[ANN][SILKCOIN][DARKSILK PREANN][TESTING STORMNODES/DarkSIlk MARKET/I2P]

[SLievensDRKSLK]

Some suggestions for DarkSilk (I reviewed https://github.com/SCDeveloper/DarkSilk-Release-Candidate):
....

I am

I am bringing the codebase up to 12.1

Currently I am between 11.2 and 12.1 of Dash.

There are still a lot of differences such as CCoins too

DarkSilk will launch with these changes you mention in place

Did I review the wrong code or do you have another repo?  

I'm glad you included theses and other fixes.  I only named a few.  I know you have been working really hard on DarkSilk.

Are you including Sling's market in the first version or did you remove it?

i was wondering the same. have i wrong git?
that may be i had.
if so the core is ok? but not out yet?

How many times.....

DarkSilk is not released.

ok. but dont ignore these olds bugs. cryptovote already gave you some small part of those. he knows what we are talking about.
problem is not the mastenode code, but the main code..
all because of some guy messed up sourcecode out there really bad time with the earlier masternode shit coins.
who was it? icm? name if you can.

I know about the mess of Crave. It doesn't work, simple.

I have been working on DarkSilk since April and CryptoVote was using MY commits and is now helping with DarkSilk which is nice of him.

If anyone is aware of the mess of Crave and other similar codebases, it's me

Check this repo - https://github.com/SCDeveloper/Crave-Darksilk-Comparison (I made this 16 days ago and have done thousands of line changes since but this will give you an idea of the amount of work done)

There is not just the difference between CTransaction and CMutable, there are all the node elements, block scanning, Stealth address and messaging issues. Darksend simply doesn't work in Crave and basically the Dash code in Crave is just for show.

A simple example and proof of this is the fact that the mixer is disabled in the Crave source to not display on the overview page, ask yourself why.

I am of course referencing the original Crave release not any work done thereafter.

looks way better.. (git i looked earlier was last commit 3 months ago)
even the support for /* miniupnpc 1.9.20150730 */ added

"ibm" guys are waiting your work for crave?

"Darksend simply doesn't work in Crave and basically the Dash code in Crave is just for show.

A simple example and proof of this is the fact that the mixer is disabled in the Crave source to not display on the overview page, ask yourself why."
-yep, i found that months ago when fighting with similar code.

this BIG work you have done would help much with my hobby coin, but for personal reasons i am unable to continue..

It wouldn't surprise me if the "IBM" devs are using/waiting on my/our work.

[arteleis]

Some suggestions for DarkSilk (I reviewed https://github.com/SCDeveloper/DarkSilk-Release-Candidate):
....

I am

I am bringing the codebase up to 12.1

Currently I am between 11.2 and 12.1 of Dash.

There are still a lot of differences such as CCoins too

DarkSilk will launch with these changes you mention in place

Did I review the wrong code or do you have another repo?  

I'm glad you included theses and other fixes.  I only named a few.  I know you have been working really hard on DarkSilk.

Are you including Sling's market in the first version or did you remove it?

i was wondering the same. have i wrong git?
that may be i had.
if so the core is ok? but not out yet?

How many times.....

DarkSilk is not released.

ok. but dont ignore these olds bugs. cryptovote already gave you some small part of those. he knows what we are talking about.
problem is not the mastenode code, but the main code..
all because of some guy messed up sourcecode out there really bad time with the earlier masternode shit coins.
who was it? icm? name if you can.

I know about the mess of Crave. It doesn't work, simple.

I have been working on DarkSilk since April and CryptoVote was using MY commits and is now helping with DarkSilk which is nice of him.

If anyone is aware of the mess of Crave and other similar codebases, it's me

Check this repo - https://github.com/SCDeveloper/Crave-Darksilk-Comparison (I made this 16 days ago and have done thousands of line changes since but this will give you an idea of the amount of work done)

There is not just the difference between CTransaction and CMutable, there are all the node elements, block scanning, Stealth address and messaging issues. Darksend simply doesn't work in Crave and basically the Dash code in Crave is just for show.

A simple example and proof of this is the fact that the mixer is disabled in the Crave source to not display on the overview page, ask yourself why.

I am of course referencing the original Crave release not any work done thereafter.

looks way better.. (git i looked earlier was last commit 3 months ago)
even the support for /* miniupnpc 1.9.20150730 */ added

"ibm" guys are waiting your work for crave?

"Darksend simply doesn't work in Crave and basically the Dash code in Crave is just for show.

A simple example and proof of this is the fact that the mixer is disabled in the Crave source to not display on the overview page, ask yourself why."
-yep, i found that months ago when fighting with similar code.

this BIG work you have done would help much with my hobby coin, but for personal reasons i am unable to continue..

It wouldn't surprise me if the "IBM" devs are using/waiting on my/our work.

Oh MaN! IBM is gonna fork silk now too??  lol it just never ends.

[SLievensDRKSLK]

Stealth Transactions have been fixed!!!

Now I need to test InstantX and just get the core CTransaction/CMutableTransaction brought in-line with Dash.

Then it is pre-launch/further testing time

[cisahasa]

Stealth Transactions have been fixed!!!

Now I need to test InstantX and just get the core CTransaction/CMutableTransaction brought in-line with Dash.

Then it is pre-launch/further testing time

is there alive testnet coming with masternodes?
(testnet explorer would be nice too..)
i would like to seek some loop holes..

[SLievensDRKSLK]

Stealth Transactions have been fixed!!!

Now I need to test InstantX and just get the core CTransaction/CMutableTransaction brought in-line with Dash.

Then it is pre-launch/further testing time

is there alive testnet coming with masternodes?
(testnet explorer would be nice too..)
i would like to seek some loop holes..

http://explorer.darksilk.org

Build the current source and connect to 82.8.176.59

Block 2686 currently.

No Stormnodes up atm but can send funds for you to setup as many as you would like. Info is in the readme for ports etc.

[cisahasa]

done..
downloading blocks

DFtszYZuunFGPKvYRzkyoeECPLo2q5coWY

1 click masternodes would be nice..

i must change this background color, its hitting my eyes

[SLievensDRKSLK]

done..
downloading blocks

DFtszYZuunFGPKvYRzkyoeECPLo2q5coWY

1 click masternodes would be nice..

How much you need?

Go to the Stormnode Network page in the wallet.....

[cisahasa]

done..
downloading blocks

DFtszYZuunFGPKvYRzkyoeECPLo2q5coWY

1 click masternodes would be nice..

How much you need?

Go to the Stormnode Network page in the wallet.....

upto 1 node + wallet for staking

got money

building custom wallet..

[SLievensDRKSLK]

done..
downloading blocks

DFtszYZuunFGPKvYRzkyoeECPLo2q5coWY

1 click masternodes would be nice..

How much you need?

Go to the Stormnode Network page in the wallet.....

upto 1 node + wallet for staking

Sent 43k.

[cisahasa]

this will take time.. setting up things.
4h stake, results tomorrow.

i used this for 1-click nodes:
https://github.com/MasterDoge-dev/masterdoge/commit/a1f272a205820e3d18bc7823eede47f140a8297c

[SLievensDRKSLK]

this will take time.. setting up things.
4h stake, results tomorrow.

What are you looking for?

Might be able to save you time.

[cisahasa]

this will take time.. setting up things.
4h stake, results tomorrow.

What are you looking for?

Might be able to save you time.

pm

[SLievensDRKSLK]

this will take time.. setting up things.
4h stake, results tomorrow.

What are you looking for?

Might be able to save you time.

pm

Yes Stormnode Enforcement is active. It is in spork.h and under Spork 1 - 1st November it started. However upon launch this will not start for a month or two to give people time to setup Stormnodes.

[cisahasa]

this will take time.. setting up things.
4h stake, results tomorrow.

What are you looking for?

Might be able to save you time.

pm

Yes Stormnode Enforcement is active. It is in spork.h and under Spork 1 - 1st November it started. However upon launch this will not start for a month or two to give people time to setup Stormnodes.

custom wallet done, will continue tomorrow, im too tired

will collect you the fix info needed, if it is needed..

[SLievensDRKSLK]

this will take time.. setting up things.
4h stake, results tomorrow.

What are you looking for?

Might be able to save you time.

pm

Yes Stormnode Enforcement is active. It is in spork.h and under Spork 1 - 1st November it started. However upon launch this will not start for a month or two to give people time to setup Stormnodes.

custom wallet done, will continue tomorrow, im too tired

will collect you the fix info needed, if it is needed..

Interested to see what you find if anything. This is what the testing period before Ann and prelaunch are is about.

[cisahasa]

this will take time.. setting up things.
4h stake, results tomorrow.

What are you looking for?

Might be able to save you time.

pm

Yes Stormnode Enforcement is active. It is in spork.h and under Spork 1 - 1st November it started. However upon launch this will not start for a month or two to give people time to setup Stormnodes.

custom wallet done, will continue tomorrow, im too tired

will collect you the fix info needed, if it is needed..

Interested to see what you find if anything. This is what the testing period before Ann and prelaunch are is about.

found it. pm sent

now after next one..

[Justicemaxx]

Someone tell me how to sync the wallet SILK to the end. I have now 90.45%, says that is syncing, but this state is already 10 hours. I put in the folder of the file silkcoin silkcoin.conf, included a peer-peer address... don't know how it exactly is called, can in them - not so wrote? Can someone upload this file? Version wallet 1.1.1.1 Win32, installed Win7 64 bit. Whereas previously everything is fine. The last three months are not synchronized, and that's included in any way.
silkcoin.conf consist:
"addnode=23.227.190.182:59938
addnode=95.90.218.108:46268
addnode=194.135.94.86:16666
addnode=104.255.33.186:16666
addnode=45.63.7.225:58947
addnode=188.165.42.51:16666
addnode=188.165.42.51
addnode=82.73.160.43:16666
addnode=151.224.68.90
addnode=71.115.160.71
addnode=108.20.142.214
addnode=37.59.24.199
addnode=75.130.163.51:55988
addnode=71.58.178.14:16666
addnode=204.11.237.233:55202
addnode=212.5.143.239
addnode=50.162.235.186
addnode=217.44.137.65:16666
addnode=5.147.248.22:52892
addnode=163.47.20.62:52712
addnode=91.40.105.11:59237
addnode=78.132.246.45:63972
addnode=73.238.205.108:2042"
Is that right??? Maybe someone can put the full block chain??
Now restart the wallet and it shows already 90.42%, connections to the network 9 or 10?? Why no sync?

[cisahasa]

copy paste here last 10-30 lines from debug.log
remove your personal ip info if needed

this maybe wrong place to ask about the old client.. is there another thread for the old?

[Justicemaxx]

copy paste here last 10-30 lines from debug.log
remove your personal ip info if needed

this maybe wrong place to ask about the old client.. is there another thread for the old?

kernel failed on coinstake 462401a05e97403cd43807d073533ff608abd39b6edeb2728f6113108831ad95, hashProof=b6a8a053fb97912b2206026e86fd87bc0357508c7fcf8885f85163fe51f9280c
WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block 41b2a441e3b6406b42a31351acf955e4b523bac7a3bbd5a7e7e240bb2d5be73a
received block 0fa4ae954d562d662440
ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: check kernel failed on coinstake 24aee8b609c9d5b6be47f2f46d9acad1069294b913e1143c3efd31a09f1800c9, hashProof=fec219a8e0d96001bee5b3e8331fa52376582ba5ac9daeaf12b1da8d83216bd9
WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block 0fa4ae954d562d662440277d837811a220feedfc1066edc63c4724c4413dcbb8
connection timeout
trying connection 54.148.124.35 lastseen=0.0hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 75.68.194.191:16666 lastseen=8.5hrs
received block 0d7082f5142cbd1b0890
ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: read txPrev failed
WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block 0d7082f5142cbd1b0890e814df6a95463013c4241353162f193028f798a56fa2
connection timeout
trying connection 54.148.124.35 lastseen=0.0hrs
received block 6d43cec98a0c69131a3d
ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: read txPrev failed
WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block 6d43cec98a0c69131a3d4afef8f87f190503afde4003ecb2090920235a805ef9
connection timeout
trying connection 142.134.202.189:16666 lastseen=21.8hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 54.148.124.35 lastseen=0.0hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 54.148.124.35 lastseen=0.0hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 54.148.124.35 lastseen=0.0hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 151.224.68.90:16666 lastseen=34.7hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 54.148.124.35 lastseen=0.0hrs
received block 18e5c39120f38de3aa84
ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: read txPrev failed
WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block 18e5c39120f38de3aa8421df3548c9b64746e509d0c3316ff43b656264d3100f
connection timeout

I thought DarkSilk this is a continuation of Silkcoin, isn't it?

[SLievensDRKSLK]

copy paste here last 10-30 lines from debug.log
remove your personal ip info if needed

this maybe wrong place to ask about the old client.. is there another thread for the old?

kernel failed on coinstake 462401a05e97403cd43807d073533ff608abd39b6edeb2728f6113108831ad95, hashProof=b6a8a053fb97912b2206026e86fd87bc0357508c7fcf8885f85163fe51f9280c
WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block 41b2a441e3b6406b42a31351acf955e4b523bac7a3bbd5a7e7e240bb2d5be73a
received block 0fa4ae954d562d662440
ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: check kernel failed on coinstake 24aee8b609c9d5b6be47f2f46d9acad1069294b913e1143c3efd31a09f1800c9, hashProof=fec219a8e0d96001bee5b3e8331fa52376582ba5ac9daeaf12b1da8d83216bd9
WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block 0fa4ae954d562d662440277d837811a220feedfc1066edc63c4724c4413dcbb8
connection timeout
trying connection 54.148.124.35 lastseen=0.0hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 75.68.194.191:16666 lastseen=8.5hrs
received block 0d7082f5142cbd1b0890
ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: read txPrev failed
WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block 0d7082f5142cbd1b0890e814df6a95463013c4241353162f193028f798a56fa2
connection timeout
trying connection 54.148.124.35 lastseen=0.0hrs
received block 6d43cec98a0c69131a3d
ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: read txPrev failed
WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block 6d43cec98a0c69131a3d4afef8f87f190503afde4003ecb2090920235a805ef9
connection timeout
trying connection 142.134.202.189:16666 lastseen=21.8hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 54.148.124.35 lastseen=0.0hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 54.148.124.35 lastseen=0.0hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 54.148.124.35 lastseen=0.0hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 151.224.68.90:16666 lastseen=34.7hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 54.148.124.35 lastseen=0.0hrs
received block 18e5c39120f38de3aa84
ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: read txPrev failed
WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block 18e5c39120f38de3aa8421df3548c9b64746e509d0c3316ff43b656264d3100f
connection timeout

I thought DarkSilk this is a continuation of Silkcoin, isn't it?

NO DarkSilk is a different coin entirely.

Sorry for my late reply I was up until 11am looking at this thread and the Fantom thread. People sadly in the Fantom thread see my warnings as just publicity for DarkSilk which hasn't even been released and doesn't have it's own ANN thread. So I am a bit bemused what and how I am advertising. Ah well, I issued my warning that Fantom is using the DarkSilk code which is unfinished and if their community has any sense they wont use it. You can only try to help, right lol