|
JakeThePanda
|
 |
October 31, 2014, 02:18:07 PM |
|
It looks like zynga will use XCH coin and we have now 1$ coin in hands.That is only my opinion. You are guys are seriously fucking retards if you think Zynga (The Company) made those assets. |
|
|
|
|
RedPandaBoy
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
October 31, 2014, 02:26:02 PM |
|
No matter what they do (zynga) they made the right choice using Clearinghouse. I'll be happy to see XCH go up 100x over the coming months. It is nice that getting in now means cheaper coins. Apparently others know this too as the value of XCH is rising.
Absolutely! We're already seeing a massive rise in value of XCH, and I think this will only continue as we see more adoption of the platform. People are starting to realize how important speed is in terms of real world applications, and this is exactly where XCH and VIA shine. |
|
|
|
|
btcdrak (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 31, 2014, 02:28:30 PM |
|
It's a namesquatter, you can see by the footer notes. FYI namesquatting asset names doesnt make any sense, since it's just a label. |
|
|
|
|
kjn311
Member
Offline
Activity: 319
Merit: 10
|
|
October 31, 2014, 02:30:41 PM |
|
It looks like zynga will use XCH coin and we have now 1$ coin in hands.That is only my opinion. You are guys are seriously fucking retards if you think Zynga (The Company) made those assets. Yea, more likely someone reserved the name for ransom money.Most stupid idea ever. |
|
|
|
|
|
Altcoin4life
|
|
November 01, 2014, 01:12:28 AM |
|
Who handles PR/marketing on Clearinghouse? There are so many valid and useful applications for this it would be a shame to have solid tech and very little advertising.
|
|
|
|
|
jokumat
|
|
November 01, 2014, 07:51:35 AM |
|
FYI namesquatting asset names doesnt make any sense, since it's just a label.
almost all ClearingHouse assets are just namesquatting. Names are important, see domain names troubles. Cybersquatting makes sense. Some labels are preferable to others. And some labels might be confused with others and should be controlled by the same entity. Is this one of Counterparty/ClearingHouse weaknesses? |
|
|
|
|
btcdrak (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 01, 2014, 08:01:32 AM |
|
FYI namesquatting asset names doesnt make any sense, since it's just a label.
almost all ClearingHouse assets are just namesquatting. Names are important, see domain names troubles. Cybersquatting makes sense. Some labels are preferable to others. And some labels might be confused with others and should be controlled by the same entity. Is this one of Counterparty/ClearingHouse weaknesses? Nope. There have been zero cases on Counterparty of people buying from namesquatters. It's just not important. an asset symbol can be anything and there's pretty much no chance of people getting confused simply because the real asset would be the one that gets traded. Namesquatting, IMO, is pointless. |
|
|
|
|
kjn311
Member
Offline
Activity: 319
Merit: 10
|
|
November 02, 2014, 01:39:45 PM
Last edit: November 02, 2014, 02:05:20 PM by kjn311 |
|
FYI namesquatting asset names doesnt make any sense, since it's just a label.
almost all ClearingHouse assets are just namesquatting. Names are important, see domain names troubles. Cybersquatting makes sense. Some labels are preferable to others. And some labels might be confused with others and should be controlled by the same entity. Is this one of Counterparty/ClearingHouse weaknesses? Nope. There have been zero cases on Counterparty of people buying from namesquatters. It's just not important. an asset symbol can be anything and there's pretty much no chance of people getting confused simply because the real asset would be the one that gets traded. Namesquatting, IMO, is pointless. Speaking of namesquatters, I'm selling Clearinghouse.E xchange domain name very very cheap. |
|
|
|
|
MadGhost
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
|
|
November 02, 2014, 02:21:22 PM |
|
FYI namesquatting asset names doesnt make any sense, since it's just a label.
almost all ClearingHouse assets are just namesquatting. Names are important, see domain names troubles. Cybersquatting makes sense. Some labels are preferable to others. And some labels might be confused with others and should be controlled by the same entity. Is this one of Counterparty/ClearingHouse weaknesses? Nope. There have been zero cases on Counterparty of people buying from namesquatters. It's just not important. an asset symbol can be anything and there's pretty much no chance of people getting confused simply because the real asset would be the one that gets traded. Namesquatting, IMO, is pointless. Speaking of namesquatters, I'm selling Clearinghouse.E xchange domain name very very cheap. it will be expensive when the coin gain some interest. |
|
|
|
|
devphp
|
|
November 02, 2014, 06:26:05 PM |
|
What is MM in supply? Is that million of million as in trillion? 103 with twelve zeros?
|
|
|
|
|
prophetx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1010
he who has the gold makes the rules
|
|
November 02, 2014, 06:34:16 PM |
|
FYI namesquatting asset names doesnt make any sense, since it's just a label.
almost all ClearingHouse assets are just namesquatting. Names are important, see domain names troubles. Cybersquatting makes sense. Some labels are preferable to others. And some labels might be confused with others and should be controlled by the same entity. Is this one of Counterparty/ClearingHouse weaknesses? Nope. There have been zero cases on Counterparty of people buying from namesquatters. It's just not important. an asset symbol can be anything and there's pretty much no chance of people getting confused simply because the real asset would be the one that gets traded. Namesquatting, IMO, is pointless. actually i believe that is false, a long time ago i believe the community helped buy rockminer from a squatter. but someone would need to verify that the tx actually happened. http://blockscan.com/assetInfo.aspx?q=ROCKMINER |
|
|
|
|
RedPandaBoy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
November 02, 2014, 06:37:09 PM |
|
What is MM in supply? Is that million of million as in trillion? 103 with twelve zeros?
MM is million. Theres 103 million XCH. |
|
|
|
|
|
devphp
|
|
November 02, 2014, 06:41:17 PM |
|
What is MM in supply? Is that million of million as in trillion? 103 with twelve zeros?
MM is million. Theres 103 million XCH. Ok thank you, so one 'M' is enough - 103M, otherwise it gets confusing. |
|
|
|
|
RedPandaBoy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
November 02, 2014, 11:13:32 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altcoin4life
|
|
November 02, 2014, 11:28:53 PM |
|
Yeah i'm buying more too i feel XCH will blow up in the near future.
|
|
|
|
joffmac
Member
Offline
Activity: 120
Merit: 10
|
|
November 03, 2014, 12:44:37 AM |
|
has Zynga been a confirmed deal then?
|
|
|
|
|
|
sempyper
|
|
November 03, 2014, 11:24:36 AM |
|
has Zynga been a confirmed deal then?
yes its been confirmed legitimate. |
|
|
|
|
|
ElTomeko27
|
|
November 03, 2014, 12:12:50 PM |
|
has Zynga been a confirmed deal then?
yes its been confirmed legitimate. How? Still We have no official announcement...unfortunately. |
|
|
|
|
|
karmala
|
|
November 03, 2014, 05:30:42 PM |
|
crosspost: Hi, our community manager is right! We need to stop talking price and start contributing to value. The contest http://www.reddit.com/r/viacoin/comments/2k0k81/viacoin_and_clearinghouse_present_the_future_of/ is a very good start to find real-world applications. The big advantage of a community driven project is that it boundles brain power from around the world. People are comming from all kind of proffessions. You should think about how via/clearinghouse can revolutionize your specific business. Once we know our market better we can reach out for adoption. Please participate. edit: does anybody wants to buy a genesis-mining contract account for a discount? I would like to sell it. You can mine viacoins with it. KarmaKaguy |
|
|
|
|
darkslash
|
|
November 05, 2014, 03:56:04 AM |
|
any updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
