Drop cryptsy....the fact that Navajo is waiting on an exchange that holds less than 5 percent of trading sounds ridiculous
Some my personal considerations about de-list of Crapsty:
1) What makes you think that the de-list eventually decided here,
get Cryptsy to remove the market NAV?
2) Have you thought that the de-list of a currency, it is always
a traumatic event, a big and decisive sign of weakness, or even a state of coma?
Do you want to just give this signal?
3) What makes you think that the eventual de-list, can accelerate the
departure of anonymity?
In any case, I remind you that for the start of anonymity, it is not enough
that the DevTeam turn on a server, but as mentioned, serves the release of
another new wallet.
4) While it is all too easy to be excluded from a market, often forever,
be included is often difficult. The NAV\SummerCoin take long to go in Cryptsy,
and when we were the first announcements, was hailed as a victory.
5) I do not know if technical support is cryptsy really bad or not, but
in this case, would not have been more appropriate to make a perfect release,
bombproof, instead of multiple release, complicated, whose source taken from
github does not compile, and the wallet can not bootstrap of the
block-chain alone?
6) Thinking in perspective, whereas Criptsy also accepts fiat currency and
therefore could become a very practical way to convert dollars or fiat
in Nav through a single subject, ask a de-list is really a far-sighted idea?
AFAIK, before there were four markets. BTER by long time does not allow
operation of deposit or withdrawal, even before he had his "accident",
and still it is
not safe to transfer ("NAV deposit disabled").
Polo seems to me that has always had a limited number of exchanges and
volume, sometime even less of Cryptsy.
Now you want to get rid of even Criptsy: guys, really?
Bye Bye
