Me too, but I still don't have enough information to decide whether this is a scam or not.
Then do your homework.
This is irrelevant to the question "is it a scam ?" and does not bring information as to what did happen.
The operator being attacked and/or having sustained loss of, for example, his private PC, thus preventing him to contact anyone, would be another equally valid speculation.
There is another fact which would plead in favor of incapacitation of the operator : the wallet remains untouched to this date (and should be closely monitored). Leaving the money in the chest is hardly running away with it, and is even an element of doubt as to whether it is a scam.
It is relevant. Something is not in my possession anymore. What you are saying is: If someone is being defrauded, you can't call it fraud until you have all facts together. This is plain wrong. If you can not get back your money, you normally go to the police and file a complaint. Then the police does the research. Then the judge tells you, if you are right or wrong. What you say is basically: "We have to protect fraudsters all over the world."
Unconclusive : I've seen many very small companies either registered under a different name, or being still in the process of being registered. This does not allow to reach a conclusion.
Okay, which company in Sweden has been running an operation while still being registered? Have you talked to the You are only speculating. not bringing ANY evidence. Have you talked to the people at Bolagsverket? I know you haven't because then you would know that no company is in the proceeding of being registered at the given address.
Indeed, but that could also very possibly be because it is someone who doesn't want to be harassed or pay taxes on crypto-currencies revenue. There is a greater proportion of people wanting their privacy to remain undisturbed in the bitcoin-related field than in the general population. Although I don't take extraordinary steps to hide my real-life identity, I'm not publishing it either, for I value some degree of privacy.
You are in the nice field of speculation.
Speculation. How do you know whether someone opens an email or not ? Did you hack into those yahoo accounts ?
Most probably, you simply don't know.
You say you are an investigator and don't know how to find out if someone is accessing the mail account at Yahoo? I do know and have the evidence, while you prove that you do not know anything about investigative work.
Untrue. There are several persons using that name, in Europe and elsewhere.
Would you mind sharing this information with me? If necessary also by PM. Maybe I have to be more precise: I only checked in Europe for persons of age. But you seem just to speculate...
Irrelevant. There are many ways to attack, or more generally put a server offline, and I didn't allude to a DDOS.
He did mention ddos. And this, while he was obviously able to send out mail. And: He sent out mails via his Yahoo-account...
Well, shit happens. I could for example illustrate that Bitmain did not send me my coupons for the S3 batch 1, but that doesn't make scammers of them.
Bitmain hasn't anything to do with Lunamine. Did Lunamine pay or not? Stick with the facts.
This not a proof at all. The operator could be prevented to inform lunamine customers, for any reason including loss of passwords, data, theft of identity etc.
As for the fake registration data, well, why not, that would be a (somewhat ill-advised, indeed) way to keep some privacy.
Speculation. Stick with the facts.
Well, that doesn't change the fact that you made an unfounded accusation without evidence to back it up.
Not knowing the identity of someone you harm the reputation of is not a justification to do so.
Lol, you are really not knowing anything about any legal system, right?
Who's reputation did I harm? looool? Name him. Her. It.
I can say that Winnetou Speckdrosselflug is a total fraudster. Because he does not exist.
You basically are protecting fraudster with your "argumentation" - victims have to do the research, in your opinion, then go and file a lawsuit, presenting all the evidence. I don't know in which country you are living in. But in the civilized world, if a contract is broken and you can't get your funds anymore, you go to the police and the police does the investigation. Then the judge does decide wether or not it is fraud. But you would file a criminal complaint, thus indicating that you are convinced that it is fraud.
