|
|
|
|
|
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
jc12345
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1013
|
 |
June 30, 2014, 09:41:46 AM |
|
I think,hashing power of each worker and/or IP should be limited to not more than 50 MH/s
Agreed. Per account. |
|
|
|
|
|
elixir
|
|
June 30, 2014, 10:11:19 AM |
|
x13 please.  looking at the wallet just wanted to point out that judges don't use hammers only in the movies. auctioneers use hammers. |
OPEC oc2E9cQ4StgaMW2a18pKuZGe5h9RZdLL9c ✪ Non nobis solum, sed omnibus! - Franko ✪ Ɖ ~ DSNJ49NdZM4KjLHfPSYEGWKRn7wSC4bWqi |
|
|
|
elixir
|
|
June 30, 2014, 10:14:12 AM |
|
|
OPEC oc2E9cQ4StgaMW2a18pKuZGe5h9RZdLL9c ✪ Non nobis solum, sed omnibus! - Franko ✪ Ɖ ~ DSNJ49NdZM4KjLHfPSYEGWKRn7wSC4bWqi |
|
|
Hesiod
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
June 30, 2014, 01:36:30 PM |
|
I think,hashing power of each worker and/or IP should be limited to not more than 50 MH/s
I agree. It did very well for Mineral, and is a nice way to avoid massive early dumps from big farms that are really harmful for the coin. |
|
|
|
|
|
pagona
|
|
June 30, 2014, 01:42:06 PM |
|
it looks good, i will mine it
check out Minerals, they limited hashing power, although you could cheat by IP`s or something, i mined it with 4 280x cards for 5 days and now have 0.17 btc
|
life is amazing
|
|
|
|
rastimonac
|
|
June 30, 2014, 02:40:24 PM |
|
ok this is looking good but i`m sick and tired of everyone saying that thay are honest... i say prove it, scan your passeport, give us your real name... if i ever make a coin that will be the first thing i will do... good luck
|
|
|
|
|
DRPD
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 30, 2014, 04:37:36 PM |
|
I think,hashing power of each worker and/or IP should be limited to not more than 50 MH/s
sounds good + i would go with x15 algo .... |
|
|
|
|
|
judgecrypto (OP)
|
|
June 30, 2014, 04:45:18 PM |
|
ok this is looking good but i`m sick and tired of everyone saying that thay are honest... i say prove it, scan your passeport, give us your real name... if i ever make a coin that will be the first thing i will do... good luck
There is a point to what you are saying. Although it would be foolish to post an ID or Passport unless you want someone to start identity theft on you. I am leaning towards posting my real name, degree, and IT certifications... |
|
|
|
|
|
judgecrypto (OP)
|
|
June 30, 2014, 05:17:47 PM |
|
I think,hashing power of each worker and/or IP should be limited to not more than 50 MH/s
sounds good + i would go with x15 algo .... The launch will be x13. We are finishing testing and will Launch July 5th at 20:00 GMT |
|
|
|
|
|
judgecrypto (OP)
|
|
June 30, 2014, 05:20:24 PM |
|
I think,hashing power of each worker and/or IP should be limited to not more than 50 MH/s
I agree. It did very well for Mineral, and is a nice way to avoid massive early dumps from big farms that are really harmful for the coin. I don't see massive dumps as bad. There are many people who have no other way to get coins. In the end the market will drive the price whether it is mined by a farm or individuals. |
|
|
|
|
|
judgecrypto (OP)
|
|
June 30, 2014, 05:21:11 PM |
|
x13 please. looking at the wallet just wanted to point out that judges don't use hammers only in the movies. auctioneers use hammers. Very good point  Didnt the peoples court judge have a hammer though? |
|
|
|
|
DRPD
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 30, 2014, 05:22:59 PM |
|
I think,hashing power of each worker and/or IP should be limited to not more than 50 MH/s
sounds good + i would go with x15 algo .... The launch will be x13. We are finishing testing and will Launch July 5th at 20:00 GMT sure np will be mining anyway (and i don't wanna mess with a judge  ) what do you think about the hashrate limit on pools? |
|
|
|
|
jc12345
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1013
|
|
June 30, 2014, 05:26:44 PM |
|
I think,hashing power of each worker and/or IP should be limited to not more than 50 MH/s
sounds good + i would go with x15 algo .... The launch will be x13. We are finishing testing and will Launch July 5th at 20:00 GMT sure np will be mining anyway (and i don't wanna mess with a judge ) what do you think about the hashrate limit on pools? If I can chip in - even if not done for this coin hash rate limitation is the way of the future imo. |
|
|
|
|
|
judgecrypto (OP)
|
|
June 30, 2014, 05:28:25 PM |
|
I think,hashing power of each worker and/or IP should be limited to not more than 50 MH/s
sounds good + i would go with x15 algo .... The launch will be x13. We are finishing testing and will Launch July 5th at 20:00 GMT sure np will be mining anyway (and i don't wanna mess with a judge ) what do you think about the hashrate limit on pools? I am not sure I understand how that is enforceable... How are they limiting the pools hash rate? |
|
|
|
|
|
judgecrypto (OP)
|
|
June 30, 2014, 05:30:35 PM |
|
I think,hashing power of each worker and/or IP should be limited to not more than 50 MH/s
sounds good + i would go with x15 algo .... The launch will be x13. We are finishing testing and will Launch July 5th at 20:00 GMT sure np will be mining anyway (and i don't wanna mess with a judge ) what do you think about the hashrate limit on pools? If I can chip in - even if not done for this coin hash rate limitation is the way of the future imo. The idea is intriguing... any links to details on how it is done? |
|
|
|
|
grolll
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1014
|
|
June 30, 2014, 05:30:55 PM |
|
Think again dev,
Big farms=big dumps
|
|
|
|
|
|
judgecrypto (OP)
|
|
June 30, 2014, 05:34:44 PM |
|
Think again dev,
Big farms=big dumps
Big dump = lower price that EVERYONE has access too = fair distribution More people have access to exchange than to big mining gear |
|
|
|
|
DRPD
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 30, 2014, 05:40:55 PM |
|
I think,hashing power of each worker and/or IP should be limited to not more than 50 MH/s
sounds good + i would go with x15 algo .... The launch will be x13. We are finishing testing and will Launch July 5th at 20:00 GMT sure np will be mining anyway (and i don't wanna mess with a judge ) what do you think about the hashrate limit on pools? If I can chip in - even if not done for this coin hash rate limitation is the way of the future imo. The idea is intriguing... any links to details on how it is done? check the minerals thread ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=641057.0). there was only 1 worker allowed per account and all workers limited to 50mh/s you have to host or control all pools if you wanna do this. i also think this is the future for a fair distribution (sorry for my english) |
|
|
|
|
|
judgecrypto (OP)
|
|
June 30, 2014, 05:45:03 PM |
|
I think,hashing power of each worker and/or IP should be limited to not more than 50 MH/s
sounds good + i would go with x15 algo .... The launch will be x13. We are finishing testing and will Launch July 5th at 20:00 GMT sure np will be mining anyway (and i don't wanna mess with a judge ) what do you think about the hashrate limit on pools? If I can chip in - even if not done for this coin hash rate limitation is the way of the future imo. The idea is intriguing... any links to details on how it is done? check the minerals thread ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=641057.0). there was only 1 worker allowed per account and all workers limited to 50mh/s you have to host or control all pools if you wanna do this. i also think this is the future for a fair distribution (sorry for my english) I dont think controlling hash rate through pools is effective and leaves openings to cheat. What is to stop someone from making their own pool if they have large rigs? EDIT: If someone wanted to game the system they could put a pool limitation out...then setup private pools with no limitation and it would be the same as an instamine. |
|
|
|
|
|
