[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[laredo7mm]

I know but excavator stands in an unused room so I do not mind a desire to be better cooled card
and self multipool is another great idea
Bullseye by me, Ladies and Gentlemen

A cooler card at the expense of extra wear and tear on your fans.  Anything less than 75°C for card temp is fine.

When I was mining XC (during PoW) with my 280x's they would stay at 50 to 60°C and the fan was at around 30 to 35%.

[qawzsx]

Vote for XC to be supported on this new auction website - http://cryptomart.co

Why do you keep spamming this on this thread and other threads?

I can't believe you just asked that question...

[laredo7mm]

Vote for XC to be supported on this new auction website - http://cryptomart.co

Why do you keep spamming this on this thread and other threads?

I can't believe you just asked that question...

You better believe, because I did.

Every day here for the past three days, plus you spammed it on Dark and Veri, so you aren't just trying to promote XC adoption.

[policymaker]

m8 dont get me wrong, but, buying 6 750ti to mine scrypt is like buying a mini cooper and going off road. Let the pool take its due, 5,5MH for 6 750ti seems low, my 660ti gets up to 2MHZ on latest CC miner alone, and I know for a fact that one 750ti can get better than that, while running cooler and not needing so much watt.

Were I you, I would definitely hit the cudaminer thread, you totally need to finetune your cards if u dont get more than 10MH.


TL:DR 750ti has the best MH/watt/investment ratio for x11, you need better settings

No offense taken, but I think your analogy is all off:  It's like buying a monster truck and never taking it off road... or buying a race car and only driving it to starbucks. 

Getting 10.5 Mhs now on the x11.  If I'm using ccminer, would I still hit up the cudaminer thread to do some tuning?

well yeah, that was a better analogy, but u got the point

And yeah, you do need to visit the cudaminer topic or google for ur cards settings, you can certainly do better than that

[five8andten]

my 1.5mh is clipping along just fine.  20k accepted shares already!!!

EDIT:  I should say that my miners aren't getting rejected shares

are you running asic?

gridseeds

[tr8kr]

We need a estimated XC payout on the new multipool pool... i know i dont mine for nothing but i like to see a progress on my mining

[policymaker]

We need a estimated XC payout on the new multipool pool... i know i dont mine for nothing but i like to see a progress on my mining

yeah its still beta so I guess all these stuff will be available at some point. Its just nice to know team's working on so many things at the same time and actually delivering!

[wevus]

Never a dull moment in XC land.


This weekend we are looking to test out the XC Multipool.

We need SHA256, scrypt and X11 miners for testing the backend.


If your interested in testing - head over to http://www.hashevolved.com/ to get started.  


We may need to restart the pool at times for updates, your miners should automatically reconnect when we do.


thanks,

ATCSECURE

Never mined x11 before, but now's a good a time as any.   6 card 750 ti rig pointing to :5555 with new ccminer 3.5 -   Anyone know what MH I should expect on x11 with this rig?

750 ti gets around 2.3 mhz per card, if your question hasnt been answered yet

[therightmintality]

As a traditional investment professional, as I have stated before, I am impressed with the underlying fundamentals.  A good traditional stock has a good management team, good R & D to stays relevant and appealing to the masses, and if lucky enough a dividend.  XC has a great management team, cutting edge technology that has been delivered or is being worked on that will have mass appeal, and it coins increase only 3.3% a year, which is similar to a dividend being paid to current holders.  It also has a market cap of $4 to $5 million with plenty of room for growth.  

Other coins that intrigued me at first have some flawed fundamentals.  They over promise and under deliver.  They do no have a set amount of coins (shares).  This will lead to dilution.  An example is a traditional stock who's price increased over the years and it becomes cumbersome to record keep so they do a stock split.  A 2-1 split increases everyones shares by 2, but cuts the price in half.   A few other coins have less than half of their final coin number in circulation.  This will cause dilution of that coin over time... It simple economics.  You look at these same coins and they will have resistance to growth.  Say a coin has a $40 million market cap, or approx. 10x XC's, it will struggle to grow.  It will take another $40 million to double the price, it will also take more if the number of coins continues to grow as mining continues and causes dilution.  You are looking at a $60-$80 million of additional market capitalization to double the price.  While doubling is not bad, I see XC with as much or more technology as these coins after only 6 weeks.  I see the roadmap and the marketing that has been organized, the developer and his skill set, and the fact this coin can not be diluted as an opportunity that is very rare.  A chance to earn many times your initial investment if you hold and trust the plan.   As I said before, I bought more earlier this week when the price was low, and will continue to hold until I see a bad diversion from the plan.  However, I don't expect this, because so far this team has under promised and over delivered and I expect this to continue.

[Artoodeetoo]

As an traditional investment professional, as I have stated before, I am impressed with the underlying fundamentals.  A good traditional stock has a good management team, good R & D to stays relevant and appealing to the masses, and if lucky enough a dividend.  XC has a great management team, cutting edge technology that has been delivered or is being worked on that will have mass appeal, and it shares increase only 3.3% a year, which is similar to a dividend being paid to current holders.  It also has a market cap of $4 to $5 million with plenty of room for growth.  

Other coins that intrigued me at first have some flawed fundamentals.  They over promise and under deliver.  They do no have a set amount of coins (shares).  This will lead to dilution.  An example is a traditional stock who's price increased over the years and it becomes cumbersome to record keep so they do a stock split.  A 2-1 split increases everyones shares by 2, but cuts the price in half.   A few other coins have less than half of their final coin number in circulation.  This will cause dilution of that coin over time... It simple economics.  You look at these same coins and they will have resistance to growth.  Say a coin has a $40 million market cap, or approx. 10x XC's, it will struggle to grow.  It will take another $40 million to double the price, it will also take more if the number of coins continues to grow as mining continues and causes dilution.  You are looking at a $60-$80 million of additional market capitalization to double the price.  While doubling is not bad, I see XC with as much or more technology as these coins after only 6 weeks.  I see the roadmap and the marketing that has been organized, the developer and his skill set, and the fact this coin can not be diluted as an opportunity that is very rare.  A chance to earn many times your initial investment if you hold and trust the plan.   As I said before, I bought more earlier this week when the price was low, and will continue to hold until I see a bad diversion from the plan.  However, I don't expect this, because so far this team has under promised and over delivered and I expect this to continue.

Have to agree with this 100% ....

[qawzsx]

As a traditional investment professional, as I have stated before, I am impressed with the underlying fundamentals.  A good traditional stock has a good management team, good R & D to stays relevant and appealing to the masses, and if lucky enough a dividend.  XC has a great management team, cutting edge technology that has been delivered or is being worked on that will have mass appeal, and it coins increase only 3.3% a year, which is similar to a dividend being paid to current holders.  It also has a market cap of $4 to $5 million with plenty of room for growth.  

Other coins that intrigued me at first have some flawed fundamentals.  They over promise and under deliver.  They do no have a set amount of coins (shares).  This will lead to dilution.  An example is a traditional stock who's price increased over the years and it becomes cumbersome to record keep so they do a stock split.  A 2-1 split increases everyones shares by 2, but cuts the price in half.   A few other coins have less than half of their final coin number in circulation.  This will cause dilution of that coin over time... It simple economics.  You look at these same coins and they will have resistance to growth.  Say a coin has a $40 million market cap, or approx. 10x XC's, it will struggle to grow.  It will take another $40 million to double the price, it will also take more if the number of coins continues to grow as mining continues and causes dilution.  You are looking at a $60-$80 million of additional market capitalization to double the price.  While doubling is not bad, I see XC with as much or more technology as these coins after only 6 weeks.  I see the roadmap and the marketing that has been organized, the developer and his skill set, and the fact this coin can not be diluted as an opportunity that is very rare.  A chance to earn many times your initial investment if you hold and trust the plan.   As I said before, I bought more earlier this week when the price was low, and will continue to hold until I see a bad diversion from the plan.  However, I don't expect this, because so far this team has under promised and over delivered and I expect this to continue.

Always trust a serious face
Take a look at Dan, and know that you're in good hands

[dadon]

As a traditional investment professional, as I have stated before, I am impressed with the underlying fundamentals.  A good traditional stock has a good management team, good R & D to stays relevant and appealing to the masses, and if lucky enough a dividend.  XC has a great management team, cutting edge technology that has been delivered or is being worked on that will have mass appeal, and it coins increase only 3.3% a year, which is similar to a dividend being paid to current holders.  It also has a market cap of $4 to $5 million with plenty of room for growth.  

Other coins that intrigued me at first have some flawed fundamentals.  They over promise and under deliver.  They do no have a set amount of coins (shares).  This will lead to dilution.  An example is a traditional stock who's price increased over the years and it becomes cumbersome to record keep so they do a stock split.  A 2-1 split increases everyones shares by 2, but cuts the price in half.   A few other coins have less than half of their final coin number in circulation.  This will cause dilution of that coin over time... It simple economics.  You look at these same coins and they will have resistance to growth.  Say a coin has a $40 million market cap, or approx. 10x XC's, it will struggle to grow.  It will take another $40 million to double the price, it will also take more if the number of coins continues to grow as mining continues and causes dilution.  You are looking at a $60-$80 million of additional market capitalization to double the price.  While doubling is not bad, I see XC with as much or more technology as these coins after only 6 weeks.  I see the roadmap and the marketing that has been organized, the developer and his skill set, and the fact this coin can not be diluted as an opportunity that is very rare.  A chance to earn many times your initial investment if you hold and trust the plan.   As I said before, I bought more earlier this week when the price was low, and will continue to hold until I see a bad diversion from the plan.  However, I don't expect this, because so far this team has under promised and over delivered and I expect this to continue.

so what do you think...do you see any reason why in the next few years XC cant have a marketcap equal to BTC..what do you think the future holds, if XC keeps delivering like it has?

[benthach]

XC need to copy SuperCoin wallet idea, it is the best one right now.

[GrGr]

XC need to copy xxxxxxxx wallet idea, it is the best one right now.

No we need to go our own way. To copy something is stupid and lazy  

[benthach]

XC need to copy SuperCoin wallet idea, it is the best one right now.

No we need to go our own way. To copy something is stupid and lazy  

just some idea. i don't think it can copy.

[JCPoon]

Just turned my 12 MH into the pool.... didn't even make a sound    

[Artoodeetoo]

XC need to copy xxxxxxxx wallet idea, it is the best one right now.

No we need to go our own way. To copy something is stupid and lazy  

Exactly, check the roadmap, we have more than enough to keep us busy for now!

[BrewCrewFan]

0   
   stratum+tcp://stratum.hashevolved.com:5555
   48.0 c   99%   2749 Kh/s   60 / 0   0.00%   200 Series   70% (3026)   1170 Mhz   1200 Mhz   
1   
   stratum+tcp://stratum.hashevolved.com:5555
   50.0 c   99%   2609 Kh/s   45 / 0   0.00%   200 Series   70% (2913)   1100 Mhz   1200 Mhz   
2   
   stratum+tcp://stratum.hashevolved.com:5555
   51.0 c   99%   2755 Kh/s   51 / 0   0.00%   200 Series   70% (3104)   1170 Mhz   1200 Mhz   
3   
   stratum+tcp://stratum.hashevolved.com:5555
   46.0 c   99%   2713 Kh/s   38 / 0   0.00%   200 Series   70% (2828)   1150 Mhz   1200 Mhz   
4   
   stratum+tcp://stratum.hashevolved.com:5555
   43.0 c   99%   2715 Kh/s   43 / 0   0.00%   200 Series   70% (2724)   1150 Mhz   1200 Mhz   

all 270x
0,2 gigabyte
1,3,4 saphire

Dead God man.... look at your temps... no need to run those fans so high you will burn them out faster!

[RW-Stott]

XC need to copy xxxxxxxx wallet idea, it is the best one right now.

No we need to go our own way. To copy something is stupid and lazy 

+11

or how about xc's anon solution is superior?  so why would it copy?  hello?

[Grifftech2k4]

As a traditional investment professional, as I have stated before, I am impressed with the underlying fundamentals.  A good traditional stock has a good management team, good R & D to stays relevant and appealing to the masses, and if lucky enough a dividend.  XC has a great management team, cutting edge technology that has been delivered or is being worked on that will have mass appeal, and it coins increase only 3.3% a year, which is similar to a dividend being paid to current holders.  It also has a market cap of $4 to $5 million with plenty of room for growth.  

Other coins that intrigued me at first have some flawed fundamentals.  They over promise and under deliver.  They do no have a set amount of coins (shares).  This will lead to dilution.  An example is a traditional stock who's price increased over the years and it becomes cumbersome to record keep so they do a stock split.  A 2-1 split increases everyones shares by 2, but cuts the price in half.   A few other coins have less than half of their final coin number in circulation.  This will cause dilution of that coin over time... It simple economics.  You look at these same coins and they will have resistance to growth.  Say a coin has a $40 million market cap, or approx. 10x XC's, it will struggle to grow.  It will take another $40 million to double the price, it will also take more if the number of coins continues to grow as mining continues and causes dilution.  You are looking at a $60-$80 million of additional market capitalization to double the price.  While doubling is not bad, I see XC with as much or more technology as these coins after only 6 weeks.  I see the roadmap and the marketing that has been organized, the developer and his skill set, and the fact this coin can not be diluted as an opportunity that is very rare.  A chance to earn many times your initial investment if you hold and trust the plan.   As I said before, I bought more earlier this week when the price was low, and will continue to hold until I see a bad diversion from the plan.  However, I don't expect this, because so far this team has under promised and over delivered and I expect this to continue.

Excellent and useful analysis my good sir. Thank you!