[ANN] [ICB] IcebergCoin ❄︎ Big Update 27.11.❄︎ In-Wallet Tradebot❄︎ [MALWARE?]

[Icebergcoin]

How does one get in touch with Bittrex-Bill to take part in the ICO?

It will be open like any other market in bittrex, anyway we will put the link on the OP when it is available

[CryptoHobo]

How does one get in touch with Bittrex-Bill to take part in the ICO?

It will be open like any other market in bittrex, anyway we will put the link on the OP when it is available

Hope its at a decent time for those of us in the u.k. / eu.
Time to ship some sellables to bittrex ready :-)

[Youghoor]

How does one get in touch with Bittrex-Bill to take part in the ICO?

It will be open like any other market in bittrex, anyway we will put the link on the OP when it is available

yes it will be helpful

[dare88]

Only 24 hours!
can't wait!

Yes, its taking too long for me

+1

I will be ready for tomorrow 

[Auxi]

You will put all ICO ICBcoin at the same price on Bittrex, and we must buy, is it correct?

[Icebergcoin]

You will put all ICO ICBcoin at the same price on Bittrex, and we must buy, is it correct?

Yes,the whole ICO will be at the same price on bittrex.

[SecondsOld]

Ice Ice Baby!

[atleticofa]

I sent right now  btc to bittrex. I'm ready! Let's the iceberg begin 

[zhengqi]

Only 30 coins? Few than we could image!

[dare88]

Only 30 coins? Few than we could image!

As you can read in the main post, the devs don't want a pump and dump coin, so there is no sense in giving a big free giveaway. If the this giveaway were bigger, this 1000 users would dump the coin in the first days.

You have to add that the unsold coins will be destroyed and that the difficulty of mining will be high (There are many users interested in it), so you can be sure that the coin won't be dumped.

I sent right now  btc to bittrex. I'm ready! Let's the iceberg begin  

I already have them in Bittrex waiting for some fresh ICBs!

[psychocoin]

dev, should you have a limit hash in order to avoid big hand or rental mining?

As someone said in previous pages that it is impossible to implement.
The point is that it is really difficult to rent high hash for NIST5

Minerals had it implemented (by keeping source closed during PoW and providing a centralized pool; some people were suspicious but it worked) so it is possible. Maybe not the best way but if the developers can be trusted it will work.

[psychocoin]

I must write here, im seeing your signature in all threads haha
What are your features?
I mined TAC and Your best point is POS

Perhaps the algo which suits some miners better and distributes the coin in a manner that's slightly more fair.
But after 7 days of mining it's over and PoS starts. And... that's all?
Whitepaper mentions the possible future features but it's just a list of features unrelated to each other and already existing in other coins, so even the ideas are nothing new, and there is not a word about what purpose will the coin and wallet serve or what problem does it tackle, or anything of any value about the features mentioned.
Without anything to back your pretty much undefined intentions with, no serious investor will come within miles of this coin, so you need to think fast about this:

- What problem not addressed by any other coin on the market can we tackle with a unique approach and go on to design and deliver an innovative, working solution that would serve some sort of a purpose to the public?
- Realistically thinking - if we don't come up with ideas backed by convincing theoretical knowledge and present them within a couple days, it would be a miracle to sell even as much as 1% of the IPO, as the proposed Market Cap valuation is currently far beyond delusional. What reasoning is your supposed Market Cap value based on, anyway?

These problems need to be addressed and then we can talk about a coin that could survive past its first few weeks.

Don't worry, I still think this has potential - but these questions need to be asked and need to be addressed!

Developers - why haven't you addressed any of these concerns? Please respond.

[dare88]

dev, should you have a limit hash in order to avoid big hand or rental mining?

As someone said in previous pages that it is impossible to implement.
The point is that it is really difficult to rent high hash for NIST5

Minerals had it implemented (by keeping source closed during PoW and providing a centralized pool; some people were suspicious but it worked) so it is possible. Maybe not the best way but if the developers can be trusted it will work.

Yes, but by this way you are taking the risk of mining in a pool of the same devs of the coin. So the coin won't be plural and fair.

And also, somebody can cheat, and use several users/password to avoid the hashing block.

[psychocoin]

Yes, but the miners can use serveral usernames and password, to avoid the hash blocking.

I wasn't personally mining, so can you please provide a source for proof that it's effective, for both private farms and rented hashpower? It's something so obvious that I think they would never even try to enforce the limit, if something so simple would make the limit meaningless.

Yes, but by this way you are taking the risk of mining in a pool of the same devs of the coin. So the coin won't be plural and fair.

Yes, that's true if the project is a scam. Minerals wasn't. So, if the people behind the project can be trusted and prove their idea has potential - it's not too much of a problem.

[Tyr808]

I must write here, im seeing your signature in all threads haha
What are your features?
I mined TAC and Your best point is POS

Perhaps the algo which suits some miners better and distributes the coin in a manner that's slightly more fair.
But after 7 days of mining it's over and PoS starts. And... that's all?
Whitepaper mentions the possible future features but it's just a list of features unrelated to each other and already existing in other coins, so even the ideas are nothing new, and there is not a word about what purpose will the coin and wallet serve or what problem does it tackle, or anything of any value about the features mentioned.
Without anything to back your pretty much undefined intentions with, no serious investor will come within miles of this coin, so you need to think fast about this:

- What problem not addressed by any other coin on the market can we tackle with a unique approach and go on to design and deliver an innovative, working solution that would serve some sort of a purpose to the public?
- Realistically thinking - if we don't come up with ideas backed by convincing theoretical knowledge and present them within a couple days, it would be a miracle to sell even as much as 1% of the IPO, as the proposed Market Cap valuation is currently far beyond delusional. What reasoning is your supposed Market Cap value based on, anyway?

These problems need to be addressed and then we can talk about a coin that could survive past its first few weeks.

Don't worry, I still think this has potential - but these questions need to be asked and need to be addressed!

Developers - why haven't you addressed any of these concerns? Please respond.

While I personally feel this coin seems quite honest and refreshing in light of how many bad coins are released, I too can't help but wonder why ICB? say I'm an investor with lots of capitol, why would I want to buy it, if I'm looking to use it as a currency, what does it do that others don't?  It seems great to mine, but to what end?

Nonetheless, I still plan to take a chance on the initial bittrex buy because I'm happy to support such an honest coin.  I'd still love to hear from the devs here, because there are already many good honest coins that have constant downward pressure for quite some time now, such as MYR. 

[paulnux]

Launch date ?

[msfs]

good coin

[atleticofa]

I think some people forget that we are under Alternate cryptocurrencies subforum. ALL, I repeat, ALL alt coins have an speculative purpose and nothing more. From Litecoin, to Darkcoin. Some of them can take some advantages, some improvementes, some features, but at the end, all of them will die, and Bitcoin will be only one with a real purpose.

Icebergcoin Devs says that they don't want a pump and dump, they want a long term grow, that's ok. But everybody should understand that at the end, the final prupose is speculation like Litecoin, Darkcoin, Bytecoin, Dogecoin...

Yes, it's better when the speculation come with some innovations and good features that sustain that speculation, of course. But ask to icebergcoin dev to tell us the "final purpose" is ridiculous.

Just my opinion.

I will buy ICB, I think marketcap is ok, I don't see it expensive, if they actually have a plan the coin will overpass 500BTC marketcap easily. I will buy because I will sell later for more BTC, that's the purpose. I would like mine with a farm, but I just have 6 GPU, so I think it will be hard to get too much for me just mining.

[Icebergcoin]

I must write here, im seeing your signature in all threads haha
What are your features?
I mined TAC and Your best point is POS

Perhaps the algo which suits some miners better and distributes the coin in a manner that's slightly more fair.
But after 7 days of mining it's over and PoS starts. And... that's all?
Whitepaper mentions the possible future features but it's just a list of features unrelated to each other and already existing in other coins, so even the ideas are nothing new, and there is not a word about what purpose will the coin and wallet serve or what problem does it tackle, or anything of any value about the features mentioned.
Without anything to back your pretty much undefined intentions with, no serious investor will come within miles of this coin, so you need to think fast about this:

- What problem not addressed by any other coin on the market can we tackle with a unique approach and go on to design and deliver an innovative, working solution that would serve some sort of a purpose to the public?
- Realistically thinking - if we don't come up with ideas backed by convincing theoretical knowledge and present them within a couple days, it would be a miracle to sell even as much as 1% of the IPO, as the proposed Market Cap valuation is currently far beyond delusional. What reasoning is your supposed Market Cap value based on, anyway?

These problems need to be addressed and then we can talk about a coin that could survive past its first few weeks.

Don't worry, I still think this has potential - but these questions need to be asked and need to be addressed!

Developers - why haven't you addressed any of these concerns? Please respond.

Now,our first priority is to launch this coin.
We have a hard work ahead and we are working hard to launch accordingly to our plans.
This coin is not a copypaste coin,it has been rebuilt because it is the first coin NIST5 PoW/PoS and many features has to be recoded.
We have many plans,but,first we have to finish the most important thing.
We actually know which one will be the next step, but we are not going to publish it. We don't want fall in pump and dump schemes. We have seen in the last weeks a lot of examples of that, any dev publishes an announce of a next feature, suddenly everybody buy, later everyday sell, and after that people forget about this coin and begin to look for the next one to pump. That's not what we are looking for.

We are not going to change the ICO marketcap because we,the team, have discussed it many times and we consider that it is a fair price for everyone.
We don't care if nobody buys, we don't care if we sell 0.1 BTC or 90 BTC in the ICO,we prefer to sell 0.1 BTC with a fair price,than 90 BTC with a low price,because this would make investor dump the coin. The objective of the ICO is to give the chance to investors of buying at a fair and realistic price,unsold coins will be destroyed by Bittrex.

[Icebergcoin]

dev, should you have a limit hash in order to avoid big hand or rental mining?

As someone said in previous pages that it is impossible to implement.
The point is that it is really difficult to rent high hash for NIST5

Minerals had it implemented (by keeping source closed during PoW and providing a centralized pool; some people were suspicious but it worked) so it is possible. Maybe not the best way but if the developers can be trusted it will work.

We want to be as transparent as possible,that is why we chose Bittrex,because investors will be secure that their coins are safe.
Making that we could not spread the hash,making possible attacks.
There will not be any suspicious here.