Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 11:14:31 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: LTC mining with Reaper on a 7970  (Read 33003 times)
exahash (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 278
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 15, 2012, 07:15:55 PM
 #1

Anyone else tried this?  What are your litecoin.conf settings?  Especially if you have a 7970.  I'm under Win7 using the newest 64-bit reaper from the wiki. http://wiki.solidcoin.info/wiki/Reaper

I'm getting about 236 kh/s at stock clocks and voltage, and Afterburner shows the GPU at 96% usage with the following settings in litecoin.conf:

worksize 256
aggression 12
threads_per_gpu 4
sharethreads 18
lookup_gap 2
gpu_thread_concurrency 6144

If I increase the aggression above 12 I get lots of stales/invalids and the message "Weird response from server"

I'm wondering what the last three settings do (sharethreads, lookup_gap, gpu_thread_concurrency).  I noticed that gpu_thread_concurrency is 3x my 2048 stream processors and tried other multiples of 2048 but that didn't help.  I also tried different values for lookup_gap but none were any better.

If I reduce threads_per_gpu below 3, performance drops into the high 220's and gpu usage in afterburner drops to low 90's

I'd also like to know how this is performing on 5850's and 5970's, since I have a bunch more of those.

1714907671
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714907671

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714907671
Reply with quote  #2

1714907671
Report to moderator
1714907671
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714907671

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714907671
Reply with quote  #2

1714907671
Report to moderator
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714907671
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714907671

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714907671
Reply with quote  #2

1714907671
Report to moderator
Ahimoth
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 15, 2012, 07:33:25 PM
 #2

I think I can answer the gpu_thread_concurrency number. This should be set to [shaders per gpu] multiplied by the [shader "threads" supported].

Examples:
A 6950 has 1408 shaders, and each shader can queue 4 threads, so the optimal number for this card is 5632.
A 6990 has 1536 shaders, and each shader can queue 4 threads, so the optimal number for this card is 6144.

I think the 5xxx cards were 5 threads queued per shader, so there it would be 5 times the shader count.

I do not know how many "threads" each shader on a 7 series can queue.

Tittiez
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 15, 2012, 08:08:19 PM
 #3

Funny, I get higher kH/s on my 6850 with 6144 then I do its optimal number (3840).
Ahimoth
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 15, 2012, 09:39:51 PM
 #4

Well, that's just what I've been told. And I only have 6950's to test on.

However, that said I believe 6850 is VLIW5, so might want to try 5 x 960 = 4800
Rubberduckie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 15, 2012, 10:22:05 PM
 #5

Am I right in thinking a 6870 has 1120 shaders,4 threads so 4480?

Ahimoth
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 15, 2012, 11:13:34 PM
 #6

All 68xx series cards are still vliw5 to my knowledge, which I think means they have a queue of 5 threads per shader. So a 6870 would be 5 * 1120 = 5600
Tittiez
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 15, 2012, 11:29:45 PM
 #7

Am I right in thinking a 6870 has 1120 shaders,4 threads so 4480?

Yeah, the 6850 has 960 shaders according to AMDs site.

So 960 * 5 = 4800
I get exactly 250kh/s at aggression 17.

With it at 6144 I get 259kh/s with aggression 17 and 250kh/s with aggression 16.
ShadowAlexey
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 968
Merit: 1002



View Profile
March 16, 2012, 08:32:52 AM
Last edit: March 16, 2012, 09:10:41 AM by ShadowAlexey
 #8

You might be missing fact that it has 68**/58** series has simd wich perform 5 operation,thats how we get 1120/1600,of the actual count of processors is 224 for 6870 and 320 for 5870, so i cant find any connection to gpu_thread_concurrency...
According to OpenCL File this is size of x,the amount of main threads which would be the amount of threads we run i think...
Rubberduckie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 18, 2012, 08:28:27 AM
 #9

All 68xx series cards are still vliw5 to my knowledge, which I think means they have a queue of 5 threads per shader. So a 6870 would be 5 * 1120 = 5600

just saw your post thx!

(stopped mining LTC for a day or so)

Aseras
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 18, 2012, 11:45:05 PM
 #10

Drop threads per gpu to one overclocking the memory. Litecoin is dependent on high memory speed unlike bitcoin.
Aseras
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 19, 2012, 07:52:13 PM
 #11

right. play with it and see what happens.  The highest you can get the memory the better. the core helps too, but memory speed is more important.

on a 6990 having the ram at 800mhz vs 1250mhz is the difference between 200khash and 800khash
Aseras
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 19, 2012, 08:44:28 PM
 #12

right. play with it and see what happens.  The highest you can get the memory the better. the core helps too, but memory speed is more important.

on a 6990 having the ram at 800mhz vs 1250mhz is the difference between 200khash and 800khash

Duh play with it. There are just a lot of options to mess with compared to btc mining and very little info I can find. Thanks

ok delete the bin files between runs.

worksize try 128 or 256 mine for a couple of minutes and see what gets the best rate.

aggression 12-19

Lower if you want to use the box for anything and background mine or if stales are too high. Higher for dedicated. beyond 19 isnt good.

threads per gpu, try them all 1, 2 and 4.  mine for a couple of minutes and see what gets the best rate.

sharethreads, lookupgap leave alone.



concurrency, start at 8192 and go up. try multiples of 1024 and again mine for a couple of minutes and see what gets the best rate

in half an hour you'll answer your own question.
Aseras
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 19, 2012, 08:57:03 PM
 #13

I have 2 7970 on order I'll tell you next week.

All I have right now are 5970 and 6990

for those


worksize 256
aggression 16
threads_per_gpu 1
sharethreads 18
lookup_gap 2
gpu_thread_concurrency 8192

works best

and again FAST memory, unlike bitcoin.
tacotime
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005



View Profile
July 20, 2012, 06:28:28 PM
 #14

these settings get 600kh/s+, which is the estimated kh/s rate for one of these cards by their memory bandwidth:

worksize 256
aggression 13
threads_per_gpu 5
sharethreads 18
lookup_gap 2
gpu_thread_concurrency 10240

you need the latest sdk and 12.6+ ati drivers (tried with 12.6 and it works well, not sure about 12.7 but those are probably okay too)

Code:
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns
iCEBREAKER
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072


Crypto is the separation of Power and State.


View Profile WWW
July 20, 2012, 08:05:18 PM
 #15

So I read through this thread, then looked at btc-e's LTC/BTC and LTC/$ pages.  But the coffee isn't working.

My head gets all spinny when I try to figure out whether to mine LTC on my 7970, or keep mining BTC and exchange them for LTC.

Can somebody please math this for me?

Has anyone made a LTC vs BTC profitability calculator?  I'll start a bounty for one. 

+1BTC


██████████
█████████████████
██████████████████████
█████████████████████████
████████████████████████████
████
████████████████████████
█████
███████████████████████████
█████
███████████████████████████
██████
████████████████████████████
██████
████████████████████████████
██████
████████████████████████████
██████
███████████████████████████
██████
██████████████████████████
█████
███████████████████████████
█████████████
██████████████
████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
██████████████████████
█████████████████
██████████

Monero
"The difference between bad and well-developed digital cash will determine
whether we have a dictatorship or a real democracy." 
David Chaum 1996
"Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect."  Adam Back 2014
Buy and sell XMR near you
P2P Exchange Network
Buy XMR with fiat
Is Dash a scam?
pooler
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 838
Merit: 507


View Profile
July 20, 2012, 08:15:58 PM
 #16

Has anyone made a LTC vs BTC profitability calculator?  I'll start a bounty for one. 

It already exists.
http://allchains.info/calc.html

BTC: 15MRTcUweNVJbhTyH5rq9aeSdyigFrskqE · LTC: LTCPooLqTK1SANSNeTR63GbGwabTKEkuS7
iCEBREAKER
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072


Crypto is the separation of Power and State.


View Profile WWW
July 20, 2012, 08:22:51 PM
 #17

Has anyone made a LTC vs BTC profitability calculator?  I'll start a bounty for one. 

It already exists.
http://allchains.info/calc.html

Oh goody, thanks!!!  Grin


██████████
█████████████████
██████████████████████
█████████████████████████
████████████████████████████
████
████████████████████████
█████
███████████████████████████
█████
███████████████████████████
██████
████████████████████████████
██████
████████████████████████████
██████
████████████████████████████
██████
███████████████████████████
██████
██████████████████████████
█████
███████████████████████████
█████████████
██████████████
████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
██████████████████████
█████████████████
██████████

Monero
"The difference between bad and well-developed digital cash will determine
whether we have a dictatorship or a real democracy." 
David Chaum 1996
"Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect."  Adam Back 2014
Buy and sell XMR near you
P2P Exchange Network
Buy XMR with fiat
Is Dash a scam?
mig91
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 120
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 10, 2012, 12:17:11 AM
 #18

i have allways 100% usage on cpu. how i can fix that?  Huh
goxed
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946
Merit: 1006


Bitcoin / Crypto mining Hardware.


View Profile
August 10, 2012, 02:59:11 AM
 #19

i have allways 100% usage on cpu. how i can fix that?  Huh
Use latest cgminer 2.6.1  and run with --scrypt option

Revewing Bitcoin / Crypto mining Hardware.
mig91
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 120
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 10, 2012, 08:24:50 AM
 #20

i have allways 100% usage on cpu. how i can fix that?  Huh
Use latest cgminer 2.6.1  and run with --scrypt option

i fixed the cpu problem in reaper. i have 2x 6950 and im thinking which miner i should use? cgminer or reaper?

what is that "--scrypt option" in cgminer?

thanks for helping a noob  Smiley
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!