fastminer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 12, 2014, 04:14:37 PM |
|
coins looks good but what is it with name. why was this name chosen for the coin
|
|
|
|
damiano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
103 days, 21 hours and 10 minutes.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 12, 2014, 04:49:33 PM |
|
coins looks good but what is it with name. why was this name chosen for the coin
It's an odd, but catchy name.
|
|
|
|
Voltarius
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Mercurial
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 12, 2014, 04:52:16 PM |
|
coins looks good but what is it with name. why was this name chosen for the coin
It's an odd, but catchy name. It's a reference to the British Sci-fi television series, Doctor Who.
|
|
|
|
sdersdf2
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 12, 2014, 05:36:00 PM |
|
So, spent most of the night watching to make sure that stake went off without a hitch. It did which is a good thing. The next step is to go through and add some more features. I am going to be expanding what is currently a placeholder. Some of you may have noticed a button labeled stealth this in the QT. well soon enough it will work and you will be able to send coins from one address and not only have the ip disassociated, but the sender and receiver will be disconnected as well. also what you are seeing as the network hash, keep in mind this is an estimate based on block times and difficulty. since we started staking last night the block times jumped in and skewed things.
Does this mean you have a 100% decentralised, 100% trustless anon solution?
|
|
|
|
Chris001
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
electroneum.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 12, 2014, 05:43:57 PM |
|
Wow, no wonder that it's inching up in price on Bittrex
We are on Bittrex now, a big exchange. Now the dev is announcing new features, and if he delivers, we will see the price skyrocket.
|
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=186785Here is the link to my trust settings here on forum. This trust system is very unfair. I make good on every deal Ive ever made. I had many, many deals as you can see and I never scammed anyone. All it takes is a random account to give you negative trust and youre screwed. Tomatocage has never even talked to me ever but when the random acct hit me with negative trust, Tomatocage came right behind him and marked neg trust again so obviously he was the one who did it. You can look at Tomatocage trust and see how many of his compeditors at the currency exchange thread he labeled scammers. I never scammed anyone. My trust was green over 20 before this. I hope it never happens to you because the mods cant help you.
|
|
|
SonicScrewdriverDev (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 12, 2014, 09:48:20 PM Last edit: August 12, 2014, 09:58:24 PM by SonicScrewdriverDev |
|
So anyone Paying attention. Funding first of two bounties 10k SSD for a block Explorer with Rich List 10K for Twitter Tip Bot. Feel free to add to this if you would like to contribute.
adding to OP
|
|
|
|
gysca
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 12, 2014, 10:42:24 PM |
|
Wow, no wonder that it's inching up in price on Bittrex
We are on Bittrex now, a big exchange. Now the dev is announcing new features, and if he delivers, we will see the price skyrocket.
i think this is in early stage, we'll see real price in a few weeks
|
|
|
|
nrg_wolf
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 12, 2014, 11:55:11 PM |
|
wow such difficulty. even more glad i got in early. not even worth dumping at this price. i reckon better is on the horizon
|
|
|
|
RubixRex
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 71
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 12, 2014, 11:58:36 PM |
|
Looking good fellas
|
|
|
|
damiano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
103 days, 21 hours and 10 minutes.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 12, 2014, 11:59:02 PM |
|
wow such difficulty. even more glad i got in early. not even worth dumping at this price. i reckon better is on the horizon
At these prices it's way better to buy
|
|
|
|
MemoryShock
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 13, 2014, 03:19:28 AM |
|
if dev delivers on promises this can easily become the next btcd. still a bargain at 240.
What promises? No offense but all I see are anon features. Many coins have them and two of the current ones are based off of old XC technology... I am genuinely interested to hear more for sure and Kudos to an interactive dev...
|
|
|
|
|
SonicScrewdriverDev (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 13, 2014, 05:03:27 AM |
|
if dev delivers on promises this can easily become the next btcd. still a bargain at 240.
What promises? No offense but all I see are anon features. Many coins have them and two of the current ones are based off of old XC technology... I am genuinely interested to hear more for sure and Kudos to an interactive dev... To address this, the first anon feature is already implemented in this coin. When you start the qt or daemon, you setup a TOR node with which to connect to the network. This removes the ip information from anything put into the block chain since there is no IP to pass only a .onion address. Those of you familiar with TOR will know that if you feel this has been compromised all you have to do is generate a new onion address. This removes the ability to track the block back to the ip that submitted it. If you were to attempt to remove TOR you would actually break your install. As far as I know this is unique in a SHA pow/pos coin. Now getting to the disconnect of tx vs rx addresses, I have not specified how that was going to happen so how could you compare it to an existing tech? And I believe they were referring to the anon features as the promises.
|
|
|
|
MemoryShock
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 13, 2014, 05:09:33 AM |
|
To address this, the first anon feature is already implemented in this coin. When you start the qt or daemon, you setup a TOR node with which to connect to the network. This removes the ip information from anything put into the block chain since there is no IP to pass only a .onion address. Those of you familiar with TOR will know that if you feel this has been compromised all you have to do is generate a new onion address. This removes the ability to track the block back to the ip that submitted it. If you were to attempt to remove TOR you would actually break your install. As far as I know this is unique in a SHA pow/pos coin. Now getting to the disconnect of tx vs rx addresses, I have not specified how that was going to happen so how could you compare it to an existing tech? And I believe they were referring to the anon features as the promises.
Thank you for the response. I can appreciate the detail. To be fair, I wasn't comparing anon tech with anon tech. I was wondering if there were going to be further features beyond anon implementation as there are many coins with such...I'm already mining so it is more curiosity than any attempt to assert.
|
|
|
|
Voltarius
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Mercurial
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 13, 2014, 05:25:44 AM |
|
This just in ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fpuu.sh%2FaQjUO%2F518eff86c8.jpg&t=665&c=o289GFqPKaWUWQ) That's fantastic! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
SonicScrewdriverDev (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 13, 2014, 06:04:12 AM |
|
To address this, the first anon feature is already implemented in this coin. When you start the qt or daemon, you setup a TOR node with which to connect to the network. This removes the ip information from anything put into the block chain since there is no IP to pass only a .onion address. Those of you familiar with TOR will know that if you feel this has been compromised all you have to do is generate a new onion address. This removes the ability to track the block back to the ip that submitted it. If you were to attempt to remove TOR you would actually break your install. As far as I know this is unique in a SHA pow/pos coin. Now getting to the disconnect of tx vs rx addresses, I have not specified how that was going to happen so how could you compare it to an existing tech? And I believe they were referring to the anon features as the promises.
Thank you for the response. I can appreciate the detail. To be fair, I wasn't comparing anon tech with anon tech. I was wondering if there were going to be further features beyond anon implementation as there are many coins with such...I'm already mining so it is more curiosity than any attempt to assert. Understood. And yes I am planning on more than just anon, though I haven't nailed down all the features as of yet. Will keep you updated as I go.
|
|
|
|
Bitcycle
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 13, 2014, 06:14:30 AM |
|
This just in ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fpuu.sh%2FaQjUO%2F518eff86c8.jpg&t=665&c=o289GFqPKaWUWQ) Nice. A verfied dev with a track record in crypto. Keeping an eye on this one.
|
|
|
|
Voltarius
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Mercurial
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 13, 2014, 06:23:59 AM |
|
SSD @ 500 sats on Bittrex!!! Still a steal at this price, buy while you can! Reward halving again in less than 400 blocks! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
b00s624
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
-----------✄----------
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 13, 2014, 07:09:43 AM |
|
GO GO GO!!! ssd
|
|
|
|
dinurp
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 13, 2014, 07:19:55 AM |
|
i wont sell my SSD for this price, at least 2k sat or more ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
|