PRCDice.eu - Largest Dice invest site - Open since 2013! Chat, Play, Invest!

[dooglus]

I browsed through the bets and rolls between those ID's, and none of them had the roll 70.6362 or a bet by Loidy.

That quite the allegation. Do you suspect foul play or further incompetent coding?

I happened upon the PRC dice chat earlier today only to find the usual suspects in there talking behind my back about how I shouldn't be trusted, that I'm "just a troll", senile, stupid, and idiot, etc. etc.

I tried engaging them, but it's almost impossible. They avoided almost all of my points and ended up muting me without reason.

I guess I won't attempt to engage them any more. Just be careful with PRCdice - their tech is crap and their manners are worse.

[1714876407]

1714876407

[1714876407]

1714876407

[1714876407]

1714876407

[1714876407]

1714876407

[finnile]

I browsed through the bets and rolls between those ID's, and none of them had the roll 70.6362 or a bet by Loidy.

That quite the allegation. Do you suspect foul play or further incompetent coding?

I happened upon the PRC dice chat earlier today only to find the usual suspects in there talking behind my back about how I shouldn't be trusted, that I'm "just a troll", senile, stupid, and idiot, etc. etc.

I tried engaging them, but it's almost impossible. They avoided almost all of my points and ended up muting me without reason.

I guess I won't attempt to engage them any more. Just be careful with PRCdice - their tech is crap and their manners are worse.

I suspect the latter. Yeah , thats probably a bug too  . If you say the word "sjess" or "bug" in the chart, you get banned. You argue with them , you get banned.

Their names are pretty self explanatory so you just can't argue and win.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Bazza
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=may
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Nolan

I also doubt Dean will ever reply to the bug mentioned above.

[bodgybrothers]

I browsed through the bets and rolls between those ID's, and none of them had the roll 70.6362 or a bet by Loidy.

That quite the allegation. Do you suspect foul play or further incompetent coding?

I happened upon the PRC dice chat earlier today only to find the usual suspects in there talking behind my back about how I shouldn't be trusted, that I'm "just a troll", senile, stupid, and idiot, etc. etc.

I tried engaging them, but it's almost impossible. They avoided almost all of my points and ended up muting me without reason.

I guess I won't attempt to engage them any more. Just be careful with PRCdice - their tech is crap and their manners are worse.

I suspect the latter. Yeah , thats probably a bug too  . If you say the word "sjess" or "bug" in the chart, you get banned. You argue with them , you get banned.

Their names are pretty self explanatory so you just can't argue and win.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Bazza
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=may
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Nolan

I also doubt Dean will ever reply to the bug mentioned above.

You can argue with me anytime. But if you fail to listen then you get no response. It's the reason I've been registered to this forum for years and posted very little. I doubt anyone here has the capability to comprehend a logical argument. My small number of posts actually shows how I troll very little and listen a lot.

[IamNotSure]

I browsed through the bets and rolls between those ID's, and none of them had the roll 70.6362 or a bet by Loidy.

That quite the allegation. Do you suspect foul play or further incompetent coding?

I happened upon the PRC dice chat earlier today only to find the usual suspects in there talking behind my back about how I shouldn't be trusted, that I'm "just a troll", senile, stupid, and idiot, etc. etc.

I tried engaging them, but it's almost impossible. They avoided almost all of my points and ended up muting me without reason.

I guess I won't attempt to engage them any more. Just be careful with PRCdice - their tech is crap and their manners are worse.

Poor Dooglus, you are scared by trolls now ?

[Darwerft]

I browsed through the bets and rolls between those ID's, and none of them had the roll 70.6362 or a bet by Loidy.

That quite the allegation. Do you suspect foul play or further incompetent coding?

I happened upon the PRC dice chat earlier today only to find the usual suspects in there talking behind my back about how I shouldn't be trusted, that I'm "just a troll", senile, stupid, and idiot, etc. etc.

I tried engaging them, but it's almost impossible. They avoided almost all of my points and ended up muting me without reason.

I guess I won't attempt to engage them any more. Just be careful with PRCdice - their tech is crap and their manners are worse.

Poor Dooglus, you are scared by trolls now ?

Why are you all after dooglus?

What I can see he is the most trusted person in a not trustworthy bitcoin world.

Then when he points out some obvious problems in a bitcoin dice people act bad why?

I think dooglus ask some very legit questions that should be taken serously.

How long have prcdice existed?
Yeah that's right LONGER than even JD did, so I find it scary that they still havent got the freaking code to work, its not like its the most advanced site ever build.

The concept are actually quite simple.

This smells bad.

[IamNotSure]

I browsed through the bets and rolls between those ID's, and none of them had the roll 70.6362 or a bet by Loidy.

That quite the allegation. Do you suspect foul play or further incompetent coding?

I happened upon the PRC dice chat earlier today only to find the usual suspects in there talking behind my back about how I shouldn't be trusted, that I'm "just a troll", senile, stupid, and idiot, etc. etc.

I tried engaging them, but it's almost impossible. They avoided almost all of my points and ended up muting me without reason.

I guess I won't attempt to engage them any more. Just be careful with PRCdice - their tech is crap and their manners are worse.

Poor Dooglus, you are scared by trolls now ?

Why are you all after dooglus?

What I can see he is the most trusted person in a not trustworthy bitcoin world.

Then when he points out some obvious problems in a bitcoin dice people act bad why?

I think dooglus ask some very legit questions that should be taken serously.

How long have prcdice existed?
Yeah that's right LONGER than even JD did, so I find it scary that they still havent got the freaking code to work, its not like its the most advanced site ever build.

The concept are actually quite simple.

This smells bad.

I'm not after Dooglus. He just act like he's scared by 3 anons who obviously trolled him in a chat (btw a chat is the best place to solve a bug and is full of competent devs !) ... and his conclusion is : "I guess I won't attempt to engage them any more. Just be careful with PRCdice - their tech is crap and their manners are worse."

Great logic !

[Bitco¡n]

https://i.imgur.com/rzgHt5W.png

Dean, could you clear this up and point us towards the real bet number of Loidy's Roll 70.6362 bet, please?

[PRC_May]

The 0 bet bug is known, it's just a UI bug as far as I know.

Dean will surely explain.

[Bitco¡n]

The 0 bet bug is known, it's just a UI bug as far as I know.

Cool, I hope so.  That should mean Dean can provide us with the bet number.

[suchmoon]

I'm not after Dooglus. He just act like he's scared by 3 anons who obviously trolled him in a chat (btw a chat is the best place to solve a bug and is full of competent devs !) ... and his conclusion is : "I guess I won't attempt to engage them any more. Just be careful with PRCdice - their tech is crap and their manners are worse."

Great logic !

I am not sure (see what I did here) what would you expect dooglus to do? It's not the first time he's been trolled by the PRC gang, that's pretty much a routine and generally his offers are not wanted, so why would he need to continue to engage them?

[finnile]

The 0 bet bug is known, it's just a UI bug as far as I know.
Dean will surely explain.

UI bug sure, but it has happened 3-4 times in the past, and Dean has always said, this will not happen again. And yet again and again, this has happened and that is why Dean is quiet on it.
He thinks this forum is full of trolls, but the reality is the site is full of bugs, and whenever someone helps or points it out he becomes a troll for Dean.

[PRC_May]

The forum is full of trolls and scammers.

You can say he's slow but that's about it. He's always straightened out bugs.

[Sinecoin]

he says he pays people if they find bugs but when i found a bug where when you transfer btc and invest at the same time invest your btc itll do both he didnt give me shit.  i could have abused it but i chose not and this is how i get rewarded.

[wayshegoes]

he says he pays people if they find bugs but when i found a bug where when you transfer btc and invest at the same time invest your btc itll do both he didnt give me shit.  i could have abused it but i chose not and this is how i get rewarded.

Are you "jackman"?

[RoKSeouljah420]

Poker rakeback non-existent again?

[chazley]

It seems that Dean has decided that BTCTalk is not worth his time anymore. People who point out bugs or call out Dean for mistakes are only "trolls" to him. We still never got an official statement about exactly what happened outside of his own chatbox. Dean has explained directly to me what happened, but he owes the community as a whole an explanation as to what happened, not just whoever happens to be looking at PRC chat at the time. I have expressed my own opinions to Dean directly, but I feel his biggest fault is being pretty closed-minded as to what benefits his site and he seems unaware of what his own faults are. I trust Dean 100% with my money, and I will continue to invest there until Just-Dice comes back, but this site will never grow outside of it's current limits until we see a major change in attitude from the top. I sincerely wish PRC nothing but the best - Dean is a genuinely good guy.

[robhimself]

Some nice action going on this site today, and I 20xed my deposit in the past few days between betting and investing. Haters can try to kill PRC, but it's still going strong!

[finnile]

It seems that Dean has decided that BTCTalk is not worth his time anymore. People who point out bugs or call out Dean for mistakes are only "trolls" to him. We still never got an official statement about exactly what happened outside of his own chatbox. Dean has explained directly to me what happened, but he owes the community as a whole an explanation as to what happened, not just whoever happens to be looking at PRC chat at the time. I have expressed my own opinions to Dean directly, but I feel his biggest fault is being pretty closed-minded as to what benefits his site and he seems unaware of what his own faults are. I trust Dean 100% with my money, and I will continue to invest there until Just-Dice comes back, but this site will never grow outside of it's current limits until we see a major change in attitude from the top. I sincerely wish PRC nothing but the best - Dean is a genuinely good guy.

Seems like  Dean does not care what the forum or people pointing out the bug think. He hasn't yet even posted about the major bug that happened the other day. When asked about it, he says clearly investments are increasing and I don't think I have to answer that bug question now.

[finnile]

Hi Dean,
Can you describe how the nonces work when we click on "Generate New Seed" ?

I usually record my sessions and while doing the same I had an instance where "Num. Rolls " in the Provably Fair Tab was 92 .
When I clicked on Generate New Seed, then the "Last Numb. Rolls" showed 92.
On Plugging in things in the verifier, the 92nd nonce roll, was the top most in the "My Bets Tab"

However, When I did the same thing moments later , it showed "Num. Rolls " in the Provably Fair Tab was 15 .
and clicking on Generate New Seed, the Last Numb. Rolls showed 16 , unlike the previous case when both the Numb Rolls and the last numb rolls showed the same number(on clicking generate new seed). Also the 16th nonce roll in this case had never happened and the 15th nonce roll was the top most in the My Bets tab.

Here is the video for the 92 nonces, when I click generate new seeds the bottom field changes to 92.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1REMCRWx6E&feature=youtu.be

However in the second video, it shows 15. But on clicking generate new seed, the bottom field changes to 16.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIWkNVMjUTc


Can you please explain why this difference?
And Its just a question, not an accusation.

PS: Sorry for the client seed in the second session. I never knew this would happen right then.

[PocketRocketsCasino]

Hi Dean,
Can you describe how the nonces work when we click on "Generate New Seed" ?

I usually record my sessions and while doing the same I had an instance where "Num. Rolls " in the Provably Fair Tab was 92 .
When I clicked on Generate New Seed, then the "Last Numb. Rolls" showed 92.
On Plugging in things in the verifier, the 92nd nonce roll, was the top most in the "My Bets Tab"

However, When I did the same thing moments later , it showed "Num. Rolls " in the Provably Fair Tab was 15 .
and clicking on Generate New Seed, the Last Numb. Rolls showed 16 , unlike the previous case when both the Numb Rolls and the last numb rolls showed the same number(on clicking generate new seed). Also the 16th nonce roll in this case had never happened and the 15th nonce roll was the top most in the My Bets tab.

Here is the video for the 92 nonces, when I click generate new seeds the bottom field changes to 92.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1REMCRWx6E&feature=youtu.be

However in the second video, it shows 15. But on clicking generate new seed, the bottom field changes to 16.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIWkNVMjUTc


Can you please explain why this difference?
And Its just a question, not an accusation.

PS: Sorry for the client seed in the second session. I never knew this would happen right then.

Nothing to do with how nonces work really.

As you can see in first video all your bets were verified correctly.
In the 2nd video the 15 bets in your my bets tab verify as they should.

The num rolls says 16 because you did in fact place a 16th bet, it's in the database and matches the 16th roll of the verifier.