LongAndShort
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1050
|
|
October 09, 2014, 11:40:17 PM |
|
Shadowcoin is dead, it use ring signature which found to be bloat, it's not for long term but for quick pump and dump scam here is a chart for it; why must you continue to pretend what you know you are talking about..cmon stop doing this to xst...shadows implementation will be about a 3.85-4kb...that is hardly bloat and is less then what hondos vaporware proposes if you want to start comparing the two zk-snarks! is doable and in testing right now and hondos chandran is not doable and isn't even researched yet!
|
|
|
|
risefromtheashes74
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
October 09, 2014, 11:40:27 PM |
|
Stop abusing us with your hurtful namecalling Have you considered that you're asking Hondo to reveal a trade secret? Im not asking him to reveal anything like that i'm concerned y'all gonna get royally screwed by it and that effects the whole industry what part of that is so hard to digest and why must you continue avoiding the topic of it. Have you slept at all in the past 3 days?
|
|
|
|
Forbet
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
October 09, 2014, 11:42:04 PM |
|
He just went full salesman on us. Lol, you guys were all right.
|
|
|
|
risefromtheashes74
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
October 09, 2014, 11:44:21 PM |
|
Looks like some BS Liberal propaganda to me!
|
|
|
|
risefromtheashes74
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
October 09, 2014, 11:45:58 PM |
|
ShadowCoin infiltration = FAIL!!
|
|
|
|
LongAndShort
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1050
|
|
October 09, 2014, 11:50:09 PM |
|
You're asking how he's going to pull off the "impossible". Maybe he's trying to keep that a secret. You don't know. I don't know. Why is that so hard to understand? We're waiting till November to see if it materializes or not.
What..thats not how it works he made a brief and put it on a roadmap thats creating hype to unsuspecting victem. I'm saying its not doable which one of you can counter that..none so far all its been is garbage and weak justifications for your meager existence as a coin! none of you have even had the decency to even try tell me about your coin..you are all here for the money and will all go when its gone which wont be long because the coin has no foundations it has not tech and it has a pipe dream not achievable. what are you going to do about that?
|
|
|
|
Forbet
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
October 09, 2014, 11:52:09 PM |
|
People used to say that figuring out the chemical composition of individual stars was impossible. Or that objects heavier than air would never be able to fly. It was impossible. So was space flight. Moon landing, anybody? They also said we would never harness the power of nuclear energy. There are too many examples of times when relatively smart people said something was impossible.
So you're wondering what we're all going to do with our money and energy? You keep saying that over and over and over and over. And you talk about how great shadowcash is. You are absolutely transparent sir.
|
|
|
|
CryptoPiero
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
October 09, 2014, 11:53:36 PM |
|
Why in the hell would Chandran signatures be unlinkable ? Thats the most ridiculous FUD I've ever seen. He's just trying to FUD for non-technical guys here. He doesn't know shit what he's talking about.
|
|
|
|
LongAndShort
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1050
|
|
October 10, 2014, 12:00:41 AM |
|
People used to say that figuring out the chemical composition of individual stars was impossible. Or that objects heavier than air would never be able to fly. It was impossible. So was space flight. Moon landing, anybody? They also said we would never harness the power of nuclear energy. There are too many examples of times when relatively smart people said something was impossible.
So you're wondering what we're all going to do with our money and energy? You keep saying that over and over and over and over. And you talk about how great shadowcash is. You are absolutely transparent sir.
It is not comparable at all this, tech is documented no one has linked the two like hondo implys he can but its not doable the way he is implying. Saying that its impossible he isnt capable of it is absurd. Its implying he is a genius with poof of many papers written that show industry firsts in this field..He dosn't so pull him off that pedistal and we will start to get somewhere in this discussion imo never once brought up the conversation about shadowcash stop saying i have its pathetic! im struggling to find all of your angles here what is it thats so hard for you to grasp that im here only for xst not shdow! the connection boggles my mind how are you even doing that!
|
|
|
|
|
Forbet
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
October 10, 2014, 12:06:36 AM |
|
You don't bring up shadowcoin in here?
|
|
|
|
risefromtheashes74
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
October 10, 2014, 12:08:11 AM |
|
You don't bring up shadowcoin in here? It's worthless, why bother?
|
|
|
|
CryptoPiero
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
October 10, 2014, 12:08:57 AM |
|
Why in the hell would Chandran signatures be unlinkable ? Thats the most ridiculous FUD I've ever seen. He's just trying to FUD for non-technical guys here. He doesn't know shit what he's talking about.
Do I need to repeat this ?
|
|
|
|
LongAndShort
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1050
|
|
October 10, 2014, 12:09:40 AM |
|
Why in the hell would Chandran signatures be unlinkable ? Thats the most ridiculous FUD I've ever seen. He's just trying to FUD for non-technical guys here. He doesn't know shit what he's talking about.
They are unlinkable/traceable in the way hondo is implying. Saying they are not, is the most ridiculous thing anyone that knows has heard. Kinda like him saying that stealth addresses are a working representation of PoSA..ridiculous!! Something you would expect from a dev/s who has ported most of his work and has gone as far as removing the copyright of razorcoins work and replaced it with their own. if you imply such standard is capable of implementing something that is not doable the way they are implying you also can join the ranks of the majority in this thread.
|
|
|
|
risefromtheashes74
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
October 10, 2014, 12:13:27 AM |
|
Why in the hell would Chandran signatures be unlinkable ? Thats the most ridiculous FUD I've ever seen. He's just trying to FUD for non-technical guys here. He doesn't know shit what he's talking about.
They are unlinkable/traceable in the way hondo is implying. Saying they are not, is the most ridiculous thing anyone that knows has heard. Kinda like him saying that stealth addresses are a working representation of PoSA..ridiculous!! Something you would expect from a dev/s who has ported most of his work and has gone as far as removing the copyright of razorcoins work and replaced it with their own. if you imply such standard is capable of implementing something that is not doable the way they are implying you also can join the ranks of the majority in this thread. You made yourself the majority in this thread... in as little as 3 days. Bravo, my friend!
|
|
|
|
LongAndShort
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1050
|
|
October 10, 2014, 12:16:21 AM |
|
Why in the hell would Chandran signatures be unlinkable ? Thats the most ridiculous FUD I've ever seen. He's just trying to FUD for non-technical guys here. He doesn't know shit what he's talking about.
They are unlinkable/traceable in the way hondo is implying. Saying they are not, is the most ridiculous thing anyone that knows has heard. Kinda like him saying that stealth addresses are a working representation of PoSA..ridiculous!! Something you would expect from a dev/s who has ported most of his work and has gone as far as removing the copyright of razorcoins work and replaced it with their own. if you imply such standard is capable of implementing something that is not doable the way they are implying you also can join the ranks of the majority in this thread. You made yourself the majority in this thread... in as little as 3 days. Bravo, my friend! seriously is that all you have to say...even now..you are getting more and more desperate..whats next going to question my sexuality!? ofc you are because it has nothing to do with the glaring issues in this thread! stealthsend is vaporware deal with it and lets talk about it
|
|
|
|
CryptoChronic
|
|
October 10, 2014, 12:21:12 AM |
|
Wanna know why Hondo wont answer to save all you from this Trolling because hes either A) gone left with the pump group... or B)Realizes that people have caught on to his vaporware and the fact that after 3 months he could only turn out copy and paste shitcoin and has no idea how to answer all these questions....He is most likely gone... Just like your volume from BOB and just like bobs tech guy Coinada who was the senior member that used to hang around here and defend the coin and its tech..They left it in those gigantic dumps... but enjoy waiting and enjoy the butthurt...
Where is dev... he has gone ghost? volume die where is bob? this is a problem
|
|
|
|
risefromtheashes74
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
October 10, 2014, 12:25:13 AM |
|
Why in the hell would Chandran signatures be unlinkable ? Thats the most ridiculous FUD I've ever seen. He's just trying to FUD for non-technical guys here. He doesn't know shit what he's talking about.
They are unlinkable/traceable in the way hondo is implying. Saying they are not, is the most ridiculous thing anyone that knows has heard. Kinda like him saying that stealth addresses are a working representation of PoSA..ridiculous!! Something you would expect from a dev/s who has ported most of his work and has gone as far as removing the copyright of razorcoins work and replaced it with their own. if you imply such standard is capable of implementing something that is not doable the way they are implying you also can join the ranks of the majority in this thread. You made yourself the majority in this thread... in as little as 3 days. Bravo, my friend! seriously is that all you have to say...even now..you are getting more and more desperate..whats next going to question my sexuality!? ofc you are because it has nothing to do with the glaring issues in this thread! stealthsend is vaporware deal with it and lets talk about it Where am I questioning your sexuality? I am openly bisexual & mainly date transwomen. Why would I question your sexuality? The gay dog video has nothing to do with you, if that's what you're going off. The thread was getting too serious & I wanted to get a laugh out of people. If it makes you happy, I'll let you quote me on this... "I have probably sucked more cock than LongAndShort." You are grasping at straws at this point & you grabbed the wrong straw.
|
|
|
|
CryptoPiero
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
October 10, 2014, 12:25:28 AM |
|
Why in the hell would Chandran signatures be unlinkable ? Thats the most ridiculous FUD I've ever seen. He's just trying to FUD for non-technical guys here. He doesn't know shit what he's talking about.
They are unlinkable/traceable in the way hondo is implying. Saying they are not, is the most ridiculous thing anyone that knows has heard. Kinda like him saying that stealth addresses are a working representation of PoSA..ridiculous!! Something you would expect from a dev/s who has ported most of his work and has gone as far as removing the copyright of razorcoins work and replaced it with their own. if you imply such standard is capable of implementing something that is not doable the way they are implying you also can join the ranks of the majority in this thread. Lets just assume these facts: 1. CryptoNote is a way to implement ring signatures into a blockchain 2. Chandran signature is a ring signature scheme with less space requirement So, you are either saying: 1. CryptoNote is a scam, ring signatures could not be implemented ! 2. Chandran signature paper is a lie, it doesn't provide a ring signature model ! 3. Implementing Chandran signatures instead of normal ring signatures require more requisites. If you are not completely retarded, your objection is number 3. Read this paper and tell me that requirement, as I haven't found any: http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~sahai/work/web/2007%20Publications/ICALP_Chandran2007.pdfIf you can't, just fuck off
|
|
|
|
Forbet
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
October 10, 2014, 12:33:44 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|