Hi Stingle,
If your background check reveals alt accounts of known scammers, it would be better for the Bitcoin community if you publicly name them. Makes the forum a safer place.
I would agree with you if other signature campaigns were half as vigilant about undesired behavior as I have been.
If other campaign managers want to get on the train, I'll share with them. I don't see a need to air dirty laundry. They aren't violating the forum rules, and I'm not interested in interfering with the thriving account marketplace by publicly airing linked accounts.
Botany, how does that make me a scammer? First of all I didn't enroll this campaign twice. Second of all, I only have one alt. Third of all I wasn't aware of that unwritten rule (it's not written in your rules section). I got an alt account because I recovered the password of this account a few months back while I created this account in march. I didn't intentionally create this account to do dual account signature "abuse".
Last but not least; I've made over 80 posts, 30 more than I should. I write my posts like I usually would so OP there shouldn't be much to whine about and write me off as a scammer. Anyways good luck with your campaign.
You weren't aware because nobody was, apparently. What I thought would be common sense ("Don't cheat the signature campaigns by dual enrollments") has to now be explicitly and strictly enforced. I'm not writing you off as a scammer, I'm temporarily barring you and any other participants that have abused the signature campaign system.
stingle...
we understand your point of view..
but we do not consider to have cheated.
for us it is ok... i and my bro have no problem to skip this lap...
we like bitcoin and we hope it will rise and become really a standard around the world.
so we continue to write and learn and it is not a problem for us to be disqualified, but i repeat, we do not consider to have cheated.
but we ask you two things.
1) specify in the op page under "You will be disqualified and barred from the campaign if" to not use the same wallet for different account.
2) we do not know if in the futures we will ask to enroll again... but if we will want? How to not be disqualified again? just use 2 different wallet?
3) why do you wait 3 weeks to disqualify us? you get 3 weeks of signature from 2 users for free... A better approach could be pay this month and never, i say never, accept enrollemnt from the users who you think have cheated!
no hard feelings... and marry christmas
1) I already did, and with some more details, per your request.
2) If you're sharing your wallet, you are being rightly disqualified. Shared wallets are the core of this problem.
3) Because I only just discovered the infraction recently.
I appreciate your attitude about this. If you wish to re-apply in the future, I may reconsider your participation; please wait at least 30 days to do this. I assert that the "we" at the beginning of your post really should have been an "I", based on this reply:
stingle,
why you are not answering?
i can not read mods in OP page under "You will be disqualified and barred from the campaign if:"
i think if you clarify you can help other users to understand better signature campaign rules.
if you do not want to answer, at least, update the OP page under "You will be disqualified and barred from the campaign if:"...
Are you aware that it's Christmastime?
I'm a busy man. I have a life. Human arms, legs, and a stomach that requires food in it to keep the hands that type these words functional. I cannot answer every question every day in an incredibly timely manner. I've been offline for about 12 hours, what is the urgency that requires this post? None. The OP is already updated to state you will be disqualified for using a spend-linked wallet, so this post is causing trouble for no reason at all.
i remember you,
you had many weeks of campaign signature for free, from many users!!!
I won't dignify this comment with a response. Attitude is everything when I make considerations for this campaign, as I mentioned previously.
To close this subject once and for all: It never should have come to this. It is simple, common sense that signature campaign abuse is going to risk getting you kicked out of them, and if you are asking for "explicit" defined rules concerning this simple common sense foundation, then you are clearly looking for a way to cheat. If you are an honest advertiser that isn't trying to game the system, then you won't feel threatened by this change and don't have anything to worry about.
