[ANN][AID] AidBit | Digital-currency redefined | POW/POS | Groestl | Charity

[peerson51888]

I put my rigs on maya.aidbit.net:3032 about 7 hours,but no coins to my wallet at all,why? something wrong?

[St.Neman]

I put my rigs on maya.aidbit.net:3032 about 7 hours,but no coins to my wallet at all,why? something wrong?

It is ok! Be patient, need 9-10 hours for me to see first payout.
(Coin Maturity: 500 blocks)

[St.Neman]

Some help for newbies. Use this miner to get the best hashrate but I think this one is also integrated with the wallet.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652849.0

My results:

R280X -> 12,74 Mh
R290 -> 15,72 Mh

sgminer -k groestlcoin --difficulty-multiplier 0.00390625  -o stratum+tcp://maya.aidbit.net:3032 -u YourWalletAddress -p x -I 22,22,22 -g 1,1,1 --gpu-engine 1200,1200,1100  --gpu-memclock 1050,1050,1000 --gpu-fan 65 -w 256,256,256

Drivers: AMD Catalyst 14.7

I'm pretty sure higher hashrate can be achieved but I was not able to run faster. If anyone is getting better results, feel free to disclose details of your setup.

Thank You Sir very much for this post!

R280X >>> 13.63 Mh/s 
(Win8.1, drivers AMD Catalyst 13.12

Code:

"gpu-engine" : "1020",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500",
"intensity" : "22",
"gpu-threads" : "1",

"auto-fan" : true,
"temp-cutoff" : "90",
"temp-overheat" : "80",
"temp-target" : "75",
"gpu-fan" : "30-85",
"worksize" : "256",

"api-port" : "4028",
"kernel" : "groestlcoin",
"gpu-powertune" : "20"

+1 BTC

[virgojeep]

It is ok! Be patient, need 9-10 hours for me to see first payout.
(Coin Maturity: 500 blocks)

Thanks a lot man. I figured as much but didn't know for sure. This should be posted in the wallet right over the miner section.

[idad01]

Difficulty based block reward according to: ceil(8 * dDiff / (525600 + nHeight) * 525600)

looks like the more and more coins will be generate in the future , what a inflation

+1
DEV, can you explain?

[AidBit]

Difficulty based block reward according to: ceil(8 * dDiff / (525600 + nHeight) * 525600)

looks like the more and more coins will be generate in the future , what a inflation

+1
DEV, can you explain?

The success or value of the currency does not depend on the total supply but on the acceptance of the currency and especially on the relation between the demand and supply. And in the case of crypto currencies, where things went over the margin of good taste, also on the question of sheer purpose. AidBit's algorithm tries to dynamically adjust the reward to the demand, by lowering the coin production in periods of low mining profitability. Regardless of network hash rate, the total block reward will gradually halve every twelve months, without causing substantial shocks to the market.

Thank you for your question,

AidBit

[idad01]

Difficulty based block reward according to: ceil(8 * dDiff / (525600 + nHeight) * 525600)

looks like the more and more coins will be generate in the future , what a inflation

+1
DEV, can you explain?

The success or value of the currency does not depend on the total supply but on the acceptance of the currency and especially on the relation between the demand and supply. And in the case of crypto currencies, where things went over the margin of good taste, also on the question of sheer purpose. AidBit's algorithm tries to dynamically adjust the reward to the demand, by lowering the coin production in periods of low mining profitability. Regardless of network hash rate, the total block reward will gradually halve every twelve months, without causing substantial shocks to the market.

Thank you for your question,

AidBit

TKS

[AidBit]

It is ok! Be patient, need 9-10 hours for me to see first payout.
(Coin Maturity: 500 blocks)

Thanks a lot man. I figured as much but didn't know for sure. This should be posted in the wallet right over the miner section.

Will put the idea on our to-do list. Thank you.

AidBit

[AidBit]

NEWS:

As promised, 2000.00 AID, premined in 5 hours running-in period
were just sent to the main charity account (ANhmhMCxJZkV7M5nmBMaXZWVfRuba79B3m).

1.500AID [TXID]: 4df49cabbd3825ba8129a0b4ae5d55765450f15065e4664c33ebbe2b1c2cbb4a

500 AID [TXID]: 52979a721d72f2664f007bca945a5673452fbae3e193afcede8832f34e7e52ea

[Ratanol]

Some help for newbies. Use this miner to get the best hashrate but I think this one is also integrated with the wallet.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652849.0

My results:

R280X -> 12,74 Mh
R290 -> 15,72 Mh

sgminer -k groestlcoin --difficulty-multiplier 0.00390625  -o stratum+tcp://maya.aidbit.net:3032 -u YourWalletAddress -p x -I 22,22,22 -g 1,1,1 --gpu-engine 1200,1200,1100  --gpu-memclock 1050,1050,1000 --gpu-fan 65 -w 256,256,256

Drivers: AMD Catalyst 14.7

I'm pretty sure higher hashrate can be achieved but I was not able to run faster. If anyone is getting better results, feel free to disclose details of your setup.

Thank You Sir very much for this post!

R280X >>> 13.63 Mh/s 
(Win8.1, drivers AMD Catalyst 13.12

Code:

"gpu-engine" : "1020",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500",
"intensity" : "22",
"gpu-threads" : "1",

"auto-fan" : true,
"temp-cutoff" : "90",
"temp-overheat" : "80",
"temp-target" : "75",
"gpu-fan" : "30-85",
"worksize" : "256",

"api-port" : "4028",
"kernel" : "groestlcoin",
"gpu-powertune" : "20"

+1 BTC

OK, here we go just stayed up all night trying to figure this one out, and got some extra hashing out of it to so I thought I'd share, seeing as I also have a bizarre issue...

Here is my config for my 5x280X rig (5s avg is ~77Mh/s):

This is using grs-sgminer, as specified in the OP, on debian linux 13.12 using the windows compiled .bop files

Code:

"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"gpu-engine" : "1100",
"gpu-memclock" : "1000",
"intensity" : "22",
"gpu-threads" : "1",
"auto-fan" : true,
"temp-cutoff" : "90",
"temp-overheat" : "80",
"temp-target" : "70",
"gpu-fan" : "40-100",
"worksize" : "256",
"api-port" : "4028",
"kernel" : "groestlcoin",
"kernel-path" : "/opt/grs-sgminer/kernel",
"gpu-powertune" : "20"
}

A couple of rejects but running nice and cool.

Code:

GPU 0:  67.0C 2424RPM | 14.69M/14.72Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.211/m I:22
GPU 1:  62.0C 1433RPM | 14.71M/14.73Mh/s | R:  0.9% HW:0 WU:0.212/m I:22
GPU 2:  67.0C 2221RPM | 14.72M/14.73Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.208/m I:22
GPU 3:  67.0C 2176RPM | 14.72M/14.73Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.203/m I:22
GPU 4:  67.0C 1653RPM | 14.72M/14.73Mh/s | R:  1.8% HW:0 WU:0.203/m I:22

Now the R290 rig, consisting of 5 R290's and a 280X - The 290s are running the energy saving MSI bios on elphida RAM, the bios switch switches them over to Powercolor 290X's which are rather power hungry, but have yet to test. I think it's running 14.4 Beta, though I'm not 100% on when I upgraded that recently.

Now I should be seeing at least the 20% above the hash rate of the other rig, but it's just not happening.

Here's the config:

Code:

]
,
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"gpu-engine" : "1150",
"gpu-memclock" : "150",
"intensity" : "22",
"gpu-threads" : "1",
"auto-fan" : true,
"temp-cutoff" : "90",
"temp-overheat" : "80",
"temp-target" : "70",
"gpu-fan" : "40-88",
"worksize" : "256",
"api-port" : "4028",
"kernel" : "groestlcoin",
"kernel-path" : "/opt/grs-sgminer/kernel",
"gpu-powertune" : "20"
}

All the pool info contains is the 3 pools which have port 3032 open, maya being the priority, and also the ports that are closed which are specified in the NOMP getting stated page (explanation devs?). (url, user, and pass).

So, why is it doing this: (?!)

Code:

GPU 0:  73.0C  88%    | 10.41M/10.41Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.148/m I:22
GPU 1:  63.0C 1506RPM | 7.218M/7.217Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.102/m I:22
GPU 2:  69.0C  54%    | 10.41M/10.41Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.148/m I:22
GPU 3:  69.0C  60%    | 9.369M/9.367Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.126/m I:22
GPU 4:  69.0C  58%    | 9.386M/9.384Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.128/m I:22
GPU 5:  67.0C  69%    | 10.41M/10.40Mh/s | R:  3.0% HW:0 WU:0.149/m I:22

As you can see GPU1 is the 280X. I'm thinking it's the drivers but am not sure, as it could be the bop files for 14.x

Also, when running sph-sgminer 5, with the groestl kernel, the has rate was lower but the work Units were in the 1000's, not 0.1xx's

So any ideas? I know I should update, the drivers just in case but, you don't know how many times I've installed those damn things on various computers over the last six months...

Coins looking good, let's hope it's not an instadump eh? Good causes? Well, 90% of the planet live in poverty (a guess), might be more than you can tackle with one coin (decentralising 'wealth'). Raising awareness of mental illnesses, you don't know how many times I've been called "lazy", and "it's all in your head" (well of course it is, that's where the problem is...)
I think the most beneficial tool we have is the ability to extend our lifespan. Have a look at www.longecity.org, by fixing old age, the problems that come with it will disappear too (such as alzheimer's for instance - more money is spent on this than solving the root problem.)
Finally, let's try and stop spending money on the 'illegals' who 'invade' our countries, they have no homes, and there are plenty of empty ones that can be occupied. Why should it be illegal to migrate? I wouldn't have a problem doing it, so why should I worry about others moving to the UK, or US? "They took our jobs!!!", well robots and computers are doing that far more rapidly than, most would imagine, I imagine - and we'll all be better off for it. We won't need them any more, nor will we need $$££ or crypto-currencies'.

Ok, I think I'm done procrastinating now. Oh and don't forget climate change (PoW is killing the planet, bye bye Panda's), also we could set up a herbal/pharmaceutical/nanotech company that specialises in remedies for illnesses that the giants won't develop for, new antibiotics are desperately needed, we need to chuck out DSM-I to V because it pigeon holes similar symptoms into unrelated conditions. ADHD for example, is the inattentive form the same genetic legacy as the hyperactive and impulsive forms? Read New Scientist, get the knowledge (Udacity are doing a course on applied cryptography for free if you are serious about this line of work). If not well, why are you still reading?

Also sorry in advance about the mind wonders.

Now I'm done procrastinating.

Thanks ppl,

Ratanol.

[luya518]

chinese translationg ：http://www.btclt.cn/thread-4299-1-1.html

[St.Neman]

Hi, SimkoMiner !
...are you sure about "gpu-memclock" : "150" ? Is this mistake in typing?

Now the R290 rig, consisting of 5 R290's and a 280X - The 290s are running the energy saving MSI bios on elphida RAM, the bios switch switches them over to Powercolor 290X's which are rather power hungry, but have yet to test. I think it's running 14.4 Beta, though I'm not 100% on when I upgraded that recently.

Now I should be seeing at least the 20% above the hash rate of the other rig, but it's just not happening.

Here's the config:

]
,
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"gpu-engine" : "1150",

"gpu-memclock" : "150",  <<<---- ONLY???,    Is this ok??? 


"intensity" : "22",
"gpu-threads" : "1",
"auto-fan" : true,
"temp-cutoff" : "90",
"temp-overheat" : "80",
"temp-target" : "70",
"gpu-fan" : "40-88",
"worksize" : "256",
"api-port" : "4028",
"kernel" : "groestlcoin",
"kernel-path" : "/opt/grs-sgminer/kernel",
"gpu-powertune" : "20"
}


All the pool info contains is the 3 pools which have port 3032 open, maya being the priority, and also the ports that are closed which are specified in the NOMP getting stated page (explanation devs?). (url, user, and pass).

So, why is it doing this: (?!)

Code:

GPU 0:  73.0C  88%    | 10.41M/10.41Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.148/m I:22
GPU 1:  63.0C 1506RPM | 7.218M/7.217Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.102/m I:22
GPU 2:  69.0C  54%    | 10.41M/10.41Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.148/m I:22
GPU 3:  69.0C  60%    | 9.369M/9.367Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.126/m I:22
GPU 4:  69.0C  58%    | 9.386M/9.384Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.128/m I:22
GPU 5:  67.0C  69%    | 10.41M/10.40Mh/s | R:  3.0% HW:0 WU:0.149/m I:22

As you can see GPU1 is the 280X. I'm thinking it's the drivers but am not sure, as it could be the bop files for 14.x

Also, when running sph-sgminer 5, with the groestl kernel, the has rate was lower but the work Units were in the 1000's, not 0.1xx's

So any ideas? I know I should update, the drivers just in case but, you don't know how many times I've installed those damn things on various computers over the last six months...


Thanks ppl,

Ratanol.

[vger888]

Optimized settings for Sapphire 290x with Elpida Ram and stock BIOS (18,9Mhash/s):

Code:

"kernel": "groestlcoin",
"gpu-engine" : "1000",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500",
"gpu-powertune" : "30",
"xintensity" : "300",
"vectors" : "1",
"worksize" : "512",
"shaders" : "2816",
"thread-concurrency" : "27400",
"difficulty-multiplier" : "0.0039062500"

[bathrobehero]

Portable wallet will be available shortly. Can you please check the application error log and post the results. We did extensive testing on multiple configurations and the only crashing we founds was on old xp platform and I am sure we fixed that. Thanks!

socket inactivity timeout
socket inactivity timeout
socket inactivity timeout
socket inactivity timeout
socket inactivity timeout
socket inactivity timeout

That's all I got for the crash.

[vger888]

Portable wallet will be available shortly. Can you please check the application error log and post the results. We did extensive testing on multiple configurations and the only crashing we founds was on old xp platform and I am sure we fixed that. Thanks!

socket inactivity timeout
socket inactivity timeout
socket inactivity timeout
socket inactivity timeout
socket inactivity timeout
socket inactivity timeout

That's all I got for the crash.

This is not related to crash. But to be on the safe side, try to upgrade your network interface drivers.

Regards,

V.

[minersday]

I think this coin has huge potential. I'm fan of humanitarian coins and I lastly invested in CleanWaterCoin as well although those guys keep having technical problems with their coin (but they are still fighting to get it all sorted out). This coin seems to be very simmilar to CleanWaterCoin. I believe this coin is not a scam because developers must have put massive effort into developing custom wallet with built-in miner, the website is quite professional and they are responsive. You don't see such luxury at majority of current scam coins launched within last 2 months. What is more, I have feeling that the launch of this coin was very original which reminds me Minerals coin. To sump up, I'm mining this coin because it's simply way much different then all those copy cat shit scam coins recently launched.

Thank you so much for your kind words. Truly massive amount of energy was put into this project and we can't say enough how proud we all are, that everything went as smooth as it did. We're here to stay and we're here to make the difference. In couple of days we will present a more thorough plan of our our vision, so please be patient.

Thank you,

AidBit

Hi dev,
could you please calculate and/or tell maximum blocks and or coins(between something..)
didn't notice it if it was on the first page..

[vger888]

I think this coin has huge potential. I'm fan of humanitarian coins and I lastly invested in CleanWaterCoin as well although those guys keep having technical problems with their coin (but they are still fighting to get it all sorted out). This coin seems to be very simmilar to CleanWaterCoin. I believe this coin is not a scam because developers must have put massive effort into developing custom wallet with built-in miner, the website is quite professional and they are responsive. You don't see such luxury at majority of current scam coins launched within last 2 months. What is more, I have feeling that the launch of this coin was very original which reminds me Minerals coin. To sump up, I'm mining this coin because it's simply way much different then all those copy cat shit scam coins recently launched.

Thank you so much for your kind words. Truly massive amount of energy was put into this project and we can't say enough how proud we all are, that everything went as smooth as it did. We're here to stay and we're here to make the difference. In couple of days we will present a more thorough plan of our our vision, so please be patient.

Thank you,

AidBit

Hi dev,
could you please calculate and/or tell maximum blocks and or coins(between something..)
didn't notice it if it was on the first page..

The plan is we do it as soon as we start working on trading part of the website, but we'll try to make some quick calculations and post them shortly. Thank you,

V.

[minersday]

I think this coin has huge potential. I'm fan of humanitarian coins and I lastly invested in CleanWaterCoin as well although those guys keep having technical problems with their coin (but they are still fighting to get it all sorted out). This coin seems to be very simmilar to CleanWaterCoin. I believe this coin is not a scam because developers must have put massive effort into developing custom wallet with built-in miner, the website is quite professional and they are responsive. You don't see such luxury at majority of current scam coins launched within last 2 months. What is more, I have feeling that the launch of this coin was very original which reminds me Minerals coin. To sump up, I'm mining this coin because it's simply way much different then all those copy cat shit scam coins recently launched.

Thank you so much for your kind words. Truly massive amount of energy was put into this project and we can't say enough how proud we all are, that everything went as smooth as it did. We're here to stay and we're here to make the difference. In couple of days we will present a more thorough plan of our our vision, so please be patient.

Thank you,

AidBit

Hi dev,
could you please calculate and/or tell maximum blocks and or coins(between something..)
didn't notice it if it was on the first page..

The plan is we do it as soon as we start working on trading part of the website, but we'll try to make some quick calculations and post them shortly. Thank you,

V.

Thanks +1

[bathrobehero]

This is not related to crash. But to be on the safe side, try to upgrade your network interface drivers.

Regards,

V.

New crash, the last lines from the log:

Code:

ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
Flushing wallet.dat
Flushed wallet.dat 15ms
CTxMemPool::accept() : accepted 036f294917 (poolsz 2)
ResendWalletTransactions()
Flushed 321 addresses to peers.dat  3ms

I have over 50 wallets working, only this one crashes randomly.

[vger888]

This is not related to crash. But to be on the safe side, try to upgrade your network interface drivers.

Regards,

V.

New crash, the last lines from the log:

Code:

ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
Flushing wallet.dat
Flushed wallet.dat 15ms
CTxMemPool::accept() : accepted 036f294917 (poolsz 2)
ResendWalletTransactions()
Flushed 321 addresses to peers.dat  3ms

I have over 50 wallets working, only this one crashes randomly.

Strange, you're the only one with problems. Give me a few minutes and I'll build a wallet without mining control system. I'll have to do it sooner or later. When the app crashes, it should post the notice in the windows application error log. Please check the error log, not the debug log. Thanks.

And BTW, how many wallets are you running at the same time.