same anonymity technology as well? Exactly how much of this tech will be given away as part of the deal? The mixer? Or the whole multipath paradigm working on TOR? What if PoBc can't be implemented? Will CACHE still get the anonymous tech? Taken from the CACHE thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=400389.msg7442411#msg7442411And before anyone says it's none of my business, I remember mining this coin when it was getting battered by a massive private hashrate. It was a community decision to end PoW early, with the dev asking for the community's input. Where would we be now if we had let that hashpower get the majority of the coins? Higher price? Lower price? The only certainty is that we'd all have a much lower percentage of the total number. Well, what will happen if we give away the secret sauce? We all saw that the dev was promising some next level shit where anonymity was concerned. No-one claimed that bounty did they? Did anyone even get close? In business, you don't give away the one thing that makes your product better than the rest. |
|
|
|
|
|
the_game1224
|
|
June 22, 2014, 08:03:14 PM |
|
Well, what will happen if we give away the secret sauce? We all saw that the dev was promising some next level shit where anonymity was concerned. No-one claimed that bounty did they? Did anyone even get close?
In business, you don't give away the one thing that makes your product better than the rest.
This is my major concern that I hope is answered asap |
|
|
|
|
policymaker
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
|
June 22, 2014, 08:06:37 PM |
|
The coins are not getting merged, that has been denied already, they will remain separate
|
|
|
|
|
Artoodeetoo
|
|
June 22, 2014, 08:07:21 PM |
|
So we're merging with CACHE now? And before anyone says otherwise, it is a merger if they have to share the same codebase to implement PoBc, presumably they will share the same anonymity technology as well? Exactly how much of this tech will be given away as part of the deal? The mixer? Or the whole multipath paradigm working on TOR? What if PoBc can't be implemented? Will CACHE still get the anonymous tech? Taken from the CACHE thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=400389.msg7442411#msg7442411And before anyone says it's none of my business, I remember mining this coin when it was getting battered by a massive private hashrate. It was a community decision to end PoW early, with the dev asking for the community's input. Where would we be now if we had let that hashpower get the majority of the coins? Higher price? Lower price? The only certainty is that we'd all have a much lower percentage of the total number. Well, what will happen if we give away the secret sauce? We all saw that the dev was promising some next level shit where anonymity was concerned. No-one claimed that bounty did they? Did anyone even get close? In business, you don't give away the one thing that makes your product better than the rest. I do not think ACT needs to reminded of that, lets wait what he has to say about this deal before jumping to conclusions. Still curious about the tech Exactly, lets wait to see what ATC says, so far its Cache coin making a big deal of it and nothing much here... So lets just wait and see... When ATC is not AFK - which he is at the moment, he is on the thread almost every night so im sure we will hear his take soon enough. ON a separate point, nice to see some buyers taking it to the sellers as opposed to just being sold to, we have to start doing this.. |
DASH #DashDC #DashIntoDigitalCash
|
|
|
|
battbot
|
|
June 22, 2014, 08:13:54 PM |
|
If XC shares its features with another coin (so that we have 2 coins with the same features), I'm dumping. No questions asked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitcad4u
|
|
June 22, 2014, 08:14:13 PM |
|
So we're merging with CACHE now? And before anyone says otherwise, it is a merger if they have to share the same codebase to implement PoBc, presumably they will share the same anonymity technology as well? Exactly how much of this tech will be given away as part of the deal? The mixer? Or the whole multipath paradigm working on TOR? What if PoBc can't be implemented? Will CACHE still get the anonymous tech? Taken from the CACHE thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=400389.msg7442411#msg7442411And before anyone says it's none of my business, I remember mining this coin when it was getting battered by a massive private hashrate. It was a community decision to end PoW early, with the dev asking for the community's input. Where would we be now if we had let that hashpower get the majority of the coins? Higher price? Lower price? The only certainty is that we'd all have a much lower percentage of the total number. Well, what will happen if we give away the secret sauce? We all saw that the dev was promising some next level shit where anonymity was concerned. No-one claimed that bounty did they? Did anyone even get close? In business, you don't give away the one thing that makes your product better than the rest. We are NOT merging with Cache, please stop spreading rumours, in the end it only hurts the coin. There is no proof from dev or PR about any such merger. |
|
|
|
|
|
lawgicc
|
|
June 22, 2014, 08:17:07 PM |
|
Is that dude(with glasses) the same one as from Blackcoin ?
yes. I think he started the blackcoin multipool if im correct |
mrBitcoinZ.com
@mrB1tc01n
|
|
|
|
the_game1224
|
|
June 22, 2014, 08:23:45 PM |
|
If XC shares its features with another coin (so that we have 2 coins with the same features), I'm dumping. No questions asked.
Ouch |
|
|
|
|
qawzsx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
NOT FUD! FACTS!
|
|
June 22, 2014, 08:27:36 PM |
|
If XC shares its features with another coin (so that we have 2 coins with the same features), I'm dumping. No questions asked.
You are an idiot, and you're the dev of a coin too...lol The tech will be open source anyway at some point... |
|
|
|
|
qawzsx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
NOT FUD! FACTS!
|
|
June 22, 2014, 08:29:35 PM |
|
So we're merging with CACHE now? And before anyone says otherwise, it is a merger if they have to share the same codebase to implement PoBc, presumably they will share the same anonymity technology as well? Exactly how much of this tech will be given away as part of the deal? The mixer? Or the whole multipath paradigm working on TOR? What if PoBc can't be implemented? Will CACHE still get the anonymous tech? Taken from the CACHE thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=400389.msg7442411#msg7442411And before anyone says it's none of my business, I remember mining this coin when it was getting battered by a massive private hashrate. It was a community decision to end PoW early, with the dev asking for the community's input. Where would we be now if we had let that hashpower get the majority of the coins? Higher price? Lower price? The only certainty is that we'd all have a much lower percentage of the total number. Well, what will happen if we give away the secret sauce? We all saw that the dev was promising some next level shit where anonymity was concerned. No-one claimed that bounty did they? Did anyone even get close? In business, you don't give away the one thing that makes your product better than the rest. We are NOT merging with Cache, please stop spreading rumours, in the end it only hurts the coin. There is no proof from dev or PR about any such merger. Nobody said any merging from the start...but what can you expect from such ignorant bunch... |
|
|
|
|
|
Slipknot79
|
|
June 22, 2014, 08:31:31 PM |
|
Yes, someone did slip and mention that somewhere on the forum. I wont go into detail on it as the concept is alien to most of this forum and I dont want to give away the features before its done. But yes you are correct.
Yea wuz up, im the one and only approved slip.  |
|
|
|
|
BrewCrewFan
|
|
June 22, 2014, 08:32:06 PM |
|
If XC shares its features with another coin (so that we have 2 coins with the same features), I'm dumping. No questions asked.
Well then, get it over with and do it shortly then. Yes I am calling you on it right now. Dump. Because it what was said is true, then they will be sharing chain info between the 2 of them. |
|
|
|
|
bitcad4u
|
|
June 22, 2014, 08:33:28 PM |
|
If XC shares its features with another coin (so that we have 2 coins with the same features), I'm dumping. No questions asked.
You are an idiot, and you're the dev of a coin too...lol The tech will be open source anyway at some point... can we be civil... ? |
|
|
|
|
DFJ
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
June 22, 2014, 08:33:50 PM |
|
Short term you'd probably be crazy to sell now prior to ATC coming back with (presumably) positive news from the conference.
That said, this Cache coin stuff at first blush is... not great. Anything that dilutes features, investor interest, etc. away from XC and into another coin, particularly one with essentially zero market cap prior to today (no offense to dev) is negative.
What would be fine is if XC has features that allow other coins to integrate into it, but DO NOT encourage investors to invest in those other coins.
|
|
|
|
|
|
