P2Pool Server List

[fsb4000]

my node:
Barnaul::Russia::http://fsb4000.no-ip.biz:9332::0%::BTC::my p2pool node::fsb4000

[1714177019]

1714177019

[Tjopper]

P2P NL Amsterdam (DCG Datacenter)

Amsterdam::The Netherlands::http://p2pool.jophartog.nl:9332::2.5%::BTC::p2pool.jophartog.nl::tjopper
Amsterdam::The Netherlands::http://p2pool.jophartog.nl:9327::2.5%::LTC::p2pool.jophartog.nl::tjopper

[caish5]

Bitvolcano

Located in New York, USA

http://btc.bitvolcano.com:9332

Redesigned interface for a new twist

I also have some for the altcoin fans.

http://bitvolcano.com:8336 for yacoin
http://caish5.com:8900 for BBQCoin

[lopheaded]

LTC Node

http://gomineit.no-ip.biz:9327/

BTC Node

http://gomineit.no-ip.biz:9332/

BQC Node

http://gomineit.no-ip.biz:8900/


Fees set @ 1%

[baloo_kiev]

78.27.191.182:8349

Location: Kiev, Ukraine
Node fee is zero (1% donated to p2pool authors).
Running unmodified original p2pool code.

[Mogumodz]

UK Location, Still all 0% fee nodes, Also added NVC p2pool to the list last night.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BTC - http://p2pool.dyndns.info:9332/static/

host: p2pool.dyndns.info
port: 9332
fee: 0%

Username: BTC Address
Password: 1234

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LTC - http://p2pool.dyndns.info:9327/static/

host: p2pool.dyndns.info
port: 9327
fee: 0%

Username: LTC Address
Password: 1234

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FTC - http://p2pool.dyndns.info:19327/static/

host: p2pool.dyndns.info
port: 19327
fee: 0%

Username: FTC Address
Password: 1234

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*NEW* NVC - http://p2pool.dyndns.info:8336/static/

host: p2pool.dyndns.info
port: 8336
fee: 0%

Username: NVC Address
Password: 1234

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[baloo_kiev]

*NEW* NVC - http://p2pool.dyndns.info:8336/static/

host: p2pool.dyndns.info
port: 8336
fee: 0%

Username: NVC Address
Password: 1234

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please source and proof that payouts to miner's address (not the node's default address!) work.

[Mogumodz]

*NEW* NVC - http://p2pool.dyndns.info:8336/static/

host: p2pool.dyndns.info
port: 8336
fee: 0%

Username: NVC Address
Password: 1234

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please source and proof that payouts to miner's address (not the node's default address!) work.

Will do, tested payout address getting payments before posting this but not another address. I'll add another miner with a new separate address other than the payout address and let you know.

[zvs]

I'm going to be shutting down nogleg.com p2pool sometime in the next 12-24 hrs, just to give fair warning to other ppl using it atm

[IYFTech]

Thought I'd throw my Merged BTC/NMC node out there for any UK/EU miners:

For merged Bitcoin/Namecoin mining point your miners at:

BTC = http://iyftech.zapto.org:9332 -u your_bitcoin_address -p 1234

NMC = http://iyftech.zapto.org:8336 -u your_bitcoin_address -p 1234

Latest Bitcoind,Namecoind & P2Pool git - all untouched & ou naturale......

1% fee.

Fill yer boots....  

[Boing7898]

Buffalo::USA::boingpool.zapto.org:9332::2%::BTC::BoingPool::Boing7898/Boing
Buffalo::USA::boingpool.zapto.org:9327::2%::LTC::BoingPool::Boing7898/Boing

Updated to last p2pool git :]

[dc81]

updated http://p2pool-nodes.info/ to show the bitcoind latency and local hashrate of the node.

[baloo_kiev]

Please update your nodes to version 13.1

[furball]

Just wanted to add Harvestcoin(http://www.harvestcoin.com) into the mix:

For Litecoin mining point your miner to :
http://mining.harvestcoin.com:9327 and use your Litecoin address as username and anything as password.

For Bitcoin mining point your miner to
http://mining.harvestcoin.com:9332 and use your Bitcoin address for username and anything for password.

Support can be received from the official Bitcointalk thread :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=193561.0

[zvs]

nogleg.net:10332 is on the old forked p2pool, just for shits (40ghash or so it looks like), i decided to put a 5% fee (that was also just for shits and giggles)

nogleg.com:9332 has been up again for a while, it's on the new 1.2thash fork, 0% fee

** nogleg.net down.  unhappy with crappy dual xeons

[BTCMiners.net]

Adding BTCMiners.net to the list!

As you can guess we are mining BTC only at this point.  There is a 2% fee, this is to prepare the funds for our co-location hosting in Kansas city which is $50/month.  We think this is a reasonable fee providing we're doing the hosting and upkeep of software as needed.

To mine with us, point your miner to:

Version 13.2 - Avalon/ASIC Supported!

http://btcminers.net:9332

Your username would be your Bitcoin address and the password would be anything you would like.

Any additional income from fees outside of the minimum required amount needed for the server's datacenter will be once a month split between all the users equally!  So everyone who mines with us gets a monthly bonus, yay!

Any questions, please inbox me!

Happy mining,
BTCMiners.net

Format to be added to list:
Indianapols, Indiana :: USA :: http://btcminers.net:9332 :: 2% :: BTC :: ASIC/Avalon Supported Stratum Mining :: BTCMiners.net

[ebereon]

Avalon enabled p2pool (13.2)!

Running of RamDisk (Bitcoind GetBlockTemplate Latency < 200ms)

Set your BTC address and "+32" as username (eg. "16pZyakbCqPnxGaUpKLtuwzjNFezqJhd1N+32") and something for password (eg. "x")


Bayern :: Germany :: http://p2pool.mjke.de:9332 :: 0.5% :: BTC :: Avalon enabled pool 100mbit :: Ebereon


Happy mining! 

Greets,
ebereon

[zvs]

Avalon enabled p2pool (13.2)!

Running of RamDisk (Bitcoind GetBlockTemplate Latency < 200ms)

Set your BTC address and "+32" as username (eg. "16pZyakbCqPnxGaUpKLtuwzjNFezqJhd1N+32") and something for password (eg. "x")


Bayern :: Germany :: http://p2pool.mjke.de:9332 :: 0.5% :: BTC :: Avalon enabled pool 100mbit :: Ebereon


Happy mining! 

Greets,
ebereon

Trying 178.27.235.42...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host


you need to add some more nodes via --p2pool-node or you'll keep getting lots of orphans

{"194.151.78.33:9333": 32.99999237060547, "120.197.59.206:9333": 375.0, "87.198.219.221:9333": 52.00004577636719, "89.19.96.93:9333": 57.000160217285156, "162.216.16.197:9333": 125.99992752075195, "80.42.85.177:14679": 63.99989128112793, "122.57.39.189:9333": 484.9998950958252, "86.161.186.124:54987": 52.00004577636719}

isn't a good peer list

[gyverlb]

Avalon enabled p2pool (13.2)!

Running of RamDisk (Bitcoind GetBlockTemplate Latency < 200ms)

Set your BTC address and "+32" as username (eg. "16pZyakbCqPnxGaUpKLtuwzjNFezqJhd1N+32") and something for password (eg. "x")


Bayern :: Germany :: http://p2pool.mjke.de:9332 :: 0.5% :: BTC :: Avalon enabled pool 100mbit :: Ebereon


Happy mining! 

Greets,
ebereon

Trying 178.27.235.42...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host


you need to add some more nodes via --p2pool-node or you'll keep getting lots of orphans

{"194.151.78.33:9333": 32.99999237060547, "120.197.59.206:9333": 375.0, "87.198.219.221:9333": 52.00004577636719, "89.19.96.93:9333": 57.000160217285156, "162.216.16.197:9333": 125.99992752075195, "80.42.85.177:14679": 63.99989128112793, "122.57.39.189:9333": 484.9998950958252, "86.161.186.124:54987": 52.00004577636719}

isn't a good peer list

I'm not sure of your thought process here, but if you are referring to the number of nodes or some somewhat large latencies for 3 of them (>100ms), 8 nodes is enough (in fact I had good results with 6) and you never proved otherwise.

This node is at ~102% efficiency with Avalons (which have large latencies which should make it a bit below 100%). Again this contradicts the assertion that 8 nodes isn't enough. When a node is above 100% efficiency (or even around 100%) I don't understand how it should "need" anything, it's already fine.

[zvs]

I'm not sure of your thought process here, but if you are referring to the number of nodes or some somewhat large latencies for 3 of them (>100ms), 8 nodes is enough (in fact I had good results with 6) and you never proved otherwise.

This node is at ~102% efficiency with Avalons (which have large latencies which should make it a bit below 100%). Again this contradicts the assertion that 8 nodes isn't enough. When a node is above 100% efficiency (or even around 100%) I don't understand how it should "need" anything, it's already fine.

because we just like to be average, I guess

i see he changed it up and has 0 orphans in 11 now... instead of 3 orphans out of 15 or whatever it was before.

yes, the efficiency is less atm, but DOAs would just be a luck factor

since his bitcoind latency is only 0.204s, there should be very few orphans (instead they would be DOA).