Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 12:36:07 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 ... 97 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][SDC] ShadowCoin | ShadowChat [EM] | ShadowSend [Anon] | ShadowGo [Mobile]  (Read 172554 times)
cindereynolds
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 02, 2014, 04:38:50 AM
 #461

A great chart just to look at:



Where do you get these charts at?

ʕ•͡ᴥ•ʔʕ•͡ᴥ•ʔʕ•͡ᴥ•ʔ PND bamboo muncher ʕ•͡ᴥ•ʔʕ•͡ᴥ•ʔʕ•͡ᴥ•ʔ
                        PPtd7diYFaKzY11iqVV1xoy6MLLY6mg7Kq
BitcoinCleanup.com: Learn why Bitcoin isn't bad for the environment
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714912567
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714912567

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714912567
Reply with quote  #2

1714912567
Report to moderator
1714912567
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714912567

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714912567
Reply with quote  #2

1714912567
Report to moderator
1714912567
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714912567

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714912567
Reply with quote  #2

1714912567
Report to moderator
keshuker
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 395
Merit: 250

aka. dibdab


View Profile
August 02, 2014, 05:19:45 AM
 #462

Good morning from Europe, I am hearing rumors about new stuff coming Saturday so I am up early to catch them Smiley

EM got us to almost 30ksat, maybe 50ksat is the next leg
AltxF4
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 230
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 02, 2014, 05:46:52 AM
 #463

Very Exciting!
00Smurf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 02, 2014, 05:59:41 AM
 #464

A great chart just to look at:



Where do you get these charts at?

http://shadowhangout.com/topic/27/ongoing-ta-of-shadowcoin-as-it-unfolds
00Smurf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 02, 2014, 06:00:13 AM
 #465

Good morning from Europe, I am hearing rumors about new stuff coming Saturday so I am up early to catch them Smiley

EM got us to almost 30ksat, maybe 50ksat is the next leg

Well its morning PST time i believe. So sometime after USA wakes up.
anarchyx914
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 338
Merit: 251


View Profile
August 02, 2014, 12:43:01 PM
 #466

50k here we come! Exciting to know that we have an experience dev for the coin. The community is growing rapidly! Awesome!
olloman
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 433
Merit: 250


Crypto Angel


View Profile
August 02, 2014, 01:56:07 PM
 #467

I've been into XC since the beginning and still am, I have been following SDC for the past week and I have to say that Shadowcoin looks a lot like XC in the early days, because of the style of the development, the community and the slow but steady upward trend, I hope it will actually follow XC's path Smiley
jioy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 02, 2014, 02:13:17 PM
 #468

is it sold on the bittrex?
RW-Stott
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 02, 2014, 02:34:43 PM
 #469

is it sold on the bittrex?

yes

https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-SDC
00Smurf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 02, 2014, 03:35:52 PM
 #470

I've been into XC since the beginning and still am, I have been following SDC for the past week and I have to say that Shadowcoin looks a lot like XC in the early days, because of the style of the development, the community and the slow but steady upward trend, I hope it will actually follow XC's path Smiley

I see the parallel as well.
suchnekky
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 02, 2014, 03:37:36 PM
 #471

I did a little research on the p2p EM system that Shadowcoin has implemented, because if was thinking of investing. I will not invest because:

It seems that it is not that new, and was already implemented in Cinnicoin, before it was implemented in Shadowcoin. Take a look at this screenshot, you can see it uses the same commands and same type of interface:



Also the whitepaper has many parts literally copied from the Cinnicoin whitepaper, look at the parts about encryption and decryption and the references (which they scrambled):

Cinnicoin: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10793660/wp.pdf

Shadowcoin (whitepaper in OP):
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700087.0

See for yourself if you want to do something with this or not, but I am not investing in a copycat coin.

Also:Take a look at
https://github.com/Cinnicoin/CinniCoin/blob/master/src/emessage.cpp
https://github.com/Cinnicoin/CinniCoin/blob/master/src/emessage.h
https://github.com/Cinnicoin/CinniCoin/blob/master/src/emessageclass.h

compare it to:
https://github.com/SDCDev/shadowcoin/blob/master/src/smessage.cpp
https://github.com/SDCDev/shadowcoin/blob/master/src/smessage.h

This is supposed to be the code for the P2P EM System.
Please tell me what is the difference, apart from some objectclasses that CinniCoin has put in emessageclass.h and shadowcoin has put in smessage.h (which is only a way to put some programlines in another place, the lines are the same) and some minor changes in smessage.cpp versus emessage.cpp.

• ⓢⓤⓒⓗⓝⓔⓚⓚⓨ •
sdcoin (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 129
Merit: 100


Leave nothing but a shadow.


View Profile WWW
August 02, 2014, 03:45:50 PM
 #472


this has already been addressed


The code and WP appear similar because it was my team wrote the code and WP for Cinni. I was not the original developer of CinniCoin, I just built the encrypted messaging system.

My team and I decided to create the ShadowCoin project so we would have the freedom to implement our innovations as we saw best. I can assure you that the ShadowChat EM system is much improved from the original EM system that we developed for Cinni.

Here is a list of improvements that ShadowChat EM has over the EM system we developed for Cinni:

  • Instant Messaging UI
  • Conversation Grouping
  • Single Database - uses levelDB instead of berkeleyDB
  • More efficient
  • BBCode (coming soon) and rich text display


I can confirm that I am sdcoin / SDCDev / lead developer of ShadowCoin

I have already addressed this.  See above.
00Smurf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 02, 2014, 03:47:42 PM
 #473

I did a little research on the p2p EM system that Shadowcoin has implemented, because if was thinking of investing. I will not invest because:

It seems that it is not that new, and was already implemented in Cinnicoin, before it was implemented in Shadowcoin. Take a look at this screenshot, you can see it uses the same commands and same type of interface:



Also the whitepaper has many parts literally copied from the Cinnicoin whitepaper, look at the parts about encryption and decryption and the references (which they scrambled):

Cinnicoin: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10793660/wp.pdf

Shadowcoin (whitepaper in OP):
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700087.0

See for yourself if you want to do something with this or not, but I am not investing in a copycat coin.

Also:Take a look at
https://github.com/Cinnicoin/CinniCoin/blob/master/src/emessage.cpp
https://github.com/Cinnicoin/CinniCoin/blob/master/src/emessage.h
https://github.com/Cinnicoin/CinniCoin/blob/master/src/emessageclass.h

compare it to:
https://github.com/SDCDev/shadowcoin/blob/master/src/smessage.cpp
https://github.com/SDCDev/shadowcoin/blob/master/src/smessage.h

This is supposed to be the code for the P2P EM System.
Please tell me what is the difference, apart from some objectclasses that CinniCoin has put in emessageclass.h and shadowcoin has put in smessage.h (which is only a way to put some programlines in another place, the lines are the same) and some minor changes in smessage.cpp versus emessage.cpp.

This was already addressed. Perhaps you should read some of the pages before you posting extraneous BS.
chnchapters
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 02, 2014, 03:48:25 PM
 #474

I did a little research on the p2p EM system that Shadowcoin has implemented, because if was thinking of investing. I will not invest because:

It seems that it is not that new, and was already implemented in Cinnicoin, before it was implemented in Shadowcoin. Take a look at this screenshot, you can see it uses the same commands and same type of interface:



Also the whitepaper has many parts literally copied from the Cinnicoin whitepaper, look at the parts about encryption and decryption and the references (which they scrambled):

Cinnicoin: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10793660/wp.pdf

Shadowcoin (whitepaper in OP):
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700087.0

See for yourself if you want to do something with this or not, but I am not investing in a copycat coin.

Also:Take a look at
https://github.com/Cinnicoin/CinniCoin/blob/master/src/emessage.cpp
https://github.com/Cinnicoin/CinniCoin/blob/master/src/emessage.h
https://github.com/Cinnicoin/CinniCoin/blob/master/src/emessageclass.h

compare it to:
https://github.com/SDCDev/shadowcoin/blob/master/src/smessage.cpp
https://github.com/SDCDev/shadowcoin/blob/master/src/smessage.h

This is supposed to be the code for the P2P EM System.
Please tell me what is the difference, apart from some objectclasses that CinniCoin has put in emessageclass.h and shadowcoin has put in smessage.h (which is only a way to put some programlines in another place, the lines are the same) and some minor changes in smessage.cpp versus emessage.cpp.

Try reading before you post genious... This is already been addressed multiple times. It was actually good news.
keshuker
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 395
Merit: 250

aka. dibdab


View Profile
August 02, 2014, 03:49:17 PM
 #475

Still waiting anxiously for the news ANN Smiley

I hope it will get the next leg up to 50ksat
00Smurf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 02, 2014, 03:49:47 PM
 #476


This is supposed to be the code for the P2P EM System.
Please tell me what is the difference, apart from some objectclasses that CinniCoin has put in emessageclass.h and shadowcoin has put in smessage.h (which is only a way to put some programlines in another place, the lines are the same) and some minor changes in smessage.cpp versus emessage.cpp.
[/quote]

Read page 24.
ItsNotMe
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 02, 2014, 03:49:54 PM
 #477

I did a little research on the p2p EM system that Shadowcoin has implemented, because if was thinking of investing. I will not invest because:

It seems that it is not that new, and was already implemented in Cinnicoin, before it was implemented in Shadowcoin. Take a look at this screenshot, you can see it uses the same commands and same type of interface:


Also the whitepaper has many parts literally copied from the Cinnicoin whitepaper, look at the parts about encryption and decryption and the references (which they scrambled):

Cinnicoin: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10793660/wp.pdf

Shadowcoin (whitepaper in OP):
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700087.0

See for yourself if you want to do something with this or not, but I am not investing in a copycat coin.

Also:Take a look at
https://github.com/Cinnicoin/CinniCoin/blob/master/src/emessage.cpp
https://github.com/Cinnicoin/CinniCoin/blob/master/src/emessage.h
https://github.com/Cinnicoin/CinniCoin/blob/master/src/emessageclass.h

compare it to:
https://github.com/SDCDev/shadowcoin/blob/master/src/smessage.cpp
https://github.com/SDCDev/shadowcoin/blob/master/src/smessage.h

This is supposed to be the code for the P2P EM System.
Please tell me what is the difference, apart from some objectclasses that CinniCoin has put in emessageclass.h and shadowcoin has put in smessage.h (which is only a way to put some programlines in another place, the lines are the same) and some minor changes in smessage.cpp versus emessage.cpp.

HaHa fudMan...you did not see that the Rynomster is the dev of ShadowCoin...kiss this!  Kiss
00Smurf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 02, 2014, 03:50:04 PM
 #478

Still waiting anxiously for the news ANN Smiley

I hope it will get the next leg up to 50ksat

its coming.
Honeypot
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 02, 2014, 03:51:32 PM
 #479


this has already been addressed


The code and WP appear similar because it was my team wrote the code and WP for Cinni. I was not the original developer of CinniCoin, I just built the encrypted messaging system.

My team and I decided to create the ShadowCoin project so we would have the freedom to implement our innovations as we saw best. I can assure you that the ShadowChat EM system is much improved from the original EM system that we developed for Cinni.

Here is a list of improvements that ShadowChat EM has over the EM system we developed for Cinni:

  • Instant Messaging UI
  • Conversation Grouping
  • Single Database - uses levelDB instead of berkeleyDB
  • More efficient
  • BBCode (coming soon) and rich text display


I can confirm that I am sdcoin / SDCDev / lead developer of ShadowCoin

I have already addressed this.  See above.

The coin is reaching new heights and is currently undergoing a healthy correction. The 8 btc sell wall buy eaten few hours ago after being posted for a few hours.

The coin delivers. It's contents are based off of proven tech upgrades, improved even more by the dev. Most importantly, in the time when most coins are all promises and no delivery, this coin among very few others deliver consistent results.

How many coins are based off of proven btc and ltc technology alone? There is no such thing as development without learning from examples of past projects. For a coin that is barely 1.5 weeks old, market is showing us that shadow coin is gathering investor confidence all around.

3 factors necessary for a crypto to succeed: Public and community support, dedicated and diligent dev with innovative ideas, and combined financial support from all sources interested in power. Check out the dev delivery results so far, the internet public and market interest, and buy support on the exchanges.

All 3 conditions are met. This coin can easily break top 10 marketcap.

This has been addressed to death already.
1024KB
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 02, 2014, 03:52:42 PM
 #480


this has already been addressed


The code and WP appear similar because it was my team wrote the code and WP for Cinni. I was not the original developer of CinniCoin, I just built the encrypted messaging system.

My team and I decided to create the ShadowCoin project so we would have the freedom to implement our innovations as we saw best. I can assure you that the ShadowChat EM system is much improved from the original EM system that we developed for Cinni.

Here is a list of improvements that ShadowChat EM has over the EM system we developed for Cinni:

  • Instant Messaging UI
  • Conversation Grouping
  • Single Database - uses levelDB instead of berkeleyDB
  • More efficient
  • BBCode (coming soon) and rich text display


I can confirm that I am sdcoin / SDCDev / lead developer of ShadowCoin

I have already addressed this.  See above.

Already addressed dude, read up yo
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 ... 97 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!