[XDN] duckNote [ANN]. Anonymous, CPU-efficient, Smart Economy

[akula999]

my old .wallet can't synchronizing all blocks and only get the block of 27609.
I only backup the .wallet without .keys.
But I can get all block by generate new address.
What can I do to get my coin which in the old address.
My ADDRESS:dddVM6YEg28hDgT2jUZMFBB4vFP1vJTZiXPSxqvFVH9oTiGV4C6v4vkD9BNv5rL4DtgYpab6ZLSzd37 ZTpvKjbCy2wirdpE32
Thx.

Just send the coins from the old wallet to the new wallet.

synchronizing failed,I can't send it.

Beyond my knowledge. Can anyone help him? I set up 2 of my own wallets and 5 wallets for friends in the last 2 months and have had no issues.

[1714727729]

1714727729

[1714727729]

1714727729

[1714727729]

1714727729

[Winner]

XDN nearing 50 satoshi's!

[makyoo]

my old .wallet can't synchronizing all blocks and only get the block of 27609.
I only backup the .wallet without .keys.
But I can get all block by generate new address.
What can I do to get my coin which in the old address.
My ADDRESS:dddVM6YEg28hDgT2jUZMFBB4vFP1vJTZiXPSxqvFVH9oTiGV4C6v4vkD9BNv5rL4DtgYpab6ZLSzd37 ZTpvKjbCy2wirdpE32
Thx.

Just send the coins from the old wallet to the new wallet.

synchronizing failed,I can't send it.

Try heavy mode.
Download classic wallet with daemon (ducknoted.exe)
Run ducknoted.exe wait until it synchronize. (download blockchain to your pc)
Use your old gui wallet in local mode - connect to local ducknoted (not remote)
Transfer xdn to your new address.

[joewills]

my old .wallet can't synchronizing all blocks and only get the block of 27609.
I only backup the .wallet without .keys.
But I can get all block by generate new address.
What can I do to get my coin which in the old address.
My ADDRESS:dddVM6YEg28hDgT2jUZMFBB4vFP1vJTZiXPSxqvFVH9oTiGV4C6v4vkD9BNv5rL4DtgYpab6ZLSzd37 ZTpvKjbCy2wirdpE32
Thx.

Just send the coins from the old wallet to the new wallet.

synchronizing failed,I can't send it.

Try heavy mode.
Download classic wallet with daemon (ducknoted.exe)
Run ducknoted.exe wait until it synchronize. (download blockchain to your pc)
Use your old gui wallet in local mode - connect to local ducknoted (not remote)
Transfer xdn to your new address.

What should I do to change to Heavy mode?

[makyoo]

What should I do to change to Heavy mode?

1. Download classic wallet with daemon (ducknoted.exe)
2. Run ducknoted.exe wait until it synchronize. (download blockchain to your pc)
3. Use your old gui wallet in local mode - connect to local ducknoted (not remote)
4. Transfer xdn to your new address.

[adhitthana]

I have to say, well done to the Ducknote Dev and team..I sold my XDN too early, but am pleased to see it doing well.

[digital7]

the price is too expensive

[akula999]

the price is too expensive

you serious??!?!? Too expensive? Get out of crypto and go seek fortune in the fiat world.

[joewills]

the price is too expensive

you serious??!?!? Too expensive? Get out of crypto and go seek fortune in the fiat world.

Refer to 200 satoshi, It's cheap and only 40 satoshi.
Next week, 200 satoshi.Aha, It' cool.

[smooth]

dNote is English your first language? I mean no offence just trying to understand whats going on. 

Me is Privacy Protected:)

Ok fair enough, just to be clear before the fix you released could XDN have been attacked the same way as XMR. We know XDN was not attacked but it has been widely spread that all cryptonotes had the same flaw.

I will be brief as usual D< :
1. This vulnerability is a double spend vulnerability.
2. This vulnerability is possible only if blockchain split occurs. Can call it fork.
3. Split or fork is possible with long attack preparation and that preparation is visible to those who watch the blockchain.
4. XDN devs watch blockchain 24/7 to avoid that kind of issues.
5. 1->2->3->4-> XDN IS and WAS invulnerable

P.S. XDN devs fixed any related issues, and were first team who did that.
https://github.com/ducknote/ducknote/commit/e9dcc9825601f5a7b209c78e3a61169ba4f31fbc

You guys are extremely clueless or just full of shit.

XDN has a much higher default median size (32000) and also has a high background level of transactions (likely due to the ongoing pump). It woould have been extremely easy to increases the median size to around 35-40k where the attack becomes possible. If done carefully it would likely be indisinguishable from normal activity. In fact I wouldn't be surprised if the XDN median has already reached that level due to normal fluctutation without any "attack preparation" at all. In that case an attacker would merely need to lay in wait for the appropriate conditions to occur, and no about of "24/7" would prevent it.

Summary is that XDN was more vulnerable, not invulnerable. Furthermore XDN was not the first team to fix the exploit. Not by a wide margin.

[33zer0w0lf]

Is this hostility really necessary?

[dNote]

dNote is English your first language? I mean no offence just trying to understand whats going on.  

Me is Privacy Protected:)

Ok fair enough, just to be clear before the fix you released could XDN have been attacked the same way as XMR. We know XDN was not attacked but it has been widely spread that all cryptonotes had the same flaw.

I will be brief as usual D< :
1. This vulnerability is a double spend vulnerability.
2. This vulnerability is possible only if blockchain split occurs. Can call it fork.
3. Split or fork is possible with long attack preparation and that preparation is visible to those who watch the blockchain.
4. XDN devs watch blockchain 24/7 to avoid that kind of issues.
5. 1->2->3->4-> XDN IS and WAS invulnerable

P.S. XDN devs fixed any related issues, and were first team who did that.
https://github.com/ducknote/ducknote/commit/e9dcc9825601f5a7b209c78e3a61169ba4f31fbc

You guys are extremely clueless or just full of shit.

XDN has a much higher default median size (32000) and also has a high background level of transactions (likely due to the ongoing pump). It woould have been extremely easy to increases the median size to around 35-40k where the attack becomes possible. If done carefully it would likely be indisinguishable from normal activity. In fact I wouldn't be surprised if the XDN median has already reached that level due to normal fluctutation without any "attack preparation" at all. In that case an attacker would merely need to lay in wait for the appropriate conditions to occur, and no about of "24/7" would prevent it.

Summary is that XDN was more vulnerable, not invulnerable. Furthermore XDN was not the first team to fix the exploit. Not by a wide margin.

Sure, now Monero devs can only offer excuses, because of the goal missed in their gates. Truly XMR devs and supporters are not quite adequate. They hate everyone. Very strange community.

[smooth]

dNote is English your first language? I mean no offence just trying to understand whats going on.  

Me is Privacy Protected:)

Ok fair enough, just to be clear before the fix you released could XDN have been attacked the same way as XMR. We know XDN was not attacked but it has been widely spread that all cryptonotes had the same flaw.

I will be brief as usual D< :
1. This vulnerability is a double spend vulnerability.
2. This vulnerability is possible only if blockchain split occurs. Can call it fork.
3. Split or fork is possible with long attack preparation and that preparation is visible to those who watch the blockchain.
4. XDN devs watch blockchain 24/7 to avoid that kind of issues.
5. 1->2->3->4-> XDN IS and WAS invulnerable

P.S. XDN devs fixed any related issues, and were first team who did that.
https://github.com/ducknote/ducknote/commit/e9dcc9825601f5a7b209c78e3a61169ba4f31fbc

You guys are extremely clueless or just full of shit.

XDN has a much higher default median size (32000) and also has a high background level of transactions (likely due to the ongoing pump). It woould have been extremely easy to increases the median size to around 35-40k where the attack becomes possible. If done carefully it would likely be indisinguishable from normal activity. In fact I wouldn't be surprised if the XDN median has already reached that level due to normal fluctutation without any "attack preparation" at all. In that case an attacker would merely need to lay in wait for the appropriate conditions to occur, and no about of "24/7" would prevent it.

Summary is that XDN was more vulnerable, not invulnerable. Furthermore XDN was not the first team to fix the exploit. Not by a wide margin.

Sure, now Monero devs can only offer excuses, because of the goal missed in their gates. Truly XMR devs and supporters are not quite adequate. They hate everyone. Very strange community.

I love duckNote honestly. I always have.

What I don't like is your attitude about making false claims of being not vulnerable when you were in fact more vulnerable.

The fact that someone chose to attack us instead of you does not make your (pre-patch) code any less broken. Your code had the same bug, and your increase to the default median made it easier to exploit.

It is too bad neither of us caught the bug before it was exploited, isn't it?

[thefunkybits]

Has the Block 122 bug been fixed on the mac wallet?

[joewills]

Sorry if this has been explained before. If I want to use the GUI wallet can I import my command line wallet to it or do I have to send the coins to the GUI wallet?

Currently you can`t, but we are working on such a feature. Soon we will announce it.
Also we are working on lots of small features, like mentioned above.
But soon - in next 5-10 days we will announce duckNote feature, that will blow your mind. We will lift XDN to the next level D<.
Stay tuned.

Is XDN joining the SuperNET launch? 

No. features we are talking about is not related to any other project, than duckNote.
duckNote only features.

SuperNET is really really good.

[Baird Ben]

Cute coin and i'm sorry to miss this coin.Yes i have noticed that some ppl said we need to join the supernet.I think this is a excellent idea.

[dNote]

Has the Block 122 bug been fixed on the mac wallet?

Wallet works fine and tested on latest MAC OS version.

[joewills]

4 days have been pasted.

[Winner]

how is things dev?

[skidog]

how is things dev?

I read a few pages back that we are getting some special feature...Maybe a different wallet....?