GREEDYJOHN
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 21, 2015, 01:48:48 PM |
|
Nice FUD...FUD again..
NICE TRADE VULUME, DUMP AGAIN ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) 24hr high 0.00003518 BTC 24hr low 0.00001221 BTC BTC Vol 114.12823784 BTC NAV Vol 5734004.79440141 NAV
|
|
|
|
Remy_5
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 21, 2015, 01:51:43 PM |
|
I am exited like a little child ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Shahim, do you mean that you had some.... leaks? ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Seriously, our only luck and still a source of hope for the future of NAV, is that there are guys like Pakage and Shahim at work. I think I saw in the main block-chain, activities and the transactions similar to what have took place during the period of beta testing. So as my observation is partial (I'm still more disappointed for the events in last days), and imprecise being an anonymous transaction, I think something is moving really. Pakege, congratulations. Bye Bye
|
|
|
|
STEALTHMODE
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 329
Merit: 250
No TX Fees #JustRaiBlocks
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 21, 2015, 02:07:22 PM |
|
I am exited like a little child ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Shahim, do you mean that you had some.... leaks? ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Seriously, our only luck and still a source of hope for the future of NAV, is that there are guys like Pakage and Shahim at work. I think I saw in the main block-chain, activities and the transactions similar to what have took place during the period of beta testing. So as my observation is partial (I'm still more disappointed for the events in last days), and imprecise being an anonymous transaction, I think something is moving really. Pakege, congratulations. Bye Bye You are disappointed Remy? So i'm I? Why could they not be upfront? We all know what they said and still people are evasive about simple questions?
|
|
|
|
GREEDYJOHN
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 21, 2015, 02:14:12 PM |
|
I am exited like a little child ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Shahim, do you mean that you had some.... leaks? ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Seriously, our only luck and still a source of hope for the future of NAV, is that there are guys like Pakage and Shahim at work. I think I saw in the main block-chain, activities and the transactions similar to what have took place during the period of beta testing. So as my observation is partial (I'm still more disappointed for the events in last days), and imprecise being an anonymous transaction, I think something is moving really. Pakege, congratulations. Bye Bye You are disappointed Remy? So i'm I? Why could they not be upfront? We all know what they said and still people are evasive about simple questions? DEVs NEVER FORCED ANYBODY TO DUMP, DID THEY?
|
|
|
|
cryptokia
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 198
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 21, 2015, 02:17:38 PM |
|
FUDs come back again ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Official Announcement - Anonymous Technology Release Date Dear Community!
We are very pleased to announce the official release date for our Anonymous Technology to the Main Navajocoin Block Chain!
Monday 9 March 2015
Since the success of the unencrypted beta test of the transaction infrastructure, the Dev team has been busily working, adding the asymmetric double encryption to the anonymous system as well as SSL across all of the network nodes.
Let me explain again what makes Navajo Anonymous Technology so unique and valuable.
-------------------- NAVAJO ANONYMOUS TRANSACTIONS --------------------
Here's a technical overview of how the anonymous transaction system works
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fnsk1AXl.png&t=665&c=Kt9CDJBzvUcyDQ)
-------------------- NAVAJO DOUBLE ENCRYPTION --------------------
As explained previously by Pakage, all communication between the wallet, the API server and between the nodes is encrypted and sent over SSL. This means that someone who is actively reading the data coming in and out of your IP address or in and out of our servers can not decipher what is being transmitted into plain text.
All destination addresses sent via the block chain are encrypted by the wallet using an Asynchronous encryption key pair.
Asynchronous encryption means that the wallet will get supplied with a public key which can encrypt data but can NOT decrypt data. The Nodes will retain the private key and never broadcast it. The private key is the only thing which can decrypt something encrypted by the public key. This means that at no point in time is anything broadcast which can be used to decrypt the destination address and the destination address is encrypted before leaving the wallet, so the destination address is never ever transmitted in plain text or in a format which can be deciphered.
When we transmit the transaction information over the private subchain we decrypt and then re-encrypt the destination address with a new key pair and send it in a similar manner to the outgoing servers and this all also happens over encrypted SSL communication.
These key pairs are regularly replaced on the servers, as to protect past transactions in the unlikely event that a security breach occurs.
-------------------- PROJECT STATUS --------------------
COMPLETED ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FKErmQ5n.png&t=665&c=KLegDQURYd9Bhg)
Beta Test of Anonymous Transaction Infrastructure is complete. Double Encryption scripts have been written for the Navajo Magic Gateway and Choctaw Star Gate nodes. SSL communication has been added to all nodes and to the API server. Wallet encryption of the destination address has been completed.
IN PROGRESS
Refining and Optimizing the transaction obfuscation methods. Adding validation layers to the wallet transaction form. Thorough end to end testing of anonymous transactions with the new encryption layers. Porting the final code over from the Beta wallet to the main wallet. Thorough end to end testing of anonymous transactions on the main network. Releasing the finished wallet to the public.
--------------------
As you can see, the majority of the work is completed. The Dev team is now transitioning to a testing and refinement phase before we prepare to port the anonymous transactions over to the main network.
Thorough testing is very important, we are not going to risk rushing the Navajo Anonymous Transactions to the public with any bugs. We understand the importance of our work and what it means to the world. We are going to take the time to make sure that the code we release is high quality and works exactly as described in the whitepaper. That is the reason why we have decided to delay the release from the tentative March 1 date until Monday the 9th of March. I hope you can understand our decision around this and help us spread the good word about Navajo Anonymous Technology over the next 10 days.
We will keep you updated with periodic status reports.
We will also be releasing the updated whitepaper as soon as we receive the finished version back from the designer.
Best wishes
- Navajo Coin Development Team ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi61.tinypic.com%2F2ez7i43.png&t=665&c=YpxUPd7ZFObJYw) Once is enough, twice too much, this coming monday? 23rd march? are the DEV SURE?
surprise later again? 500 Sat surprise or 100 sat surprise?
Soopy better come out and tell us what does he mean for the 20th announcement with surprised!
|
|
|
|
Cryptojunkey
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 21, 2015, 02:18:28 PM |
|
Im looking to sell 150k NAV. PM me with offers.
|
|
|
|
david1365
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 21, 2015, 02:19:14 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
blackened515
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 21, 2015, 02:22:54 PM |
|
Im looking to sell 100k NAV. PM me with offers.
2 btc now. 10 btc Tuesday :p
|
|
████▄██████████▄ ███▄████████████ ▄███▀ ████ ████ ████ ▀███▄ ███▀████████████ ████▀██████████▀ |
▄██████████▄ ████████████ ███████████▀███▄ ████████████████ ████████████████ ████████████████ ▀███▄███████████ ████████████████ ████▀██████████▀ |
▄██▄█████████▄██▄ ▀████▄█████▄████▀ ▀████▄█▄████▀ ███████████ ▄████▀█████▀████▄ █████████████████ █████████████████ █████████████████ ▀███████████████▀
|
▄███████████████▄ █████████████████ ████▀███▀██████▀ ███████▄█████▀ ████▄▄██████████▄ █▀▀██████▀███████ █▄██████▄███▄████ █████▀███████████ ▀██▀███▀████████▀ |
████▄███████████ ████████████████ ▄███▀███████████ ████████████████ ████████████████ ████████████████ ███████████▄███▀ ████████████ ▀██████████▀ | | | | ████████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ | |
██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ████████
| | | . [ [ [ | | . ] ] ] | | | | . Listed on
| | BINANCE KUCOIN Gate.io | | |
|
|
|
STEALTHMODE
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 329
Merit: 250
No TX Fees #JustRaiBlocks
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 21, 2015, 02:23:57 PM |
|
I am exited like a little child ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Shahim, do you mean that you had some.... leaks? ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Seriously, our only luck and still a source of hope for the future of NAV, is that there are guys like Pakage and Shahim at work. I think I saw in the main block-chain, activities and the transactions similar to what have took place during the period of beta testing. So as my observation is partial (I'm still more disappointed for the events in last days), and imprecise being an anonymous transaction, I think something is moving really. Pakege, congratulations. Bye Bye You are disappointed Remy? So i'm I? Why could they not be upfront? We all know what they said and still people are evasive about simple questions? DEVs NEVER FORCED ANYBODY TO DUMP, DID THEY?Where did you read Remy and I dumped John?? You don't find it strange that 2 developers of the same coin don't communicate about a simple date of an important anon which they have worked on since the beginning of navajocoin? Soopy had promised a surprise also on friday. What was the surprise you think honestly?
|
|
|
|
Remy_5
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 21, 2015, 02:24:50 PM |
|
Sorry to say that I have lost all confidence in this coin. The dev team to me have no credibility after all these extended and delyed announcments, etc. Something just aint right. Will keep my coins tucked away for a rainy day, but will not be buying more and wouldnt recommend anybody else does either. If Annon wallet does come out, then great, if not, nothing ventured. RICH LIST TODAY 1 sWqp2puWCnc1SfyXAQJPCW6U64obhK6grR 8,100,100 2 sNyNwMYKkZFnzdx72qxUy3pRZtTSQdtqtr 3,051,993 3 sJVkG6Z5FzVTxaUYHdJQ5HoKQxZF9zaRCQ 3,000,000 4 sfdzo3PKsVTdRMPPKrW4bi6cUt1LruMNxe 2,785,352 Have you noticed any changes from Yesterday below? LOOK AT THE RICH LIST, YOU MORONS, BIG HOLDERS ARE ACCUMULATING COINS
1 sWqp2puWCnc1SfyXAQJPCW6U64obhK6grR 5,900,100 2 sfdzo3PKsVTdRMPPKrW4bi6cUt1LruMNxe 4,455,142 3 sNyNwMYKkZFnzdx72qxUy3pRZtTSQdtqtr 3,051,993 4 sJVkG6Z5FzVTxaUYHdJQ5HoKQxZF9zaRCQ 3,000,000
From what I see and from what was wrote in the forum, and mine are just speculation and conjecture, it seems to me that sWqp2puWCnc1SfyXAQJPCW6U64obhK6grR took a first big leap, when our former MobyDick sfdzo3, he transferred 3M Nav in the first address. At the same time, I think I read that on Bittrex had appeared from nowhere a wall of the same entity, then it might be inferred that sWqp2p is a wallet on bittrex. One other thing that I see is that if we add up, and sWqp2p sfdzo3, both before and after, we get a figure of the same order of magnitude. This might make us think that sfdzo3, he later transferred a large part of its portfolio, forward, backward, and then to Bittrex again. But as I said these are just speculations and conjectures, a free interpretation of events, and has no claim to be the truth. Bye Bye
|
|
|
|
|
david1365
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 21, 2015, 02:27:38 PM |
|
I am exited like a little child ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Shahim, do you mean that you had some.... leaks? ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Seriously, our only luck and still a source of hope for the future of NAV, is that there are guys like Pakage and Shahim at work. I think I saw in the main block-chain, activities and the transactions similar to what have took place during the period of beta testing. So as my observation is partial (I'm still more disappointed for the events in last days), and imprecise being an anonymous transaction, I think something is moving really. Pakege, congratulations. Bye Bye You are disappointed Remy? So i'm I? Why could they not be upfront? We all know what they said and still people are evasive about simple questions? DEVs NEVER FORCED ANYBODY TO DUMP, DID THEY?Where did you read Remy and I dumped John?? You don't find it strange that 2 developers of the same coin don't communicate about a simple date of an important anon which they have worked on since the beginning of navajocoin? Soopy had promised a surprise also on friday. What was the surprise you think honestly? I gave you an honest answer, it was just a simple misunderstanding, do you understand what does that mean?
|
|
|
|
vince232
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 21, 2015, 02:42:21 PM |
|
well best way is to buy when anon is launched
|
|
|
|
STEALTHMODE
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 329
Merit: 250
No TX Fees #JustRaiBlocks
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 21, 2015, 02:42:53 PM |
|
I am exited like a little child ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Shahim, do you mean that you had some.... leaks? ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Seriously, our only luck and still a source of hope for the future of NAV, is that there are guys like Pakage and Shahim at work. I think I saw in the main block-chain, activities and the transactions similar to what have took place during the period of beta testing. So as my observation is partial (I'm still more disappointed for the events in last days), and imprecise being an anonymous transaction, I think something is moving really. Pakege, congratulations. Bye Bye You are disappointed Remy? So i'm I? Why could they not be upfront? We all know what they said and still people are evasive about simple questions? DEVs NEVER FORCED ANYBODY TO DUMP, DID THEY?Where did you read Remy and I dumped John?? You don't find it strange that 2 developers of the same coin don't communicate about a simple date of an important anon which they have worked on since the beginning of navajocoin? Soopy had promised a surprise also on friday. What was the surprise you think honestly? I gave you an honest answer, it was just a simple misunderstanding, do you understand what does that mean?So do you think that or you spoke them? The answer to my question, What was the surprise, you answer a simple misunderstanding? Please read it again? Like I ask for an apple and you gave me a computer?? ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif)
|
|
|
|
GREEDYJOHN
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 21, 2015, 02:43:02 PM |
|
Where did you read Remy and I dumped John?? You don't find it strange that 2 developers of the same coin don't communicate about a simple date of an important anon which they have worked on since the beginning of navajocoin? Soopy had promised a surprise also on friday. What was the surprise you think honestly?
I gave you an honest answer, it was just a simple misunderstanding, do you understand what does that mean?This is a response a gave before. These members will never be satisfied: Please give an honest answer?
I GIVE YOU SOME ANSWERS: We live in different time zones Human error - things don't work out as expected DEVs have got too much on their plates The DEVs faces more challenges than expected, so time frame has to reflect this Cryptsy ? Fatique Operating costs???
|
|
|
|
qwep1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 21, 2015, 02:48:48 PM |
|
Im looking to sell 100k NAV. PM me with offers.
2 btc now. 10 btc Tuesday :p ahahhaha 2 btc now. 10 Ltc Tuesday :p or 0.10 Tuesday ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
Vlizzjeffrey
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 21, 2015, 02:50:31 PM |
|
yall got screwed in the ass by the devs lol, bet they took big profit
|
|
|
|
Remy_5
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 21, 2015, 02:58:09 PM |
|
You are disappointed Remy? So i'm I? Why could they not be upfront? We all know what they said and still people are evasive about simple questions?
DEVs NEVER FORCED ANYBODY TO DUMP, DID THEY?Where did you read Remy and I dumped John?? You don't find it strange that 2 developers of the same coin don't communicate about a simple date of an important anon which they have worked on since the beginning of navajocoin? Soopy had promised a surprise also on friday. What was the surprise you think honestly? Because i write really slow. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I partly agree, you should never give "public announcement" of "official announcement", and then pull out at the last moment a message with no facts, and only a request for donations. At the end may give the impression of species of extortion. Very little serious and very unprofessional. And if you want to play where they fly big money, you can not act so superficial. You can not do it on the side of the PR, and even less on the technical side. This way, you burn a project, and you kill the community, and any hope to take it to a good conclusion. One way of looking at it is that if this kind behavior come from the Head Dev, it actually induces disappointment, loss of trust, and ultimately, just to sell everything. IMHO, it would be much better to give a series of regular updates, with the good news and also in case of a hitch, and only when everything was ready and tested, prepare an real announcement \ official release. Bye Bye
|
|
|
|
STEALTHMODE
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 329
Merit: 250
No TX Fees #JustRaiBlocks
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 21, 2015, 03:01:36 PM |
|
You are disappointed Remy? So i'm I? Why could they not be upfront? We all know what they said and still people are evasive about simple questions?
DEVs NEVER FORCED ANYBODY TO DUMP, DID THEY?Where did you read Remy and I dumped John?? You don't find it strange that 2 developers of the same coin don't communicate about a simple date of an important anon which they have worked on since the beginning of navajocoin? Soopy had promised a surprise also on friday. What was the surprise you think honestly? Because i write really slow. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I partly agree, you should never give "public announcement" of "official announcement", and then pull out at the last moment a message with no facts, and only a request for donations. At the end may give the impression of species of extortion. Very little serious and very unprofessional. And if you want to play where they fly big money, you can not act so superficial. You can not do it on the side of the PR, and even less on the technical side. This way, you burn a project, and you kill the community, and any hope to take it to a good conclusion. One way of looking at it is that if this kind behavior come from the Head Dev, it actually induces disappointment, loss of trust, and ultimately, just to sell everything. IMHO, it would be much better to give a series of regular updates, with the good news and also in case of a hitch, and only when everything was ready and tested, prepare an real announcement \ official release. Bye Bye Thank you Remy, couldn't agree more! I don't understand why not one of the devs are reacting?
|
|
|
|
Remy_5
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 21, 2015, 03:09:58 PM Last edit: March 21, 2015, 03:26:48 PM by Remy_5 |
|
IMHO, it would be much better to give a series of regular updates, with the good news and also in case of a hitch, and only when everything was ready and tested, prepare an real announcement \ official release.
Thank you Remy, couldn't agree more! I don't understand why not one of the devs are reacting? Maybe because now, people are rightly angry, there would be a predictable anti-aircraft fire. ^_- And fudder could not but rejoice and feed the flames. Also it is always difficult admit errors. I imagine that there will be answers only when the waters have calmed down a bit... and maybe something real of which they can be proud of and for which to be forgiven. (Ok this is a wickedness not necessary, but at least let me take it out) ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Bye Bye EDIT: WOW I was contradicted while still writing. LOL
|
|
|
|
|