[ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient HDD Mining | New 1.2.3 Fork block 92000

[SpeedDemon13]

Damn with the size others are plotting my 4tb will be irrelevant before it shows up

lol I hear ya...I'm getting really anxious waiting for the damn thing.

I'm waiting on my 4x open box special 4TB drives from Newegg. Hopefully they come in on Thursday or Friday.  

This should bring me to a total of 20TB. I might get about 3TB to 12TB more of hdd's also within the week.

[1715223028]

1715223028

[1715223028]

1715223028

[1715223028]

1715223028

[SpeedDemon13]

ubuntu plots double the speed, is that still the case if you run it in vmware? inside of windows

All depends if you have enough cores and ram to run it. How efficient the system is in that environment.

[Razerglass]

ubuntu plots double the speed, is that still the case if you run it in vmware? inside of windows

All depends if you have enough cores and ram to run it. How efficient the system is in that environment.

i guess my question is my i5 8gb ram plotting in windows 7 seems slow, would i be better off running vmware ubuntu with the same specs?

[IncludeBeer]

I just started generating plots that are greater than the number I put for the last nonce range number. ie 4000000 to 4082000.....and my generate plot script shows me generating 4088000.  What is happening???

[Razerglass]

I just started generating plots that are greater than the number I put for the last nonce range number. ie 4000000 to 4082000.....and my generate plot script shows me generating 4088000.  What is happening???

mine did that too till it had 8mb left and it just kinda froze!

[SpeedDemon13]

ubuntu plots double the speed, is that still the case if you run it in vmware? inside of windows

All depends if you have enough cores and ram to run it. How efficient the system is in that environment.

i guess my question is my i5 8gb ram plotting in windows 7 seems slow, would i be better off running vmware ubuntu with the same specs?

You can try it. I might try it out once I get my new drives in.

[fanepatent]

ubuntu plots double the speed, is that still the case if you run it in vmware? inside of windows

Not really. You see a drop in performance, but still a lot faster than the windows plotter

[Razerglass]

ubuntu plots double the speed, is that still the case if you run it in vmware? inside of windows

Not really. You see a drop in performance, but still a lot faster than the windows plotter

if i stop my plotter while its generating what will happen and whats the downside? is there a way to know where it stopped so i can start it again

[fanepatent]

ubuntu plots double the speed, is that still the case if you run it in vmware? inside of windows

Not really. You see a drop in performance, but still a lot faster than the windows plotter

if i stop my plotter while its generating what will happen and whats the downside? is there a way to know where it stopped so i can start it again

If you use the windows plotter it tells you were it is. And you can start plotting from where it tell you it left off. If you are using the linux plotter... not really.
This is the downside. Other than that, nothing much. The miner will give an error message that it can't read the file, but it actually does.

[Razerglass]

right now at difficulty how much could i expect to earn in a pool/day with 10TB or if i go at it solo?

[Prototyp]

With 10TB, i think its better to use the Pool.

[Razerglass]

With 10TB, i think its better to use the Pool.

ok but what is the return estimate with the pool?

[Amph]

right now at difficulty how much could i expect to earn in a pool/day with 10TB or if i go at it solo?

go solo, 10tb are enough for 1 block a day or more

[SpeedDemon13]

With 10TB, i think its better to use the Pool.

ok but what is the return estimate with the pool?

Rough estimate you can do it divide your total TB by the total in the network, then multiply by 3.6 million coins. I think the current network size is 1.9~2 PB.

For example if I had my 4x 4TB now, it would do (16/2000TB)3.6*10^6=28800 approx. So, about 2 to 3 blocks a day-ish.

About 4~5TB to get a block/day, give or take.

[Prototyp]

That sucks and is not good for the Burst miner.

The XCloudcoin Cloud HD Hashing multi pool will be released very soon to all XCloudcoin holders and public. This will offer support for XCloudcoin and it's subsequent investors giving us a solid foundation. This is the first step of cloud mining integration with crypto currency and is an important stepping stone in our development. We are choosing BURST to mine on the multi pool. We have looked at the development of the coin and we are happy with the technological development of this coin and the properties to help our investors. XCloud storage will also be integrated into the mining platform. Soon to be released will be the worlds first Cloud HD hashing pool with integrated storage this will be a huge and innovative step for XCloudcoin, we are currently testing our storage performance and capacity of the service at 80 Terabytes we are seeing positive signs with our tests for profitability and efficiency. We are very excited about this development. With this service we aim to give back to investors with an enhanced profit sharing system. Revenue will be distributed from the multi pool to XCloudcoin holders. The pool has already been setup for one of our private investors and you can currently see the wallet amount here http://burst.cryptoport.io/acc/6777939135823731909

If you launched your very successful coin, why are you mining another to pay your investors?

Is this not the concept of multi pool?  Pure PoS Coins mine PoW coins to buy their own coins for the miners.

how much of the cloud storage capacity will be used to mine this coin?

we are still under testing and monitoring performance, we might add a little more so around 150tb to 200 tb .

[SpeedDemon13]

That sucks and is not good for the Burst miner.

The XCloudcoin Cloud HD Hashing multi pool will be released very soon to all XCloudcoin holders and public. This will offer support for XCloudcoin and it's subsequent investors giving us a solid foundation. This is the first step of cloud mining integration with crypto currency and is an important stepping stone in our development. We are choosing BURST to mine on the multi pool. We have looked at the development of the coin and we are happy with the technological development of this coin and the properties to help our investors. XCloud storage will also be integrated into the mining platform. Soon to be released will be the worlds first Cloud HD hashing pool with integrated storage this will be a huge and innovative step for XCloudcoin, we are currently testing our storage performance and capacity of the service at 80 Terabytes we are seeing positive signs with our tests for profitability and efficiency. We are very excited about this development. With this service we aim to give back to investors with an enhanced profit sharing system. Revenue will be distributed from the multi pool to XCloudcoin holders. The pool has already been setup for one of our private investors and you can currently see the wallet amount here http://burst.cryptoport.io/acc/6777939135823731909

If you launched your very successful coin, why are you mining another to pay your investors?

Is this not the concept of multi pool?  Pure PoS Coins mine PoW coins to buy their own coins for the miners.

how much of the cloud storage capacity will be used to mine this coin?

we are still under testing and monitoring performance, we might add a little more so around 150tb to 200 tb .

This is kind of a mix feeling with this. I'd rather have gpu, asic and cpu miners do the multipool.

[Razerglass]

That sucks and is not good for the Burst miner.

The XCloudcoin Cloud HD Hashing multi pool will be released very soon to all XCloudcoin holders and public. This will offer support for XCloudcoin and it's subsequent investors giving us a solid foundation. This is the first step of cloud mining integration with crypto currency and is an important stepping stone in our development. We are choosing BURST to mine on the multi pool. We have looked at the development of the coin and we are happy with the technological development of this coin and the properties to help our investors. XCloud storage will also be integrated into the mining platform. Soon to be released will be the worlds first Cloud HD hashing pool with integrated storage this will be a huge and innovative step for XCloudcoin, we are currently testing our storage performance and capacity of the service at 80 Terabytes we are seeing positive signs with our tests for profitability and efficiency. We are very excited about this development. With this service we aim to give back to investors with an enhanced profit sharing system. Revenue will be distributed from the multi pool to XCloudcoin holders. The pool has already been setup for one of our private investors and you can currently see the wallet amount here http://burst.cryptoport.io/acc/6777939135823731909

If you launched your very successful coin, why are you mining another to pay your investors?

Is this not the concept of multi pool?  Pure PoS Coins mine PoW coins to buy their own coins for the miners.

how much of the cloud storage capacity will be used to mine this coin?

we are still under testing and monitoring performance, we might add a little more so around 150tb to 200 tb .

This is kind of a mix feeling with this. I'd rather have gpu, asic and cpu miners do the multipool.

this means there is going to be a huge diff jump?

[burstcoin]

With 10TB, i think its better to use the Pool.

ok but what is the return estimate with the pool?

Rough estimate you can do it divide your total TB by the total in the network, then multiply by 3.6 million coins. I think the current network size is 1.9~2 PB.

For example if I had my 4x 4TB now, it would do (16/2000TB)3.6*10^6=28800 approx. So, about 2 to 3 blocks a day-ish.

About 4~5TB to get a block/day, give or take.

Variance is still a pain though. I have an 8TB rig that for the past week keeps getting nothing for 3 days straight, then gets 2 blocks about an hour apart, then nothing for 3 days again. Getting really tempting to move that to pool.

[Amph]

With 10TB, i think its better to use the Pool.

ok but what is the return estimate with the pool?

Rough estimate you can do it divide your total TB by the total in the network, then multiply by 3.6 million coins. I think the current network size is 1.9~2 PB.

For example if I had my 4x 4TB now, it would do (16/2000TB)3.6*10^6=28800 approx. So, about 2 to 3 blocks a day-ish.

About 4~5TB to get a block/day, give or take.

with 6w of consumption 

[Razerglass]

With 10TB, i think its better to use the Pool.

ok but what is the return estimate with the pool?

Rough estimate you can do it divide your total TB by the total in the network, then multiply by 3.6 million coins. I think the current network size is 1.9~2 PB.

For example if I had my 4x 4TB now, it would do (16/2000TB)3.6*10^6=28800 approx. So, about 2 to 3 blocks a day-ish.

About 4~5TB to get a block/day, give or take.

with 6w of consumption 

i bet alot will change by time it takes me to plot 10TB in what half a month... >.<