[ANN][SILKCOIN][DARKSILK PREANN][TESTING STORMNODES/DarkSIlk MARKET/I2P]

[souljah1h]

The Silk Network WhitePaper December 2015 has been released on Slack.

Just PM your email to gain access to the Slack group.

Just release it here...

https://www.dropbox.com/s/8r2g16ls5ug7eop/Silk%20Network%20Whitepaper%20December%202015.pdf?dl=0

Hope you find the whitepaper informative.

Thanks for sharing, reading tonight!

[1714933242]

1714933242

[1714933242]

1714933242

[1714933242]

1714933242

[SLievensDRKSLK]

Please retweet and like the post below, let's spread the word:

https://twitter.com/Silk_Network/status/677776959255011328

[SLievensDRKSLK]

Off to bed, over 60 hours spent on the whitepaper, eyes hurt and brain hurts. Good to be released though

[Jocuserious]

That's a pretty impressive effort on the WP.  Skimmed through it; will read more in depth when I wake up, but wanted to toss out props. 

[DoctorBugsBunny]

That's a pretty impressive effort on the WP.  Skimmed through it; will read more in depth when I wake up, but wanted to toss out props. 

I must agree, the whitepaper is spectacular. The future definitely looks bright for the Silk Network. Major respect Spencer. 

[SLievensDRKSLK]

Many thanks for the compliments on the whitepaper.

I would like people to know that I will be reviewing the systems prior to launch and any last minute changes will be updated within the whitepaper.

The Gold and Diamond accounts are for people who would transact large amounts.

Otherwise the standard account is more than adequate for most users.

Also the fees are preliminary within the whitepaper and will be refined before launch to be as low as possible.

However what people have to appreciate is that users use server resources and this in turn costs money.

I am currently reviewing the costs per trade, withdraw etc. and looking to reduce the fees as much as possible whilst still maintaining the platform and allowing it to grow.

[child_harold]

Please retweet and like the post below, let's spread the word:

https://twitter.com/Silk_Network/status/677776959255011328

I have a question about the whitepaper . You cite the Shadowchat whitepaper [6] and the Bitmessage paper [18]. Given you were following this thread I'm surprised you elected to include the SDC paper since it's a rip-off of Bitmessage. Or do you not think this is the case? Could you explain this decision?

[SLievensDRKSLK]

Please retweet and like the post below, let's spread the word:

https://twitter.com/Silk_Network/status/677776959255011328

I have a question about the whitepaper . You cite the Shadowchat whitepaper [6] and the Bitmessage paper [18]. Given you were following this thread I'm surprised you elected to include the SDC paper since it's a rip-off of Bitmessage. Or do you not think this is the case? Could you explain this decision?

I cited both because I took the code directly from the ShadowCash GitHub and they took the code in-turn from Bitmessage.

Are you stating the code is a rip-off? It is open-source.

Or their whitepaper? I based my content off of the ShadowCash whitepaper, which I then checked through and edited errors and reworded etc. Theirs is based on Bitmessage, another reason I cited both.

Also this is in the whitepaper: "DarkSilk P2P (peer-to-peer) messaging, taken from ShadowChat which is based upon Bitmessage[18], utilises state-of-the-art encryption technology to keep your communications private."

So I ask you, what is the issue? I also ask you kindly to remove Silk from your thread.

[arteleis]

Please retweet and like the post below, let's spread the word:

https://twitter.com/Silk_Network/status/677776959255011328

I have a question about the whitepaper . You cite the Shadowchat whitepaper [6] and the Bitmessage paper [18]. Given you were following this thread I'm surprised you elected to include the SDC paper since it's a rip-off of Bitmessage. Or do you not think this is the case? Could you explain this decision?

  well no such thing as a rip-off of open source but not really sure what youre gettinf at.  believe shadow chat was rewritten to a different language? its also used in like 100+ coins? youd like us to discrrdit rynos shadowchat? or what you saying here.

[SLievensDRKSLK]

To be honest I have a feeling that Child_Harold is probably the same as most of the people in this thread.

Been fucked. Basically. Pardon my french.

But seriously, this is more than likely the case.

Why not just come and join us dude, and actually be a part of a good community with public and honest, hardworking developers?

Time to stop falling for scams.

[quantumgravity]

To be honest I have a feeling that Child_Harold is probably the same as most of the people in this thread.

Been fucked. Basically. Pardon my french.

But seriously, this is more than likely the case.

Why not just come and join us dude, and actually be a part of a good community with public and honest, hardworking developers?

Time to stop falling for scams.

I 100% agree with this. Because that is exactly what I've done.

[arteleis]

To be honest I have a feeling that Child_Harold is probably the same as most of the people in this thread.

Been fucked. Basically. Pardon my french.

But seriously, this is more than likely the case.

Why not just come and join us dude, and actually be a part of a good community with public and honest, hardworking developers?

Time to stop falling for scams.

I 100% agree with this. Because that is exactly what I've done.

 yep.  been lots of butthurt with this coin.  but ive kept it solid and honest for a couple years now and in addition we got a damn fine dev leading the charge.  who also has some freakin values.  hard to find in crytos.

[child_harold]

Please retweet and like the post below, let's spread the word:

https://twitter.com/Silk_Network/status/677776959255011328

I have a question about the whitepaper . You cite the Shadowchat whitepaper [6] and the Bitmessage paper [18]. Given you were following this thread I'm surprised you elected to include the SDC paper since it's a rip-off of Bitmessage. Or do you not think this is the case? Could you explain this decision?

I cited both because I took the code directly from the ShadowCash GitHub and they took the code in-turn from Bitmessage.

Are you stating the code is a rip-off? It is open-source.

Or their whitepaper? I based my content off of the ShadowCash whitepaper, which I then checked through and edited errors and reworded etc. Theirs is based on Bitmessage, another reason I cited both.

Also this is in the whitepaper: "DarkSilk P2P (peer-to-peer) messaging, taken from ShadowChat which is based upon Bitmessage[18], utilises state-of-the-art encryption technology to keep your communications private."

So I ask you, what is the issue? I also ask you kindly to remove Silk from your thread.

The shadowchat paper is a transparent rip-off as anybody can plainly see. The code I cannot speak to. You couldve referenced the Bitmessage paper and the SDC Github I suppose. Anyway its not my bag. Well done on releasing the paper, Ill give it a read later. Good Luck.

[SLievensDRKSLK]

Please retweet and like the post below, let's spread the word:

https://twitter.com/Silk_Network/status/677776959255011328

I have a question about the whitepaper . You cite the Shadowchat whitepaper [6] and the Bitmessage paper [18]. Given you were following this thread I'm surprised you elected to include the SDC paper since it's a rip-off of Bitmessage. Or do you not think this is the case? Could you explain this decision?

I cited both because I took the code directly from the ShadowCash GitHub and they took the code in-turn from Bitmessage.

Are you stating the code is a rip-off? It is open-source.

Or their whitepaper? I based my content off of the ShadowCash whitepaper, which I then checked through and edited errors and reworded etc. Theirs is based on Bitmessage, another reason I cited both.

Also this is in the whitepaper: "DarkSilk P2P (peer-to-peer) messaging, taken from ShadowChat which is based upon Bitmessage[18], utilises state-of-the-art encryption technology to keep your communications private."

So I ask you, what is the issue? I also ask you kindly to remove Silk from your thread.

The shadowchat paper is a transparent rip-off as anybody can plainly see. The code I cannot speak to. You couldve referenced the Bitmessage paper and the SDC Github I suppose. Anyway its not my bag. Well done on releasing the paper, Ill give it a read later. Good Luck.

Many thanks Child_Harold, your welcome anytime, enjoy the read

[quantumgravity]

Please retweet and like the post below, let's spread the word:

https://twitter.com/Silk_Network/status/677776959255011328

I have a question about the whitepaper . You cite the Shadowchat whitepaper [6] and the Bitmessage paper [18]. Given you were following this thread I'm surprised you elected to include the SDC paper since it's a rip-off of Bitmessage. Or do you not think this is the case? Could you explain this decision?

I cited both because I took the code directly from the ShadowCash GitHub and they took the code in-turn from Bitmessage.

Are you stating the code is a rip-off? It is open-source.

Or their whitepaper? I based my content off of the ShadowCash whitepaper, which I then checked through and edited errors and reworded etc. Theirs is based on Bitmessage, another reason I cited both.

Also this is in the whitepaper: "DarkSilk P2P (peer-to-peer) messaging, taken from ShadowChat which is based upon Bitmessage[18], utilises state-of-the-art encryption technology to keep your communications private."

So I ask you, what is the issue? I also ask you kindly to remove Silk from your thread.

The shadowchat paper is a transparent rip-off as anybody can plainly see. The code I cannot speak to. You couldve referenced the Bitmessage paper and the SDC Github I suppose. Anyway its not my bag. Well done on releasing the paper, Ill give it a read later. Good Luck.

The bitmessage paper was referenced and cited in the Silk Network whitepaper. I don't understand what the issue is???

[FogHorn_LegHorn]

I wanna get silky and put on my legs.

[SLievensDRKSLK]

Please retweet and like the post below, let's spread the word:

https://twitter.com/Silk_Network/status/677776959255011328

I have a question about the whitepaper . You cite the Shadowchat whitepaper [6] and the Bitmessage paper [18]. Given you were following this thread I'm surprised you elected to include the SDC paper since it's a rip-off of Bitmessage. Or do you not think this is the case? Could you explain this decision?

I cited both because I took the code directly from the ShadowCash GitHub and they took the code in-turn from Bitmessage.

Are you stating the code is a rip-off? It is open-source.

Or their whitepaper? I based my content off of the ShadowCash whitepaper, which I then checked through and edited errors and reworded etc. Theirs is based on Bitmessage, another reason I cited both.

Also this is in the whitepaper: "DarkSilk P2P (peer-to-peer) messaging, taken from ShadowChat which is based upon Bitmessage[18], utilises state-of-the-art encryption technology to keep your communications private."

So I ask you, what is the issue? I also ask you kindly to remove Silk from your thread.

The shadowchat paper is a transparent rip-off as anybody can plainly see. The code I cannot speak to. You couldve referenced the Bitmessage paper and the SDC Github I suppose. Anyway its not my bag. Well done on releasing the paper, Ill give it a read later. Good Luck.

The bitmessage paper was referenced and cited in the Silk Network whitepaper. I don't understand what the issue is???

His point is I should of referenced the ShadowChat GitHub but at the same time I did take a bulk of information directly from the whitepaper of SDC and they in turn took from Bitmessage. I believe what I have done in the Silk Network whitepaper is absolutely fine and accurately cites what it needed. There is no point in the whitepaper where I quote the code directly that I took from SDC, which in-turn gives no place for citation.

Nice to see that someone is passionate though about morals and making sure people get the recognition they deserve.

[arteleis]

Please retweet and like the post below, let's spread the word:

https://twitter.com/Silk_Network/status/677776959255011328

I have a question about the whitepaper . You cite the Shadowchat whitepaper [6] and the Bitmessage paper [18]. Given you were following this thread I'm surprised you elected to include the SDC paper since it's a rip-off of Bitmessage. Or do you not think this is the case? Could you explain this decision?

I cited both because I took the code directly from the ShadowCash GitHub and they took the code in-turn from Bitmessage.

Are you stating the code is a rip-off? It is open-source.

Or their whitepaper? I based my content off of the ShadowCash whitepaper, which I then checked through and edited errors and reworded etc. Theirs is based on Bitmessage, another reason I cited both.

Also this is in the whitepaper: "DarkSilk P2P (peer-to-peer) messaging, taken from ShadowChat which is based upon Bitmessage[18], utilises state-of-the-art encryption technology to keep your communications private."

So I ask you, what is the issue? I also ask you kindly to remove Silk from your thread.

The shadowchat paper is a transparent rip-off as anybody can plainly see. The code I cannot speak to. You couldve referenced the Bitmessage paper and the SDC Github I suppose. Anyway its not my bag. Well done on releasing the paper, Ill give it a read later. Good Luck.

 coolio.  well welcome to the thread man. any questions are welcome!

[SLievensDRKSLK]

Final Splashscreen for DarkSilk:

[bhokor]

Final Splashscreen for DarkSilk:

It is a nice design, perhaps a little more of contrast of the scorpion with the background  would be a little more visually attractive, but it is only an opinion