★ LuckyBit Bitcoin Talk Affiliate Program ★ [CLOSED]

[noma]

I am a Full Member now, and still have half a month for my enrollment period. I was wondering if I can be shifted to Full member ?

If you rank up during enrollment, you will be payed at the enrolling rank, not the current rank. There is no pro-rate payment for promoted accounts.

Thanks for that . I was searching for words like promoted etc. instead of reading the whole thing.

 

I actually meant promotion I did it in the morning, so don't remember. Thats what just came into mind riight now. Probably it was a search for full member.
Anyways, have am taking part in another one for now. Will join some other time. 15 days to go, the current payout, doesn't do much good.

[stingleword]

Ok then I'll try my luck.. (Hopefully I'm luckier now than at my bet^^)
Requesting sign-up:
Recent bet http://luckyb.it/check?txin=246dfd6ee6fb4af2f9f95cdf8e7eecb7e43ddf50ef886c7361478ab172fb0ed6:0
Post count 417
BTC 1NG5gBx9kGxDCK7JQkBppHcznBqJp9ccKi

Declined. You registered with an address that has only been funded with BitMixer; this could be used to disguise cheating.

Name: Ingramtg
Posts: 268
Address: 1TNaMMtavbHtY82VzHAK3uCww83aMokGq
Bet:
http://luckyb.it/check?txin=e18aa225d319062b4b6c0c987b035fc16e3dcf231ca1de53fc8de0d05ba750c9:0

Registered.

Name:chennan
Recent bet http://luckyb.it/check?txin=6a2fe04344b965adc634999486c124d3ac8766e8100ab58fdcd3cf96927e8889:1
Post count 277
BTC 1GASCgEZ1uCNqaxcJ9LvUWdCReLVYgjynV

Declined. Your address is spend-linked with another address used by multiple accounts to sign up for signature campaigns. Your alts are also barred.

Post count: 769
Bitcoin Address: 1Q4WPsizqRrHHk3Y2MAwLE8cPacdmRVRm7
Recent Bet: http://luckyb.it/check?txin=ceaa81dc90c3b3ddbc74fac07d0fe447409b2b72445eb648c52c3212f49fcf49:1

Registered.

noma has voluntarily vacated his slot.

[stingleword]

Today's qualified payment has been sent.

thompete - 0.05BTC- d1c85168ea9ec3e70d0be46029b5e3e0d0a8cf54ba4d33f1548af77f48281dc7

[jakeranco]

hmmmmm I think I am not ready lol

[stingleword]

I've cooked up a new signature for 0.1BTC enrollments only. Sorry, full members - this one is hefty!

Remember, you can change between signatures anytime during your enrollment. Rotating is fun!

[fran2k]

Today's evaluated enrollment has been disqualified. You've been one of my good advertisers, I really wish you had simply contacted me after your "away time" for an extension instead of this hurry-up activity. Yes, you're barred from the campaign for a while; just like everyone else that is barred, you can apply for re-evaluation in a couple of weeks. My suggestion is to join another campaign for a while then come back. On the bright side, I didn't find evidence of signature cheating.

fran2k - 31 posts in four days (Jan 1-5)

I took three weeks of vacations that I spent almost offline. I just came back in January and I had a big activity during that first week.

[medUSA]

I've cooked up a new signature for 0.1BTC enrollments only. Sorry, full members - this one is hefty!

Your design is excellent. I would have designed something similar myself. I am switching over to this one now.

[JLynn171]

I am a Full Member now, and still have half a month for my enrollment period. I was wondering if I can be shifted to Full member ?

If you rank up during enrollment, you will be payed at the enrolling rank, not the current rank. There is no pro-rate payment for promoted accounts.

Thanks for that . I was searching for words like promoted etc. instead of reading the whole thing.

lol i think that may be problem with people not completing this otherwise very simple monthly task of promoting lol

[noma]

I am a Full Member now, and still have half a month for my enrollment period. I was wondering if I can be shifted to Full member ?

If you rank up during enrollment, you will be payed at the enrolling rank, not the current rank. There is no pro-rate payment for promoted accounts.

Thanks for that . I was searching for words like promoted etc. instead of reading the whole thing.

lol i think that may be problem with people not completing this otherwise very simple monthly task of promoting lol

It certainly is, but currently I would be paid 0.025 per month as a member , and I can easily make more for the time being part of another campaign.
As for the not completing, I don't intend to offend luckybit, I have not even requested to be paid for the 15 days advertising.
I have not even wasted a spot as members have been empty always .

[stingleword]

Today's qualified payments have been sent.

llanillo^* - 0.025BTC - 4089011558120258d32a0402e05aa4001ff465b03cf01e28676d456d363a6f1c
farrukh - 0.025BTC - 08664b6213f7f33d71bff3344d68efd6dd41d9ea435da30cbe50e5d310e30c32

^* While this enrollment has been paid, you are barred from future enrollment. You're advertising a click farm "blog" in your personal message and in posts, most of your activity is low-quality commentary in the off-topic section, and this account's history carries significant evidence of it having been created with the explicit purpose of signature farming. You didn't break any of the rules and were a successful enrollment, which is why you are being paid for this month, but your activity is not the type that Lucky Bit wishes to be associated with.

I see that farrukh has already reserved a slot with a higher-paying campaign. No offense taken - but this does indicate that there is not much interest in the 0.025BTC slots. Hey, can't win them all, and now there's more money for the budget!

So, here's what's happening. The 0.025BTC slots are being removed entirely and there will be a 120-activity requirement to join the campaign. Since there is a budget imbalance, I will need to reorganize the remaining slots. This means there's going to be some jockeying again, but we've been down this road a couple times so it shouldn't be too much of a hassle, and there's good news at the end of the road. The reorganization process will be effective IMMEDIATELY and works like this:

● Users registered on or before 11-01-15 will be honored as advertised (0.1BTC or 0.05BTC).
● Senior-level payments will be increased to 0.125BTC. There will be 15 of these slots.
● Full Member-level payments will be increased to 0.075BTC. There will be 15 of these slots.
● Available 0.05BTC slots are immediately upgraded.
● 0.125BTC slots will become available as existing enrollments are paid.

[finnile]

● Users registered on or before 11-01-15 will be honored as advertised (0.1BTC or 0.05BTC).
● Senior-level payments will be increased to 0.125BTC. There will be 15 of these slots.
● Full Member-level payments will be increased to 0.075BTC. There will be 15 of these slots.
● Available 0.05BTC slots are immediately upgraded.
● 0.125BTC slots will become available as existing enrollments are paid.

Can we re-enroll today itself ?  I have the signature on for the past 13 days in this period. If I was to enroll as a new full member today then that would mean I would earn the same amount by 11th of next month either way. However due to the increase in pay and the possibility of the famous campaigns like bitmixer closing down, there would be more competition to get in towards the end of the month(28th when my enrollment ends) , and since I intend to continue with the campaign , it would be difficult to get in then.

[botany]

Declined. You registered with an address that has only been funded with BitMixer; this could be used to disguise cheating.

Isn't that a bit harsh, if that is the only reason?
I ask because the first thing that newbies are told over here is not to reuse addresses, as far as possible.

[stingleword]

Declined. You registered with an address that has only been funded with BitMixer; this could be used to disguise cheating.

Isn't that a bit harsh, if that is the only reason?
I ask because the first thing that newbies are told over here is not to reuse addresses, as far as possible.

With the recent action against signature farming, a registration funded by BitMixer raises an immediate red flag. That's going a lot further than not re-using addresses; it's actively disguising your coins' source.

Can we re-enroll today itself ?  I have the signature on for the past 13 days in this period. If I was to enroll as a new full member today then that would mean I would earn the same amount by 11th of next month either way. However due to the increase in pay and the possibility of the famous campaigns like bitmixer closing down, there would be more competition to get in towards the end of the month(28th when my enrollment ends) , and since I intend to continue with the campaign , it would be difficult to get in then.

I won't re-register an applicant into the slot they just abandoned. In other words, if you quit to grab a higher paying slot, you can't re-apply until someone else gets registered at the same rank. This prevents someone from occupying a slot indefinitely without pay. In this case, it also prevents the signature campaign from going over budget.

[BTCreward]

Declined. You registered with an address that has only been funded with BitMixer; this could be used to disguise cheating.

Isn't that a bit harsh, if that is the only reason?
I ask because the first thing that newbies are told over here is not to reuse addresses, as far as possible.

With the recent action against signature farming, a registration funded by BitMixer raises an immediate red flag. That's going a lot further than not re-using addresses; it's actively disguising your coins' source.

You are wrong on this. He is currently enrolled in the bitmixer signature campaign which pays from their 1bitmixer... address. If he used bitmixer to mix his coins then you would most likely not know that he used a mixing service without significant resources (especially with bitmixer)

You are in effect denying him participation because he participated with a competitor campaign.

Signature/account farming is not against any forum rule

[BTCreward]

Name:chennan
Recent bet http://luckyb.it/check?txin=6a2fe04344b965adc634999486c124d3ac8766e8100ab58fdcd3cf96927e8889:1
Post count 277
BTC 1GASCgEZ1uCNqaxcJ9LvUWdCReLVYgjynV

Declined. Your address is spend-linked with another address used by multiple accounts to sign up for signature campaigns. Your alts are also barred.

Even before you raised rates you were effectively paying .002 BTC per post to senior members, yet you could not fill all your slots while other, much larger signature campaigns have been full for months with similar payout rates. Why do you think this is? Do you really think that having two accounts is really that harmful to luckybit?

[stingleword]

Signature/account farming is not against any forum rule

It's against this campaign's rules. My standards are higher than the "required minimum".

Even before you raised rates you were effectively paying .002 BTC per post to senior members, yet you could not fill all your slots while other, much larger signature campaigns have been full for months with similar payout rates. Why do you think this is? Do you really think that having two accounts is really that harmful to luckybit?

I think it's due to the fact that most campaign participants are alt accounts, and since I don't allow them, they don't participate. If some competitor wants to pay someone three times to spam the forum, hey; it's their money to waste. I'm on a fixed budget and I'd rather focus my efforts on quality advertisers that aren't going to abuse the system for a quick profit.

Just because we're surrounded by thieves and scumbags doesn't mean we have to be ones.

You are wrong on this. He is currently enrolled in the bitmixer signature campaign which pays from their 1bitmixer... address. If he used bitmixer to mix his coins then you would most likely not know that he used a mixing service without significant resources (especially with bitmixer)

You are in effect denying him participation because he participated with a competitor campaign.

Can anybody else verify this?

[BTCreward]

Signature/account farming is not against any forum rule

It's against this campaign's rules. My standards are higher than the "required minimum".

fair enough

Even before you raised rates you were effectively paying .002 BTC per post to senior members, yet you could not fill all your slots while other, much larger signature campaigns have been full for months with similar payout rates. Why do you think this is? Do you really think that having two accounts is really that harmful to luckybit?

I think it's due to the fact that most campaign participants are alt accounts, and since I don't allow them, they don't participate. If some competitor wants to pay someone three times to spam the forum, hey; it's their money to waste. I'm on a fixed budget and I'd rather focus my efforts on quality advertisers that aren't going to abuse the system for a quick profit.

Just because we're surrounded by thieves and scumbags doesn't mean we have to be ones.

You make a lot of rules to try to prevent alt accounts from participating but you have not succeeded. It is not difficult to use multiple accounts in your campaign, it is just a headache to do so.

Maybe if you judged participants by the quality of their posts instead of the number of accounts they had you would have better luck with your campaign.

Regardless of the number of accounts a participant has if they are making relevant posts you are getting advertisement exposure.

I would not say that someone who has more then one account is a scumbag nor a thief. I would consider you to be more of a thief by forcing participants to risk their money by gambling on your site any time they want to even apply to participate in your campaign. I don't know what the house edge is on luckybit, nor do I care, but assuming it is 1% then the EV for people that apply is negative by 1%. This does not even count the fact that the gambler is forced to pay 2 TX fees on every bet which really makes the house edge much higher then advertised.

If you want to talk about spam, I would suggest that you look at the spam your site puts on the blockchain as in the number of spammy transactions.

You are wrong on this. He is currently enrolled in the bitmixer signature campaign which pays from their 1bitmixer... address. If he used bitmixer to mix his coins then you would most likely not know that he used a mixing service without significant resources (especially with bitmixer)

You are in effect denying him participation because he participated with a competitor campaign.

Can anybody else verify this?

Why would people in the bitmixer campaign be visiting your scammy signature campaign thread?

[baby222]

You are wrong on this. He is currently enrolled in the bitmixer signature campaign which pays from their 1bitmixer... address. If he used bitmixer to mix his coins then you would most likely not know that he used a mixing service without significant resources (especially with bitmixer)

You are in effect denying him participation because he participated with a competitor campaign.

Can anybody else verify this?

Why don't you investigate the bitmixer signature campaign thread? According to their OP payment is made to the address in your bitcointalk.org profile. If you look at various accounts in the bitmixer signature campaign, you will see that the address associated with their profile has payments received from that adddress

[Pierre11]

Is there a spot for me in this campaign? I would be interested in joining.

[hdd3go]

ENROLLING 

Post count: 201
Bitcoin Address: 1AYBhpkM64euN5LLhghXuPaz8n3PvT3DbT
Recent Bet: http://luckyb.it/check?txin=ab675069829873ed5e912f629d1c7d218b88f19057eaf4b5f117b4cd3d21ef2d:0