[SHUTTING DOWN] [DiceBitco.in | BE THE BANK ! | 1% House Edge]

[finnile]

Dooglus because he bet 2 BTC the second time. if thats what you asked.

I mean when he bets 1 BTC and loses, why is the profit -8.9 BTC? It should be -1 BTC.

But that seems to be a separate issue - all losing bets are shown as "minus (what your profit would have been if you won)".

So that should have been a winning bet  

He meant, that profit should show -2. and not -18.7.
And yes, that was a winning bet.

[MICRO]

I just glanced on all posts here from my phone. What's going on? And why they are so silent about this? If they are skipping win rolls that works into advantage for investors. But that's probably not the reason.

[Mitchell]

God, I just got attacked on the DiceBitco.in chat because I asked people to remain calm and stay patient. And when I said that I have 5BTC of them in escrow I turned into a paid chill. People clearly don't know what escrow means.

EDIT: I think that the DiceBitco.in crew is silent because they are trying to find (and most likley fix) the bug. That would be my first priority and it makes total sense if you ask me. But well, that is my prediction and I could be wrong, of course.

EDIT2:

kelton.kautzer Sep 7, 2014 7:59:20 PM
bitcoininformation shillin hard on BTCT
angel.kuphal Sep 7, 2014 8:00:07 PM
bitcoininformation = crybaby lol
kelton.kautzer Sep 7, 2014 8:00:12 PM
bitcoininformation bitch

Be a man and say that in this topic and honestly, I couldn't care less what you say about me.

EDIT3: The same person is advertising for PRC:

kelton.kautzer Sep 7, 2014 7:59:35 PM
PRC > all

[a1choi]

God, I just got attacked on the DiceBitco.in chat because I asked people to remain calm and stay patient. And when I said that I have 5BTC of them in escrow I turned into a paid chill. People clearly don't know what escrow means.

emotions are tense as there have been way too many scammy sites in the past.  the evidence points more and more to this being a deliberate scam and not just a "bug" but we're still waiting on an official response.

[Mitchell]

emotions are tense as there have been way too many scammy sites in the past.  the evidence points more and more to this being a deliberate scam and not just a "bug" but we're still waiting on an official response.

I totally get that, I would be pissed as well. I have done some gambling on DiceBitco.in in the past and I never seen anything suspicious. I pretty sure I will be called an even bigger shill/crybaby by saying this, but oh well. All we can do right now is wait for the official statement and I just hope that people can stay calm until then.

EDIT: A response within a few seconds of this post, damn.

angel.kuphal Sep 7, 2014 8:06:39 PM
bitcoininformation is STILL shilling for this site lol

[a1choi]

emotions are tense as there have been way too many scammy sites in the past.  the evidence points more and more to this being a deliberate scam and not just a "bug" but we're still waiting on an official response.

I totally get that, I would be pissed as well. I have done some gambling on DiceBitco.in in the past and I never seen anything suspicious. I pretty sure I will be called an even bigger shill/crybaby by saying this, but oh well. All we can do right now is wait for the official statement and I just hope that people can stay calm until then.

EDIT: A response within a few seconds of this post, damn.

angel.kuphal Sep 7, 2014 8:06:39 PM
bitcoininformation is STILL shilling for this site lol

haters will hate.. best to just ignore the trolls. :p

[Mitchell]

haters will hate.. best to just ignore the trolls. :p

It's quite entertaining to be honest. That person keeps posting stuff about PRC, maybe they have something to do with it. Aggressive PR is still PR. Will shall see how this unfolds.

rocky.schiller Sep 7, 2014 8:10:42 PM
PRCdice.eu, legit gambling

[Gws24]

Well, they better have a damned good explanation for me to trust them again. Skipping only winning nonces and not losing nonces is just so fishy. Especially since with Finnile it skips almost every other bet (on 2x payout) and only once with Stars on 9.9x payout so the skipping specifically targets winning nonces.

[Stars]

Well, they better have a damned good explanation for me to trust them again. Skipping only winning nonces and not losing nonces is just so fishy. Especially since with Finnile it skips almost every other bet (on 2x payout) and only once with Stars on 9.9x payout so the skipping specifically targets winning nonces.

There's around 4-5 bets which it skipped on 9.9x payout, I showed 1-2.

[100]

Yes that can also happend

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPvs9XjHOkI

[PocketRocketsCasino]

haters will hate.. best to just ignore the trolls. :p

It's quite entertaining to be honest. That person keeps posting stuff about PRC, maybe they have something to do with it. Aggressive PR is still PR. Will shall see how this unfolds.

rocky.schiller Sep 7, 2014 8:10:42 PM
PRCdice.eu, legit gambling

I have nothing to do with any posts regarding PRC in their chat room. PRC is still only run by me so not any staff or people paid by me.

However it was the PRC community that figured out this problem. The player finnile was noticing he lost too often and then Bazza helped him out and verified everything and discovered the fact that there was winning bets being skipped.

[Mitchell]

I have nothing to do with any posts regarding PRC in their chat room. PRC is still only run by me so not any staff or people paid by me.

However it was the PRC community that figured out this problem. The player finnile was noticing he lost too often and then Bazza helped him out and verified everything and discovered the fact that there was winning bets being skipped.

Finally, someone that talks with me in a normal fashion. I'm really glad to hear that you guys have nothing to do with the bullshit that is going on in the DiceBitco.in chatroom. I have read a few of the posts, but does it really happen with all winning bets? That seems really fishy and quite stupid to be honest. I mean if they pull of a scam like that, they wouldn't just skip winning nounces, right? Is there any proof that supports the statement that only winning nounces are skipped (since people keep stating that this is the case).

A quick statement by Wilco:

Wilco Sep 7, 2014 8:18:07 PM
I just checked my bets from the other day and the nonces are fine, how recent did this 'bug' happen James?Wilco Sep 7, 2014 8:18:52 PM
Hmm all my nonces are fine for losing bets, let me check my winning ones brb.

It seems that the nounce skipping is a very recent bug or a random bug. Not sure what to think of it.

[PocketRocketsCasino]

I have nothing to do with any posts regarding PRC in their chat room. PRC is still only run by me so not any staff or people paid by me.

However it was the PRC community that figured out this problem. The player finnile was noticing he lost too often and then Bazza helped him out and verified everything and discovered the fact that there was winning bets being skipped.

Finally, someone that talks with me in a normal fashion. I have read a few of the posts, but does it really happen with all winning bets? That seems really fishy and quite stupid to be honest. I mean if they pull of a scam like that, they wouldn't just skip winning nounces, right? Is there any proof that supports the statement that only winning nounces are skipped?

I can only post what I am being told by players in both the PRC chat and what I read in the DB chat so I'm not 100% sure on all the details yet but it seems to only skip winning bets. Never a losing bet. I have no idea why this would happen though.

[Gws24]

Well, they better have a damned good explanation for me to trust them again. Skipping only winning nonces and not losing nonces is just so fishy. Especially since with Finnile it skips almost every other bet (on 2x payout) and only once with Stars on 9.9x payout so the skipping specifically targets winning nonces.

There's around 4-5 bets which it skipped on 9.9x payout, I showed 1-2.

all would have been winners?

[a1choi]

I have nothing to do with any posts regarding PRC in their chat room. PRC is still only run by me so not any staff or people paid by me.

However it was the PRC community that figured out this problem. The player finnile was noticing he lost too often and then Bazza helped him out and verified everything and discovered the fact that there was winning bets being skipped.

Finally, someone that talks with me in a normal fashion. I have read a few of the posts, but does it really happen with all winning bets? That seems really fishy and quite stupid to be honest. I mean if they pull of a scam like that, they wouldn't just skip winning nounces, right? Is there any proof that supports the statement that only winning nounces are skipped?

I can only post what I am being told by players in both the PRC chat and what I read in the DB chat so I'm not 100% sure on all the details yet but it seems to only skip winning bets. Never a losing bet. I have no idea why this would happen though.

If you check the earlier posts in this thread. particularly the one by dooglus. he shows a string of missing "winning" bets that get passed over.  and then we just saw the 9.9x bet that skipped a winner as well.  so far only winners have been skipped.

[Gws24]

Did I just read that right in the chat about a new employee who had access to the code?

EDIT:



This was in response to a question from Bernard; doesn't mean that Bernard is the new employee.

[a1choi]

Did I just read that right in the chat about a new employee who had access to the code?

and the first thing this new employee does is put in some shitty code?

[RoooooR]

Did I just read that right in the chat about a new employee who had access to the code....

That was very 'funny'. He just said last day, only manl and gerry running site.

I always feel bad about DB. And this condition show they are scammer.

Ops... But.... But they allow withdraws?

[randayh]

How come they removed the capability to see your seed.Randomize and viewing seeds is now gone from the site.

[Gws24]

and the first thing this new employee does is put in some shitty code?

Apparently. Problem for me is that IF this was the case how are they gonna prove it was a new employee and not themselves doing it? I don't think they can so there will always be a scent of scam even IF they refund everyone and do the right thing they aren't to blame.