Bitcoin Forum
November 22, 2017, 07:55:48 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [OFFLINE]P2Pmining.com-Hybrid P2Pool-NO FEE!!!-BTC/NMC/IXC/I0C/DEV/LTC  (Read 55944 times)
JayCoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 408


Crypt'n Since 2011


View Profile WWW
September 09, 2012, 03:26:09 AM
 #521

Jaycoin,

Some feature suggestions for you since I know nothing about php coding: Merged Mining Unpaid Rewards data for miner pages and an extra field on the blocks with a cron job to check for orphan blocks and mark them as such on the website or remove the orphan blocks from view.

Just throwing some ideas out there.

Veddy

Orphans are now marked and current unpaid merged mining rewards are also displayed.

Keep the ideas coming   Cheesy

Hello There!
1511337348
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511337348

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511337348
Reply with quote  #2

1511337348
Report to moderator
1511337348
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511337348

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511337348
Reply with quote  #2

1511337348
Report to moderator
1511337348
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511337348

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511337348
Reply with quote  #2

1511337348
Report to moderator
Join ICO Now Coinlancer is Disrupting the Freelance marketplace!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1511337348
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511337348

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511337348
Reply with quote  #2

1511337348
Report to moderator
zvs
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484


I have some bitcoins. Somewhere.


View Profile WWW
September 09, 2012, 04:21:04 AM
 #522

Why are orphans that are valid not credited, anyway?  

My current block value is 50.65, everyone else is around 50.35 (because they are using default bitcoind settings, probably).   But, because of including more transactions, my shares are more likely to be orphaned, esp. by people on slow connections.  

I get the feeling that it would be better to include 0 transactions on P2P network, to guarantee your shares vs the ppl with low bandwidth/high latency connections?

if I were to solve a block, I'm not worried about it being orphaned on main network at all

ed:  hmmm, actually, I suppose it wouldn't grab the whole thing, so each would have an equal chance of being orphaned, eh?    so, nm

Dacentec, best deals for US dedicated servers. They regularly restock $20-$25 Opterons with 8-16GB RAM & 2x1-2TB HDD's (ofc, usually lots of other good stuff to choose from).  I did a Serverbear benchmark of one of my $20/mo Opteron (June last year), it's here.  Have had about a half dozen different servers with Dacentec, & none have failed to sustain at least 40MB/s (burst higher). My favorite is a 12-month rent-to-own ZT Systems 2XL5520 16GB 2x2TB SATA for $40/month (got lucky with the 'off-brand', haven't seen a RTO 2xL5520 for under $50/mo since -- at least for monthly contracts).  wholesaleinternet.com has some ancient 2-core intel CPUs @ $10/mo sometimes (I got an Intel Core 2 6300 @ 1.86GHz, with a 250GB HDD with 46000 hours on it, LOL. $20 @ Dacentec is much better, if you can grab one). joesdatacenter.com (same location as Wholesale Internet) also occasionally has specials (or if you don't want to wait, it has an AMD Opteron 170 @ $16/mo).
vedalken254
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 110



View Profile WWW
September 09, 2012, 05:11:23 AM
 #523

Jaycoin,

Some feature suggestions for you since I know nothing about php coding: Merged Mining Unpaid Rewards data for miner pages and an extra field on the blocks with a cron job to check for orphan blocks and mark them as such on the website or remove the orphan blocks from view.

Just throwing some ideas out there.

Veddy

Orphans are now marked and current unpaid merged mining rewards are also displayed.

Keep the ideas coming   Cheesy

I saw that earlier as you were implementing them. Cheesy

You've read my forum signature. That's enough social interaction for one day.
Krak
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 414



View Profile WWW
September 09, 2012, 06:43:42 PM
 #524

Just out of curiosity, what's the share difficulty set at? At first it looked like it was 2, but now it's looking to be more like 4. It's not a problem for me; I think my setup would be fine with 8 actually.

BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
JayCoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 408


Crypt'n Since 2011


View Profile WWW
September 09, 2012, 07:43:07 PM
 #525

Just out of curiosity, what's the share difficulty set at? At first it looked like it was 2, but now it's looking to be more like 4. It's not a problem for me; I think my setup would be fine with 8 actually.

If you don't specify difficulty, then the difficulty changes based on p2pmining hashrate.  If you want difficulty 1, then add +1 to the end of you bitcoin address/username. +2 would be difficulty 2 shares and so on and so forth. I have some miners on +2 and some on +4. All mining to the same address.

The current dynamic difficulty is at 3.6955 (changes constantly). This may cause problems with some miners, so I suggest you always specify a difficulty. Small miners should specify +1.

Hello There!
Krak
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 414



View Profile WWW
September 09, 2012, 07:46:56 PM
 #526

If you don't specify difficulty, then the difficulty changes based on p2pmining hashrate.  If you want difficulty 1, then add +1 to the end of you bitcoin address/username. +2 would be difficulty 2 shares and so on and so forth. I have some miners on +2 and some on +4. All mining to the same address.

The current dynamic difficulty is at 3.6955 (changes constantly). This may cause problems with some miners, so I suggest you always specify a difficulty. Small miners should specify +1.
Oh nice, I think I'll give 8 a try for a while.

The hashrate on i0coin must be really small; we've found a pretty big majority of the last 120 blocks. Grin

BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484



View Profile
September 09, 2012, 09:04:54 PM
 #527

Just out of curiosity, what's the share difficulty set at? At first it looked like it was 2, but now it's looking to be more like 4. It's not a problem for me; I think my setup would be fine with 8 actually.

If you don't specify difficulty, then the difficulty changes based on p2pmining hashrate.  If you want difficulty 1, then add +1 to the end of you bitcoin address/username. +2 would be difficulty 2 shares and so on and so forth. I have some miners on +2 and some on +4. All mining to the same address.

The current dynamic difficulty is at 3.6955 (changes constantly). This may cause problems with some miners, so I suggest you always specify a difficulty. Small miners should specify +1.

What's your definition of small?

M

I'm X-Fueled.  Are you? 
Tip for NiceHash: use their wallet to decrease fees!  Check out Helium!  Referral for Cryptopia.
mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484



View Profile
September 09, 2012, 09:08:51 PM
 #528

p2pool found a block an hour ago, but it doesn't seem to be showing in the p2pmining stats.  Is there a delay somewhere?

M

I'm X-Fueled.  Are you? 
Tip for NiceHash: use their wallet to decrease fees!  Check out Helium!  Referral for Cryptopia.
JayCoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 408


Crypt'n Since 2011


View Profile WWW
September 09, 2012, 09:11:27 PM
 #529

p2pool.info is reporting a erroneous block.

A small miner would be less than 1 gh/s

Hello There!
mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484



View Profile
September 09, 2012, 09:21:58 PM
 #530

p2pool.info is reporting a erroneous block.

A small miner would be less than 1 gh/s

http://blockchain.info/block-index/00000000000005b6f75f778749beaab0af867f6ce80c9deeb5292198d7945ca6

shows block 198040 found by p2pool?

M

EDIT: In p2pool thread, someone suggested this is another block on a private fork. 

I'm X-Fueled.  Are you? 
Tip for NiceHash: use their wallet to decrease fees!  Check out Helium!  Referral for Cryptopia.
JayCoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 408


Crypt'n Since 2011


View Profile WWW
September 09, 2012, 09:41:09 PM
 #531

Yeah. That has happened before. That block also shows that it only paid out the reward to four addresses when a p2pool block pays out the reward to about 200 addresses.

Hello There!
vedalken254
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 110



View Profile WWW
September 09, 2012, 10:58:40 PM
 #532

JayCoin,

Just noticed something (i think)... but are the auto-payout amounts the same as the payout mininums meaning that you can't get paid less than the minimum via the instant payout option?

Veddy

You've read my forum signature. That's enough social interaction for one day.
matthewh3
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372



View Profile WWW
September 10, 2012, 01:00:36 AM
 #533

Just started on this pool with litecoin (hope to use it for my ASIC's too) but this litecoin mining calculator - http://www.litecoinpool.org/calc?hashrate=5.62&difficulty=9.40447348 - Says I should be earning ~0.60ltc per 24hrs period according to my 24hour average effective hash rate and I've been mining with you's for over 36hrs now and only earned ~0.32ltc - what am I doing wrong  Huh

JayCoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 408


Crypt'n Since 2011


View Profile WWW
September 10, 2012, 03:30:22 AM
 #534

It takes 24 hrs to reach full mining potential because reward is distributed based on shares submitted in the past 24 hours.  Mine for at least a week before making any decision to account for variance.

Hello There!
RandomQ
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672



View Profile
September 10, 2012, 09:46:05 AM
 #535

It takes 24 hrs to reach full mining potential because reward is distributed based on shares submitted in the past 24 hours.  Mine for at least a week before making any decision to account for variance.

Does the pool still use the standard p2pool PPLNS?

Also where is this server located now?

sub 40ms ping times from Arizona
sub 50ms ping times from California

 Grin

JayCoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 408


Crypt'n Since 2011


View Profile WWW
September 10, 2012, 10:59:15 PM
 #536

It takes 24 hrs to reach full mining potential because reward is distributed based on shares submitted in the past 24 hours.  Mine for at least a week before making any decision to account for variance.

Does the pool still use the standard p2pool PPLNS?

Also where is this server located now?

sub 40ms ping times from Arizona
sub 50ms ping times from California

 Grin


P2pmining PPLNS is set up to distribute the reward from p2pool prportionally to shares submitted in the last 24 hours.

P2pool PPLNS is a little more complicated. Here what is stated in the wiki https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/P2Pool

Quote
Each share contains a generation transaction that pays to the previous n shares, where n is the number of shares whose total work is equal to 3 times the average work required to solve a block, or 8640 (= 24 hours of shares), whichever is smaller. Payouts are weighted based on the amount of work each share took to solve, which is proportional to the p2pool difficulty at that time.

So p2pmining pays PPLNS based on the reward of another PPLNS. Can any one figure out ramifications of this system?

By the way, I have no idea where the server is. vedalken254 would need to answer that.

Hello There!
Krak
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 414



View Profile WWW
September 10, 2012, 11:14:21 PM
 #537

By the way, I have no idea where the server is. vedalken254 would need to answer that.
I think he said in the p2pool server list thread that the server is in Dallas. I get ~60ms ping to it so that seems about right.

BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484



View Profile
September 11, 2012, 12:00:17 AM
 #538

I thought because of the nature of namecoin, when you find a bitcoin block, you also find a namecoin block?

In that case, aren't we short a few namecoin blocks?

M

I'm X-Fueled.  Are you? 
Tip for NiceHash: use their wallet to decrease fees!  Check out Helium!  Referral for Cryptopia.
Krak
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 414



View Profile WWW
September 11, 2012, 12:09:29 AM
 #539

I thought because of the nature of namecoin, when you find a bitcoin block, you also find a namecoin block?

In that case, aren't we short a few namecoin blocks?

M
When we get credited for finding a Bitcoin block, it doesn't mean P2P Mining was the one that found it. We did find block 197723 and found a Namecoin block shortly after.

BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484



View Profile
September 11, 2012, 12:13:54 AM
 #540

I thought because of the nature of namecoin, when you find a bitcoin block, you also find a namecoin block?

In that case, aren't we short a few namecoin blocks?

M
When we get credited for finding a Bitcoin block, it doesn't mean P2P Mining was the one that found it. We did find block 197723 and found a Namecoin block shortly after.

Duh.  I knew that.

Thanks.

M

I'm X-Fueled.  Are you? 
Tip for NiceHash: use their wallet to decrease fees!  Check out Helium!  Referral for Cryptopia.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!