DFJ
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 27, 2014, 09:31:44 PM |
|
When XC releases REV2, there really needs to be an audit performed so that people can see how XC's anon method is superior from other major competitor solutions.
Agreed. XC got ahead of itself during the original big run-up with talk of how we are better than DRK, etc. But we are getting close to the point where we will need to make that case again (and vs. Vericoin, other competitors). Except this time the code will exist rather than being in process. |
|
|
|
|
|
Artoodeetoo
|
|
June 27, 2014, 09:35:17 PM |
|
When XC releases REV2, there really needs to be an audit performed so that people can see how XC's anon method is superior from other major competitor solutions.
Agreed. XC got ahead of itself during the original big run-up with talk of how we are better than DRK, etc. But we are getting close to the point where we will need to make that case again (and vs. Vericoin, other competitors). Except this time the code will exist rather than being in process. You may have mussed but there was an open challenge and bounty for rev 1.5... Drk's best came and tried and failed... Where else has a bounty been offere to try and crack the anon? |
DASH #DashDC #DashIntoDigitalCash
|
|
|
|
RW-Stott
|
|
June 27, 2014, 09:36:30 PM |
|
When XC releases REV2, there really needs to be an audit performed so that people can see how XC's anon method is superior from other major competitor solutions.
Agreed. XC got ahead of itself during the original big run-up with talk of how we are better than DRK, etc. But we are getting close to the point where we will need to make that case again (and vs. Vericoin, other competitors). Except this time the code will exist rather than being in process. Well, in fairness of XC's dev team, it was only the community that was claiming to be "better than DRK." But still, and audit of XC's REV2 compared to competitor solutions would be appropriate. Centralized solutions (such as VRC) do not need to be included in the audit. There is no point. It really only should include DRK, which is arguably the only competitor to XC. |
|
|
|
|
|
SushiChef
|
|
June 27, 2014, 09:40:39 PM |
|
When XC releases REV2, there really needs to be an audit performed so that people can see how XC's anon method is superior from other major competitor solutions.
Agreed. XC got ahead of itself during the original big run-up with talk of how we are better than DRK, etc. But we are getting close to the point where we will need to make that case again (and vs. Vericoin, other competitors). Except this time the code will exist rather than being in process. You may have mussed but there was an open challenge and bounty for rev 1.5... Drk's best came and tried and failed... Where else has a bounty been offere to try and crack the anon? Also the team stated they will get a bigger bounty out with rev2. This to attract experts that will make Cheaplin look like a 3 year old  |
|
|
|
|
policymaker
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
|
June 27, 2014, 09:41:38 PM |
|
When XC releases REV2, there really needs to be an audit performed so that people can see how XC's anon method is superior from other major competitor solutions.
Agreed. XC got ahead of itself during the original big run-up with talk of how we are better than DRK, etc. But we are getting close to the point where we will need to make that case again (and vs. Vericoin, other competitors). Except this time the code will exist rather than being in process. You may have mussed but there was an open challenge and bounty for rev 1.5... Drk's best came and tried and failed... Where else has a bounty been offere to try and crack the anon? yeah but remember-- there is supposed to be a big bounty with rev2 released, which will be promoted to let people know how good of a solution it is---- not to mention now we got a roadmap with even more to showcase for the people, anon is just not good enough FOR US now, we need to let the word out that REAL work is being done here, not just some rush-to-anon solution in order to gain momentum. Rev2 is just a piece of a much broader plan, and people need to know this. I still feel our PR team needs to get out there, but I guess the team wants to have stuff ready, tested and working properly in order to promote them. I am actually even MORE excited for those features that are supposed to happen alongside rev2: Website Launch Social Media Revamp Update XC Wallet Logo . I reall want to see them even more professional looking and then get the real stuff promoted. I feel that's the team's plan. |
|
|
|
ssmc2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1040
|
|
June 27, 2014, 09:42:53 PM |
|
When XC releases REV2, there really needs to be an audit performed so that people can see how XC's anon method is superior from other major competitor solutions.
Agreed. XC got ahead of itself during the original big run-up with talk of how we are better than DRK, etc. But we are getting close to the point where we will need to make that case again (and vs. Vericoin, other competitors). Except this time the code will exist rather than being in process. Well, in fairness of XC's dev team, it was only the community that was claiming to be "better than DRK." But still, and audit of XC's REV2 compared to competitor solutions would be appropriate. Centralized solutions (such as VRC) do not need to be included in the audit. There is no point. It really only should include DRK, which is arguably the only competitor to XC. Something tells me this will happen and something also tells me XC will pass with flying colors. Then we see the true reflection in this coin's value which will make the current price seem like a joke. |
|
|
|
|
|
Artoodeetoo
|
|
June 27, 2014, 09:43:40 PM |
|
When XC releases REV2, there really needs to be an audit performed so that people can see how XC's anon method is superior from other major competitor solutions.
Agreed. XC got ahead of itself during the original big run-up with talk of how we are better than DRK, etc. But we are getting close to the point where we will need to make that case again (and vs. Vericoin, other competitors). Except this time the code will exist rather than being in process. You may have mussed but there was an open challenge and bounty for rev 1.5... Drk's best came and tried and failed... Where else has a bounty been offere to try and crack the anon? Also the team stated they will get a bigger bounty out with rev2. This to attract experts that will make Cheaplin look like a 3 year old I should have said 'president' cheaplin after all he extensively tested the last failed drk update... Expecting to see some vrc monies coming this way tonight, it looks done for now... |
DASH #DashDC #DashIntoDigitalCash
|
|
|
|
RW-Stott
|
|
June 27, 2014, 09:50:08 PM |
|
When XC releases REV2, there really needs to be an audit performed so that people can see how XC's anon method is superior from other major competitor solutions.
Agreed. XC got ahead of itself during the original big run-up with talk of how we are better than DRK, etc. But we are getting close to the point where we will need to make that case again (and vs. Vericoin, other competitors). Except this time the code will exist rather than being in process. You may have mussed but there was an open challenge and bounty for rev 1.5... Drk's best came and tried and failed... Where else has a bounty been offere to try and crack the anon? Also the team stated they will get a bigger bounty out with rev2. This to attract experts that will make Cheaplin look like a 3 year old I should have said 'president' cheaplin after all he extensively tested the last failed drk update... Expecting to see some vrc monies coming this way tonight, it looks done for now... I was reading through the old thread earlier today, and to my "surprise," it was 'president' chaeplin (of DRK's team) that made the first FUD post claiming XC's code was a copy of fedora's code. To anyone who thinks chaeplin is ever trying to help XC, think again. Nothing this guy says can be trusted, as far as I'm concerned. See: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=600706.msg7005794#msg7005794It was orchestrated by DRK the entire time... even leading up to the FUD tweet from DRK's official twitter account. |
|
|
|
|
|
Teka (OP)
|
|
June 27, 2014, 09:57:10 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
policymaker
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
|
June 27, 2014, 10:11:56 PM |
|
"To further break this down: 2 on Xnode, 2 on EMs/Ec and 1 on QT"
as replied by Teka in AMA, this is the amount of coders working on XC. More on other aspects(like multipool, etc).
I think it is pretty significant for people to know.
|
|
|
|
|
bitcad4u
|
|
June 27, 2014, 10:25:28 PM |
|
I put 4x 280x on it about 12.5Mh/s
whats your config? the 7970's are the same as the 280x, I'm seeing about on average 8Mh/s I use a optimized mod of sgminer with the last AMD driver GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 sgminer -k x11mod -o stratum+tcp://stratum.hashevolved.com:5555 -u (XC adress) -p x -I 18 -g 2 --lookup-gap 2 -w 256 --thread-concurrency 8192 But right now i see accepted job in my miner with no reject but the frontend of the pool tell me 59233 rejected share and 0 accepted.Unconfirmed shares aren't a bad thing. Everyone starts off with unconfirmed shares. When blocks are found for each coin, your unconfirmed shares turn into confirmed shares. At the end of each shift, you will receive a payout based on how many confirmed shares you have.
If you leave the pool and you still have unconfirmed shares in our system, they might still turn confirmed later, and guess what, you'll be paid for them.
So yeah unconfirmed shares are good thing to have, but ideally, confirmed shares are what you're looking for.
Sorry I guess this is my fault. I'll updated FAQs.
Ok i understand ! What mod of SGminer u using? |
|
|
|
|
|
conradjohnson
|
|
June 27, 2014, 10:32:59 PM |
|
Never mined x11 before, but now's a good a time as any. 6 card 750 ti rig pointing to :5555 with new ccminer 3.5 - Anyone know what MH I should expect on x11 with this rig?
6 should get you around 13 MH/s with the latest ccminer (be sure to use the 3.5-5.0 with the 750ti) Allright, getting 2.1 per card now. Pool reporting topping out at 12Mhs - (these are just the stock 750ti...no OC, no FTW, just 750ti). Trying the 5.0 version of ccminer, and I'll switch back to the 3.5 here in a bit. OC settings with precision at +125gpu/+500mem. Gonna let it run for a while to make sure it's stable, then I'll try out the 3.5 ccminer version to see if I get any better. Also... just picked up another 0.5 BTC worth of XC and cracked my first beer of the weekend so... yay! |
|
|
|
|
|
bitcad4u
|
|
June 27, 2014, 10:39:38 PM |
|
I am getting this with 4 x 7950 using sgminer :XWKG9meceCbUdJhnwoWXBzksGqbY9ACRgc 5.37 MH 100%
I have never mined X11 before but I am liking that my GPUs are not burning up and that my wife is not yelling at me asking why the fuse blows when she uses the hair dryer.
Dam Scrypt kills GPUs eh ? X11 >
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grifftech2k4
|
|
June 27, 2014, 10:41:08 PM |
|
"To further break this down: 2 on Xnode, 2 on EMs/Ec and 1 on QT"
as replied by Teka in AMA, this is the amount of coders working on XC. More on other aspects(like multipool, etc).
I think it is pretty significant for people to know.
That is super important!!!! Good Lord Almighty!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
conradjohnson
|
|
June 27, 2014, 10:41:38 PM |
|
II am liking that my GPUs are not burning up and that my wife .....
^this. 20 minutes after switching from scrypt to x11 my room got cooler and my rig is just humming along low and cool. |
|
|
|
|
policymaker
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
|
June 27, 2014, 10:44:02 PM |
|
I am getting this with 4 x 7950 using sgminer :XWKG9meceCbUdJhnwoWXBzksGqbY9ACRgc 5.37 MH 100%
I have never mined X11 before but I am liking that my GPUs are not burning up and that my wife is not yelling at me asking why the fuse blows when she uses the hair dryer.
Dam Scrypt kills GPUs eh ? X11 >
w8 half an hour for pool to detect ur true rate. I think your rate is super low for now, my 5850 does 1mh on x11. You need to tweak ur settings if this stays as it is edit: w8, u mean u didnt mine xc with 4x7950? Oh my, Id be FURIOUS were it me! |
|
|
|
|
bitcad4u
|
|
June 27, 2014, 10:44:29 PM |
|
I am getting this with 4 x 7950 using sgminer :XWKG9meceCbUdJhnwoWXBzksGqbY9ACRgc 5.37 MH 100%
I have never mined X11 before but I am liking that my GPUs are not burning up and that my wife is not yelling at me asking why the fuse blows when she uses the hair dryer.
Dam Scrypt kills GPUs eh ? X11 >
oh man - even better now XWKG9meceCbUdJhnwoWXBzksGqbY9ACRgc 6.84 MH 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
RW-Stott
|
|
June 27, 2014, 10:50:30 PM |
|
Some very interesting information there... from both Dev + community... Especially noted was this comment: "I know Dr. Zach Harris personally ( http://www.wired.com/2012/10/dkim-vulnerability-widespread/). He is a PhD Mathematician + Experienced Secure Code Analyst. I will ask him to check XC's code when atcsecure feels it is ready. Analyzing custom cryptography for any/all issues is Dr. Harris' area of expertise. And yes, this will be huge for XC from both security & marketing perspectives." Seems like a pretty huge deal... |
|
|
|
|
|
SushiChef
|
|
June 27, 2014, 10:51:13 PM |
|
I am getting this with 4 x 7950 using sgminer :XWKG9meceCbUdJhnwoWXBzksGqbY9ACRgc 5.37 MH 100%
I have never mined X11 before but I am liking that my GPUs are not burning up and that my wife is not yelling at me asking why the fuse blows when she uses the hair dryer.
Dam Scrypt kills GPUs eh ? X11 >
oh man - even better now XWKG9meceCbUdJhnwoWXBzksGqbY9ACRgc 6.84 MH 100% This calls for some fridaynight "celebration" with your wife.  |
|
|
|
|
|
conradjohnson
|
|
June 27, 2014, 10:53:11 PM |
|
Never mined x11 before, but now's a good a time as any. 6 card 750 ti rig pointing to :5555 with new ccminer 3.5 - Anyone know what MH I should expect on x11 with this rig?
6 should get you around 13 MH/s with the latest ccminer (be sure to use the 3.5-5.0 with the 750ti) Allright, getting 2.1 per card now. Pool reporting topping out at 12Mhs - (these are just the stock 750ti...no OC, no FTW, just 750ti). Trying the 5.0 version of ccminer, and I'll switch back to the 3.5 here in a bit. OC settings with precision at +125gpu/+500mem. Gonna let it run for a while to make sure it's stable, then I'll try out the 3.5 ccminer version to see if I get any better. Also... just picked up another 0.5 BTC worth of XC and cracked my first beer of the weekend so... yay!
m8 dont get me wrong, but, buying 6 750ti to mine scrypt is like buying a mini cooper and going off road. Let the pool take its due, 5,5MH for 6 750ti seems low, my 660ti gets up to 2MHZ on latest CC miner alone, and I know for a fact that one 750ti can get better than that, while running cooler and not needing so much watt.
Were I you, I would definitely hit the cudaminer thread, you totally need to finetune your cards if u dont get more than 10MH.
TL:DR 750ti has the best MH/watt/investment ratio for x11, you need better settings
Pool now reporting north of 13 Mhs so cheers! Thanks everyone for the direction! |
|
|
|
|
|
